NAVIGATION |
|
|
THE ALEX JONES
SHOW |
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES |
|
|
|
|
|
SPECIAL REPORTS |
|
|
|
|
LINKS |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| CONTACT |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ADVERTISEMENTS
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
Media Subterfuge and School Shootings
Curt Maynard
Politically
Correct Apostate
Tuesday April 17, 2007
Darn it, my wife is going to be angry with me again today. I’m suppose
to mow the lawn and do some work on the house, but some crazy bastard
went and murdered 32 people at Virginia Tech today and the media is already
fixated on utilizing this story as another reason Americans should agree
to reject the Second Amendment and voluntarily disarm ourselves. I won’t
get into my feelings about these seemingly random school shootings we
seen to hear about so often anymore or who or what motivates them other
than to say I’m a bit skeptical that they are what the media presents
them to be. Why am I skeptical? Facts behind the Columbine shootings have
absolutely been covered up, there is no doubt, most of what we heard in
the media about Columbine was skewed in such a way as to suggest that
Klebold and Harris were neo-Nazis, when in fact the opposite was true,
Klebold was Jewish and he and Harris believed themselves to be the persecuted
victims of Nazi like thinking, i.e. they hated Christians and sought to
[and did] single them out for murder. Their diaries clearly reveal this
fact, but thanks to a judge named Lewis T. Babcock, you’ll never hear
about this, because he just ruled a few days ago that facts
behind the Columbine shootings will be sealed for twenty years, quite
convenient timing given that this newest shooting followed his ruling
by less than two weeks [and nearly on the anniversary of the Columbine
shooting – within the same week in fact]. Trust me, I guarantee you that
this latest shooting too will have many inconsistencies that the media
will not tell you about. I can smell these things any longer. The Columbine
shooting was NOT what it was portrayed to be by the media, there
were more than 100 witnesses whose testimony called into question the
“official story” of what happened that day in Littleton Colorado,
but many of you aren’t aware of this because the media suppressed this
information, something they can easily do, because there are no longer
any networks, newspapers, or news magazines that are independent of Zionist
control.
So on to the point of this article. We cannot trust the media to tell
us the truth, which means that we cannot trust what the media will tell
us about the latest shootings at Virginia Tech. The sad fact of the matter
is, we cannot trust the media period. I don’t know about you, but it has
come to the point for me, where if Fox News reported that the sun rises
in the East, I’d go outside to confirm this for myself before I’d pass
along this information to anyone else.
As of right now, we do not know who the shooter was or who may have killed
him, or if he even intentionally shot himself. The reason I bring this
up, is that the media has played fast and lose with important facts in
the past so as to reinforce their primary agenda which is to convince
Americans that they should voluntarily disarm themselves in the name of
a better, safer society. Bernard Goldberg, a major league Zionist propagandist
spilled the beans on this in his latest book “Arrogance”, which was essentially
a worthless piece of pro-Israel propaganda with the exception of this
single important story.
As described by a Rogers University
website:
“Goldberg analyzed media coverage of a school shooting that occurred at
the Appalachian School of Law in Grundy, Virginia.
According to Goldberg, what made this story newsworthy is that the shooter
in this event was subdued by several students who themselves used guns
to ‘overpower’ the gunman. Conducting his own Lexis-Nexis search, Goldberg
pronounced himself ‘stunned’ to discover that in a search of one hundred
news sources, “only a few papers in the whole country reported the rescuers
had guns” (p. 186). That many newspapers then used this case to editorialize
their opposition to private ownership of handguns simply reaffirms Goldberg’s
belief that a liberal media embraces a reflexive anti-gun bias.”
No doubt this is true, which is reinforced by the following excerpt from
a CNN article entitled “Suspects
in Law School slaying arraigned”, which overtly neglects to mention
that those students that “tackled” the gunmen were themselves armed with
firearms, which undoubtedly made their job much easier:
“Students
apparently tackled the gunman, said Ellen Qualls, press secretary for
Virginia Gov. Mark Warner.”
Now I’ll bet anyone $100.00 today that you and I will never see, not even
once, Fox News, CNN, MSNBC, CBS, or CBS, mention the fact that armed students
disarmed a shooter at the Appalachian School of Law back in 2002 on [this
is important] National Television. You will NOT hear about this story
because it does not support the primary agenda the Zionist media which
seeks to imbed into the forefront of our thinking, i.e. that its better
to give up our guns and live in alleged safety than to insist that our
Second Amendment rights to gun ownership be respected by our treasonous
government. The reason for this is that the Zionist media and the traitors
in our government fear us; they fear us because we are a heavily armed
society and are becoming more and more aware of the stink emanating from
Washington DC. Hell, if I were these people, I’d be afraid too.
The Zionist media also won’t tell you that Britain
and Australian crime rates have skyrocketed since they willingly gave
up their guns a few years ago, but nonetheless it’s true.
In an article I wrote some time ago entitled, “Don’t
let go of your guns,” I emphasized how important it is not to fall
for the medias lies, I wrote “now is not the time to even consider giving
up guns – now is the time to buy them, in large numbers, in large calibers,
for yourself, every member of your family, and your neighbors. I meant
it when I wrote it and I mean it even more now.
As an aside, I’m watching Bush at this very moment on television as he
attempts to convince Americans that he’s “shocked” by what took place
at Virginia Tech today. The more enlightened reader might ask; how it
is that a man who actively participated in the murder of some 3000 Americans
on 9-11 could be “shocked” by the comparably insignificant number of 32?
Fox News has done its best for the last few hours to convince us all that
“Bush cares,” that he’s “horrified,” and “shocked,” they’re doing their
best to rehabilitate this wicked man in the minds of Americans, but it
won’t work the media’s time is nearly at hand. Lastly, I strongly encourage
the reader to become immediately suspicious of any story they see or hear
in the media that is prefaced with the word “shocked,” no matter who or
where it is coming from, because this word has been so overused and abused,
that it’s real purpose is now more than apparent, to manipulate and persuade.
At the very moment I’m posting this [April 16, 2007 @ 1519], Fox News
is interviewing a student named Kelly that saw with her own eyes an Asian
man being detained by police. After she said that, Neil Cavuto immediately
interjected and stated that police are reporting that there was only one
shooter and he was killed. So you see, the story is already unraveling.
|
|
|