NAVIGATION |
|
|
THE ALEX JONES
SHOW |
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES |
|
|
|
SPECIAL REPORTS |
|
|
|
|
LINKS |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| CONTACT |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ADVERTISEMENTS
|
|
 |
| |
|
|
|
Reshaping Public Opinion and the White
Coated Propagandists Reshaping the International Order Part 4
Brent Jessop
Knowledge
Driven Revolution.com
Monday, April 28, 2008
"Atomic and political scientists from Harvard University
and MIT meeting in November 1975 concluded that an atomic war will
certainly occur before the year 2000. This, they believed, could
only be prevented by the decision of all nation-states to surrender
their sovereignty to an authoritarian world government, a possibility
they viewed as unlikely." - RIO: Reshaping the International
Order, 1976 (p46)
Public opinion is not generated by the public it is driven
into them by marketing and propaganda. One of the main aspects of
generating public opinion is the use of experts or specialists to
tell the public what to think and give them a false sense of security
derived from the belief that there are armies of experts making all
of the difficult decisions for them. What if the legions of experts
are just white coated propagandists?
The Club of Rome is a premiere think tank composed of approximately
100 members including leading scientists, philosophers, political
advisors, former politicians and many other influential bureaucrats
and technocrats. This series of articles describes the major conclusions
of the 1976 book Rio: Reshaping the International Order: A Report
to the Club of Rome [1] coordinated by Nobel Laureate Jan Tinbergen.
The RIO report "addresses the following question: what new international
order should be recommended to the world's statesmen and social groups
so as to meet, to the extent practically and realistically possible,
the urgent needs of today's population and the probable needs of future
generations?"
(Article continues below)
Part
1 of this series gives an overview of the proposed new international
order described by the RIO report as "humanistic socialism". This
includes: collective neighbourhood armies, a fully planned world economy,
global free trade, public international enterprises, proposed changes
in consumption patterns among other topics. Changes to the financial
system including international taxation and the creation of a World
Treasury, World Central Bank and World Currency are examined in part
2. Part
3 addresses the redefinition of sovereignty from "territorial
sovereignty" to "functional sovereignty" as well as the use of the
concept of the "common heritage of mankind" to gain international
control of not just the oceans, atmosphere and outer space but also
all material and non-material resources.
Importance of Public Opinion
Any attempt at creating a new international order requires the reshaping
of public opinion from their current modes of thought into newer more
appropriate forms. This important detail was not overlooked by The
Club of Rome.
From RIO: Reshaping the International Order:
[Italicised text is original emphasis and bolded text
is added by author.]
"The possibility of implementing ideas of a new power
structure would, in democratic societies, necessitate the acceptance
of such ideas by wide sections of public opinion. It is of paramount
importance, therefore, that new ways and means be found to establish,
within industrialized countries, contacts between formal and informal
groups of concerned citizens, scientists and politicians..." - 109
"Political feasibility. Crucially important especially during
the early phases of the transformation of the existing order..."
- 101
"Development implies a constant destruction of sociological and
psychological structures. The real problem of development is cleverly
to balance positive and real improvements with severe destructions...
It is the responsibility of every nation to make its own choice
between economic progress and socio-psych structure destructions,
and to define its own fundamental objectives for real development,
which is the development of man as a totality and of the totality
of men." - (Part of RIO member Maurice Guernier's position statement)
- 321
"The satisfaction of needs implies that each person available for
and willing to work should have an adequately remunerated job...
Education is the most important non-material component for fulfilling
individual ambitions... At a higher level, education not only contributes
directly to individual satisfaction by developing that individual's
spiritual endowment, but also indirectly by preparing the individual,
mentally as well as morally, for a future role in a changing world..."
- 64
Reshaping Public Opinion
Public opinion is not generated from the public, but rather given
to them from politicians, experts, fiction, news media, etc.
"Public opinion is no phenomenon sui generic.
It is in part the result of government policies and by definition
politicians cannot hide behind their own creation. If some sectors
of public opinion in the industrialized countries are immersed in
the rhetoric and slogans associated with misunderstanding, then
much of this may be inherited from their political leaders.
And if these leaders are in part responsible for a situation which
impedes acceptance of the need for change, then they themselves
must be held responsible for changing this situation." - 110
No Technocracy, Just White Coated Propagandists
"One of our main weapons in this search is the vast arsenal
of scientists we are potentially able to deploy. To fully utilize
this resource, we must deliberately choose to focus investigation
in directions we believe to be really relevant." -
107
"In political process too, the search for 'new combinations' can
be expected to produce valuable results. Such a search is likely
to demonstrate the responsibilities which scientists and other specialists
have, not only to their nations, but also to the constituency of
mankind. In the past, specialists have often been reluctant to engage
in political debate or to share their knowledge and fears with the
general public. Given social dilemmas, they have often preferred
to adopt neutral rather than value positions, to tacitly advise
rather than openly advocate. This generalization no longer holds
true. In many branches of science there are radical movements. Increasingly,
both in the rich and poor worlds, scientists are involved in active
advocacy which they see as an intellectual and ethical duty.
These observations suggest that specialists be provided with greater
opportunities to participate in the making of decisions in areas
of vital importance to the future of mankind This is not to suggest
the creation of a technocracy nor that political will can ever be
substituted by scientific expertise... Specialists must serve as
'advocates of the unborn' and the expansion of their role can be
viewed as an example of functional representation in international
decision-making.
Not only must specialists advocate courses of action in international
fora, they must also more fully commit themselves to development
efforts at the local level. Their commitment must be total, their
allegiance to a problem or community unstinting. Experts operating
through bilateral and multilateral channels have not always meet
these requirements. The 'new expert', in actively promoting local
self-reliant development, may need to subordinate his own values
even his knowledge, to those of the community he is attempting
to serve. We have seen the rise of 'barefoot doctors'; we must encourage
the rise of 'barefoot experts'." - 108
The above quote clearly states that the "new experts"
should form a league of white coated propagandists willing to subordinate
their knowledge (the only thing they have to offer) to a desired political
agenda. It should also be noted the use of the term "functional representation".
This is significant because the Club of Rome redefines sovereignty
from what they call "territorial sovereignty" to "functional sovereignty"
completely changing the meaning of sovereignty. More on the redefinition
of sovereignty here.
Using Other Groups
"The most important options for organizing institutions
lie in three main areas. The first relates to the way in which the
means of operating society are grouped into bunches which
can appropriately be handled by one institution. From the viewpoint
of efficiency, the most suitable approach would be to group together
those means requiring similar techniques of control. The second
option concerns the various levels of decision-making and the hierarchy
corresponding to it. This important structural consideration applies
to single institutions as well as to the relationship between
persons and between institutions. ... Third... Membership should
not be limited to national governments; it should also embrace
non-governmental organizations of many kinds operating at different
levels." - 101
"Whereas national public opinion may exist in the singular, internationally
it exists in the plural... Groups of many different kinds, both
in and outside the production process - students, trade unions,
scientists - from both the Third World and the industrialized countries
should join forces in their attempts to shape public and political
opinion. The aim here must be the internationalization of attempts
at 'conscience-raising'. There would appear to be tremendous
scope for a range of non-governmental organizations in this field
and for cooperation among them." - 111
"... a conscious attempt must be made to organize intellectual and
political lobbies to re-educate international public and political
opinion." - 177
"Convincing Public and Political Opinion: Coordinated and intensified
effort should be made, particularly in industrialized countries,
to publicize the need to create an international social and economic
order which is perceived as more equitable by all peoples.
... The primary task of many non-governmental organizations must
be to undertake the effort suggested." - 122
The Ministry of Third World Truth
The Club of Rome proposes the creation of a Ministry of Third World
Truth to help shape international public opinion.
"Such reform [of news media] should include the creation
of a Third World information centre to specifically serve Third
World needs and to facilitate the dissemination of information on
the Third World, both in industrialized and Third World countries."
- 111
Conclusion
The creation of a World Food Authority and its use for population
control is examined in part
5. The final
article in this series deals with a variety of issues including
global solidarity, regional unions, legal changes and a standing United
Nations Peace Force.
[1] Quotes from Jan Tinbergen, RIO: Reshaping the International
Order: A Report to the Club of Rome (1976). ISBN 0-525-04340-3
Related Articles
Reshaping
the International Order Part 1: What Does a World Governed by Humanistic
Socialism Look Like?
Reshaping
the International Order Part 2: Reshaping the International Financial
Order
Reshaping
the International Order Part 3: "Functional" Sovereignty and the Common
Heritage of Mankind
Reshaping
the International Order Part 5: Population Control and a World Food
Authority (May 5)
Reshaping
the International Order Part 6: A Glimpse into the New Order (May
12)
Also
see series on Mankind at the Turning Point: The Second Report to The
Club of Rome
|
|
|