<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC Article: &#8220;9/11 Third Tower Mystery &#8216;Solved&#8217;&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 21:05:02 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: simon lomax</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-161206</link>
		<dc:creator>simon lomax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-161206</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m not sure i&#039;d rely on the bbc to get the day and date right to be frank. 

&quot;ministry of truth&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m not sure i&#8217;d rely on the bbc to get the day and date right to be frank. </p>
<p>&#8220;ministry of truth&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Fantom</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1730</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Fantom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:50:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1730</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t even have to argue against the BBC&#039;s theory on WTC7 - it&#039;s so ludicrous that all you have to do is to encapsulate it and repeat it ;-)

See the comments #255 and #261 on Mike Rubins blog page at http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/07/controversy_conspiracies_iii.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t even have to argue against the BBC&#8217;s theory on WTC7 &#8211; it&#8217;s so ludicrous that all you have to do is to encapsulate it and repeat it <img src='http://www.prisonplanet.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>See the comments #255 and #261 on Mike Rubins blog page at <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/07/controversy_conspiracies_iii.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/the.....s_iii.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1601</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1601</guid>
		<description>Short article.  This man was Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, NYC Housing Authority and went in the Office of Emergency Management inside WTC building 7.  There is video too but I can&#039;t hear it as I have no speakers:

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/062308_dead_bodies.htm

&#039;&quot;Upon arriving into the OEM EOC, we noticed that everybody was gone,&quot; said Jennings. &quot;I saw coffee that was on the desk, the smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half-eaten sandwiches,&quot; he stated, adding that he and Hess were told to leave the building right away.&#039;

&#039;The firefighters kept saying to Jennings &quot;do not look down&quot; because, according to Jennings, &quot;we were stepping over people and you can tell when you&#039;re stepping over people.&quot;&#039;

&#039;&quot;I&#039;m an old boiler guy, if it was a fuel oil tank it would have been one side of the building,&quot; he stated.&#039;

What he heard were explosions and he got caught in one of them while leaving.
He saw &quot;dead bodies inside the building.&quot;
My guess is that they had to take the building down to cover up whomever they murdered, and maybe they murdered everyone so there would be no witnesses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Short article.  This man was Deputy Director, Emergency Services Department, NYC Housing Authority and went in the Office of Emergency Management inside WTC building 7.  There is video too but I can&#8217;t hear it as I have no speakers:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2008/062308_dead_bodies.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.prisonplanet.com/ar.....bodies.htm</a></p>
<p>&#8216;&#8221;Upon arriving into the OEM EOC, we noticed that everybody was gone,&#8221; said Jennings. &#8220;I saw coffee that was on the desk, the smoke was still coming off the coffee, I saw half-eaten sandwiches,&#8221; he stated, adding that he and Hess were told to leave the building right away.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8216;The firefighters kept saying to Jennings &#8220;do not look down&#8221; because, according to Jennings, &#8220;we were stepping over people and you can tell when you&#8217;re stepping over people.&#8221;&#8216;</p>
<p>&#8216;&#8221;I&#8217;m an old boiler guy, if it was a fuel oil tank it would have been one side of the building,&#8221; he stated.&#8217;</p>
<p>What he heard were explosions and he got caught in one of them while leaving.<br />
He saw &#8220;dead bodies inside the building.&#8221;<br />
My guess is that they had to take the building down to cover up whomever they murdered, and maybe they murdered everyone so there would be no witnesses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1565</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 13:20:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1565</guid>
		<description>They really expect us to believe that every load bearing beam in the entire building failed simultaneously. I&#039;m talking down to the thousandth of a second, to fall symmetrically into its own footprint, at freefall speed. Fires do NOT burn symmetrically. We haven’t ingested THAT much fluoride YET! 911 Truth is Rising! They are getting desperate, we had better look out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They really expect us to believe that every load bearing beam in the entire building failed simultaneously. I&#8217;m talking down to the thousandth of a second, to fall symmetrically into its own footprint, at freefall speed. Fires do NOT burn symmetrically. We haven’t ingested THAT much fluoride YET! 911 Truth is Rising! They are getting desperate, we had better look out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1561</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 12:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1561</guid>
		<description>Does anyone else find it strange this story come out on the aneversary of the London bombings, 7/7/2005? 

Also, why didn&#039;t they fight the fires? There was only 1 fire at that point really! 1 and 2 had come down, 6 was destroyed from falling towers? Why not try and save 7?

The way it falls is just amazing if that is fires, fire in all four corners and collasping at the same time in order to fall directly into it&#039;s footprint! 

All high rise buildings should now see there insurance go through the room as a fire could cause the whole building to collasp! 

Bare in mind that build 7 was built very different to towers 1 and 2.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone else find it strange this story come out on the aneversary of the London bombings, 7/7/2005? </p>
<p>Also, why didn&#8217;t they fight the fires? There was only 1 fire at that point really! 1 and 2 had come down, 6 was destroyed from falling towers? Why not try and save 7?</p>
<p>The way it falls is just amazing if that is fires, fire in all four corners and collasping at the same time in order to fall directly into it&#8217;s footprint! </p>
<p>All high rise buildings should now see there insurance go through the room as a fire could cause the whole building to collasp! </p>
<p>Bare in mind that build 7 was built very different to towers 1 and 2.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Cunnington</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Cunnington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 11:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>Yet another pathetic attempt by the BBC to cover their guilty butts.

Most people have already seen the BBC News 24 coverage (Live at the scene) with a news reporter reporting that WTC7 has collasped 26 minutes before it did. Not only that but the still standing WTC7 building was clearly visible out of the window AS SHE SPOKE!

So somebody got the deception out of sync.

It reminds me of the Jewish joke. &quot;Hey Abe, I heard you had a warehouse fire!&quot;Ssshh! It&#039;s not till next week!&quot;

What I see is probably the biggest act of insurance fraud in History. All of these buildings were sheduled for demolition by 2007 although controlled demolition had been forbidden due to the large amount of aspestos and other toxic materials in these early seventies steel framed buildings.

Because of this the cost of manaul demolition and disposal of toxic materials would be at least a Billion Dollars. The free hold for these buildings was purchased just five weeks before the events for 150 million Dollars and they were then insured specifically against a terorist attack.

The insurance pay out  to the free holder came in at 3.7 billion Dollars. Not a bad return.

The problem the BBC have with WTC7 is their &quot;early reporting&quot; of the WTC7 collaspe. As no steel framed building had ever collasped due to fire, then no one should have expected it to collaspe for this reason.

They were caught out by this as it is now clear that they were orchestrating the news. They have even buried the archive and it&#039;s been pulled several times from youtube and Google for &quot;Unexplained reasons&quot;.

Forget the other towers and the Pentagon. The BBC have literally proved that it was an inside job and that they were involved in covering it up

The reason it&#039;s being denied now is because they are getting increasingly worried about be pulled up for it as the truth movement can no longer be buried by the mainstream media.

Speak to mainstream journos. Newpaper circulation is dropping like a stone. People are clearly not finding anything worth reading there. We are getting to the point where a signiificant percentage of people no longer trust MSM as an impartial and accurate source of information.

The Elephant in the room question for the BBC is, &quot;As you admit that no steel frame building has ever collasped due to fire, how could anyone predict or forsee the collaspe before it happened?&quot;

The anwser is that they couldn&#039;t have done. Unfortunately for the BBC their time-line error was recorded and broadcast live complete with time and date ticker, reporter breaking the news and incredibly, the WTC7 building still standing in the same frame!

The only way anyone could have known it was going to collaspe would be the people responsible for the collaspe and I&#039;m afraid that rules out Osama with his donkey parked outside his cave in Torra borra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet another pathetic attempt by the BBC to cover their guilty butts.</p>
<p>Most people have already seen the BBC News 24 coverage (Live at the scene) with a news reporter reporting that WTC7 has collasped 26 minutes before it did. Not only that but the still standing WTC7 building was clearly visible out of the window AS SHE SPOKE!</p>
<p>So somebody got the deception out of sync.</p>
<p>It reminds me of the Jewish joke. &#8220;Hey Abe, I heard you had a warehouse fire!&#8221;Ssshh! It&#8217;s not till next week!&#8221;</p>
<p>What I see is probably the biggest act of insurance fraud in History. All of these buildings were sheduled for demolition by 2007 although controlled demolition had been forbidden due to the large amount of aspestos and other toxic materials in these early seventies steel framed buildings.</p>
<p>Because of this the cost of manaul demolition and disposal of toxic materials would be at least a Billion Dollars. The free hold for these buildings was purchased just five weeks before the events for 150 million Dollars and they were then insured specifically against a terorist attack.</p>
<p>The insurance pay out  to the free holder came in at 3.7 billion Dollars. Not a bad return.</p>
<p>The problem the BBC have with WTC7 is their &#8220;early reporting&#8221; of the WTC7 collaspe. As no steel framed building had ever collasped due to fire, then no one should have expected it to collaspe for this reason.</p>
<p>They were caught out by this as it is now clear that they were orchestrating the news. They have even buried the archive and it&#8217;s been pulled several times from youtube and Google for &#8220;Unexplained reasons&#8221;.</p>
<p>Forget the other towers and the Pentagon. The BBC have literally proved that it was an inside job and that they were involved in covering it up</p>
<p>The reason it&#8217;s being denied now is because they are getting increasingly worried about be pulled up for it as the truth movement can no longer be buried by the mainstream media.</p>
<p>Speak to mainstream journos. Newpaper circulation is dropping like a stone. People are clearly not finding anything worth reading there. We are getting to the point where a signiificant percentage of people no longer trust MSM as an impartial and accurate source of information.</p>
<p>The Elephant in the room question for the BBC is, &#8220;As you admit that no steel frame building has ever collasped due to fire, how could anyone predict or forsee the collaspe before it happened?&#8221;</p>
<p>The anwser is that they couldn&#8217;t have done. Unfortunately for the BBC their time-line error was recorded and broadcast live complete with time and date ticker, reporter breaking the news and incredibly, the WTC7 building still standing in the same frame!</p>
<p>The only way anyone could have known it was going to collaspe would be the people responsible for the collaspe and I&#8217;m afraid that rules out Osama with his donkey parked outside his cave in Torra borra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1497</link>
		<dc:creator>American Revolutionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:21:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1497</guid>
		<description>Oh...and lets take their quote

&quot;The collapse of the first of the Twin Towers does not seem to have caused any serious damage to Tower Seven, but the second collapse of the 1,368ft (417m) North Tower threw debris at Tower Seven, just 350ft (106m) away.&quot;

AND EXACTLY HOW DID MASSIVE AMOUNT OF DEBRIS ACCELERATE ENOUGH TO MOVE 106 METER!!! Thats almost 25% of the high of the building..come on guys, check your math so it fits the lies...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230;and lets take their quote</p>
<p>&#8220;The collapse of the first of the Twin Towers does not seem to have caused any serious damage to Tower Seven, but the second collapse of the 1,368ft (417m) North Tower threw debris at Tower Seven, just 350ft (106m) away.&#8221;</p>
<p>AND EXACTLY HOW DID MASSIVE AMOUNT OF DEBRIS ACCELERATE ENOUGH TO MOVE 106 METER!!! Thats almost 25% of the high of the building..come on guys, check your math so it fits the lies&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: American Revolutionary</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1496</link>
		<dc:creator>American Revolutionary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:17:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1496</guid>
		<description>Gesh...wow took almost 7 years to fabricate. Imagine if the protests didnt rise...

Come on..I have seen pictures of all sides...EXPLAIN HOW THE PENTHOUSE MOVED DOWNWARD FIRST.. THE CENTER KRIMPS!! There was plenty of water being pumped in.

I encourage all the sheeple buyin this rubbish to do their own research on their own with no one elses opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gesh&#8230;wow took almost 7 years to fabricate. Imagine if the protests didnt rise&#8230;</p>
<p>Come on..I have seen pictures of all sides&#8230;EXPLAIN HOW THE PENTHOUSE MOVED DOWNWARD FIRST.. THE CENTER KRIMPS!! There was plenty of water being pumped in.</p>
<p>I encourage all the sheeple buyin this rubbish to do their own research on their own with no one elses opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1440</link>
		<dc:creator>steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1440</guid>
		<description>I think the BBC did a really good job. I hope now we can put all this rubbish about 911 Conspiracy theories to rest. Lets now  concentrate on the Conspiracy of 911 not the theories, I do think people at the BBC have just done a very good job convincing the UK public that there is something really wrong with what them at the BBC are telling us. In the UK we call this &quot;you&#039;ve just shot your self in the foot MATE!&quot; And this is what they have just done. This program will convince people as much as the chocolate fireguard really does work! I really do think people whom did not believe the Conspiracy &quot;theories&quot; may have reached the turning point that the theories may not actually not be that much of a theory anymore! This program can only serve to be a good thing and the &quot;theory&quot; way out weighs the so called official version of events, and that will get people thinking. People inherently don&#039;t think they just &quot;DO&quot; but being curious is a very strong emotion as long as its looked at within a very short time after that &quot;something&quot; to be looked at. So lets not sit here and slag the BBC off all night (although you can if you want) Because the fact of the matter is that the weight was definitely in our favor!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the BBC did a really good job. I hope now we can put all this rubbish about 911 Conspiracy theories to rest. Lets now  concentrate on the Conspiracy of 911 not the theories, I do think people at the BBC have just done a very good job convincing the UK public that there is something really wrong with what them at the BBC are telling us. In the UK we call this &#8220;you&#8217;ve just shot your self in the foot MATE!&#8221; And this is what they have just done. This program will convince people as much as the chocolate fireguard really does work! I really do think people whom did not believe the Conspiracy &#8220;theories&#8221; may have reached the turning point that the theories may not actually not be that much of a theory anymore! This program can only serve to be a good thing and the &#8220;theory&#8221; way out weighs the so called official version of events, and that will get people thinking. People inherently don&#8217;t think they just &#8220;DO&#8221; but being curious is a very strong emotion as long as its looked at within a very short time after that &#8220;something&#8221; to be looked at. So lets not sit here and slag the BBC off all night (although you can if you want) Because the fact of the matter is that the weight was definitely in our favor!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c.thruyu</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/bbc-article-911-third-tower-mystery-solved.html/comment-page-4#comment-1437</link>
		<dc:creator>c.thruyu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jul 2008 22:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=171#comment-1437</guid>
		<description>1 MILLION iRAQUI DEAD:-
750,000 AFGHANI DEAD:-
SOON ?.....MILLIONS OF iRANI DEAD:-?
THEN THE WIDOWS AND THE MOTHERS WILL WANT REVENGE....Mike Rudin and his BBC chums don’t know how much trouble they are in...A SMALL TRIP TO ANYWHERE AND THEY WILL BE HACKED TO DEATH IN A SUNLIT STREET FOR AIDING AND ABETTING THE BUSH/BLAIR CRIMINALS!
BETTER STAY AT HOME FROM NOW ON MIKE!...KISS THAT TRIP TO MARBELLA GOODBYE YOU SAD AND LONELY LITTLE ARSE-LICKER!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 MILLION iRAQUI DEAD:-<br />
750,000 AFGHANI DEAD:-<br />
SOON ?&#8230;..MILLIONS OF iRANI DEAD:-?<br />
THEN THE WIDOWS AND THE MOTHERS WILL WANT REVENGE&#8230;.Mike Rudin and his BBC chums don’t know how much trouble they are in&#8230;A SMALL TRIP TO ANYWHERE AND THEY WILL BE HACKED TO DEATH IN A SUNLIT STREET FOR AIDING AND ABETTING THE BUSH/BLAIR CRIMINALS!<br />
BETTER STAY AT HOME FROM NOW ON MIKE!&#8230;KISS THAT TRIP TO MARBELLA GOODBYE YOU SAD AND LONELY LITTLE ARSE-LICKER!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
