 |
1 Sentence Rebuttal to NIST
9/11 Blogger
Monday, July 7, 2008
Sometimes, a single sentence is all that is needed to debunk a bogus claim.
NIST claims in its soon-to-be released report on WTC 7 that fires alone brought down the building. People like Steven Jones, Kevin Ryan, Gordon Ross and others will – in the near future – definitively demolish that claim in numerous ways.
In the meantime, here’s a one-sentence rebuttal to NIST, which links to a New York Times article:
NIST Theory that Fire Brought Down WTC7 is False: Partly EVAPORATED Steel Beams Were Found After Collapse; But Neither Office Nor Diesel Fires Can Evaporate Steel.
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
14 Responses to “1 Sentence Rebuttal to NIST”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 7th, 2008 at 6:09 am
Who is keeping names of those responsible for high treason? After the next revolution those people need to be put on trial and justice served. Just convert a FEMA camp to death row and fill it up with these criminals. That would be a sight to behold.
July 7th, 2008 at 7:26 am
http://www.debunking911.com
July 7th, 2008 at 8:55 am
See drjudywood.com. Judy wood and “Directed Energy Weapons.”
July 7th, 2008 at 10:51 am
Is there any research being done about a “tactical” or “mini” nuke being used to bring down towers 1 and 2?
July 7th, 2008 at 11:29 am
huh? Evaporated steel? That explanation won’t work on the masses.
If fires on one floor brought down WTC7 then EVERY modern skyscraper is unsafe. This is untrue simply because fires happen in skyscrapers all the time… and none of them have ever collapsed because of it. KISS…
July 7th, 2008 at 11:33 am
I heard that a thermite reaction melted the steel, no matter how thick it was:
http://911blogger.com/node/12620
It can heat to 16,000 degrees and is not explosive (safe and effective).
July 7th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
See: “Red Mercury” it’s a fusion bomb.
July 7th, 2008 at 1:02 pm
“Partly EVAPORATED Steel Beams” says it all…
And that picture of steel beams sticking up out of the ground with diagonal cuts before the cleanup of the debris even started.
July 7th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Hey Brad, are you throwing that link out there like that’s an answer? Most of us truthers have already been to the “debunking” sites and “debunked” the “debunkers.” Debunkers are famous for coming up with reasons to explain away PARTS of the story but NOT ALL THE PARTS. They can’t explain why buildings that should fall over on their sides fall through the path of the greatest resistance. They can’t explain the NUMEROUS errors in the official story. They can’t explain the NUMEROUS COINCIDENCES required to support the official STORY. They cannot explain the testimony of firefighters and policemen that were there that day. And when asked specific questions they tend to change the subject. I’ll take on ANY debunker ANYDAY and in the end traitors get what traitors deserve.
July 7th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
What is NIST’s plan to protect all steel frame structures in the U.S. from this new failure mode?
July 7th, 2008 at 2:22 pm
“brad”…. what a lame lazy ass posting…even a chimpanzee can cross-reference and destroy all the BS at that (and all the other) “debunking” site with all the available and applicable laws of theromdynamics, physics and forensic chemical analysis of the steel and dust from the crime scene …then just to top off the parfait…throw in all the testimony of those that experienced the explosions, bombs going off, etc in all three buildings…jump off the stupid boat would ya?
July 7th, 2008 at 6:17 pm
Well said – Ken D Webber
July 7th, 2008 at 7:38 pm
ricardo, if you are so knowledgeable, please give me the address of your website with all your cross referencing. I used to be one of you 911 conspiracy dorks. Then I took my head out of my ass.
February 13th, 2009 at 8:46 am
Show us the source.