The easiest way to carry out a false flag attack is by setting up a
military exercise that simulates the very attack you want to carry out.
As I'll detail below, this is exactly how government perpetrators in
the US and UK handled the 9/11 and 7/7 "terror" attacks, which were
in reality government attacks blamed on "terrorists."
Although ill health keeps me from working as hard in the area of false
flag analysis as I used to, the urging of independent editors and brother
intelligence officers has prompted me to write this essay. I'll keep
it short for readers with limited time, but I will include invaluable
links for those who want to delve deeper and understand better.
My aim, as a former military intelligence officer who spent five years
with the U.S. Army 75th Division conducting military war games, is to
convince the American people that the "next 9/11" -- constantly promised
by officials and the media -- is likely to be carried out under the
guise of future military exercises. If the American people are aware
of pending exercises and the danger they represent, then the exercises
cannot "go live" and effect the very terror events that they are supposed
to be rehearsing against.
(Article continues below)
Military Exercises
The 9/11, 2001 attacks in the United States and the 7/7, 2005 attacks
in the United Kingdom both have smoking guns proving that the mass murderers
were not foreign terrorists but domestic tyrants. Each country's government
was conducting military exercises that simulated the exact events that
were to occur.
The US 9/11 Commission stumbled across strong evidence of treason by
Dick Cheney when it interviewed Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta,
who was present in Cheney's famous command bunker as Flight 77 sped
toward Washington, DC. Cheney was at the center of national military
exercises simulating terrorist hijackings of US aircraft -- at the very
time that those hijackings were occurring in real life. On May 23, 2003,
Secretary Mineta testified:
"During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon,
there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President,
"The plane is 50 miles out." "The plane is 30 miles out." And when it
got down to "the plane is 10 miles out," the young man also said to
the Vice President, "Do the orders still stand?" And the Vice President
turned and whipped his neck around and said, "Of course the orders still
stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?"
9/11 Commission co-chairman Lee Hamilton failed to follow up on
the bombshell revelation, and quickly switched the topic. Thanks to
YouTube, Mineta's astounding revelation and Hamilton's amazing reaction
are both viewable on a three minute clip:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bDfdOwt2v3Y
In the case of the 7/7 London railway bombings, there is same-day evidence
in a BBC interview with former Scotland Yard anti-terrorism agent, Peter
Power, who was a contract employee working in government exercises:
POWER: "At half past nine this morning we were actually running an exercise
for a company of over a thousand people in London based on simultaneous
bombs going off precisely at the railway stations where it happened
this morning, so I still have the hairs on the back of my neck standing
up right now."
BBC HOST: "To get this quite straight, you were running an exercise
to see how you would cope with this and it happened while you were running
the exercise?"
POWER: "Precisely."
For a one minute excerpt containing the statements above, refer to
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JKvkhe3rqtc
Mainstream Media
It goes without saying that serious media inquiry would quickly ferret
out the facts demonstrating high treason in the cases of 9/11 and 7/7.
It also goes without saying, unfortunately, that the traitors behind
the two false flag attacks understood this very well, and would not
have done what they did without a green light from a collaborative media.
Three World Trade Center buildings collapsed in New York City on September
11, 2001: WTC 1 and WTC 2 (the Twin Towers) in the morning, and WTC
7 (the Salomon Building) at 5:20 p.m. EST. Given that all three buildings
were said to be unexpected collapses by all official sources, there
is no good reason -- except for complicity -- to explain how it is that
the BBC reported the collapse of WTC 7 twenty minutes before it happened:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7SwOT29gbc&feature=related
Fox news damned itself by announcing that WTC 7 had collapsed -- even
as it showed a live shot of downtown New York with WTC 7 still standing.
A few seconds later the building collapsed, understandably confusing
the newscasters:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwUJ9MhzgK
The owner of all three buildings was Larry Silverstein, who had recently
doubled the insurance value of the Twin Towers. Amazingly, "Lucky Larry,"
later stated in a PBS interview that he and the New York Fire Department
agreed to a controlled demolition of WTC 7. Since skyscrapers are not
wired for demolition -- unless someone intends to demolish them -- Silverstein's
statement is an admission that 9/11 was an inside job:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7WYdAJQV100
"The Noble Lie"
I believe that on the strength of the five YouTube links above an objective
investigation would have more than enough evidence to warrant impeachment
of Bush and Cheney on a charge of high treason, and to summon a grand
jury that would indict many others on charges of high treason against
Larry Silverstein and other apparent 9/11 collaborators. I believe that
the American people, if presented with a single news story containing
the five YouTube links above, would demand that the case of high treason
be carried to its logical conclusion.
Congress, though, won't impeach the president. The mainstream media,
for which I used to write, will not investigate and report the story.
The military that was used as a tool to mass murder American citizens
will not take action against traitors in uniform who knew exactly what
they were doing on 9/11, or the many more uniformed dupes who thought
they were conducting military exercises until the events of 9/11 occurred.
To this day there have been no adverse actions -- which would require
investigation and evaluation -- against any military person involved
in what even official apologists call the greatest defense failure in
American history. All of this shows that the fix is in, and that we
are in a fix.
The high officials, media executives and military officers who are bound
by law and ethics to serve the American people have become a textbook
example of a grand conspiracy. To look at it from their point of view,
they are historic actors who are beyond good and evil, who must stimulate
the American people to a necessary geostrategic adventure by any means
necessary. To them, the official account of the 9/11 "terror" attacks
is what Plato once described as the "noble lie," a necessary falsehood
told to a childlike public in order to direct it maturely. The simple
fact is that 9/11 has justified an attempt to seize and control the
ultimate geostrategic resource: oil. He who controls Middle East oil
controls the world.
Top Three US Target Cities
Last year I published "Next 9/11, Summer 2007?" in response to the same
kind of requests that have led me to publish this essay as a 2008 update.
My 2007 three most likely cities for the next 9/11 were Houston, Chicago
and Portland. This year the same three cities are still most endangered,
in light of the fact that the US military has designated Texas, Indiana
and Oregon as three of its four target states in the 2008 version of
its Noble Resolve military exercises. Granted, Chicago is in Illinois,
not Indiana, but Indiana is quite close, and has been used to stage
forces for terror exercises conducted in Chicago in recent years.
It may come as a surprise to people not acquainted with military preparations
that the same cities remain on the list even though analysts like me
have publicized them widely. There are considerable difficulties in
setting up the political, police, military and media players necessary
to support a false flag attack. While many in the 911 truth movement
believes that national military forces can simply hit any city at any
time, it's not so easy -- thank God. Fortunately, this means that those
of us who study false flag prospects and focus on most likely targets;
regrettably, this means that target cities can't breathe easy just because
they have detected, exposed and preempted a single false flag attempt.
Here is a brief target analysis of the top three cities:
Primary Target: Houston. Over the past four years military and police
veterans like me have been alerting the public to government exercises
aiming at the nuclear destruction of Houston petro-suburbs. Five times
in those four years we were able to predict to within a day major petrochemical
explosions in those petro-suburbs. The odds against this kind of accuracy
are astronomical. As the center of Big Oil and the Bush Family, Houston
remains the most endangered city in America. Any patriotic group, like
mine, trying to alert its home city to the dangers of a false flag attack
should read my recent article, "The 1/31 Nuke: Proof for Ron Paul" about
the successful interdiction of a 2006 attempt against Texas City:
http://www.thepriceofliberty.org/08/01/28/may.htm
Secondary Target: Chicago. While Houston is the most endangered city,
the most endangered building -- the best candidate to be the next World
Trade Center -- is the Sears Tower. Official sources have pronounced
it just that ever since the original 9/11 attack, when they said it
was on the Al Qaeda hit list. Larry Silverstein, who bought the Twin
Towers two months before 9/11, led a group that purchased the Sears
Tower on 3/11, 2004, the day of the Madrid bombings. Federal officials
have been pointing to Chicago and its Sears Tower as Al Qaeda targets
since the original 9/11 attacks, and have repeated the threat ever since.
In May 2006,, the government scheduled secret 9/11-type exercises in
Chicago, while Chicago Mayor Daley was docked conveniently away in Israel
for his first visit there. I sent a widely read communiqué to Illinois
Governor Blagojevich as part of a successful Internet attempt to shut
down the pending false flag attack:
http://tekgnosis.typepad.com/tekgnosis/2006/05/ghost_troop_com.html
Tertiary Target: Portland. Portland, called "Little Beirut" by Bush
cronies because of its enmity to Bush 41 and Bush 43, only made my top
three list last summer, when it was designated as a target for a nuclear
attack by successive exercises Noble Resolve and TOPOFF. The language
in an official press release stated the case plainly enough: "Noble
Resolve will coordinate with officials in Oregon to model a nuclear
attack on Portland." In the course of researching Portland for a series
of articles I wrote about the city and its exercises. I discovered that
Stanford and Harvard had prepared a detailed nuclear fallout map for
it, that national military commanders and state National Guard commanders
were telling different stories about what the exercises were trying
to accomplish, and that Portland's The Oregonian newspaper was doing
everything it could to avoid investigating the frightening anomalies.
I wasn't at all surprised that the last day of the exercises found the
Homeland Security director Michael Chertoff in downtown Portland, which
was largely closed down by an "unexpected" bomb threat. For another
professional perspective on how great the danger was -- and may be again
-- I refer the reader to the analysis of my colleague, Major William
B. Fox (USMC):
http://www.lonestaricon.com/absolutenm/anmviewer.asp?a=2006&z=186
Postscript
"Good morning. At this moment, somewhere in the world, terrorists
are planning new attacks on our country. Their goal is to bring destruction
to our shores that will make September the 11th pale by comparison."
-- George W. Bush, Feb. 13, 2008
I can't think of a more important question than the one of where the
next 9/11 will be attempted. Common sense dictates to all of us who
understand the truth about 9/11 that its perpetrators must strike again.
Indeed, every directive, act and decision of our post-9/11 unitary executive,
cowards Congress and Judas judiciary has increased the power of the
federal government to wage the Global War and impose the Homeland State.
Why on earth would those already guilty of high treason, mass murder
and war crimes fail to follow up on their earlier efforts? They understand
quite well that the Global War is going badly and the Homeland State
is becoming onerous, and that only a reapplication of false flag terror
will force the American people to proceed with our post-9/11 national
insanity.
Still, for every one person who republishes or constructively comments
on this essay, there will be another who employs division, abuse and
ridicule against me or anyone else who asserts the common sense point
that false flaggers will continue to false flag, just as murderers will
continue to murder and robbers will continue to rob. It's Newtonian
in its simplicity: things continue to drift the way they are drifting
until they are stopped.
We can only stop the deadly drift of America by understanding 9/11 and
anticipating the next 9/11. Many of the vociferous voices impeding our
understanding and anticipation are performing a vital service for treason.
The federal government once used counterintelligence programs (COINTELPRO)
against the Vietnam era antiwar and civil rights movement, and common
sense would suggest that they are using it again in the post-9/11 era,
this time against the antiwar and 911 truth movement. The most dangerous
voices of all our those from false friends who have infiltrated us to
confuse us until the traitors who carried out 9/11 can repeat their
performance.
Captain May is a former Army military intelligence and public affairs
officer, as well as a former NBC editorial writer. His political and
military analyses have appeared in The Wall Street Journal, the Houston
Chronicle and Military Intelligence Magazine.
For more information, or his interview schedule, refer to his homesite:
http://www.spiritone.com/~pazuu/pow-mia/Ghost_Troop_Captain_Eric_H_May.htm