THE United States edited out more than 8000
crucial pages of Iraq's 11,800-page dossier on weapons, before
passing on a sanitised version to the 10 non-permanent members of
the United Nations security council.
The full extent of Washington's complete control over who sees
what in the crucial Iraqi dossier calls into question the
allegations made by US Secretary of State Colin Powell that
'omissions' in the document constituted a 'material breach' of the
latest UN resolution on Iraq.
Last week, Secretary General of the UN Kofi Annan accepted that
it was 'unfortunate' that his organisation had allowed the US to
take the only complete dossier and edit it. He admitted 'the
approach and style were wrong' and Norway, a member of the security
council, says it is being treated like a 'second-class country'.
Although Powell called the Iraqi dossier a 'catalogue of recycled
information and flagrant omissions', the non-permanent members of
the security council will have no way of testing the US claims for
themselves. This will be crucial if the US and the UK go back to the
security council seeking explicit authorisation for war on Iraq if
breaches of resolution 1441 are confirmed when the weapons
inspectors -- this weekend investigating 10 sites in Iraq, including
an oil refinery south of Baghdad -- deliver their report to the UN
next month.
A UN source in New York said: 'The questions being asked are
valid. What did the US take out? And if weapons inspectors are
supposed to be checking against the dossier's content, how can any
future claim be verified. In effect the US is saying trust us, and
there are many who just will not.'
Current and former UN diplomats are said to be livid at what some
have called the 'theft' of the Iraqi document by the US. Hans von
Sponeck, the former assistant general secretary of the UN and the
UN's humanitarian co- ordinator in Iraq until 2000, said: 'This is
an outrageous attempt by the US to mislead.'
Although the five permanent members of the security council --
the US, the UK, France, China and Russia -- have had access to the
complete version, there was agreement that the US be allowed to edit
the dossier on the ground that its contents were 'risky' in terms of
security on weapons proliferation.
Yesterday, US President George W Bush announced that a planned
trip to several African countries, scheduled for January, had been
cancelled. As he gave the go-ahead to double the current 50,000 US
troops deployed in the Gulf by early January, he used his weekly
radio address to say that 'the men and women in the [US] military,
many of whom will spend Christmas at posts and bases far from home'
were the only thing that stood between 'Americans and grave danger'.
An equally pessimistic view of the immediate future came from the
Vatican. Pope John Paul II promised the Catholic church would not
cease to have its voice heard and would offer prayers 'in the face
of this horizon bathed in blood'.
Despite the prayers, the US military isn't expecting peace.
Yesterday, General Richard Myers, chairman of the US joint chiefs of
staff, was asked if US forces were ready if called upon immediately.
General Myers simply said: 'You bet.'
The language coming from Baghdad was equally gung ho. The Iraqi
newspaper Babel, owned by Saddam Hussein's eldest son Uday, likened
US and UK political leaders to ruthless Mongol conquerors of the
past.
News in focus: Into
the breach
News in focus: Blair
keeps UN in the picture, but does he want to stop Bush or speed him
along?
News in focus: Police
swoops in Edinburgh leave paranoia in their wake
Seven Days: The Iraqi
regime may be brutal, but we must overcome evil with good in the
framework of the UN
What we think:
Christmas is coming, the war is getting fat
Iain MacWhirter: War
Is A Suspect Package, Tony
Web report: Iraq
22 December 2002
in this section