So i put it back on my list, but will have to watch out for writer Dee Norris. Wish there was author’s name next to article snippet on the front page…

Lets see child’s responses:

‘Melissa: Uh huh. They put all that junk in the air and it has to be causing the world to get warmer.’

Clearly an indoctrinated way of thinking.

And here is your enlightened response:

‘Dee: Is that so? That junk is called carbon dioxide and of all the carbon dioxide that is going into the air, how much of it do you think that people are adding?’

Wow! CO2 is the only junk we put in the air! Isn’t this an example of indoctrination, narrowing the scope of the broad understanding of ‘junk’ to a singular cause of your choice?

Than you correct a child estimate about percentage of human contribution. My dear ‘an inconvenient youth’ writer, check your facts before ‘enlightening’ youth. http://www.noaanews.noaa.gov/stories2005/s2412.htm

‘Melissa: Well how about all the polar bears that are drowning? The ice cap is melting.

Dee: Ummmm… How many polar bears have drowned?’

You ask a rhetorical question to which obviously answer is very hard to know. How many people drowned this summer in Florida? You don’t know? And there is an almost exact count of these — almost each one ended up in morgue or hospital, or at least reported by their families! As far as drowning of bears, who are mainly drowning when people are not around: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....767459.ece

I am quite disappointed (weak word) with this ‘article’ and will remove this site from my RSS feed. You used a famous catchy title to gain readers for your writing, but instead, you lost (at least one) reader for this website.

By Daily Mail Reporter
Last updated at 12:04 AM on 10th September 2008

Park wardens have been ordered to stop and interrogate anyone who is not accompanied by children.

The visitors who are quizzed have to explain their presence and risk being thrown out or reported to police if their answers are not satisfactory.

I guess that we agree that the polar bear population has increased. Perhaps it doesn’t prove that CO2 global warming is a farce, but it does prove that the facts have been misrepresented and propagandized in a way that tugs at our heartstrings. Did you know that Austria has some of the strongest wildlife preservation laws in the world? They were put in place by Hitler.

Of course, that GW propaganda is dangerous, no question. But this type of indoctrination is nothing new. David Icke called it the “repeater syndrome”. The brainwashed adults just repeat the bull to the children. The blind are leading the potentially blind.

You put forth a position that claims it is no longer legal to hunt polar bears, and therefore, using the recent population increase is, in your mind, a “red herring”.

Do you have facts to back that position up? How many different countries have Polar Bears? Have all these countries banned hunting outright or is some hunting still allowed? How many Polar Bear populations exist in the world and what is the total population when adding each individual population? Which population increased, and was that population still being hunted during the increase in any way? If it was, what percentage of the population has been harvested each year for say, the last 50 years? How do those numbers compare with the claims being made about decreasing population?

See Sean, some of us have questions, and they have not really been answered. Also, we know we have been presented falsified data in the past by those that want to lower standards of living to “Save the Planet”. Until you can show us exactly why the increased population is a “red herring”, most individuals will not buy it just because you claim it to be true. Where is the evidence to support your position.

If I go to US Fish and Wildlife or a lot of other sites, I find that hunting is still legal for native populations as long as they don’t “take too many to detrimentally affect the population”. So you are at least partially wrong. What else are you wrong about Sean?