Listen to Alex Jones
  • Midas Resources

    Listen to Alex Jones

    • Prison Planet.tv
    • Pre-Order The Obama Deception
  • 9/11 truth movement continues to grow

    Tom Theimer
    The East Texan
    Sunday, Sept 29, 2008

    There will be a test. All students and faculty will be tested over their research concerning this issue.We have all been fooled. We have been duped concerning the truth surrounding the events of Sept. 11, 2001. Science does not lie, but the government does.

    The evidence is unimpeachable, but the media censors. Thoroughly investigate “9/11 Truth.” This is probably one of the most important issues of your life and your country. Don’t muff it.

    You had better ask yourself why you have not seen ALL of the videos and information surrounding the collapse of Building 7. Watch ALL the videos concerning Building 7, including: the BBC story which announced that the building had already collapsed 20 minutes prior to its actual collapse; the collapse angle shots; the many eyewitnesses who heard the countdown or knew that the building was about to “blow up” or heard explosions; the order from the owner of the building to “pull it”; the full Barry Jennings interview where he cites bombs going off in Building 7 prior to the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers, and how the stairwell was blown-out beneath Barry’s feet.

    (Article continues below)

    Coincidently, this 53-year-old key witness to explosions, an executive government official with security clearance, died just a month ago. He died just days prior to the release of the long-awaited NIST report about Building 7. NIST is the government agency charged with releasing an official explanation for the collapse of Building 7, which had been years overdue.

    You had better ask yourself why there was absolutely no mention of Building 7 in the “9/11 Commission Report.” The “9/11 Commission Report” states that it is supposed to be “a full and complete account” You had better ask yourself why the government kept changing their story about Building 7, until finally admitting that Building 7 had no significant structural damage. Find out about the list of tenants in Building 7. Find out who were principles in the company managing security for the World Trade Center Complex.

    Full article here

    Prison Planet.tv Members Can Watch Fall Of The Republic Right Now Online - Don't Miss Out! Get Your Subscription Today!

    Survive

    CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are "they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU be the next victim? Learn the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY

     

    • Social bookmarks
    • Social bookmarks
    • Email this article
    • Email this article
    • Print
    • Print this page
    Comment Terms Of Use

    12 Responses to “9/11 truth movement continues to grow”

    1. Doug Plumb Says:

      The facts we know about 9/11 are more than enough to prove inside job. I have always stuck to the facts and avoided any speculation and have always won debates.

      I debated 9/11 publically at the Centre For Inquiry in Toronto. The debate was myself against two JREFers.

      I think its important to not speculate on how the towers collapsed until something is proven 100%. I am just a bachelor level engineer – I can’t disprove Wood or Deagle.

      The towers went straight down through what would normally be the path of greatest resistance- straight down the core. This proves it was a controlled event and therefore likely an inside job. It doesn’t matter how they made the towers do this for our purposes.

      Let the qualified scientists theorize and speculate until something is proven. We already have all the proof we need.

    2. dish gotta swim Says:

      Doug, if you didn’t nail the JREFers with the yellow-hot molten iron spill from WTC2 then you need to find other subjects to debate.

    3. dish gotta swim Says:

      Practically nobody talks about the long straight black tarp-like thing hanging down the middle of the North side of WTC7 (see: “ABC 13:54 WTC7 damage” on youtube). No one says there was damage there on WTC7 except “debunkers” on the internet, where it’s called a “gaping hole” despite the fact that it emits no smoke and has perfectly straight parallel sides. The brownish facade of WTC7 is much darker than the whitish support layer below it, visible on photos of WTC7 taken post-collapse, BTW.

      Practically nobody talks about how bad the photoshopping was on NISTs “corner damage” photo, (see: “Popular Mechanics and NIST caught doctoring WTC 7 photos!” on youtube) which shows parts of the facade impossibly pushed upward.

    4. dish gotta swim Says:

      Yes, NIST admitted there was no significant damage to the exterior of WTC7, and this is because THEY WERE CAUGHT RED-HANDED PUBLISHING A WTC7 PHOTO WITH PHOTOSHOPPED FAKE DAMAGE.

      Uhhh, so, why not press them on this, people???????

      Well???????

    5. Johnathan Douglas Says:

      I got BANNED from Afterdowning street.org for taking about ONLY the forensics of 9 11 …

      http://www.afterdowningstreet.org/node/35718

      This is the debate that got me kicked … Three times in a few hours:

      http://www.afterdowningstreet......ent-213326

      I had to change my email address … ip address … username … and member login just to get in what I did ….

    6. will hale Says:

      doug plumb well said!
      i also use only facts and i never get laughed at.
      i dont speculate on the politics or the reasons its not something we have intimate knowledge of so we only come across as nuts.
      however if we stick to the facts and use the laws of physics and motion we can prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the 3 buildings were rigged to be brought down.
      getting our fellow citizens to open their eyes requires just the facts and they usually start their own journey on the road to the truth of 9/11

    7. username2 Says:

      Gordon Kawl, Randy Weaver, Waco, WTC’s, Anthrax, Iraq……………All fucking based on lies. Vietnam too. We are a bunch of sorry mother-fuckers in USA my guess. It’s bad to think I score higher IQ than W?

    8. tracehd1 Says:

      I thought NIST just came out with their bogus report for building 7?? Wasn’t their lame *research* pointing towards *Fire* and a hunk of the building being blown out that brought 7 down? Sureeee makes sense to me… lmaoo that’s why the whole building came down under 10secs…a piece of the building broke!!! I don’t know how they could even do a full 100% investigation…all debris from the buildings were shipped overseas!!! Tgod for big brother and all the video proof we have!!

      I ?’d 9/11 the very day it happened. I didn’t know our own Pres. and his elitist buddies were behind it…I figgard that out on day 2…lol Anyway’s..I will always fight until the true killers are brought to justice!!! I’m not surprised that people r still sticking their heads in the Sand instead of listening to that voice inside of them that tells them something isn’t right! U cannot overlook the obvious..unless…those people r afraid that if they admit their govt is ruthless power hungry NWO killers…they’ll have to admit there is no SantaClause either. Some people feel safer in the dark period…ignorance is bliss right?

      ^5’s to all the brave People out there that aren’t afraid to go against the grain and stand up for the truth…after all .. it will set u free!

    9. tracehd1 Says:

      Dish.. how about the people that were literally standing in the holes that the planes made…?? Which proves the fire was not hot and burned off rather quickly!!!

      geezz..there’s so much evidence it was an inside job that I can only go back to what I said before.. ignorance is bliss!!!

    10. ROCKMACHINE Says:

      THE ONLY PROOF I NEEDED WAS THAT LOOK ON BUSH’S POS FACE WHEN HIS SS MAN WHISPERED IN HIS EAR.

    11. jay Says:

      The only possible explanation is controlled demolition. Even if one tower could could collapse at near free fall speed that is strange. But all 3? Surely something would have been left standing. There are so many eyewitnesses and video clips from multiple angles. The CFR/CIA controlled media covering it just adds more suspicion to the cause of the disaster. When you add in the motives then the picture becomes disturbingly clear. This was obviously an inside job. But what is the most appalling thing about this entire event is the power of the government to control the media. Look up Steve Kangas and Carl Bernstein.
      Most people dont mention the Anthrax attacks. We know they came from govt. laboratory. Also key people surrounding this event are mysteriously dieing. The govt. is protecting Philip Zack.
      Fortunately, with today’s computer technology, I suspect that future postmortem analysis of events will be carried out faster and receive a wider audience. There truth will come out but the question is …will America be gone by the time the sheep wake up?

    12. Darryl Says:

      Just watched a documentary on the Lockerbie/PanAm 747 bombing. You know they pieced together 90% of that jet again on a giant jig-frame and found the piece of paper glued to the radio bomb that caused the explosion? Took them 12 months.

      And then think of the plane that hit the Pentagon. Nothing. Nada. Except a picture of an engine compressor and a strip of aluminum with red paint. When are the people gonna call “Bullshit” on this??


    English flagItalian flagKorean flagChinese (Simplified) flagChinese (Traditional) flagPortuguese flagGerman flagFrench flagSpanish flagJapanese flagArabic flagRussian flagGreek flagDutch flagBulgarian flagCzech flagCroat flagDanish flagFinnish flagHindi flagPolish flagRumanian flagSwedish flagNorwegian flagCatalan flagFilipino flagHebrew flagIndonesian flagLatvian flagLithuanian flagSerbian flagSlovak flagSlovenian flagUkrainian flagVietnamese flag
    By N2H