Comments on: 9/11 Commission Counsel: Government Agreed to Lie About 9/11 http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:03:07 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: The truth http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-3#comment-337220 The truth Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:25:27 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-337220 The government is corrupt Here are some of my points- The British before America was created had “colony’s” which were really military base’s back then so they pretty much owned a global empire at that time. But then there was a flaw in the system and the Governments started getting organized and took back there land. Now America wants to do this process again working with the British government why do you think we have such a close relation ship with the enemies of are past would you ever make peace with the government that wanted to control you like a dictator? Benedict Arnold was a military general who talked the British to coming back and attacking America in the “War of 1812″ he was hired to do this by High ranking Government officials which is not in the autobiography’s but in his private journal only published on one website but the the journal was removed and only a few still have the article printed but it is close to impossible to find them sorry. The events that are happening now have happen’d in Germany before the the Nazi take over and even some of the events that are happening now are exactly the same that have happen’d in Germany look up this information it is all true if you actually all true history repeats it’s self so it’s time for people to stop that and learn the truth! i am only a 14 year old guy but i’m president and get great grades in my junior high and i still have time to l,earn this stuff and learn the truth knowledge is power we must use are knowledge to stop things like whats going on now! “The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those who look at it without doing anything” ,Albert Einstein “The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing.” ,Albert Einstein Anyone who doesn’t take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either. ,Albert Einstein “Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.” , Albert Einstein The government is corrupt
Here are some of my points-
The British before America was created had “colony’s” which were really military base’s back then so they pretty much owned a global empire at that time. But then there was a flaw in the system and the Governments started getting organized and took back there land. Now America wants to do this process again working with the British government why do you think we have such a close relation ship with the enemies of are past would you ever make peace with the government that wanted to control you like a dictator? Benedict Arnold was a military general who talked the British to coming back and attacking America in the “War of 1812″ he was hired to do this by High ranking Government officials which is not in the autobiography’s but in his private journal only published on one website but the the journal was removed and only a few still have the article printed but it is close to impossible to find them sorry. The events that are happening now have happen’d in Germany before the the Nazi take over and even some of the events that are happening now are exactly the same that have happen’d in Germany look up this information it is all true if you actually all true history repeats it’s self so it’s time for people to stop that and learn the truth! i am only a 14 year old guy but i’m president and get great grades in my junior high and i still have time to l,earn this stuff and learn the truth knowledge is power we must use are knowledge to stop things like whats going on now!

“The world is not dangerous because of those who do harm but because of those who look at it without doing anything”
,Albert Einstein

“The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existing.”
,Albert Einstein

Anyone who doesn’t take truth seriously in small matters cannot be trusted in large ones either.
,Albert Einstein

“Learn from yesterday, live for today, hope for tomorrow. The important thing is not to stop questioning.”
, Albert Einstein

]]> By: Justin Thought http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-2#comment-334745 Justin Thought Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:15:40 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-334745 "Ignoring a mountain of evidence and facts and focusing on a small impossible aspect of a bigger picture is not truth seeking…" Okay, so where is this "mountain" of evidence that you've been perusing? If it has a title that includes the words "911 Commission Report" you probably have the wrong thing unless the word "Debunked" in it as well. And if you have had the temerity to read that tome, you shouldn't be daunted by the "mountain" of evidence found here, http://911research.wtc7.net/ But you'd probably be better informed... “Ignoring a mountain of evidence and facts and focusing on a small impossible aspect of a bigger picture is not truth seeking…”

Okay, so where is this “mountain” of evidence that you’ve been perusing? If it has a title that includes the words “911 Commission Report” you probably have the wrong thing unless the word “Debunked” in it as well.

And if you have had the temerity to read that tome, you shouldn’t be daunted by the “mountain” of evidence found here, http://911research.wtc7.net/

But you’d probably be better informed…

]]> By: Justin Thought http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-2#comment-334736 Justin Thought Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:06:30 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-334736 real life, in case our favorite marine can't find it, here's a good link: What is the Hegelian Dialectic? http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm Interesting read. Alex, of course, calls it "Problem, Reaction, Solution," Icke claims to have come up with it. Call it Rose, if you want, the result is the same, the powers-that-be manage to push their agenda along another little tip-toed step. real life, in case our favorite marine can’t find it, here’s a good link:
What is the Hegelian Dialectic? http://www.crossroad.to/articles2/05/dialectic.htm

Interesting read. Alex, of course, calls it “Problem, Reaction, Solution,” Icke claims to have come up with it. Call it Rose, if you want, the result is the same, the powers-that-be manage to push their agenda along another little tip-toed step.

]]> By: Justin Thought http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-1#comment-334713 Justin Thought Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:36:38 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-334713 And, puh-leeze, let's try to keep this on an adult level. Swearing and name-calling is acceptable behavior for 7th graders, but I think most of us are adults here. Space better used for facts. However, a little blistering sarcasm...okay, I'm all for that! :-) And, puh-leeze, let’s try to keep this on an adult level. Swearing and name-calling is acceptable behavior for 7th graders, but I think most of us are adults here. Space better used for facts.

However, a little blistering sarcasm…okay, I’m all for that! :-)

]]> By: Justin Thought http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-1#comment-334685 Justin Thought Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:11:41 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-334685 After reading recon-marine's postings here and below in this article, it is obvious that he's on the payroll, his job to dispute ANY aspect of truth that might accidentally slip out. He's engaging in the normal pattern, obfuscation and/or ad hom attacks. Good for him! Unfortunately, these tactics are starting, more and more, to backfire, because each posting he makes is immediately refuted by the knowledgeable people who tend to hang around this site. As a result, once again, the facts are stated, which increases the chances that additional people become aware of the facts. And that's exactly the goal that most of us are working toward, to "wake up" more and more people! What IS undeniable is that we don't know what happened on that day almost eight years ago. And it's also undeniable that what we were told by "our government" and their associates is NOT what happened. Any investigator will tell you that that's an excellent starting point for discovery. Now, I'd like to take the same stance, and attack the "straw man" point most deniers take, that "so many people involved wouldn't be able to keep such a secret so long." There's an excellent hypothetical scenario on the 911research page, here: http://911research.wtc7.net/essays/thermite/blasting_scenario.html , which gives an example of how the work could have easily been done without the majority of the workers even having a suspicion of what they were doing--even to this day! Yes, it's hypothetical, but I guess we wouldn't need hypotheses if the people who were (allegedly) tasked with providing an explanation had given us something we could believe. Keep up the good work, reconmarine. You're helping us more than you could know! Oh, yeah, I forgot to mention. Your check is in the mail. It left Langley this morning. After reading recon-marine’s postings here and below in this article, it is obvious that he’s on the payroll, his job to dispute ANY aspect of truth that might accidentally slip out. He’s engaging in the normal pattern, obfuscation and/or ad hom attacks. Good for him!

Unfortunately, these tactics are starting, more and more, to backfire, because each posting he makes is immediately refuted by the knowledgeable people who tend to hang around this site. As a result, once again, the facts are stated, which increases the chances that additional people become aware of the facts. And that’s exactly the goal that most of us are working toward, to “wake up” more and more people!

What IS undeniable is that we don’t know what happened on that day almost eight years ago. And it’s also undeniable that what we were told by “our government” and their associates is NOT what happened. Any investigator will tell you that that’s an excellent starting point for discovery.

Now, I’d like to take the same stance, and attack the “straw man” point most deniers take, that “so many people involved wouldn’t be able to keep such a secret so long.” There’s an excellent hypothetical scenario on the 911research page, here: http://911research.wtc7.net/es.....nario.html , which gives an example of how the work could have easily been done without the majority of the workers even having a suspicion of what they were doing–even to this day! Yes, it’s hypothetical, but I guess we wouldn’t need hypotheses if the people who were (allegedly) tasked with providing an explanation had given us something we could believe.

Keep up the good work, reconmarine. You’re helping us more than you could know!

Oh, yeah, I forgot to mention. Your check is in the mail. It left Langley this morning.

]]> By: recon spends a lot of time convincing himself http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-3#comment-334606 recon spends a lot of time convincing himself Mon, 20 Apr 2009 21:40:00 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-334606 hey recon, I can understand your need to keep convincing yourself all is good and great about our government. Get away from architect and engineer articles and ask why the firefighters were told by their superiors that if they gave public interviews about the bombs then they would lose their pensions. Another question, why, when an intelligence officer interrupted his own vacation to go to see GW at his Texas ranch in August, 2001 to tell him of certain terrorist attack involving high jacked commercial airliners, Bush told him, "ok, you have covered your ass now." 3rd question, why all of the coinciding terrorist training drills taking place on the morning of 9/11 which entailed highjacking commercial aircraft and ramming them into buildings? The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) "provides our nation its eyes and ears in space." It operates a system of reconnaissance satellites to provide real-time monitoring of objects in the skies. On the morning of 9/11/01 the NRO headquarters in Chantilly, VA, were evacuated as part of a "plane into building" drill. The scenario involved a small corporate jet crashing into one of the campus' four towers, thus making this mediating control dead. As well, a large-scale military training exercise called "Global Guardian" was in full swing. "Global Guardian" is an annual exercise involving Stratcom (the US Strategic Command), the US Space Command, and NORAD, in which a threat to North American airspace is simulated. Stratcom directed the exercise, which included all the US strategic forces, from Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, where President Bush landed Air Force One late in the afternoon of 9/11. “Northern Vigilance” had pulled a significant number of North American fighter aircraft into Canada and Western Alaska and Northern Alaska in a 'mock Cold War hijack' exercise. Another drill, “Vigilant Guardian” was a hijack exercise, involving the insertion of false radar blips onto radar screens in the Northeast Air Defense Sector command post. In addition, General Richard Myers tells of “Vigilant Warrior”, which was a live-fly hijack drill being conducted on the morning of 911. With only eight remaining fighter aircraft in the Northeast sector, and they had to be dispatched in pairs, they were dealing with a confirmed 22 blips on the radar screen indicating possible hijacks and they couldn't separate the war game exercises from the actual hijacks. There is evidence that the date of the 2001 “Global Guardian” exercise was changed to correspond with the the terrorist attack. NBC News military analyst William Arkin, in his book”Code Names”, gives the date of the exercise as October 22-31, 2001. Also, a military newspaper, the Space Observer, reported in an article dated 3/23/01 that the exercise was scheduled for October of that year. Yes, there is an unusual amount of crazy information out there, it is intended to mislead and confuse and keep us arguing indefinitely. But the average psyche knows intuitively something is very amiss. You can spend the rest of your life trying to convince yourself you are right and the entire truth movement, flawed as it is, is nuts. But it does seem you are in a fading minority. Most military personnel I know have turned the corner toward disbelief. Quote of Hermann Goerig, Hitlers Reich-Marshall at the Nuremberg Trials after WWII: "Naturally, the common people don't want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country." hey recon,

I can understand your need to keep convincing yourself all is good and great about our government. Get away from architect and engineer articles and ask why the firefighters were told by their superiors that if they gave public interviews about the bombs then they would lose their pensions. Another question, why, when an intelligence officer interrupted his own vacation to go to see GW at his Texas ranch in August, 2001 to tell him of certain terrorist attack involving high jacked commercial airliners, Bush told him, “ok, you have covered your ass now.” 3rd question, why all of the coinciding terrorist training drills taking place on the morning of 9/11 which entailed highjacking commercial aircraft and ramming them into buildings?

The National Reconnaissance Office (NRO) “provides our nation its eyes and ears in space.” It operates a system of reconnaissance satellites to provide real-time monitoring of objects in the skies. On the morning of 9/11/01 the NRO headquarters in Chantilly, VA, were evacuated as part of a “plane into building” drill. The scenario involved a small corporate jet crashing into one of the campus’ four towers, thus making this mediating control dead.

As well, a large-scale military training exercise called “Global Guardian” was in full swing. “Global Guardian” is an annual exercise involving Stratcom (the US Strategic Command), the US Space Command, and NORAD, in which a threat to North American airspace is simulated. Stratcom directed the exercise, which included all the US strategic forces, from Offutt Air Force Base, Nebraska, where President Bush landed Air Force One late in the afternoon of 9/11.

“Northern Vigilance” had pulled a significant number of North American fighter aircraft into Canada and Western Alaska and Northern Alaska in a ‘mock Cold War hijack’ exercise. Another drill, “Vigilant Guardian” was a hijack exercise, involving the insertion of false radar blips onto radar screens in the Northeast Air Defense Sector command post.

In addition, General Richard Myers tells of “Vigilant Warrior”, which was a live-fly hijack drill being conducted on the morning of 911. With only eight remaining fighter aircraft in the Northeast sector, and they had to be dispatched in pairs, they were dealing with a confirmed 22 blips on the radar screen indicating possible hijacks and they couldn’t separate the war game exercises from the actual hijacks.

There is evidence that the date of the 2001 “Global Guardian” exercise was changed to correspond with the the terrorist attack. NBC News military analyst William Arkin, in his book”Code Names”, gives the date of the exercise as October 22-31, 2001. Also, a military newspaper, the Space Observer, reported in an article dated 3/23/01 that the exercise was scheduled for October of that year.

Yes, there is an unusual amount of crazy information out there, it is intended to mislead and confuse and keep us arguing indefinitely. But the average psyche knows intuitively something is very amiss. You can spend the rest of your life trying to convince yourself you are right and the entire truth movement, flawed as it is, is nuts. But it does seem you are in a fading minority. Most military personnel I know have turned the corner toward disbelief.

Quote of Hermann Goerig, Hitlers Reich-Marshall at the Nuremberg Trials after WWII:

“Naturally, the common people don’t want war, but after all, it is the leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it is always a simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy, or a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. This is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in every country.”

]]> By: L http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-3#comment-334299 L Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:44:52 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-334299 ya have fun trying to debunk a peer reviewed scientific journal recon all you can say is they are connected to 9/11 truth which is a complete cop out since the journal is PEER REVIEWED ya have fun trying to debunk a peer reviewed scientific journal recon all you can say is they are connected to 9/11 truth which is a complete cop out since the journal is PEER REVIEWED

]]> By: John Rock Sold Humanity to Highest Bidder http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-2#comment-333149 John Rock Sold Humanity to Highest Bidder Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:44:07 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-333149 This is getting good. Truman warned us about the Military industrial complex taking control. Since I have yet to see any aliens or UFOs - that is who I think is a big part of these shenanigans. Yep this is a prison planet. Now who the hell is on the other side of the bars??? This is getting good. Truman warned us about the Military industrial complex taking control. Since I have yet to see any aliens or UFOs – that is who I think is a big part of these shenanigans. Yep this is a prison planet. Now who the hell is on the other side of the bars???

]]> By: John Rock Sold Humanity to Highest Bidder http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-2#comment-333147 John Rock Sold Humanity to Highest Bidder Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:40:30 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-333147 HAHAHAHA - I worked in the same building as Star. The reporters would flock around my car when I left at night. I got a brunette wig, and a blanket - put it in my back seat and really freaked em out. They chased me over the potomac into Virginia. Great point you make though. That was insane. HAHAHAHA – I worked in the same building as Star. The reporters would flock around my car when I left at night. I got a brunette wig, and a blanket – put it in my back seat and really freaked em out. They chased me over the potomac into Virginia. Great point you make though. That was insane.

]]> By: John Rock Sold Humanity to Highest Bidder http://www.prisonplanet.com/911-commission-counsel-government-agreed-to-lie-about-911.html/comment-page-2#comment-333145 John Rock Sold Humanity to Highest Bidder Sat, 18 Apr 2009 23:32:07 +0000 http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=9232#comment-333145 Ok - I am trying to believe that you aren't dis-information. I am well versed in the Chemtrails so here is your government trying to protect you - honest...There are some government workers who aren't DoD or totally sold out. OOOOOPS - you will notice that the research and funding abruptly stops almost as fast as all of these studies popped up - if you want to put your conspiracy theory hat on. SHEEPLES PLEASE WAKE UP AND CONNECT THE DOTS. And I am one of the good guys in the funny hat. From the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health... NIOSH Safety and Health Topic: Nanotechnology Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research: Filling the Knowledge Gaps Appendix I. NIOSH sponsored conferences 1. First International Symposium on Occupational Health Implications of Nanomaterials, October 12–14, 2004, Buxton, UK. The conference is co-sponsored by the U.K. Health and Safety Executive and NIOSH. 2. Second International Symposium of Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, October 3–6, 2005, Minneapolis, MN. 3. Frontiers in Aerosol Dosimetry Research, October 24–25, 2005, Irvine, CA. 4. Mechanisms of Action of Inhaled Fibers, Particles, and Nanoparticles in Lung and Cardiovascular Disease, October 25–28, 2005, Research Triangle Park, NC. Appendix J. Invited presentations. 1. Castranova V. Potential toxicity of nanoparticles. 2004 Northwest Occupational Health Conference. Portland, OR, October 14, 2004. 2. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. NASA Scientific Group, Houston, TX, February 17, 2005. 3. Castranova V. Nanotechnology safety and health research in NIOSH. Korean Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Daejeon, South Korea, May 12, 2005. 4. Castranova V. Pulmonary response to exposure to carbon nanotubes. Korean Society of Toxicology, Seoul, South Korea, May 13, 2005. 5. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, July 12, 2005. 6. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, July 14, 2005. 7. Castranova V. Toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes and other ultrafine particles. The Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, July 14, 2005. 8. Castranova V. General toxicological issues of potential concern with nanoparticles, as overview. Nanotechnology Building Block for Tomorrow’s Advanced Technology, Perth, Australia, July 18, 2005. 9. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. Ian Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, July 26, 2005. 10. Castranova V. Pulmonary toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes and other ultrafine particles. Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, July 27, 2005. 11. Castranova V. Pulmonary toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes. National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. Sydney, Australia, July 29, 2005. 12. Gardner P, Richardson A, Rengasamy A. Efficiency of respirator filters against nano-aerosols under high flow conditions. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN, October 4–6, 2005. 13. Hoover MD. Mixed exposure issues for nanotechnology safety. 1st International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Buxton, UK, October 11–14, 2004. 14. Hoover MD, Miller AL, Lowe, NT, Stefaniak AB, Day, GA, Linch KD. Information management for nanotechnology safety and health. 1st International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Buxton, UK, October 11–14, 2004. 15. Hoover MD. An introduction to nanotechnology and the possible hazards. Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health Lecture, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, March 1, 2005. 16. Hoover MD. Lung dosimetry of boundary fire smoke samples. Wildfire Symposium, Morgantown, WV, March 31, 2005. 17. Hoover MD. NIOSH nanotechnology informatics overview. NIOSH-Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. Information Exchange Meeting, Reno, NV, April 19, 2005. 18. Hoover MD. Informatics for nanotechnology safety and health. Round Table on the Role of the Occupational Safety and Health Professional in the Emerging Nanotechnology Industry, American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005. 19. Hoover MD. Nanotechnology: addressing potential health impact. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Albuquerque, NM, June 6, 2005. 20. Howard J. The NIOSH nanotechnology initiative: ensuring a safe and healthful workforce in a changing environment. Kansas City Safety & Health Conference, American Society of Safety Engineers, Kansas, MO, July 14–15, 2005. 21. Howard J. The NIOSH nanotechnology initiative: ensuring a safe and healthful workforce in a changing environment. The Art of Safety: the 10th Anniversary Commemorative Safety & Health Congress & Expo, Isla Verde, PR, July 30–August 5, 2005. 22. Howard J. The NIOSH nanotechnology initiative: ensuring a safe and healthful workforce in a changing environment. OSHA Health Forum, Denver, CO, August 31, 2005. 23. Kim SC, Harrington MS, Rengasamy A, Pui DYH. Collection efficiency of filter media for nanoscale particles. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN, October 4–6, 2005. 24. King B, Gao P. A passive aerosol sampler for evaluation of personal protective ensembles. Advanced Personal Protective Equipment: Challenges in Protecting First Responders Conference, Blacksburg, VA, October 16–18, 2005. 25. Kuempel E. Assessing the health risks of nanomaterials in workers: current knowledge and research gaps. Meeting of the National Research Council, Board on Environmental Science and Toxicology, Woods Hole, MA, October 7, 2004. 26. Kuempel E. Nanomaterials: a risk to workers’ health? OSHA/NIOSH Interagency Health Outcome Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, November 16, 2004. 27. Luster M. Nanoparticles toxicity testing issues. Nanotoxicology Workshop, Gainsville, FL, November 3–4, 2004. Luster M. Nanoparticles toxicity issues. Ramazzini Collegium, Bologna, Italy, September 18–21, 2005. 28. Maynard A. Working with engineered nanomaterials: towards developing responsible work practices in an uncertain world. National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) meeting. Nanosafe: A Workshop on Environmental Health and Safety in Nanotechnology Research, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, December 2, 2004. 29. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health. Professional Conference of Industrial Hygienists, Montreal, Canada, October 5, 2004. 30. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health. American Chemical Council Nanotechnology Workshop, Atlanta, GA, October 20, 2004. 31. Maynard A. Laboratory safety and disposal issues. Nanotoxicology Workshop, Gainsville, FL, November 3, 2004. 32. Maynard A. Working at the nanoscale: nanotechnology and potential health risks. CDC/Environmental & Occupational Health & Injury Prevention Coordination Center, Atlanta, GA, November 9, 2004. 33. Maynard A. Nanotechnology: challenges and opportunities. OSHA/NIOSH Interagency Health Outcome Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, November 16, 2004. 34. Maynard A. Nanotechnology at NIOSH. NORA Liaison Committee Meeting, Washington, DC, December 2, 2004. 35. Maynard A. Generating and characterizing airborne nanoparticles. American Association for the Advancement of Science Conference, Washington, DC, February 20, 2005. 36. Maynard A. Understanding the potential impact of nanotechnology on occupational health. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, February 23, 2005. 37. Maynard A. Nanomaterials and occupational health. Establishing a healthy working environment. The World Environment Center International Environment Forum, New York, March 10, 2005. 38. Maynard A. Responsible nanotechnology and the working environment. National Research Council Review of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative Meeting on Responsible Nanotechnology, Washington, DC, March 24, 2005. 39. Maynard A. Working with engineered nanomaterials: towards developing safe work practices. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, May 2, 2005. 40. Maynard A. Working with engineered nanomaterials: towards developing safe work practices. Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), Daejeon, South Korea, May 11, 2005. 41. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health―addressing potential health risks. Korean Society of Toxicology Annual Conference, Seoul, Korea, May 13, 2005. 42. Maynard A. Nanotechnology: overview and relevance to occupational health. American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005. 43. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health. American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005. 44. Maynard A. Working at the nanoscale: nanotechnology and potential health risk. American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005. 45. Porter D. Particulate handling in the human lung. Biological Effects of Lunar Dust Workshop, Sunnyvale, CA, March 29–31, 2005. 46. Porter D. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety and Health Perspectives. 21st Annual Kentucky Governor’s Safety and Health Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, May 11, 2005. 47. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. International Congress on Nanotechnology, San Francisco, CA, November 7–10, 2004. 48. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotube: what we know and what we do not know. National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) meeting. Nanosafe: A Workshop on Environmental Health and Safety in Nanotechnology Research, Atlanta, GA, December 1–3, 2004. 49. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of SWCNT (Single-walled carbon nanotubes). National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) meeting. Nanosafe: A Workshop on Environmental Health and Safety in Nanotechnology Research, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, December 2, 2004. 50. Shvedova S. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. American Chemical Society, San Diego, CA, March 26–28, 2005. 51. Shvedova A. Pulmonary oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis induced by single wall carbon nanotubes. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN, October 3–6, 2005. 52. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. 8th International Conference on Mechanisms of Action of Inhaled Fibers, Particles, and Nanoparticles in Lung and Cardiovascular Diseases, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 25–28, 2005. 53. Simeonova P. Nanoparticles-systemic and vascular effects. Nanotoxicology: Biomedical Aspects, Nanotoxicology 2006, Miami, FL, January 29–February 1, 2006. Ok – I am trying to believe that you aren’t dis-information. I am well versed in the Chemtrails so here is your government trying to protect you – honest…There are some government workers who aren’t DoD or totally sold out. OOOOOPS – you will notice that the research and funding abruptly stops almost as fast as all of these studies popped up – if you want to put your conspiracy theory hat on. SHEEPLES PLEASE WAKE UP AND CONNECT THE DOTS. And I am one of the good guys in the funny hat.

From the National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health…

NIOSH Safety and Health Topic:
Nanotechnology

Strategic Plan for NIOSH Nanotechnology Research: Filling the Knowledge Gaps
Appendix I. NIOSH sponsored conferences

1. First International Symposium on Occupational Health Implications of Nanomaterials, October 12–14, 2004, Buxton, UK. The conference is co-sponsored by the U.K. Health and Safety Executive and NIOSH.

2. Second International Symposium of Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, October 3–6, 2005, Minneapolis, MN.

3. Frontiers in Aerosol Dosimetry Research, October 24–25, 2005, Irvine, CA.

4. Mechanisms of Action of Inhaled Fibers, Particles, and Nanoparticles in Lung and Cardiovascular Disease, October 25–28, 2005, Research Triangle Park, NC.

Appendix J. Invited presentations.

1. Castranova V. Potential toxicity of nanoparticles. 2004 Northwest Occupational Health Conference. Portland, OR, October 14, 2004.

2. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. NASA Scientific Group, Houston, TX, February 17, 2005.

3. Castranova V. Nanotechnology safety and health research in NIOSH. Korean Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Daejeon, South Korea, May 12, 2005.

4. Castranova V. Pulmonary response to exposure to carbon nanotubes. Korean Society of Toxicology, Seoul, South Korea, May 13, 2005.

5. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia, July 12, 2005.

6. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, July 14, 2005.

7. Castranova V. Toxicity of single-walled carbon nanotubes and other ultrafine particles. The Centre for Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia, July 14, 2005.

8. Castranova V. General toxicological issues of potential concern with nanoparticles, as overview. Nanotechnology Building Block for Tomorrow’s Advanced Technology, Perth, Australia, July 18, 2005.

9. Castranova V. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. Ian Wark Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, July 26, 2005.

10. Castranova V. Pulmonary toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes and other ultrafine particles. Research School of Physical Sciences and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia, July 27, 2005.

11. Castranova V. Pulmonary toxicity of single walled carbon nanotubes. National Industrial Chemicals Notification and Assessment Scheme. Sydney, Australia, July 29, 2005.

12. Gardner P, Richardson A, Rengasamy A. Efficiency of respirator filters against nano-aerosols under high flow conditions. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN, October 4–6, 2005.

13. Hoover MD. Mixed exposure issues for nanotechnology safety. 1st International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Buxton, UK, October 11–14, 2004.

14. Hoover MD, Miller AL, Lowe, NT, Stefaniak AB, Day, GA, Linch KD. Information management for nanotechnology safety and health. 1st International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Buxton, UK, October 11–14, 2004.

15. Hoover MD. An introduction to nanotechnology and the possible hazards. Institute of Occupational and Environmental Health Lecture, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, March 1, 2005.

16. Hoover MD. Lung dosimetry of boundary fire smoke samples. Wildfire Symposium, Morgantown, WV, March 31, 2005.

17. Hoover MD. NIOSH nanotechnology informatics overview. NIOSH-Altair Nanotechnologies, Inc. Information Exchange Meeting, Reno, NV, April 19, 2005.

18. Hoover MD. Informatics for nanotechnology safety and health. Round Table on the Role of the Occupational Safety and Health Professional in the Emerging Nanotechnology Industry, American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005.

19. Hoover MD. Nanotechnology: addressing potential health impact. Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists, Albuquerque, NM, June 6, 2005.

20. Howard J. The NIOSH nanotechnology initiative: ensuring a safe and healthful workforce in a changing environment. Kansas City Safety & Health Conference, American Society of Safety Engineers, Kansas, MO, July 14–15, 2005.

21. Howard J. The NIOSH nanotechnology initiative: ensuring a safe and healthful workforce in a changing environment. The Art of Safety: the 10th Anniversary Commemorative Safety & Health Congress & Expo, Isla Verde, PR, July 30–August 5, 2005.

22. Howard J. The NIOSH nanotechnology initiative: ensuring a safe and healthful workforce in a changing environment. OSHA Health Forum, Denver, CO, August 31, 2005.

23. Kim SC, Harrington MS, Rengasamy A, Pui DYH. Collection efficiency of filter media for nanoscale particles. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN, October 4–6, 2005.

24. King B, Gao P. A passive aerosol sampler for evaluation of personal protective ensembles. Advanced Personal Protective Equipment: Challenges in Protecting First Responders Conference, Blacksburg, VA, October 16–18, 2005.

25. Kuempel E. Assessing the health risks of nanomaterials in workers: current knowledge and research gaps. Meeting of the National Research Council, Board on Environmental Science and Toxicology, Woods Hole, MA, October 7, 2004.

26. Kuempel E. Nanomaterials: a risk to workers’ health? OSHA/NIOSH Interagency Health Outcome Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, November 16, 2004.

27. Luster M. Nanoparticles toxicity testing issues. Nanotoxicology Workshop, Gainsville, FL, November 3–4, 2004. Luster M. Nanoparticles toxicity issues. Ramazzini Collegium, Bologna, Italy, September 18–21, 2005.

28. Maynard A. Working with engineered nanomaterials: towards developing responsible work practices in an uncertain world. National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) meeting. Nanosafe: A Workshop on Environmental Health and Safety in Nanotechnology Research, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, December 2, 2004.

29. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health. Professional Conference of Industrial Hygienists, Montreal, Canada, October 5, 2004.

30. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health. American Chemical Council Nanotechnology Workshop, Atlanta, GA, October 20, 2004.

31. Maynard A. Laboratory safety and disposal issues. Nanotoxicology Workshop, Gainsville, FL, November 3, 2004.

32. Maynard A. Working at the nanoscale: nanotechnology and potential health risks. CDC/Environmental & Occupational Health & Injury Prevention Coordination Center, Atlanta, GA, November 9, 2004.

33. Maynard A. Nanotechnology: challenges and opportunities. OSHA/NIOSH Interagency Health Outcome Conference, Salt Lake City, UT, November 16, 2004.

34. Maynard A. Nanotechnology at NIOSH. NORA Liaison Committee Meeting, Washington, DC, December 2, 2004.

35. Maynard A. Generating and characterizing airborne nanoparticles. American Association for the Advancement of Science Conference, Washington, DC, February 20, 2005.

36. Maynard A. Understanding the potential impact of nanotechnology on occupational health. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, February 23, 2005.

37. Maynard A. Nanomaterials and occupational health. Establishing a healthy working environment. The World Environment Center International Environment Forum, New York, March 10, 2005.

38. Maynard A. Responsible nanotechnology and the working environment. National Research Council Review of the U.S. National Nanotechnology Initiative Meeting on Responsible Nanotechnology, Washington, DC, March 24, 2005.

39. Maynard A. Working with engineered nanomaterials: towards developing safe work practices. University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, May 2, 2005.

40. Maynard A. Working with engineered nanomaterials: towards developing safe work practices. Korean Occupational Safety and Health Agency (KOSHA), Daejeon, South Korea, May 11, 2005.

41. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health―addressing potential health risks. Korean Society of Toxicology Annual Conference, Seoul, Korea, May 13, 2005.

42. Maynard A. Nanotechnology: overview and relevance to occupational health. American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005.

43. Maynard A. Nanotechnology and occupational health. American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005.

44. Maynard A. Working at the nanoscale: nanotechnology and potential health risk. American Industrial Hygiene Conference and Exposition, Anaheim, CA, May 24, 2005.

45. Porter D. Particulate handling in the human lung. Biological Effects of Lunar Dust Workshop, Sunnyvale, CA, March 29–31, 2005.

46. Porter D. Toxicity of ultrafine particles. Nanotechnology: Occupational Safety and Health Perspectives. 21st Annual Kentucky Governor’s Safety and Health Conference and Exposition, Louisville, KY, May 11, 2005.

47. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. International Congress on Nanotechnology, San Francisco, CA, November 7–10, 2004.

48. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotube: what we know and what we do not know. National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) meeting. Nanosafe: A Workshop on Environmental Health and Safety in Nanotechnology Research, Atlanta, GA, December 1–3, 2004.

49. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of SWCNT (Single-walled carbon nanotubes). National Nanotechnology Infrastructure Network (NNIN) meeting. Nanosafe: A Workshop on Environmental Health and Safety in Nanotechnology Research, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, December 2, 2004.

50. Shvedova S. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. American Chemical Society, San Diego, CA, March 26–28, 2005.

51. Shvedova A. Pulmonary oxidative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis induced by single wall carbon nanotubes. 2nd International Symposium on Nanotechnology and Occupational Health, Minneapolis, MN, October 3–6, 2005.

52. Shvedova A. Pulmonary toxicity of carbon nanotubes. 8th International Conference on Mechanisms of Action of Inhaled Fibers, Particles, and Nanoparticles in Lung and Cardiovascular Diseases, Research Triangle Park, NC, October 25–28, 2005.

53. Simeonova P. Nanoparticles-systemic and vascular effects. Nanotoxicology: Biomedical Aspects, Nanotoxicology 2006, Miami, FL, January 29–February 1, 2006.

]]>