Scientific American Plans 9/11 Hit Piece

Total 9/11 Info | May 5 2005

Comment: It's ironic that Shermer is head of the Skeptics Society because we are skeptical of the government's fairytale explanation behind 9/11. The evidence points to Osama? How did Osama get NORAD to stand down? How did Osama plant the bombs in the building? How did Osama warn public oficials not to fly the night before 9/11? Was it Osama that placed put options on American and United Airlines?

Again, the fact that have to address this at all shows their desperation and the fact that we're winning. Remember what Ghandi said......

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win."

--------------------

"Alex" on 911TruthAction Yahoo Group May 4, 2005:

I just found out that Scientific American is writing a hit piece on 9-11. Have no idea when its coming out. I learned about this because a friend, who I'm trying to convince about 9-11, corresponded with the author of the article, Michael Shermer, who is the head of something called "the Skeptics Society".

[...]

Shermer just wrote me. He thinks the Scientific American 9-11 issue will be out next month. Here's his message:

"Alex:

I wrote one of my Scientific American columns on 9/11 conspiracy theories, which I think will be out next month. I don't pretend to be an expert on the whole subject, but as I see it the preponderance of evidence points to Osama and company.

I found the March issue of Popular Mechanics to be especially good in presenting the best conspiracy theories and knocking them down one by one, using factual evidence only to do so. You should check that out. It is on-line at their web page."