NAVIGATION |
|
|
THE ALEX JONES
SHOW |
|
|
|
|
|
SERVICES |
|
|
|
|
|
ARCHIVES |
|
|
|
SPECIAL REPORTS |
|
|
|
|
LINKS |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| CONTACT |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| ADVERTISEMENTS
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
NIST: "We are Unable to Provide
a Full Explanation of the Total Collapse"
George
Washington's Blog
Tuesday October 16, 2007
On April 11th, 2007, family members Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, scientists
Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage and the group Scholars
for 9/11 Truth and Justice filed
a petition with NIST demanding that it correct its erroneous methods and
findings.
On September 27th, NIST finally
replied.
While the reply is mainly bogus, and the filers of the petition intend
to appeal the decision of NIST not to correct the many fatal errors in
its reports, attorney James Gourley (who drafted the petition) has pointed
out one interesting statement. Specifically, NIST says in its reply:
"We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse".
(Article continues below)
Well, yes! That's exactly the point the petitioners are trying to make.
No modern steel frame high-rise building has ever
collapsed before or after 9/11 due to fire other than at WTC 1,
2 and 7, even though other
fires have burned longer and hotter. And even if they somehow did
start to collapse, the
collapse would not have occurred at virtual free-fall speeds while
creating enormous dust clouds right from the start.
So yes . . . NIST will forever be "unable to provide a full explanation
of the total collapse" unless it stops covering up the evidence that the
Twin Towers and Building 7 were brought down by controlled demolition.
|
|
|
Yahoo! MyWeb
