The country's never-ending debate over guns is heating up again.

This time it's fueled by news that the Interior Department may relax a 25-year ban on loaded guns in national parks and wildlife refuges, leaving the issue for states to decide. In a decision that the National Rifle Association has applauded, the department announced that it will issue a new set of rules by April 30.

"Under this proposal, federal parks and wildlife refuges will mirror the state firearm laws for state parks," said Chris Cox, the NRA's chief lobbyist. "This is an important step in the right direction."

The number of criminal offenses reported in the nation's parks declined by 25 percent from 1995 to 2006, going from 6,009 to 4,485, according to statistics compiled by the National Park Service. That includes murders, rapes, robberies, kidnappings, aggravated assaults, burglaries, thefts and arson.

(Article continues below)

Despite the decline, Cox said that law-abiding citizens shouldn't be prohibited from defending themselves while visiting the parks. He said the ban was outdated, noting that while only six states allowed citizens to carry handguns for self-defense in 1982, 48 states now issue licenses or permits for people to carry firearms to protect themselves.

Under current law, guns are allowed in national parks only if they're unloaded and stowed.

Gun-rights advocates are optimistic that they'll have the muscle to change the law this year. In the Senate, 50 members already have signed a letter complaining about the ban.

In the House of Representatives, however, Washington state Democratic Rep. Norm Dicks said he was prepared to block the effort. As the chairman of the House interior appropriations subcommittee, Dicks oversees the National Park Service's annual budget. He's usually reluctant to add legislative provisions — such as one barring the Interior Department from lifting the ban — to his spending bill, but he said he was ready to make an exception, even if it prompted a presidential veto.

"Every now and then something rises up that needs to be fought, and this is one of them," Dicks said.

Dicks said that his counterpart in the Senate, Democrat Dianne Feinstein of California, had told him that she'd use her position as the chairman of the interior appropriations committee to block any changes.

"Permitting loaded firearms to be carried or used within our national parks or wildlife refuges would be a radical, unprecedented change that would likely upset the delicate balance that exists between wildlife and park visitors in these areas," Dicks and Feinstein said in a letter to Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne.

Tom Kiernan, the president of the National Parks Conservation Association, called the plan to lift the ban alarming and said it was "a blow to the national parks and the 300 million visitors who enjoy them every year." He said that deferring to the states would result in confusion and that the federal government must be responsible for managing national parks.

"Poachers could operate with impunity, because rangers would lack the authority to question individuals about their loaded weapons," Kiernan said.

In recent years, Democrats in Congress have shown little interest in gun-control legislation, fearing that it's a losing issue with most voters. And many of them have little appetite for voting on the issue in a highly charged election year.

Full article here.