 |
Attack on cricketers in Pakistan; MI6, CIA, Mossad
aangirfan
Tuesday, March 3, 2009
Attack on a bus carrying a cricket team in Pakistan.
1. Reportedly, certain security services are trying to break up Pakistan, just as they broke up Yugoslavia.
Reportedly, it was Henry Kissinger who “gave the green light to India’s plan to break up East Pakistan and create Bangladesh.” (Written by www.daily.pk )
Unfortunately, a lot of the top people in Pakistan seem to be working for foreign security services, and that makes Pakistan look doomed.
2. Omar Sheik is reported to have murdered US journalist Daniel Pearl
In his 2006 memoir In the Line of Fire, President Musharraf wrote that Omar Saeed Sheik “is a British national born to Pakistani parents in London” in December 1973.
Omar Sheikh was reportedly a contemporary of England cricket captain Nasser Hussain at the private Forest School, in Snaresbrook, in the UK. (BBC Profile: Omar Saeed Sheikh)
Omar Sheik attended the London School of Economics (which reportedly has links to MI6).
“It is believed in some quarters that while Omar Sheikh was at the LSE he was recruited by the British intelligence agency MI-6,” Musharraf wrote. “It is said that MI-6 persuaded him to take an active part in demonstrations against Serbian aggression in Bosnia and even sent him to Kosovo to join the jihad” (Pervez Musharraf Nailed Top Pakistani Terrorist and Kidnapper As … )
3. On 3 February 2009, in the Pakistani city of Lahore, gunmen killed at least five Pakistan policemen and wounded up to six Sri Lankan cricket players. Cricketers wounded in Lahore attack / Sri Lankan cricketers injured in deadly gun attack in Pakistan .
The attackers, reportedly armed with Kalashnikovs, rocket launchers and hand grenades, targeted the Sri Lankan team’s bus.
Habibur Rehman, Lahore’s chief of police, said there were about 12 attackers, who “appeared to be well-trained.” They appeared to have had formal combat training.
Video seen on news channels showed the cricket team’s white van with its front window shattered. Pakistan TV showed footage of gunmen with rifles and backpacks running through the streets and firing on unidentified vehicles.
4. mostaqueali/ speculates whether Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, was a British agent. (The Mutiny. )
Was Pakistan set up by the British in order to weaken India?
Jinnah had “all those long years in … London, during the critical years of the independence movement.”
Jinnah had a “penchant for … alcohol.”
“His speeches to his Muslim audiences (were) in immaculate Oxbridge English mostly.”
He showed “deference to British Raj law.”
Meanwhile, “Congress leaders were imprisoned by the Raj.”
“It started in 1940 when the Muslim league drafted a constitution… As the Muslim League developed, the majority of the top echelon of the (mainly Hindu) Congress were locked up from 1942, with the ‘Quit India’ Movement.
“The Muslim League thus with covert British Raj guidance became a legitimate force in Indian politics, which could articulate its position with mass appeal…
“For me all this could not have been done by Jinnah himself or his close cadres… There must have been some sort of institutional backing from Britain to translate the Muslim League into a reasonably cohesive force by 1946…”
5. The Pakistan Daily, 1 March 2009, tells us of the Mossad Link to One of Key 9-11 Hijackers ( Israeli Secret Service Mossad Link Found to One of Key 9-11 …)
A New York Times story on 19 Feb. 2009 revealed that Ali al-Jarrah, a Lebanese Muslim Arab who reportedly is a spy for for Israeli intelligence, is a cousin of one of the Muslims alleged to have been one of the 9-11 hijackers.
One of Mr. Jarrah’s cousins, Ziad al-Jarrah, was among the 19 ‘hijackers’ who allegedly carried out the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.
On 3 August 1993, investigative reporter Robert I. Friedman revealed in New York’s Village Voice that Ahmad Ajaj, a Palestinian held in federal custody for conspiracy in the first attack on the World Trade Center in 1993, may have been a Mossad mole.
Ajaj was arrested at Kennedy Airport on Sept. 1, 1992, after he arrived on a Pakistani International flight from Peshawar.
6. Rehman Malik
Malik
On 17 January 2009, Pakistan acknowledged that India’s 26/11 Mumbai dossier has “proof” of the involvement of Pakistani elements.
The first-ever admission that India had proof came from Pakistan’s interior ministry chief Rehman Malik.
Pak concedes India has got proof against Pak nationals
The most powerful man in Pakistan appears to be a friend of Mossad and the American government.
Rehman Malik is the effective Interior Minister of Pakistan.
ISI is the Pakistan spy agency.
Pakistan Daily writes of ‘the bizarre, abortive handover of the ISI to Rehman Malik’. (You Can’t Be On The Wrong Side Of Pakistan Mr Asif Ali Zardari)
Benazir Bhutto appointed Rehman Malik as chief of Pakistan’s Federal Investigation Agency (FIA)
According to the article on Rehman Malik at Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia :
1. The Pakistani military was dismayed by reports of FIA contacts with the Israeli secret service, the Mossad, which had been cooperating with Indian secret service RAW.
2. One of the first acts of President Farooq Leghari after dismissing Benazir Bhutto on 5 November 1996 was to imprison Rehman Malik, the Additional Director General FIA.
3. Rehman Malik was the person responsible for security of Benazir Bhutto. After the assassination of Benazir Bhutto there were many accusation against Rehman Malik for lax security. (A Fishy Character – Rehman Malik Pakistan Politics / Rehman “Double Agent” Malik–>Emergency mailing list … )
According to the Pakistani Spectator, 11 May 2008, (Rehman Malik Runs Zardari and PPP The Pakistani Spectator):
“Rehman Malik … helped Zardari a lot to launder … looted money and invest and secure it at different places in the world… He does what he is told to do by the masters in Washington.”
7. Pakistan army chief General Ashfar Parvez Kayani has been trained in the USA.
And Pakistan’s President Zardari is reportedly a friend of the neocons.
One report suggests that the American neocons toppled Mussharraf and put Zardari into power.
In the Guardian, 7 September 2008, Tariq Ali wrote that “a hardcore neocon faction led by Zalmay Khalilzad, the US ambassador to the Security Council, was busy advising Asif Zardari in secret and helping him plan the campaign to oust the general (Musharraf).” Asif Ali Zardari: the godfather as president
Rehman Malik discuss terrorism issue with Jacqui Smith
Saudi intelligence chief meets Rehman Malik, others
Lashkar-e-Jhangvi plotted Marriott attack: Malik
8. Breaking up Pakistan
On 3 December 2008, at Al Ahram Weekly, Abdus Sattar Ghazali wrote ‘Behind the scenes’ (Cached)
He tells us about the US-UK-Israel agenda for the Middle East and South Asia region.
Among the points made:
1. The Global Trends 2025 report by Thomas Fingar, US deputy director of national intelligence for analysis, suggests that Pakistan may become much smaller.
2. The New York Times reported on a “New Middle East” map published in 2006 by the US Air Force Journal along with an article by retired Lieutenant-Colonel Ralph Peters, entitled, “How a better Middle East would look?” The map and Peters suggested that a ‘natural’ Pakistan would be much smaller than today.
3. It can be argued that redrawing the map, from the Lebanon and Syria to Anatolia, Arabia, the Persian Gulf, the Iranian Plateau and South Asia is part of a longstanding Anglo-American and Israeli agenda.
4. “Constructive chaos” (violence and war) is the means to gradually achieve this objective.
5. There is a rapidly deteriorating situation in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas (FATA) in the wake of frequent US missile attacks and Pakistan’s military operations.
The FATA region, along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border, was peaceful before the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001.
The commander of US forces in Afghanistan, General David McKiernan, was asked by a group of parliamentarians meeting with him at the residency of the US ambassador in Islamabad: Why did you Americans come to Afghanistan when it was so peaceful before you got there?
6. Some commentators suggest that the US is financing the Taliban. The point is to bog down the Pakistani army, they say, leaving the way open for the Americans to grab Pakistan’s nuclear weapons.
Recently, in the officers’ mess in Bajaur, the northern tribal region where the Pakistani army is stuck fighting militants, one officer offered his own theory: Osama bin Laden did not exist, he told a visiting journalist. Rather, he was a creation of the Americans, who needed an excuse to invade Afghanistan and encroach upon Pakistan.
~~~
Abdus Sattar Ghazali is executive editor of the online magazine American Muslim Perspective (http://www.amperspective.com/).
Rashid Rauf linked to Bombay Attacks
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
19 Responses to “Attack on cricketers in Pakistan; MI6, CIA, Mossad”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 3rd, 2009 at 6:18 am
They want to get their hands on those nukes too ~
REAL BAD !
March 3rd, 2009 at 7:16 am
Alex Jones addresses the crowd at a recent truther conference:
http://opposingdigits.com/images/sheepherder.jpg
March 3rd, 2009 at 7:16 am
See what I mean when I say truthers will believe something as long as it’s on a website somewhere and is critical of some government?
be Reply:
March 3rd, 2009 at 7:19 am
Yep!
And this is all the “proof” most of them will ever see. It becomes fact to them because some random guy posits it on his website. The truthers know everything going on in the world, all without leaving their keyboard. What frightening naivete.
obama's mama Reply:
March 3rd, 2009 at 8:36 am
some interesting observations. nothing new. but, why lash out at ‘truthers,’ poi? the writer is not an artist, agreed. but, there is nothing here that isn’t plausible. unlike the official story of 9/11, the official reasons for limiting gun ownership and ammunition imports, the official reasons for leaving troops in iraq, the official reasons for prosecuting a war on terrorists who only ever seem to attack whoever the u.s. and israel is currently targeting, anyways, there is nothing here that fails to stand up to initial scrutiny. i understand that letting go of what you think is reality is a scary proposition. everyone wants to believe something! maybe this is why your ‘truthers’ are so often quick to grab at whatever seems to fill in the uncomfortable blanks. after a while, most will let go of the things that don’t stand up, and will continue searching, until they arrive at a more mature worldview. in the end, i suppose, this why you are so ready to express your disgust for them – you don’t have the balls to even start. good luck with the official story…
Wake Up Call for "admin" Reply:
March 3rd, 2009 at 8:30 pm
Quotation by the lame sub-intellect who calls himself “obama’s mama:
“i understand that letting go of what you think is reality is a scary proposition.”
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Oh, the delicious fucking irony.
Thanks “obama’s mama”!
March 3rd, 2009 at 7:48 am
You must have been drunk when you wrote this. The grammatical errors are bad enough, not to mention the discombobulated information the doesn’t make a thesis statement. Sober the fuck up.
Disgusted Reply:
March 3rd, 2009 at 11:03 am
If you can’t make a decent argument, attack the opposing person himself
March 3rd, 2009 at 8:27 am
Yeah, Funny how the conspiracy theorists keep getting it right and you naysayers constantly get it wrong. Proveable on all counts.
Wez the Aussie Reply:
March 3rd, 2009 at 1:57 pm
Yep.
March 3rd, 2009 at 12:49 pm
It doesn’t really matter who is in charge over there. They’re all a bunch of freaks.
March 3rd, 2009 at 2:00 pm
The cricketers would have had huge security. The Aussie and Indian teams had turned down the tour due to security fears. For a group of 10 or so men, to cause such carnage, seems to me to be a stand-down of security around the team. Very suspicious.
March 3rd, 2009 at 2:30 pm
I could beleive anything of mossad and the CIA. They have long track records of clandestine activities. If your looking for terrorist this group is a good place to start.
March 3rd, 2009 at 4:06 pm
Shouldn’t no. 3 read MAR 3 2009?!
Very sloppy i have to say – like someone said before me – sober the fuck up!
March 4th, 2009 at 12:58 am
Dear Lord,
Please send a huge, earth-destroying asteroid to end life COMPLETELY on this evil, evil planet. For this, a prayer is devoutly prayed. Thank you.
ljk Reply:
March 4th, 2009 at 1:03 am
Prayer Addendum:
If not a huge, earth-destroying asteroid, then please let the evil-doers taste the Fierce Flames of Hell until they repent completely and forevermore. Thank You.
March 4th, 2009 at 1:30 am
As far as Mostaque Ali’s article is concerned, this guy spills LOTS OF LIES mixed with truths. Obviously, he’s one of the people who just doesn’t like Pakistan, probably being “pro-Bengali”. But in any case, what he says about Jinnah are almost ALL LIES. There is too much to type, but I’ll name a few:
1.) It is true that this guy was studying in Britain, and etc. But being a lawyer DOES NOT make an agent. In fact, he was very much hesitant to first leave his position from Britain during the first few years before 1942. But at the same time, this individual does not mention that there were HINDU FUNDAMENTALISTS who even up to this day are completely intolerant of minorities including Muslims, Christians, and others. There was always a suspicion that riots and civil war may start. THIS WAS THE REASON Jinnah wanted to make Pakistan. But at the same time, it was never his intention that there would be hostilities (unfortunately, what he did not expect eventually is happening today). Otherwise, if it was a ploy to be this, HE WOULD NEVER HAVE MADE EAST PAKISTAN, as to maintain that part of the territory required use of Indian territory and airspace. It may be interesting to know that the very Hindu fundamentalists were responsible for shooting Ghandi.
Also, it was BHUTTO, who WAS A traitor put in by the British (according to his memos and statements of some of his close friends that came forward, including on retired Air force official, this guy hated the country). It is for this reason this guy never accepted the free and democratic election results of East Pakistan where the “East Pakistani” won because he was determined to resolve shortages of all kinds that were being faced because Bhutto was not maintaining it. And eventually people rioted and had enough and voted to have this guy put in. Eventually, Bhutto ILLEGALLY sent in the forces. And I DO NOT DEFEND what they did there either. And I guess since this guy is a Bengladeshi, anti-”Pakistanism” is also leading to distortion of facts, or maybe even REVISIONISM (provided if this is what they teach in Bangladeshi schools).
2.) As far as him being a descendat of Brahman Hindus and Gujarat, Almost 75% of the population of Pakistan and India, Christian, Muslim, or otherwise are DESCENDANTS of these two groups apart from mix of other races including some of European descent, as there were also INTER-MARRIAGES. And the entire region has been conquered by many Empires, including Persians, Greeks, and British. And that goes also for this Bengali Pakistani hater.
3.) The fact that British knew of tuberclerosis. NOT TRUE. The British did everything in their power put down founding of another country. If they knew that it was going to happen, they would have delayed the date so he dies before the partition could be ratified. Only his doctor and him knew of his TB disease.
4.) The British did not leave India because of Jinnah. Who does this guy think he’s kidding. How about putting up the fact that the nation was exhausted fighting the Axis. And also treaties were made during the war with many pro-”seperatist” politicians that if they help them against the Nazis, they will leave. Because of the resistance, and the fact that Britain was completely exhausted, if not bankrupt, fighting the Axis that it could no longer maintain control of the territory. They NEVER wanted to give up India (which included Pakistan and Bangladesh) because it is EXTREMELY rich in resources and coughed out around 60% of commodities for the British Empire.
Even though, Pakistan was made, Jinnah wanted a tension free region. And also Jinnah was a good friend of Gandhi. But eventually, slowly and gradually, mainly through extremism from both Hinduism and Islam, as well as secret ploys by the outside organizations, to use these elements to have region in a state of conflict. I sometime wonder if the Kashmir issue was deliberately done by Mountbatten to use this element for further destabilization of the region, and put them and keep them in dependence of the IMF and World Bank.
From the Bhuttos, to other politicians, eventually corruption became rampant including briberies.
And HAS THIS GUY EVER READ THE ORIGINAL PAKISTANI CONSTITUTION? NOOO… Then he would see that the constitution ENFORCES RIGHTS OF ALL RELIGIONS AND SEXES in Pakistan. There is only one clause though. The official religion was to be “Islam”. Maybe this was done out of fear of Hindu extremism attempting coups, but Islamic extremists later exploited that.
Jinnah did make however, one fatal mistake, as did Ghandi. They put up a Central Banking system that WAS AN EXACT COPY OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND, which was the FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM. OOOOh doesn’t that make GHANDHI A “BANK OF ENGLAND” AGENT? Obviously not… These fellas were both “educated” in Britain and taught that this is the “civilized” way to do banking, instead of a banking system under the Republic of United States banking model which was not backed by gold or any precious metal but SUPPLY AND DEMAND. Had they did that both Pakistan and India would PROBABLY have been economically strong (provided they could foil and withstand conspiracies of the private bankers to destabilize their government as was done in Argentina and Yugoslavia).
March 4th, 2009 at 4:50 am
ISI prints all over it!!
ali Reply:
March 4th, 2009 at 8:12 am
@bushdidit2u911:
the MAIN THING you should look in terror is the MOTIVE. Who would stand to benefit and gain from this. ISI gain nothing out of this. The Taliban, the Indians (particularly the extremist elements there) DO GAIN as it fulfills their objectives of intent of further destabilization.