Mike Adams
NaturalNews
Monday, Jan 12, 2008
The era of pre-birth genetic screening of babies has commenced. Doctors at University College in London have produced what they called the “world’s first breast cancer gene-free baby” by screening a baby for the BRCA1 gene, which they claim causes breast cancer. (http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/78196…)
That announcement is saturated with so many medical myths, it’s difficult to know where to begin. For starters, the idea that the BRCA1 gene causes cancer is pure hogwash. There’s no such thing as a gene that causes cancer by itself. The truth is that environmental factors such as exposure to cancer-causing chemicals in foods, medicines, personal care products, pesticides or other industrial chemicals causes the expression of the cancer gene. Without all that toxic chemical exposure, the gene never gets expressed in the first place.
And it gets even better: You can eat raw broccoli sprouts or other cruciferous vegetables and suppress the BRCA1 gene so that you never grow cancer tumors at all. Thus, the patient has complete control over the expression of their genes based on their diet and environment, and there are literally hundreds of different foods that have an anti-cancer effect: Cruciferous vegetables, onions, garlic, red wine, green tea, raw cacao, omega-3 oils, and of course a whole universe of anti-cancer herbs and superfoods.
This doesn’t even mention the effects of vitamin D and exercise on the BRCA1 gene, both of which also suppress cancer.
But modern medicine — which is largely based on marketing-motivated quackery — wants women to believe they have no control over breast cancer and that it all comes down to your genes, not your choices. That’s the little trap they set for women, stripping them of their power and condemning them to a lifetime of medical “treatment” that just happens to earn outrageous profits for the drug companies.
So now we have a new era being unleashed where babies born with the BRCA1 gene are going to be considered “defective” while babies born without the gene will be considered “superior.”
(Article continues below)
This is leading us into a dangerous new mindset where babies will be condemned as second-class citizens from the moment they’re born simply because they carry a gene that the corrupt medical system mistakenly believes is a causative factor for some disease.
The relevant movie to watch here is GATTACA (http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0119177/), a film that depicts a future society where your genes determine every opportunity you have in life: Your job, you income, your social standing and much more.
GATTACA is a smart movie that sends a highly relevant warning message: If we begin to profile babies for their genes, then we are heading down a slippery slope of defunct medical ethics that could ultimately lead to a new division between the “genetic upper class” and the “genetic lower class.”
The next class war could very well be based on genetics, and parents will fret over the genetic makeup of their children, choosing to abort babies that don’t have the “right” genes, even if those babies are perfectly healthy. And then we’ll have medical companies offering to manipulate the genes of the fertilized egg, promising to give parents a baby with blond hair, or a high IQ, or a thin physique…
It’s just what we need, huh? A whole society of genetically-selected supermodels running around society, thinking they’re superior because they’ve been genetically designed by scientists who think they’re God.
These gene-pushing doctors mistakenly think they can determine the future of a human being by manipulating the genes of the fetus. It’s no surprise, after all: Most conventionally-trained physicians believe in outright determinism, thinking that there is no such thing as a soul, or free will, or a spiritual reality of any kind. You’re born with genes, you “play out” your predetermined fate recorded in those genes, and then you die and that’s the end of everything. It’s a deeply pessimistic, deterministic point of view, and yet it’s the view that’s held by the vast majority of western doctors.
The real truth is that while genes certainly have potential influence over a person’s health, it is the environment (foods, health habits, exercise, exposure to chemicals, etc.) that is the far more important factor in determining what happens to an individual’s health. I can take a room full of a thousand BRCA1 gene carriers and show every one of them how to live a life 100% free of breast cancer through simple, safe and low-cost methods that are available to everyone.
Modern medicine refuses to do that. Because despite all the grand technology, the manipulation of human life and the arrogant playing God that takes place daily in the minds of western doctors, there’s one thing they still haven’t figured out how to do: Tell the truth to a patient about how they can prevent cancer, regardless of their genes.
Modern medicine is a huge technical success and a complete humanistic failure. It offers the most impressive technology in the world and puts it into the hands of the most ethically-deficient professionals who are so pessimistic about the nature of reality that they don’t even believe in the existence of their own souls.
And do you really want scientists who don’t even believe in the existence of the human soul to be playing God with your baby’s genes?
Disturbing.
It should also be noted, by the way, that this whole process of “gene screening babies” involves testing the embryo at the eight-cell stage (when conception has already taken place and the baby is beginning to grow), and then throwing away any embryos that don’t fit the desire genetic profile.
In effect, the gene screening of babies involves the systematic destruction of viable human embryos that could grow into full-fledged babies. This opens up a whole new debate on the issue of abortion, of course, and I’d like to hear your comments on all this. Simply post your thoughts in the comment section below.
The key issues are: At what point is the genetic screening of a baby going too far? Most people might agree, for example, that screening for major birth defects is acceptable, but is it acceptable to screen for things like blue eyes and then toss out the embryos that don’t carry that gene?
What will happen in the future of society if the gene screening of embryos becomes socially acceptable and is embraced by parents?
What are the risks posed by a race of beings that engages in routine genetic selection? (For example, might be lose biodiversity? Might the BRCA1 gene have another positive purpose that doctors haven’t identified yet?)
Should humans be genetically engineered to insert new traits? Larger brains? Stronger muscles? Bigger boobs? (Parents could actually order up a boob job on their daughter before she’s born!)
Think carefully about this one. It’s a hugely complex sociomedicalethical issue.
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | ![]() | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PRISON PLANET.com Copyright © 2002-2009 Alex Jones All rights reserved. Legal Notice
Home » Featured Stories » Breast Cancer Gene-Free Baby Is Dangerous Sign of New Era of Eugenics, Genetic Class Wars




































January 12th, 2009 at 6:43 am
Wow. Imagine what would have happened if Hitler could have used gene selection at his discretion. Manufactring babies…what’s next, assembly lines? I was shocked when Dolly was engineered, but now this… Unbelievable!
January 12th, 2009 at 7:03 am
So should believing in God be a prerequisite for being a doctor? Does the guy who wrote this article know anythign about medicine? Your genes determine what you will be, they aren’t an ‘influence”. If you have genes to be black, you will be black. it won’t “influence” you to be black. And if you have a cancer gene, you have an 86% chance of getting cancer at some point in you life. Cancer isn’t new. it’s been around for thousands of years. And now that we have a way to prevent it, the Spiritual Witch doctors of the world are ringing the alarm! Not everything in the world is controlled by the new World Order, sometimes there are genuine miracles.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:03 am
No one knows the long term effects of this. Animals and people with genetic defects just die slowly — they just drop dead — is this what you want?
Do they really know everything about what this so-called cancer-causing gene does? I really doubt it.
It’s not nice to fool mother nature.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:36 am
Inst that totally unethical? How about getting rid of what causes cancer instead?!
January 12th, 2009 at 7:51 am
If we have learned anything, it’s that every medical action has a negative consepuence. Of course these negative consequences will be covered up and misdiangonosed but that’s just the ongoing history of western medicine. They have all the money to buy the good publicity and sell the myth to the people through the media. The best way to insure that your family is genitically superior is to get back to what has enabled mankind to evolve into the supreme being it is today. Weston Price studied primitive societies that had no contact with the western diet and found that they were physically and mentally superior to the modern socities that had began to eat processed foods. These primitive socities were genetically superior. I urge you to read his book: Nutriton and Physical Degeneration. The human race has evolved for 100’s of thousands of years on Natures code. To believe that man can just come along in the last 100 years and create a seperate evolution is as naive to believing that amn is above God himself.
January 12th, 2009 at 8:07 am
Most ethicists, pastors, rabbis and theologians would agree that when given a choice of saving a mother or saving an unborn child, the choice is the mother.
By focusing their efforts on “selection” rather than on treatment or prevention these doctors are so obviously unethical it boggles the mind.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:15 am
MotherBrain: “Not everything in the world is controlled by the new World Order”
Yeah, youre right, only most things.
But, if there is ANYTHING in the world that is controlled by a “new world order”, it would be the eugenics movement. Read history.
And also, your faith seems to lie in the dictatorial medical establishment, since you speak their language so well in denouncing “alternatives” as “Spiritual Witch doctors”. Classy.
Do you know how this establishment came to be? How it was DESIGNED? Who were the major influences? For starters, there was a man named Rockefeller…..
Again, please learn about the history, and modern day continuation, of EUGENICS.
January 12th, 2009 at 9:40 am
I think any such abomination and/or search on Truth is worth filtering through the only book that has proved true through all tests to date. Of course, this is the Bible. Daniel and Revelations specifically talk about as much, and how easily we are confused and lead as lambs to the slaughter. The tricky part, however, is to see that this state has been since His death. there is no “7 year tribulation” because it has nearly always been. I can only hope we are given the strength to fight both it and our own flesh. “the wicked shall fall by his own wickedness”. and a fool is lead by his folly. If we continue to seek ourselves, we will indeed receive it, and be quite surprised who we truly are. We, as a people, are truly owed nothing.
~John
January 12th, 2009 at 9:53 am
How many of you naysayes out there would consider getting a heart transplant operation to save your life? Or take medicine to regulate your bloodpressure? Why is this any different, if we can splice the gene to correct cancer form occuring in a persons life the why not? You are all the same people that raised hell about test-tube babies for infertile couples. It has bneen proven wonderful for said couples to have children of their own. Not everything is Satan youa re all so closed-minded it boogles my mind, yet you will all run to ER to save yiour own little-minded lives nut that is okay cause your Special Christians well look to Christians and see what they did to the MAyans back in the Sppanish COnquisadors pillage of their community so don;t even talk of God you BAstards.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:12 am
What a load of bollocks. All those already born, sorry. Science has moved ahead, but we must be aware that mainstream medicine took 400 years to accept the natural cure for scurvy, vitamin C. The cancer cure will not be accepted, as it is a trillion dollar `ìndustry`. The author of this work was threatened with imprisonment if she dared publish, (failed) , so she published prvately as no controlled Science or Medical Journal would beallowed to publish this work. They tried to get her testing and electrical devices banned as fraudulent, (failed) and have their paid attack dogs the Quackbusters and the corrupt FDA trying to discredit her work. The Cure and Prevention of All Cancers, 2007, H R Clark, PhD ND gives you 668 pages of simple, easy, and affordable ways to interrupt the identified pathways, and stop the causes. Using resonace comparison and sensitive Geiger counters, (for radioactive polonium etc) the cell biologist gives us the answer in her latest work. Snake oil, false hope and junk science from the oncologists ring hollow after you have read and followed her work. We have to ignore these false hope messages from mainstream medicine, as it is part of their.. be scared, be very scared, misinformation campaign.
January 12th, 2009 at 10:41 am
What’s funny about stuff like this, is it always ends up being MANDATORY for the sheeple. The standards and bars are set as unchallengable, and undisputed. Starts off seemingly innocent enough- like global warming. A few bogus studies, press releases, science journals etc.
Eventually, in the name of the “human rights”, and the “collective good”, tyrannical laws are mandated after these seed concepts are nurtured to fruition.
What’s most important to note about the scam, is the eventual and progressive dissolution of FREEDOM OF CHOICE in regards to the common peoples personal views in respect to these various so called “sciences” or ideas. Notwithstanding the massive influence of the corporate controlled medias in regards to information itself.
Wether it be vaccinations, global warming, food production methods, eugenics, energy sources, survelliance, identification, terrorism, fetal analysis, the rain forests, or a host of other topics- the eventual choice will be to integrate with the New World Order BORG and it’s policies, or be eliminated.
If what i’m saying is unfounded, then why was Michael New discharged from military service for refusing to don the United Nations blue beret? Apparently, there is no “freedom of choice” regarding a soldiers allegiances as well!!!
January 12th, 2009 at 11:48 am
How many lives were destroyed prematurely to prevent the premature death of one child? The people who would do such a thing have something much worse than cancer.
January 12th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
You know this reminds me of Frankenstein.
January 12th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
I am offended by the blatant ignorance of this article. As a studying chemist working on the cancer project I want to offer this one piece of information to readers out there. Scientists are not godless heathens who do not believe in the human soul. These are people who patiently dedicate their lives to the hope, just the HOPE, that their life work may help people in need. While this guy writes sensationalist articles to try to improve newspaper sales, or website hits, there are people who are genuinely concerned for the populace at large and spend their lives trying to help. The CHOICE is yours. If you CHOOSE to utilize this technology out of concern for your child’s welfare, do so, but remember: no one is forcing you.
neon Reply:
January 12th, 2009 at 7:30 pm
‘Scientists are not godless heathens who do not believe in the human soul. These are people who patiently dedicate their lives to the hope, just the HOPE, that their life work may help people in need.’
i guess that’s how the scientists that work in the defense industry feel as well…..
nico Reply:
January 28th, 2009 at 11:14 am
youre wrong about having a CHOICE when its a prerequisite for children to be vaccinated in order to attend school in the united states. J D S are you going to make sure that things remain ethical when all your hopes come true and you find something that you believe to be truly beneficial to humanity? i doubt that it will be your decision how what you discover will be dispensed and distributed.
January 12th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
This soul bullshit, please! Enough! I guess this was written for another outlet, but I see it here from authors and that Alan Watts guy makes me want to take a dump in a nativity scene. And a lot of what is said about eugenics is just reactionary, I don’t doubt things like population control are happening, but I’d never get next to you in a line and say that. Fuck, people like me don’t get in lines, and I think that’s the description of most of us. I can’t take this for-granted-banter, it’s ignorant, demeaning, and I can think for myself asshole.
January 12th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
MARIJUANA IS THE CURE FOR CANCER, IT HAS ALREADY BEEN DONE. LOOK UP RICK SIMPSON, VIDEO: RUN FROM THE CURE. THIS IS NOT BULLSHIT THIS IS REAL.
January 13th, 2009 at 8:04 am
I find this article highly disturbing. This area of human ethics is, at the end of the day, one BIG grey zone. In my opinion it all comes down to WHO will determin WHO, HOW and WHAT this technology is to be used for. How to control it and secure onward future compliance on this policy. The WHO is the major key-word. Unfortunatly there are very big corporate and govermental (POWER) interests attached to this specific subject.
Unfortunatly I do not trust that any true ethical guidelines and policies will preveal… I think this is truly pandoras box and that our race is not yet capable of handling this technology resonably yet! This is a shame. Because I’m sure that with the rigth intentions it could be a marvelous gift to human kind.
Your genes determin who your BODY is NOT who YOU are – remember that! You a infinite spirit.
[Copenhagen, Denmark]