Career Army Officer Sues Cheney, Rumsfeld For 9/11 Complicity

April Gallop files suit for failure to warn people inside Pentagon despite advance knowledge, as well as prior knowledge and complicity in terror attacks

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Thursday, December 18, 2008

A career Army officer who was injured in the attack on the Pentagon on 9/11 is suing Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld for failing to issue a warning that American Airlines Flight 77 was about to hit the building despite receiving knowledge of its approach some 20 minutes in advance.

Retired Army officer April Gallop, a ranking specialist with top secret clearance who began working at the Pentagon in 2000, has also filed suit against US Air Force General Richard Myers, who was acting chairman of the joint chiefs on 9/11.

Gallop was knocked unconscious when the roof collapsed in her office her and her 2-month-old baby sustained a serious brain injury after suffering the consequences of what Gallop describes as “two explosions”. Gallop does not believe that a Boeing 757 struck the building on 9/11. The lawsuit charges that the attack was “engineered by other means, a planted bomb or bombs and/or a missile,” citing the lack of plane debris witnessed after the attack, along with evidence from the “black box” discovered at the scene, which indicated that the plane passed low over the building immediately before the fireball was observed, as well as the complete failure of ground and air defenses which protect the Pentagon.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

The official 9/11 timeline confirms that NORAD and the FAA knew that Flight 77 had been hijacked and was likely headed towards Washington at 9:24 a.m, 19 minutes before the Pentagon was struck. The gap between the second plane hitting the World Trade Center and the incident at the Pentagon was a full 40 minutes.

“The ex-G.I. plaintiff alleges she has been denied government support since then, because she raised ‘painful questions’ about the inexplicable failure of military defenses at the Pentagon that day, and especially the failure of officials to warn and evacuate the occupants of the building when they knew the attack was imminent” said Gallop’s attorney William Veale in a press release.

The suit charges that Cheney, Rumsfeld and Myers conducted a conspiracy to facilitate the attacks and alleges that other unnamed individuals had foreknowledge. The preliminary statement of the lawsuit charges that the attacks were staged so as to “Generate a political atmosphere of acceptance in which the new Administration could enact and implement radical changes in the policy and practice of constitutional government in our country.”

The text of the lawsuit lists a mountain of evidence indicating that top members of the Bush cabinet had a hand in the attacks, focusing not just on the Pentagon, but prior knowledge of the attacks and the inconceivable response to all four hijacked airliners on 9/11.

The suit cites the Project For a New American Century strategy documents as proof that top Neo-Cons were yearning for “a new Pearl Harbor” in order to whip up support for a pre-planned geopolitical agenda.

April Gallop.

“By helping the attack succeed, defendants and their cohorts created a basis for the seizure of extraordinary power, and a pretext for launching the so-called Global War on Terror, in the guise of which they were free to pursue plans for military conquest, “full spectrum dominance” and “American primacy” around the world; as they have done,” reads the lawsuit.

Attorney William Veale says that if the lawsuit gets past a motion to dismiss, it may be the key which will unlock a plethora of disturbing questions about 9/11.

“What they don’t want is for this to go into discovery,” William Veale told Raw Story. “If we can make it past their initial motion to dismiss these claims, and we get the power of subpoena, then we’ve got a real shot at getting to the bottom of this. We’ve got the law on our side.”

The full text of the lawsuit is reprinted below.

—————————————————————————

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ___

APRIL GALLOP, for Herself and as Mother and Next Friend of ELISHA GALLOP, a Minor, No. _____________

Plaintiff, Jury Trial Demanded

vs.

DICK CHENEY, Vice President of the U.S.A., DONALD RUMSFELD, former U.S. Secretary of Defense, General RICHARD MYERS, U.S.A.F. (Ret.), and John Does Nos. 1– X, all in their individual capacities, Defendants.

__________________________________________

COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS, CONSPIRACY, AND OTHER WRONGS

PRELIMINARY STATEMENT

1. This case arises from the infamous Attack on America of Sept 11, 2001, and especially on the Pentagon; and is premised on an allegation of broad complicity in the attack on the part of key U.S. Government officials, beginning with and led from the top by Vice President Dick Cheney, then-Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld, and Richard Myers, then acting Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The plaintiffs allege that these and other government officials, whose identities will be ascertained from their proven or evident relevant roles and activities, and who are named herein as ‘John Doe’ defendants, together with other known and unknown operatives and functionaries, official and otherwise, engaged in an unlawful conspiracy, or a set of related, ongoing conspiracies, in which the concrete objective was to facilitate and enable the hijacking of the airliners, and their use as living bombs to attack buildings containing thousands of innocent victims; and then to cover up the truth about what they had done.

2. The defendants’ purpose in aiding and facilitating the attack, and the overall object of the conspirac(ies), was to bring about an unprecedented, horrifying and frightening catastrophe of terrorism inside the United States, which would give rise to a powerful reaction of fear and anger in the public, and in Washington. This would generate a political atmosphere of acceptance in which the new Administration could enact and implement radical changes in the policy and practice of constitutional government in our country. Much of their intention was spelled out prior to their coming into office, in publications of the so-called Project for the New American Century, of which defendants Cheney and Rumsfeld were major sponsors. There they set forth specific objectives regarding the projection of U.S. military power abroad, particularly in Iraq, the Persian Gulf, and other oil-producing areas. They observed, however, that the American people would not likely support the actions the sponsors believed were necessary, without being shocked into a new outlook by something cataclysmic: “a new Pearl Harbor”. By helping the attack succeed, defendants and their cohorts created a basis for the seizure of extraordinary power, and a pretext for launching the so-called Global War on Terror, in the guise of which they were free to pursue plans for military conquest, “full spectrum dominance” and “American primacy” around the world; as they have done.

3. In pursuit of the goals of the conspiracy, the named and unnamed defendants knowingly and by agreement committed a series of acts and omissions which were aimed at and did generally accomplish the following objectives:

+ To permit the men they later identified as the hijackers and any immediate accomplices to enter and remain in the country, and carry out the activities, movements and communications needed in their preparations for the hijacking, free from interference by police or counter-terrorist authorities; and then allow the groups of these men to book passage, all on the same day, and board the flights;

+ To cause normal operation of the regular off-course airline flight interception practice of the US Air Force, in cooperation with civil flight control authorities, to be altered, suspended or disrupted in such a way as to remove its protections, at least on that day, and thus permit three of the four apparently hijacked planes to reach their targets and crash into them (or appear to do so…);1

+ To cause the normal operation of ground and air defenses which guard the Pentagon from external attack to be altered, suspended or disrupted in such a way as to remove or negate the building’s normal protections, and thus permit an airliner, believed to be hijacked by possible suicide bombers, and following a forbidden, descending flight path, to reach the Pentagon undeterred;

+ To cause and arrange for high explosive charges to be detonated inside the Pentagon, and/or a missile of some sort to be fired at the building, at or about the time the wayward airliner supposedly arrived there, to give the false impression that hijackers had crashed the plane into the building, as had apparently happened in New York;

+ To arrange, thereafter, and fabricate, propound and defend, as part of the conspiracy, an elaborate, highly complex and sophisticated cover-up, centering around the Report of the 9/11 Commission, and continuing to this day. To this end, defendants misappropriated the highest authority of government to block, misdirect and otherwise evade any fair, independent investigation of the evidence, and officially if implausibly explain away the evident wholesale failure of America’s defenses with misinformation, omissions and distortions, withheld and destroyed evidence, and outright lies.

4. In the attack on the Pentagon, in particular, plaintiff avers that the official story, that a hijacked plane crashed into the Pentagon and exploded (causing the plaintiff’s injuries), is false. In fact, the bombing was accomplished another way, so as to limit the damage, protect the defendants, and only make it appear that a plane had been crashed into the building. This claim is supported by data from the plane’s supposed “black box”, released by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which indicate the plane passed over the building at very low altitude, just as an explosion and fireball were engineered by other means, a planted bomb or bombs and/or a missile. This is supported by the lack of any photographic evidence of a wrecked airliner at the Pentagon, compounded by the record of reported refusal by the U.S. Department of Justice to release some 85 video tapes from surveillance cameras in locations at or near the Pentagon, which it has declared exempt from Freedom of Information Act disclosure.

5. Whatever way the bombing of the Pentagon was accomplished, however, and whatever else may or may not have been done by defendants to facilitate the hijackings that day, it is clear the defendant top commanders would have had and did have, at a profound minimum, enough foreknowledge, on that day and in the intelligence information they received beforehand, to have sounded a warning in time for plaintiff and others to evacuate the building, and thereby avoid much if not all the death and injury which occurred. In the end, more than half an hour passed after flight controllers first sounded the alert on Flight 77, while all concerned were fully aware of the suicide crashes in New York; plenty of time for the Pentagon to be evacuated. ‘Top gun’ jet fighter-interceptors under defendants’ command, available with time to spare, were not summoned; and the people in the building, including plaintiff and her infant, were not

warned. This was the result of unlawful conspiracy among these highest-level commanders, and others, who acted knowingly and intentionally to have the Pentagon attacked or to allow it to be attacked, without warning, with deliberate indifference to and in reckless and callous disregard for the fundamental constitutional and human rights of plaintiff and her child, and many other people, dead, injured and bereaved.

6. Plaintiff April Gallop brings this action for herself and as next friend of her son Elisha Gallop now aged 7, who was a two-month-old baby in her arms on that day, her first back from maternity leave. She was a career member of the US Army, a ranking specialist with top secret clearance, who had served six years, two-and-a-half of them in Germany, before being assigned to the Pentagon in 2000. Her desk was roughly 40 feet from the point where the plane allegedly hit the outside wall. As she sat down to work there was an explosion, then another; walls collapsed and the ceiling fell in. Hit in the head, she was able to grab the baby and make her way towards the daylight showing through a blasted opening in the outside wall. There was no airplane wreckage and no burning airplane fuel anywhere; only rubble and dust.

7. Plaintiff and her baby both suffered substantial head and brain injuries, which seriously affect them still today. Plaintiff charges that, because of the conspiracy alleged herein, she and her child and others were injured by acts of terrorism participated in by defendants. Further, as more fully described within at Pars 57-59, she and her child were and subsequently have been denied fundamental rights — including by acts of retaliation against her for raising painful questions about what occurred — as the cover-up continues.

JURISDICTION & VENUE

8. This Court has jurisdiction of this case, as follows:

a. Under the First, Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, as applied to federal officials under the rule of Bivens v Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971); and 28 USC 1331;

b. Under the federal Common Law — given that the most direct occurrences and mechanisms of plaintiffs’ injuries, no doubt including crucial agreements and other communications among various defendants, took place in the Pentagon, a federal enclave — giving plaintiff a right of action in this Court for conspiracy to commit and facilitate actions likely to cause wrongful death, great bodily injury, terror and other loss to plaintiff and others to whom defendants owed a special duty of care; where, instead, defendants acted with reckless and callous disregard for and deliberate indifference to the likelihood of great harm to plaintiff and others, and deprivation of their rights;

c. Under the Terrorism Acts, 18 U.S.Code 2333(a), for acts of terrorism brought about by actions wholly outside the scope of defendants’ duties, in perversion of their authority, and beyond the bounds or color of any law; and therefore not exempt or immune under the provisions of Sec. 2337, the application of which to exonerate these defendants would be unconstitutional.

9. Venue for the case is set by the special provisions of the Air Transportation Safety Act of September, 2001, 49 U.S.C. 40101, Subsection 408(b)(3), bringing all claims arising from events of 9/11 to this honorable Court .

PARTIES

10. Plaintiff APRIL GALLOP is an American citizen, resident of the State of Virginia, a member until this year of the U.S. Army, stationed at the Pentagon on 9/11, claiming for herself and for her minor child, ELISHA GALLOP, who was just two months old on 9/11/01, and was with her when the building was hit. Plaintiff respectfully petitions the Court to appoint her as guardian ad litem for the purposes of this action and related matters.

11. Defendants are DICK CHENEY, the Vice President of the United States; DONALD RUMSFELD, formerly and at relevant times Secretary of Defense of the U.S.; Gen. RICHARD MYERS, then acting chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff; all sued in their individual capacities. Additional named, unknown defendants are other persons who were and are co-actors and co-conspirators in sundry phases of the (terrorist) undertaking complained of herein, whose identities, and some of whose precise places or functions in the plot(s) alleged herein are not yet known or fully known, but who certainly include high-ranking members of the Defense Department, the Military, the C.I.A., the F.B.I. and other agencies. Such persons are named and alleged as co-defendants, designated as John Does Nos.1-X and hereby notified of this action, pro tanto, to be identified for the record and impleaded by plaintiffs as the particulars of both culpable and innocent acts and omissions by everyone involved in these events become known.

12. Existence of a Class. Plaintiff notes that a number of other persons suffered injury and loss in the Pentagon on September 11 as she did, and are similarly situated to her, plainly within the provisions of Rule 23, F.R.Civ P., so that she represents a Class, the members of which evidently are also entitled to recover judgment as sought herein. She does not now assert the Class interest; but, where it appears there could be action by the Court affecting this question, and a class could emerge, she wishes to and does hereby reserve the right, subject to the Court’s approval, to act as lead plaintiff.

13. Limitations. There is no time bar to the claims in this action. The Statute does not run against plaintiff’s child, as a minor, under Virginia law (Va. Code Ann., §8.01-229). As to the plaintiff herself, defendants and their cohorts and agents, by means of elaborate planned and other ad hoc cover stories, public lying, alteration of records, misappropriation of official authority and other nefarious activities, have concealed and continue to conceal, fraudulently, the truth about the attacks and the way they occurred — and their own participation and complicity in the range of acts and omissions needed, in furtherance of conspiracy, to bring them about. Likewise, the original conspiracy to act secretly in furtherance of terrorism, and lie and dissemble afterwards, in order to foment war and vengeance against the supposed perpetrators, has stayed alive and continued to harm the plaintiff, as she will show.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

I. Background: Al Qaeda and the 9/11 Attack

14. As the world knows, four large commercial airliners filled with ordinary passengers were reported hijacked in the northeastern United States the morning of September 11, 2001. Two were evidently crashed into the World Trade Center towers in New York, which later collapsed; a third was said to have hit the Pentagon in Washington DC, and the fourth, supposedly aiming for the White House or the Capitol, was reported crashed in Pennsylvania by its passengers, fighting back against the hijackers.

15. The alleged hijackers were quickly identified by US authorities, supposedly from passenger lists, as 19 men of Middle Eastern descent, fifteen from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one Egyptian and one Lebanese. Their pictures, apparent police mug shots, were shown on TV around the world soon after the attack. It emerged that some if not all of these men were already known to police and intelligence authorities in the US and elsewhere as terrorist suspects. They were said to be associated with Al-Qaeda, a network of radical ‘Islamic’ militants, led by the renegade Saudi aristocrat Osama bin Laden, and pledged to unremitting ‘holy war’ against the United States and its people. Al Qaeda was blamed for several previous terrorist attacks, including suicide attacks in which hundreds died, in the Middle East and Africa, and against a U.S. Navy warship in the Persian Gulf. An earlier, precursor group of ‘Islamist’ terrorists, based in Brooklyn and New Jersey, carried out the first bombing of the World Trade Center, in 1993.

16. At the time the Clinton Administration was succeeded by that of George W. Bush and defendant Dick Cheney, in January, 2001, an extensive, complex U.S. counter-terrorism effort against Al Qaeda was in progress, involving personnel and resources from a number of government agencies, including the FBI, the CIA, the NSA, the U.S. Military, and others, requiring coordination between these agencies at the highest levels. The Chief of Counterterrorism under President Clinton, Richard Clarke, was retained by Bush, but later strongly criticized the Bush Administration for ignoring the Al Qaeda threat, allowing the effort begun under Clinton to lapse, to the point where he felt constrained to apologize to the families of those who died, for the failure he said led directly to the devastation of September 11th. At all events, it is clear from the accounts of Clarke and others that, once Mr. Bush and Defendant Cheney were in office, the effort to combat Al Qaeda was decisively blunted at the top, and at key points down the chain of command.

17. In particular, little or no attention was paid by defendants and others responsible to an increasingly explicit series of warnings, during 2001, that Al Qaeda was hoping and planning to strike inside the US; and that there were concrete plans — which cadres in U.S. agencies were aware of, and were in fact conducting exercises to prepare for, and defeat — which included attempting to crash planes into important buildings. U.S. investigators were well aware that the man they believed was the enemy network’s chief bomb-maker for the 1993 attack on the Trade Center, Ramzi Youssef, had hoped and attempted to bring a tower down in that attack; and that this remained a goal of the group.

18. Responsible intelligence officials were aware that Al Qaeda members were operating inside the U.S., and there were a number of critical investigative leads. Two of the hijackers-to-be lived with an FBI informant in San Diego. The CIA monitored a meeting in Malaysia in 1999, after which two of the participants came to the U.S., where authorities supposedly lost track of them. There were reports from FBI field offices in Arizona and elsewhere that figures on the suspect list were taking or seeking training as pilots — including one who reportedly said he only wanted to learn how to fly an airliner, not how to land or take off — but coordination and follow-up investigation on these and other leads was blocked by John Doe defendant CIA and FBI higher-ups and key players. Notwithstanding such malfeasance, the signs and portents of an imminent attack were very strong in the summer of 2001. As the then CIA chief George Tenet testified, “The system was blinking red.”

19. Despite the flow of ominous information to various sections of the US counterterrorism apparatus, however, and the danger to innocent people — and as a result of conspiracy among defendants Cheney and Rumsfeld, and other members of the Government in various positions — the many warnings of a coming attack by Al Qaeda forces (as many as forty messages in all, according to the Commission Report, from eleven different countries) were studiously ignored.

20. That is, defendants and others in the highest circles of the Government knew more than enough beforehand about the threat and gathering danger of an imminent possible attack by Al Qaeda in the U.S. to understand that they needed to take strong, thoroughgoing measures to increase the country’s protections and alertness. Instead, led by defendants Cheney and Rumsfeld, and because defendants were callously indifferent to the rights and safety of innocents — including their own people in the Pentagon, plaintiff among them — the government did not respond. On information and belief, no special meetings of high officials and agency heads were called, to make sure protections systems were on high alert and functioning properly, and that all needed information was being shared. No special warnings were given to the Federal Aviation Administration, the Immigration Service, the Military and other affected agencies. No consultations were had about possible methods of attack, including specifics about possible hijackings, and the use of planes as missiles to hit buildings, despite operational planning and training which had already occurred at lower echelons. The FBI did not step up surveillance of suspected terrorist individuals or “cells”, or immigration checks, or let such people know they were being watched, in order to impede their activities; and it appears that no coordinated, high-level monitoring and analysis of the threats, and planning for counteraction, ever took place. Instead, the threat was dismissed, and ignored.

21. It should be noted that plaintiff cannot and does not know with certainty the outlines of the plot at its initiation. The attacks may have been conceived of as a false-flag operation from the beginning, with the defendants and their operatives as creators, planners, and executors, with the assistance of others as necessary. Or, defendants may have employed Muslim extremists to carry out suicide attacks; or they may have used Muslim extremists as dupes or patsies. The roles of the supposed “nineteen” could have been to hijack the airliners, or simply, unwittingly, to be on the planes when they were crashed into buildings by remote control. It is also possible that the defendants learned of a plot originated by Muslim extremists, and co-opted or overrode it with their own plan. Whatever lay in the minds of the defendant conspirators at the outset, it is clear that the nineteen men so quickly identified as the hijackers, some if not all of them known terrorist suspects, traveling under their own names, simply walked onto the four planes that morning, with their “box cutters”, without hindrance or incident.

II. Failure of the Air Defense System.

22. Accounts from the FAA and the National Military Command Center vary widely, suffer from internal contradictions, and are in conflict with each other; but credible reports show that FAA flight controllers were aware of a problem with the first plane as early as 8:14 or 8:15 a.m. the morning of September 11th, and evidently called the military for emergency assistance, pursuant to routine, by 8:21 a.m. or thereabouts. They learned the second plane was off course and not responding a short time later. According to reports, United Flight 11 hit the WTC North Tower at 8:46 a.m. and Flight 175 hit the South Tower at 9:03. The Pentagon was hit at or about 9:32 a.m. — although the official version says 9:38 — and the fourth plane crashed in Pennsylvania shortly after 10:00 a.m. High performance jet fighter planes stationed at various bases around the northeastern U.S. — tasked to intercept and deal with unidentified or straying aircraft entering or flying in U.S. airspace under NORAD district command, or otherwise at NORAD’s disposal — were available at a moment’s notice. None were notified, however, or sent to the right place, until it was too late; at least for the first three planes.

23. No interceptor planes came to stop the supposed hijackers — shoot them down if necessary — even though the Air Force has for many years maintained a practice of immediate response in which the fighters have readily been “scrambled” when aircraft are seen to go too far off course, or lose radio contact with flight controllers. The interceptor program has been an elite assignment in the Air Force, even after the Cold War ended, in which pilots fly regularly, and wait in ‘ready rooms’ near the hangars, and planes are kept in top condition, with engines warm and ready for takeoff. The best jets are used, which can reach speeds of 1600-1800 miles per hour, and the personnel are so well trained and practiced that pilots routinely go from hearing the scramble order to 29,000 feet in less than three minutes. The scramble orders are normally made by local NORAD commanders in cooperation with the FAA. Both the FAA and the affected NORAD North East Air Defense Sector (NEADS) military command have radar tracking coverage of the entire airspace, and special telephone hotlines between them and with higher authority. Nor are these forays rare, reportedly occurring once or twice a week at various U.S. locales during the past several years. Published Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) records showed that, between September 1, 2000 and June 1, 2001, interceptor jets took to the air 67 times to check on “in-flight emergencies” involving wayward planes.

24. No interceptors came to defend the Pentagon, in particular, and plaintiff and the other occupants, because of actions and failures to act by defendant Rumsfeld, Defendant General Myers and John Doe others in concert with them, even though more than an hour passed between the time the first warning went out to the Military, at or about 8:21a.m., and the attack on the Pentagon at 9:32; even though the first tower was hit in a suicide crash in New York at least 46 minutes before the Pentagon was hit; and even though ‘combat air patrol’ jets from any of several bases in the region could have reached the Pentagon — or the path of Flight 77 — in a fraction of that time.

25. Having pre-arranged a coordinated failure of the Pentagon defenses, and its warning system, the defendants hid and distracted themselves, and otherwise failed to act, just at the time they were needed to ensure defense of the building; and they have dissembled ever since, as part of the conspiracy, in representing where they were and what they did during that time. As with the planes that hit the towers in New York, the Military and the 9/11 Commission, while failing to cast blame, explained away the failure to launch fighter interceptors at the Pentagon as the result of a failure by flight controllers — which FAA personnel deny — to notify the Air Force of the flight emergencies in a timely way. This was cover-up, in furtherance of the conspiracy.

26. Likewise, by the acts of one or more defendants in furtherance of the conspiracy, no defenses at the Pentagon responded either, no missile or anti-aircraft batteries opening from the ground around the building, or the roof; no sharpshooters deployed with hand-held missiles at stations close by; nothing. And, shockingly, when the towers in New York had already been hit, and Flight 77 (or a substitute, see below) was out of radio contact and headed back towards the capital; and even when the plane approached, and then doubled back and headed toward the building in a long dive, no alarm was sounded.

27. It is evident, particularly with respect to the attack on the Pentagon in which the plaintiff and her baby were injured, that, if the building was hit by a plane that morning, or if, as appears more likely, a plane flew low over the building at the time the bomb(s) went off inside and/or the missile hit, to give the (false) impression of a crash, some form of order or restriction was in force which suspended normal operation of the building’s defenses. In particular, it is indisputable that the expected response of the fighter-interceptors failed completely; and plaintiff avers this resulted from orders or authorization from within the defendant circle of Rumsfeld and Myers and their helpers, restraining normal operation of the protections system and armaments at the Pentagon — including but not limited to jets available at various bases near the capital.

28. Plaintiff alleges further that such “standdown” orders, in whatever manner or form they had been prepared or issued, were maintained and affirmed by defendants up to and through that morning, and that defendant Cheney in particular, operating in the underground command bunker (Presidential Emergency Operations Center, or PEOC) beneath the White House, personally affirmed such an order. His word kept the order in force during the period between 9:20 a.m., when he was observed in the Bunker and the moment the Pentagon was hit.

29. In this connection, plaintiff refers the Court to the testimony of then-U.S. Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta to the 9/11 Commission. Mineta testified that when he arrived at the White House, he was sent to the PEOC, and arrived at around 9:20 a.m., to find Cheney there, and in charge. He said he sat at a table with Cheney for the next period of time, during which a young man came in the room, three times, and informed the Vice President that an “unidentified plane” was approaching Washington, D.C., first at 50, then 30, and then 10 “miles out”; and that, when he reported the distance as 10 miles, the young man asked the vice president, “Do the orders still stand?” Secretary Mineta testified that defendant Cheney responded sharply, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?” Whereupon the young man left the room; and a few minutes later, the hit on the Pentagon was announced. This testimony by the Secretary has never been contested, discredited or explained away by any U.S. official.

30. Plaintiff alleges that the “orders” were orders not to intercept or shoot down the approaching plane. If the orders had been to attack the approaching plane, it would have been shot down before it reached the Pentagon — or at least some attempt to stop it would have been made; and the world would know of it. Based on some two hundred years of American military history, the failure would have led to a Board of Inquiry or other public official investigation, to determine how and why the defense apparatus had failed. Individuals would have been called to account, and disciplinary procedures followed resulting in findings of responsibility and demotions or formal charges against those found to have failed the Country. All of these bureaucratic events would have become part of the official record, and known to the public; none of which has happened. There has been no publicly recorded disciplinary action against any military or civilian officer of the United States government as a result of the attacks of September 11th. Such proceedings would have created a great risk that the truth would be exposed.

31. The public record also shows that no meaningful follow-up questioning of Sec. Mineta occurred before the 9/11 Commission; that defendant Cheney has never testified under oath or been reasonably questioned about these events; and that he has given contradictory accounts, one of which—the account he gave to Tim Russert on “Meet the Press” five days after 9/11— conflicts with The 9/11 Commission Report. The 9/11 Commission Report adopts an unsworn statement by Cheney that he never reached the bunker until about 10:00 a.m.; and contains no reference to Mineta’s testimony, ignoring completely this contradiction between the two high government officials. The Commission also ignores the fact that Richard Clarke’s book “Against All Enemies” supports Mineta’s testimony and hence contradicts the 9/11 Commission’s account.

32. Plaintiff charges that, in point of fact, the “orders” referred to were orders not to shoot the plane down, but to let it proceed, and that such orders were given and/or approved by defendants Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers, pursuant to the root conspiracy alleged herein, and transmitted down a chain of command. The normal expected operation of Pentagon defense that day was thus prevented, allowing the attack to succeed, or to “succeed” in creating a false and deceptive scenario of a plane crash.

III. The Attack on the Pentagon.

33. At the Pentagon, the plaintiff was at her desk, with her baby, in her office on the first floor, when large explosions occurred, walls crumbled and the ceiling fell in. Although her desk is just some forty feet from the supposed impact point, and she went out through the blown-open front of the building afterwards, she never saw any sign that an airliner crashed through. If Flight 77, or a substitute, did swoop low over the building, to create the false impression of a suicide attack, it was then flown away by its pilot, or remote control, and apparently crashed someplace else. At the building, inside or outside of the wall the plane supposedly hit, there was no wreckage, no airplane fragments, no engines, no seats, no luggage, no fuselage sections with rows of windows, and especially, no blazing quantities of burning jet fuel. The interior walls and ceilings and contents in that area were destroyed, but there was no sign of a crashed airplane. A number of those present inside the building and out have attested to this fact in published reports.

34. Instead, just when plaintiff turned on her computer — for an urgent document-clearing job she was directed by her supervisor to rush and begin, as soon as she arrived at work, without dropping her baby off at child care until she was finished — a huge explosion occurred, and at least one more that she heard and felt, and flames shot out of the computer. Walls crumbled, the ceiling fell in, and she was knocked unconscious. When she came to, terrified and in pain, she found the baby close by, picked him up, and, with other survivors caught in the area, made her way through rubble, smoke and dust towards daylight, which was showing through an open space that now gaped in the outside wall. When she reached the outside she collapsed on the grass; only to wake up in a hospital some time later.

35. Plaintiff’s injuries could have been avoided, had an alarm been sounded. However, despite the undoubted knowledge of the defendant commanders and operators in the system that an unknown aircraft was headed towards Washington, possibly as part of the apparent terrorist suicide attack begun earlier in New York — and in spite of well-established Pentagon emergency evacuation procedures and training — there was no alarm. On the contrary, plaintiff was directed to go straight to her desk when she arrived at work, and when she got there, and turned her computer on, the place blew up. If an unauthorized non-military plane was headed towards the building, on a day when two apparently hijacked planes had hit the Twin Towers, why wasn’t she evacuated, with her baby, instead of hurried inside? Why weren’t alarms going off, and all the people in the building rushing to safety? Due to the conspiracy, and defendants’ actions and flagrant failures to act, in furtherance of it, one hundred and twenty-five people, members of the Military and civilian employees, died in the bombing; and many more including plaintiff and her child were seriously hurt.

36. Plaintiff alleges further that, pursuant to the conspiracy, the attack on the Pentagon was contrived to “succeed” in only a very limited way. Destruction, death and injuries, in comparison to what would have occurred if the building had been attacked straight on with a large plane, by enemies bent on causing the greatest possible devastation and loss of life, were kept to a minimum; and the conspirators themselves not put at risk. Certainly the official account of what occurred is full of gross anomalies,

which contradict the physical evidence, the scientific and aeronautical evidence, and the laws of physics and aerodynamics. The 9/11 Commission Report is exposed as an artifact of the conspiracy, aimed at covering up the fact that no airliner crashed into the Pentagon, and that it was bombed a different way.

37. The official account established in the 9/11 Commission hearings is that American Airlines Flight 77, a Boeing 757-200 jetliner, took off from Dulles International Airport at or about 8:20 a.m., and apparently was hijacked at about 8:55 a.m. some two or three hundred miles west of Washington. Radio contact was lost and the plane’s “transponder” was turned off. At that point, Flight 77 was traversing an apparent radar “dead zone”, located over the southeast Ohio-West Virginia borderland, where another similar plane, fitted with radio control reception equipment, may have been substituted, so as to ensure that the precise maneuvers required by the conspirators’ plan could be carried out. Whichever plane it was soon established a flight path leading back towards Washington at high speed, on a downward trajectory, until it was close to the Pentagon. There it began a two-and-a-half-to-three-minute spiral dive, from an altitude of about 8000 feet and in a 330-degree loop, which supposedly carried it into the northwest wall of the building. Experts agree this dive was an aeronautically fantastic maneuver, nearly impossible for a plane of that size, which would require the most skillful and experienced pilot — or remote control.

38. The returning plane, according to the official version, struck the Pentagon just above ground level. There it disintegrated — even maybe vaporized, according to some accounts, at least in part — but, paradoxically, also plowed inside. Had it simply flown straight into the top of the building rather than making its improbable spiral dive, there would have been far greater damage and loss of life. Had it turned only 150-180 degrees, it could have smashed into the East side of the building, where the office of defendant Rumsfeld was publicly known to be located on the third floor, looking out at the river, with the Joint Chiefs and other high officials all nearby. In contrast, the ground floor area that was blown up held offices like the one plaintiff worked in, many of them empty for a remodeling project, which was said to have included reinforcement to protect against attack. Another part of the destroyed space held financial records.

39. Also in the official version, the nose of the plane supposedly penetrated the distance of the three outer “rings” of the building, leaving a large, nine- or ten-foot-high round hole — shown in official photographs, without any sign of a plane — in the inner wall of the third (“C”) ring. The hole was located some 300 feet from the alleged impact point, through a maze of structural pillars and interior walls. It was also said that the wings of the plane knocked over five lampposts along a nearby road, as it approached the building, which meant the wings were a maximum of 50 feet off the ground as the plane flew past, roughly 300-350 yards away from the near face of the building.

40. This account is at odds with known evidence, and raises substantial questions about the absence of evidence — and official withholding of evidence — including the following:

a. There are no photos of a wrecked airplane at the place where the building was hit and set on fire; or of airplane wreckage at the hole in the inner ring where the nose of the plane was originally said by Rumsfeld to have come to rest, or elsewhere inside the building. Moreover, the nose of such a plane contains radar equipment, and the outer shell is made of a porous, composite material that allows the radar to function. Therefore, the nose was not capable of surviving an impact with the outer wall without being crushed, let alone penetrating all the way inside to the C-Ring wall, 300 feet away.

Although this story was later dropped, defendant Rumsfeld has never been publicly questioned about his statement that this is what occurred.

b. As noted, there is no footage from numerous video surveillance cameras — reportedly 85 different tapes are being withheld by the U.S. Justice Department — which are known or reliably assumed to have been operating at various nearby locations where some or all of the plane and the crash could be expected to have been caught on tape.

c. The official account says the plane knocked over several lampposts with its wings — two on one side of a nearby road, three on the other — which meant the wings were less than fifty feet off the ground as the plane approached, over uneven terrain, and the undercarriage even closer. The earliest photographs, taken before the upper floors fell in, about 30 minutes after the explosion(s), show the front blown off an expanse of the ground floor, no marks on the lawn in front of the impact zone; and several large cable reels standing in front of the building, unscathed.

d. The “black box” flight data recorder identified by the Government as coming from Flight 77, and reportedly recovered from the wreckage at the scene, bears data, according to pilots who have examined printouts provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), which contradict various aspects of the official account, — and indeed the very notion that a plane struck the Pentagon — in crucial ways, viz:

1. It is a fundamental premise of airliner manufacture and operation that the black box only stops recording data when a flight is terminated — by the pilot turning off the engines at the gate, or by a crash. According to the pilots who studied the printouts, however, the record showing the path of Flight 77, etched with codes which connect it to that plane that day, cuts off, unaccountably, some 4-500 yards short of the building — a point reached after the pitched, diving loop described above — at an altitude of 273 feet. The Pentagon is roughly 75 feet high. Just as they will confirm the improbability of that dive, expert pilots will attest that for a plane that size to descend from 273 feet, going approximately 500 miles an hour, and then level off inside of a quarter mile without hitting the ground — let alone get down to 50 feet in time to catch the lampposts, 300 yards closer — is an aerodynamic and gravitational impossibility.

2. The Safety Board has released a computer simulation of the flight path of Flight 77, allegedly based on the data from the flight recorder, which contradicts a simulation adopted by the 9/11 Commission. The Commission simulation shows the flight path of the official story, at an angle reflected by the damage inside the building, consistent with the downed light poles, and to the south of two nearby buildings housing the Navy Annex and a Citgo gas station. The NTSB simulation shows the plane headed towards the building on a path north of the two buildings and the line of lampposts.

3. Similarly, in the one fragment of a surveillance tape the Pentagon has released, two of the five frames disclosed appear to show an object, not recognizable as an airliner and apparently trailing a plume of white smoke, moving parallel to and just above the ground towards the Pentagon wall, followed by a bright explosion and a fireball mounting from the front of the building. The NTSB’s black box data shows Flight 77 was roughly 200 feet above the top of the Pentagon as it reached its last known position some 400 to 500 yards (2-3 seconds) away. Thus, it could not have hit the building except by diving into it, and so could not have flown parallel to the ground between there and the point of impact. So it appears that, contrary to the defendants’ false cover story of an airliner suicide crash, there was a different, additional, flying object, which hit the Pentagon, and was part of the terrorist bombing that caused the plaintiffs’ injuries.

e. Additionally, the FBI identified the hijacker pilot of Flight 77 as “Hani Hanjour”, supposedly a known terrorist suspect, who was reported to have received flight training in various places in the months before the attack. His flight instructors, however, reported that Hanjour was such a poor flight student that he was barely able to fly a small Cessna; and then he was so erratic that instructors refused to go up with him, and, just a few months before 9/11, recommended he be washed out and his license taken away. Thus it seems quite impossible that he could have flown the 757 really at all, let alone in its great uncanny dive. There have also been repeated reports since 9/11 that several of the other men named and pictured by the FBI as the hijackers were still alive after 9/11, and living in various locations in the world — including one, Waleed Al-Shehri, who was said to be a working pilot for Moroccan Air Lines, correctly shown in the FBI photo, whose identity and location have been verified by at least one major press outlet, the BBC. This information has not been pursued by U.S. investigators, or media.

f. Several trained and experienced military personnel at the scene noted the distinctive odor of cordite, a high explosive used in gunpowder, in the aftermath of the attack at the Pentagon. This suggests explosives as the cause for the destruction rather than the impact and fire resulting from burning jet fuel.

g. One investigator has documented the fact that numerous clocks in the damaged area of the building stopped at 9:32 a.m., as the plaintiff’s watch did also, supporting the idea that electrically timed or detonated explosives were used to bring about the intended damage to the building — and that the attack occurred at 9:32, not 9:38.

41. All the matters alleged in paragraph #40 are known and demonstrable, and most would have been immediately evident to the defendants at the time. As Secretary of Defense, defendant Rumsfeld in particular was in a unique position to determine the truth and fix responsibility. He did neither. That he did not is confirmation of his complicity in the attack–and his indifference to and callous disregard for the injuries and loss of rights suffered by plaintiff and others.

42. Further, it should be noted that on September 10, 2001, the day before the attack, Defendant Rumsfeld conducted a press conference at the Pentagon in which he publicly announced that auditors had determined that some 2.3 trillion dollars in Defense Department funds —$2.300,000,000,000 — could not be accounted for. To plaintiff’s knowledge and belief, part of the area of the ground floor of the Pentagon that was destroyed in the bombing is a location where records were kept that would be used to trace those funds, and where people worked who knew about them. On information and belief, there has been to this day no public report concerning the fate of those records, or that money.

43. In any event, the plainly visible pattern of damage on the outside and in other photographic views makes it clear the building was not hit by a plane. There may have been a missile strike, perhaps penetrating through to the back wall, which helped collapse the section that fell in, possibly augmented by explosives placed inside. Photos taken before the collapse suggest this, showing a single blown-out window section, above the ground floor; and witnesses have reported seeing a helicopter above the building, and disappearing behind it, followed by a big explosion and bright fireball. As noted, a large roundish hole was found in the C-ring wall, some 300 feet inside the building; and there were credible accounts, ignored in the Commission Report, of serious bomb damage in the B-ring, second from the center, and even some reports of dead bodies in the central A-ring, also ignored. As shown on CNN television, a large military aircraft, identified as an E-4B — the so-called “Doomsday Plane”, which carries the most complete and sophisticated military command and control apparatus — was circling above Washington at the time the Pentagon was hit. It was in perfect position to coordinate the detonation and/or missile shot with a fly-over; and guide the airliner in its dive by remote control. It was also in perfect position to spot the oncoming plane on its radar and sound an alarm. Significantly, the Department of Defense has denied any knowledge of this airplane flying in that area on that day.

44. Whatever the cause of the bombing, and the traumatic injuries to plaintiff and others which resulted, the Government, of which the two main defendants were and have been the highest, most powerful officers, pursuant to the conspiracy they led and still lead as alleged herein, has been altogether deceptive in investigating, reporting and explaining the attack and its cause; and defendants, rather than righteously investigate and determine the derelictions which occurred, have done nothing but lie and cover up.

45. Defendant Rumsfeld in particular has been deceptive from the start, as where, on September 13, he reported on Good Morning, America that the plane “…went in through three rings (of the Pentagon). I’m told the nose is — is still in there, very close to the inner courtyard, about one ring away”; a palpably false statement, contradicted by numerous witnesses, a total lack of photographic evidence, and evident impossibility. Rumsfeld has also contradicted himself several times in describing his whereabouts and movements during the first hour or more of the attack. He does not acknowledge his presence in a teleconference which Richard Clarke said he, Rumsfeld, and others were part of, beginning shortly after 9:00 a.m. — after the Flight 77 emergency was reported, at or about the time the second tower was hit in New York, and more than half an hour before the Pentagon was hit — and he contradicts himself about whether and when he went to the Executive Support Center and/or the National Military Command Center, both within the Pentagon, as events transpired that morning. General Myers also (falsely) denied he was at the Pentagon in the early stages of the teleconference, as reported by Clarke. Tellingly, the tape of the videoconference, which obviously would have been part of any good faith investigation, has been kept secret.

46. Defendant Rumsfeld also made a striking prediction of the attack, as if speaking compulsively about his secret knowledge, that very morning, and several days later, he publicly referred to the “missile” that hit the Pentagon. In testifying before the 9/11 Commission, the defendant stonewalled and double-talked egregiously, responding to direct questions (some of them personally submitted by plaintiff herself during a hearing open only to survivors), especially about the Air Force fighter-interceptors not showing up, with irrelevant and sometimes incomprehensible ramblings. Consistent with their part in the cover-up, Commissioners failed to question him closely or confront his non-responsiveness.

IV. The Other Planes.

47. In spite of what the record shows was a regular, timely alert and request to NEADS commanders by FAA flight controllers at Boston for in-flight emergency response regarding United Airlines Flights 11 and 175 out of Boston, as described above in Pars. 22-24, the jets were not scrambled, or properly “vectored”, in time to intercept the planes that hit the Towers in New York — even though there was plenty of time for the interception.

48. With respect to Flight 93, which was thought to be intended for an attack on the White House or the Capitol, but crashed in Pennsylvania, there remains a great deal of mystery. Much of what supposedly happened was a made-in-Hollywood saga, where the passengers, learning of the earlier suicide crashes, gathered themselves and counter-attacked the hijackers, succeeding in heroic, self-sacrificing measure by crashing the plane (or causing the hijacker pilot to crash it) in a remote field, before it could approach its target. This story was supposedly recounted to persons on the ground by passengers with cell phones; but the science is clear that, at least in 2001, cell phones couldn’t operate at the high altitude where the struggle supposedly took place. Also, the FBI, in presenting evidence at the Moussaoui trial in 2006, denied that any of the high-altitude calls that had been reported actually took place. The only cell phone calls confirmed by the FBI were two that reportedly occurred when the plane had descended to 5,000 feet. Thus, the mythic account is suspicious, to say the least.

49. Moreover, it appears fairly well established that one or more fighters ultimately did go aloft, and reached Flight 93, although this was also comprehensively denied in the Commission Report. There is also good evidence that supposed presidential authority to “engage”, meaning shoot down the plane, was given by defendant Cheney at or about 9:50 a.m. that morning, wherewith Flight 93 was indeed shot down with an air-to-air missile from a U.S.A.F. fighter jet.

50. Finally, there are multiple reports that debris from the plane was found a mile or more from the crash site, an obvious impossibility if the plane simply fell or dove into the ground. Likewise, there is no debris visible in photographs of the crash site, despite a long photographic history of airliner crashes showing plane parts and debris spread around the point of impact. Instead there was a crater, and no sign of the plane. Implausibly, however, the official report said that a visa, in the name of the alleged hijacker identified as the pilot, was recovered near the crater, along with a red headband of the type the hijackers supposedly wore. Again, available evidence shows the official account promulgated under the defendants’ illicit influence is, and plaintiffs allege that it is, false and fraudulent, in furtherance of the conspirac(ies) alleged herein.

V. The Cover-up.

51. As with the other branches or phases of the conspiracy, wherein a number of John Doe defendants working on different aspects of the organized enablement of the hijacking led by defendants Cheney and Rumsfeld may not have been aware or fully aware of each other’s involvement; so too with the cover-up, a complicated operation which those involved have maintained for these seven years, and must continue to see to, indefinitely, on any number of fronts. That is, the skein of misrepresentations, distortions, omissions, contradictions, withheld evidence and outright lies which comprise the fraudulent “official” version, must be and plaintiffs allege that it has been and is assiduously, and fraudulently, maintained by the original perpetrators and various cohorts, who have kept the original conspiracy alive to this day.

52. In particular, the cover-up — beyond the fact that the simulated plane crash at the Pentagon was itself a cover-up — has been concentrated around the purported investigation and analysis of the attack and its supposed background by the 9/11 Commission, formally known as The National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon The United States, and the Report it issued in 2004. There, as extensively shown by a number of critics and commentators, this official organ put forth a supposedly comprehensive account of the attacks, the alleged attackers and their history, and various surrounding events and circumstances, in a version so full of omissions, distortions and outright falsehoods, as to clinch its purpose as a mainstay of the cover-up, in furtherance of the underlying conspiracy alleged herein, and its ongoing success.

53. Thus the Report gives a careful account and description of some of the many warnings the Government received during 2001 about Al Qaeda’s intention to attack — in the United States, possibly with hijacked planes. The Report goes on to describe an interview with President Bush, which occurred only after intense negotiations in which the Commissioners acquiesced to White House conditions requiring that defendant Cheney be permitted to accompany the President, and that no record would be kept and no notes taken. There the President earnestly insisted to his Commission interlocutors that no warning of the attack had come. All contradictions were left unexplored, and ignored in the Report.

54. Similarly, defendant Rumsfeld — like the President himself, then-National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, Defendant Gen. Richard Myers and others — testified and said in public, repeatedly, that no one in the Government security apparatus ever imagined terrorists suicidally crashing planes into buildings. This claim was also absolutely false. In point of fact, the CIA, the NSA, the FAA and NORAD had planned and trained for just such a possibility. Indeed, the record shows training exercises involving such a potential attack had in fact been carried on at the Pentagon in October, 2000 and May, 2001, and that NORAD had begun planning in July, 2001, for a training exercise in which the premise would be that a hijacked airliner was crashed into the World Trade Center. The 9/11 Commission, however — with the same studied indifference it showed towards the Mineta testimony — failed even to mention these contradictions in its Report, let alone explain them away.

55. In any event, it is in the nature of the acts alleged that the participants would endeavor from the outset to keep their actions — and the meeting of the minds that unleashed them — the deepest and darkest of secrets, forever. Thus the cover-up, even as it continues today, and will be manifest in the litigation of this complaint, was inherently part of the original unlawful agreement, and thereby part of the cause of the injuries and deprivations plaintiffs suffered on 9/11, and continuing injury since that time.

56. As to the overall plot, with its roots in the command positions and unhinged political fantasies and intentions of the two main defendants, Cheney and Rumsfeld, plaintiff alleges that, necessarily, there were multiple meetings of the minds among the various necessary parties in various implicated locations, positions and phases of the action. Indeed, the narrative reflects an evident form of rolling conspiracy, or multiple successive, interlocking, sub-conspiracies, by which defendants and their cohorts maintain and have maintained the original agreement to cover up the original crime(s) of terrorism, and their part in it, to this day.

VII. Plaintiffs’ Injuries.

57. The injuries, loss and deprivation of rights suffered by Plaintiff April Gallop, her child and others in the bombing of the Pentagon, however it was accomplished, were the result of terrorism, and terrorist acts, and conspiracy to commit terrorism, and to violate constitutional rights, and they include serious head and brain injuries she and her child both sustained when the ceiling caved in on them, as well as the loss and deliberate denial of their rights involved in their being made innocent victims of the attack. Plaintiff’s son, Elisha, has had ongoing problems as he has grown older, associated with injury to his brain, and has required continuing medical care and other special help. Both mother and child have had continuing difficulty, pain and suffering as a result, and sustained need for medical care, and financial and other loss; and they evidently will continue to suffer and to need medical and other assistance for the future.

58. Further, clearly as a result of and in retaliation for her public statement that no airplane wreckage was present in the building after the explosion(s), and for raising other questions, John Doe Department of Defense (DOD) defendants, pursuant to the conspiracy, have wrongfully caused plaintiff to be denied medical care and other benefits she should have received since the attack, and have acted to discourage others from helping her, all to her consequent, actionable loss. Most recently, on being discharged from the Army earlier this year, plaintiff’s financial account was closed out with a zero balance. A short time later, however, she was refused service at the VA medical center, on grounds that she supposedly owed the Defense Department more than $14,000; for which no documentation has been provided.

59. The plaintiff and her child also will experience more general loss, pain and suffering, forever, from what was done to them by high officials of their own government, who, attacking the Country and the Constitution, were willing to see her killed, and did see many others, thousands, killed, simply to further crass political designs. They were and are themselves terrorists, in truth, without whose crucial complicity the Al Qaeda attacks would never have occurred.

PLAINTIFFS’ CAUSES OF ACTION

One. Violation of Constitutional Rights – Bivens.

a. Conspiracy. The defendants engaged in an unlawful conspiracy or series of interlocking conspiracies whereby they and various co-conspirators and others took various concrete steps, pursuant to a meeting of the minds around the objective of facilitating and enabling the terrorist attacks, specifically by de-activating and defaulting various normal defense systems and measures, as described and to be shown, so that the Al Qaeda hijackings and bombings of September 11 could succeed. They thereby helped cause the attacks and the resulting injuries to plaintiff, denial of her fundamental rights under the Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, and death and injury loss to so many others; entitling plaintiff to judgment against the defendants under the rule of the Bivens case, for compensatory damages in such amount as the Jury may determine; and Punitive Damages.

b. Deliberate Indifference. The concerted actions of defendants in their efforts to facilitate and enable the terrorist attacks of September 11 in various ways as described hereinabove and to be shown, and the defendants’ deliberate indifference to the likelihood of serious injury and deprivation of rights arising therefrom, resulted in plaintiff and her child being made unknowing, defenseless victims of the attack, and thereby seriously injured and denied fundamental rights under the Fourth, Fifth and Ninth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, entitling her to judgment against the defendants, under the rule of the Bivens case, for compensatory damages in such amount as the Jury may determine; and Punitive Damages.

c. Retaliation. The actions taken against plaintiff in retaliation for her speaking out with questions about the official explanations of what happened violated her rights under the First Amendment, entitling her to a further judgment against those responsible for compensatory damages in such amount as the Jury may determine; and Punitive Damages.

Two. Common Law Conspiracy to Cause Death and Great Bodily Harm. The plaintiff is further entitled to judgment against the defendants, jointly and severally, for the injuries she and her child received which were caused by the acts and omissions of defendants and others pursuant to the conspiracy(ies) alleged herein, and by breach of defendants’ duty of care towards the plaintiff, for compensatory and punitive damages in such amounts as the Jury may determine, and costs and attorneys fees.

Three. Acts of Terrorism Causing Injury – 18 U.S.Code 2333(a). The aforesaid acts and omissions of and by defendants were part and parcel of a terrorist attack on the United States, and the Pentagon in particular, resulting from a conspiracy or conspiracies to cause and help cause, facilitate and enable the hijacking and crashing of the planes and other elements of the attack; and these acts resulted in serious injuries to plaintiff and her child, entitling her to judgment against the defendants for compensatory damages as determined by the Jury, treble damages, and Attorneys Fees, under the Terrorism Acts — notwithstanding the provision of Sec.2337, purporting to exempt or immunize U.S. officers and employees acting “within… official capacity or under color of legal authority”; in that the agreements, acts and omissions alleged herein are outside and beyond the reach and compass of any conceivable official capacity or legal authority, actual or colorable, and therefore unconstitutional as applied in this case, as a deprivation of Due Process of Law, and of her right under the Seventh Amendment to have her claim tried by a Jury according to Law.

///

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, the plaintiff demands Trial By Jury, and Judgment against all defendants, jointly and severally, for compensatory and punitive damages in such amounts as the Jury may see fit to award; treble damages under 18 U.S.C. 2333(a), and costs of suit, expenses and attorneys fees…

Yours, etc.,

DATED: December 15, 2008.

• 
• Social bookmarks
• 
• Email this article
• 
• Print this page

Comment Terms Of Use

90 Responses to “Career Army Officer Sues Cheney, Rumsfeld For 9/11 Complicity”

1. Alex (not Jones) Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 6:03 am

   The great thing about a lawsuit is it allows discovery. NO telling what could be found during an agressive discovery phase.
   I just hope Ms Gallop isn’t feeling depressed and dejected enough to commit suicide by shooting herself in the back of the head 3 times.

2. mythicshadow Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 6:12 am

   A Xmas card for all the conspiracy guys….

   http://ca.youtube.com/watch?v=SPTRtbLi_yc

3. Hologram5 Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 6:25 am

   This is awesome, you go girl!! Get them where it hurts… Bring the TRUTH to light.

4. rich Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 6:30 am

   this is a keeper, good post ! she must have listened to alex or another alternative news broadcast for PENAC info and everything else. this is going to be interesting.

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....annel_page

   goldieshouse.piczo.com

5. blindboy Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 6:34 am

   @#1: With two different caliber handguns…………

6. BeTrueSeekTruth Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 7:12 am

   Great courage. All the paid disinfo clones out there should look at this woman. This is what you should be doing if you loved humanity and truly wanted a better world. As it is your sitting in your cheesy desk chair tapping lies out like a sullen grade school brat. Trouble is you shot right from video games to military brainwashing. You lack the courage to think for yourself and pursue goodness. You’re too afraid of being ostracized by your high and tight fraternity of automatons.

7. MikeyGonebad Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 7:12 am

   Here is a better link to the pics:
   http://www.flickr.com/photos/11119173@N02/?saved=1

8. mark Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 7:19 am

   This is what more victims need to do! We have to get these bastards and bring them to justice!

9. the clueless blonde Says:
   December 18th, 2008 at 7:24 am

   Oh my, truth and hope sure do float and surface eventually do they not? till the day elite pals.tcb and hugs to all others.

10. the clueless blonde Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:26 am

    Oh my, truth and hope sure do float and surface eventually do they not? till the day elite pals. tcb and hugs to all others.

11. Gauran Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:35 am

    I wish her every success, it is my hope that her lawsuit will be able to expose the criminals who were behind this evil deed.

12. jurikurri Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:35 am

    I hope for the best, but judges, lawyers, politicians are all scared of these guys..I doubt it will go anywhere..just like the bush impeachment.

13. caleb Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:42 am

    im currently doing some research on american corparate media, could any americans

    posting on this site please tell me if this story has had any telivision media coverage? apart

    from alex jones of course, , any comments would be appreciated.

14. shadoobie Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:46 am

    Great strategy for an “end run” around the “new” 9/11 independent commission which will NEVER happen. Come Jan 20, none of these treasonous murderers will remain “above the law.” The big question: In light of this incredibly well written complaint, will the Federal Judge assigned will proceed with hearing the case. If not, it becomes painfully obvious (like its not already!) that 9/11 was a complete inside job. We can only pray, spread the word, get people to realize that it is RIGHT to want the TRUTH, and support Ms. Gallop anyway we can. Strength in numbers. We need our country back. The punch drunk, goofy bastards that got away with this must hang at the city gates. Hopefully, the law is still on our side(?)
    Cries for justice. Dissent gave birth to this Nation. S

15. LiveFreeOrDieFighting Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 7:47 am

    Right number 13

    I hope for the best, but judges, lawyers, politicians are all scared of these guys..I doubt it will go anywhere..just like the bush impeachment.

    But ya gotta try, the 2nd amendment is not there to protect hunters.

16. TRUTHPLZ Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:21 am

    I highly doubt this story makes it into the MSM, and if it does it will likely only be a blip and then dissappear. But this AWESOME that this case is beginning. This whole operation was so obviously an inside job that the truth WILL come out if people want to have the will to get at the truth. And to appeal to people’s self-interest for a moment – do you think we the people would all be better or worse off if these criminals were caught? You think mabye we’d be keeping a lot more of our money in our pockets rather than dumping it in Iraq and Afghanistan and Homeland Security? Or in Canada, airport security? You think the world might generally be a hell of a lot better place without these guys inciting hatred around the globe so they can profit?? People gotta wake up soon and help themselves cuz they really do have a direct interest in this. 9/11 has effected everyone….

17. Jim Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:33 am

    Unfortunately, I agree that this won’t go anywhere.
    She’s brave, but she should just try to get the door open, not push the whole giant elephant through at once.
    While I believe most allegations in the pleading, I don’t WANT to believe them.
    The truth is so outrageous, that no one else wants to believe it either.
    She should have just made one or two claims, to get a hearing , then added others to the class with more claims, at a later date.

    I fear this will end up in the bin.

18. TruthSeeker Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:45 am

    -We must all PRAY in concerted consciousness that the NWO-zionist controlled usJudicial-system will somehow prevail through brave action by magistrates which must thoughtfully understand this issue is not just about the Plaintiff, –it is about the very survival of our long manipulated nation of for the most part decent conscious-driven ’sheeple’ lead to believe that our Judicial-system ultimately also has a duty to preserve our precious usConstitution & BoR…

19. Dan Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:46 am

    As much as it pains me to say this, the law is not on our side. It hasn’t been for a long time. Government officials, special interests, and the legalized cons of the IRS have manipulated our laws to serve their purposes. I would love to see a thousand more lawsuits like this but could we expect to see any coverage in the main-stream media? It is doubtful at best. I believe that it is too late to bring about any real change through litigation or legislation at this point. As a whole, OUR country was too complient in gobbling up the spoon fed shit of the “9-11 story”. We waited too long and didnt get mad enough. Had there been a revolution that day, that week, that month, or even that year, they would not have been prepared for it. Now, seven years later, all these crooks and murderers have done is prepare for the day they have a reason to heard us up like the sheep we have been. I would hope that our military would not take up arms against our citizenry but the fact is that the military changed their recruitment standards. When I served, I never would have imagined that there would be so many sick twisted individuals serving. Thecode of honor has been thrown out the window in favor of a kill em all mentality. I was deployed in 5 combat operations and murdered for the God of Oil! I opened my eyes to what was really going on and I thank the true GOD that I ETS’d in 2001. I have spoken to soldiers returning home from Iraq and Afghanastan and I am shocked by what I hear. These kids wear their victims like a badge of honor now. Like it is a fucking video game! The sad sad truth is that nothing can be done. We are left with two choices. You can leave this shit hole we all helped to create or you can stay and fightand most likely be tortured and killed. Think about it! Who will come and save you from the holocaust that the government will perpetuate against its own. NOONE!! The world will wait on the sidelines as we tear ourselves apart discussing who will get to keep the pieces. Our counrty is already divided into class warfare between the haves and the have nots while the really have it alls laugh at the mess they made. The golden rule is now whoever has the gold makes the rules. Short of an organized front, there is nothing that can be done by talking about it. Alex, I implore you to use the websites and radio shows to organize people. Get them out in the streets all over the country not just New York once a year. Mass protests with thousands of people not hundreds. Thousands of lawsuits hitting the court system all at once not just one that we talk about that will undoubtably fizzle away. I suggest starting a scholarship fund for people who cant afford guns. Take applications then give grants to arm the population. I dont know. I could type all day but it would accomplish noting. I dont have the means to start websites or get on the radio or give out money for people to buy guns. I know someone who does though! All Im saying is the time to talk about our problems is over. It is time to do something about it!

20. EON Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:48 am

    Just like Bin Laden, this will end up in the bin..

21. freedomwriter Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:55 am

    Dear Dan,
    Alex does enough and is stretched so thin you can hear fatigue in his voice at times. STOP ASKING ALEX TO COORDINATE PROJECTS…START THESE YOURSELF. That is how we will win, quit being a monday morning QB and get in the game.

    Alex has shown us the path, armed us with knowledge, now let’s get after it.

22. Stop NWO/globalists Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:58 am

    Why weren’t people warned to get away from windows & to take cover since it was know well ahead of time that an airliner was approaching??? This, after two other “hijacked” airliners already struck the WTC???

    Many lives could have been saved at the Pentagon!!! What the hell was Cheney up to???

23. Dan Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:08 am

    Hey freedomwriter, Alex has three websites that are nothing more than a discussion forum. How fucking hard is it to add a link to a page where people can sign up and organize something. The simple fact is that any link on these sites goes to some other company trying to sell us something thanks to our “thirst for knowledge”. Stop reporting the news and start making it! If I had the millions of dollars he has generated through these sites I would damn sure be doing something about it! I have been in the game for a long damn time! Long before 9-11! I tried to tell the world the shit I knew from the military. I spent 8 years as an intelligence analyst and when I went public, I got ostracised, repremanded, and removed from avtive duty. People would shit themselves if they knew that the plans for 9-11 were in the works long before I learned about it in 1996. Bin Ladins name got threw around more than the president’s back then. That asshole had been visiting the US since 1982. He hung around Ft. Bragg in the early 90’s and chilled out in Dubai with the CIA after that. He was a Sabre Rattler just like Hussein was. Hussein out lived his usefulness so he was dealt with. Bin Ladin is dead!! The only question that remains is how long has he been dead. Depending on who you talk to, he died in 2002, 2003, or 2006. Some circles seem to think he died before 9-11 but you will never hear one of our intelligence agencies admit to it. But since his usefulness lives on, the government manufactures more tapes. Hell, I wrote a book about this shit back in 2001 and it has been turned down by every publisher in the known world. Nobody wants to dig this stinking corpse up so what is wrong with me asking someone who has the means to get something done to change up what they are doing a little bit?

24. Eat Organic Food Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:10 am

    BE THE CHANGE YOU WANT TO SEE.

25. Travis Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:17 am

    This is awesome. Please follow-up with any new information.

    Unfortunately, this case is probably too big of a blow at once. If there were a few cases that got the foot in the door, wider strokes could then be made. If this lawsuit was simply about the 20 minutes of specific advanced knowledge and negligence*, there might be a shot at it seeing the light of day. But convoluting that with, well, hahaha, practically the entire 9/11 truth movement, will probably get this case a quick and quiet dismissal.

    *And it’s obvious why they didn’t use that “20 minutes” of advanced knowledge to evacuate – all eyes would have been on the pentagon. What didn’t they want everyone to see?

26. GO! Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:20 am

    Go April! God is on your side!

27. kriss Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:30 am

    Good job!!!!

    9/11 was an inside job!!

    Horrible act, to invade iraq and enable Patriot act, REAL ID!!! and POLICE STATE!!!!

    NO REAL ID!!!!!!

28. Awoken Marine from NY Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:31 am

    We need to get out in the streets and spread truth!!!

    Thank god for the Strength that April Has. We need to rally around things like this to get the truth out there to all the people in this world.

    Theese guys are going down. I would forgive them, but forsaken them to a life in the mohave, living as our ancestors did to reddeem their souls.

    Somehow I belive the MOB though will Shout, OFF WITH THERE HEADS

29. Larry Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:43 am

    Im on April’s side here, but why did it take her 7 years? well, I should really say 5 years, since Norman Mineta’s testimony about Cheney being in the bunker was made in 2003. I’d like to see this get off the ground, but considering the fact that that mother fucker Cheney confessed to war crime on national TV will go ignored–Im sure this will too.

30. RealityBase Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:44 am

    One of these days a lawsuit like this will stick. She needs to get the word out that if she’s “suicided” or continually harassed that the government is behind it. Go for it!

31. Steve Williams Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:48 am

    You go, gal!

32. Donald F. Truax Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:53 am

    April

    Let the wind be at your back and the road rise to meet you in this endevor!!! Know that “WE THE PEOPLE” also know the truth concerning the attacks made against our country on the 11th of September 2001.

    Love “Light” and Energy

    _Don

33. Jamie H Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Cheney will pay. 911 was an inside job! 911 was an inside job! 911 was an inside job! 911 was an inside job! 911 was an inside job! 911 was an inside job! 911 was an inside job!

34. Bal Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:53 am

    Dont’ want to be nit-picky however, if Gallop “does not believe that a Boeing 757 struck the building on 9/11″ why is she suing “for failing to issue a warning that American Airlines Flight 77 was about to hit the building despite receiving knowledge of its approach some 20 minutes in advance.” The defense team will attack this and push to dismiss the case from the start. By making the lawsuit more personal in regards to her loss and that of her child and seeking damages, the case would stand a better chance of being heard at all.

35. John N Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:00 am

    I wouldn’t hold your breath the USA has one of the most disgusting justice systems in the world, they certainly will not allow this suit to proceed.

36. CounterJihadist Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:02 am

    The examples have already been made; the precedents set. It would take a judge of extraordinary courage and a titanium ’set’ to allow this suit to go forward. I pray April finds one.

    I also pray she does not ’suicide’ herself with multiple shots to the back of her head in different calibers while her hands are cuffed behind her.

    Steel yourselves everyone – a bad moon’s risin’.

37. Earface Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:12 am

    Best of luck April, take em to the cleaners.

38. Gary S Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:14 am

    This is highly unlikely to be able to proceed to a real trial. Whatever judge who is going to hear the case was appointed by some bureacratic dictator, so his loyalties are always to be questioned. No, this like the many other similar types of cases, will be dropped. The government is always not guilty.

39. Rob in CT Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:23 am

    They will get away with it. They will recite the mantra “National Security” and the lawsuit will go away like magic.

    Nice try though.

40. Theywontchipme Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:24 am

    All it needs is to go to discovery and we are bound to learn something new. The NWO might find some use of bringing Cheney down. The rabbit hole is getting deeper and deeper, day by day. Continue to prepare and awaken humanity. I believe it is all we can do with this knowledge. Unless you just want to curl up in a ball and shake in the corner. (we will let the elite do that soon enough) ; )

41. WakeUpAmerica Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:35 am

    Then someone else needs to file suit – again and again and again.

42. George Hayduke Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:37 am

    Will Garrison to prosecute?

43. JJJames Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:45 am

    They are setting up these lawsuits so that they win and free themselves from guilt. What happened in that suit against Cheney and Gonzales over the torture?

    They were found innocent… these cases are getting thrown out

44. chechen Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:46 am

    Well more people should come forward and join in with her
    To make the case stronger, those criminals shouldn’t get away
    With there crimes, the whole world knows it’s an inside job and
    That Bush and company are all involved and should be tried
    And convicted for there crimes, its not just Americans paying
    For this criminal act, the whole world is paying for it and especially
    The Muslims of the Middle-East, over one million Iraqis have been
    Killed and thousands of Afghanis also have been killed. Over three
    Hundred million Americans in one way or another have been affected
    By this criminals and yet only one person have the guts to come forward,
    Shame on you.

45. Hooty Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:58 am

    Way to go April!!! Keep on fighting people.

46. Vic Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:59 am

    If the Soudan dictator has been officially declared criminal of genocide and crimes to humanity by the United Nations, when will the Bushes and collaboraters be brought to justice?

    There are people jailed for much less than that in this world!!!!!!!

    We peacefully must show the war lords enough is enough

    Peace to all good humans that beleive in a loving and peaceful world

47. Anon. of Ibid. Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:05 am

    I think she and her lawyer were waiting for some kind of gloating or admission in the end to jumpstart this lawsuit. Cheney gave them just that. And the lawyer decides to move now on the heels of Cheney’s televised admission. Little nuggets of truth often spill out from the perps just when they know or feel safe enough to get away with it. I agree though that multiple lawsuits should hit the courts all at once. Anyone directly involved who has a beef or greivance should move now whether in concert or successive waves. If that happens it CANNOT be ignored by the media even if they attempt to belittle or downplay it. What I think is really important for media and national attention to this is the addition of public figures such as actors and those who hold or held public office ne’ : Martin and Charlie Sheen, Sean Penn, Susan Sarandon, Tim Robbins, Ron Paul, Jesse Ventura. They should endorse this sort of action by Ms. Gallop and anyone else directly involved with an army of lawyers and lawsuits waving in the wind of Washington. The MSM connot ignore that for long.

48. Rosin Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:08 am

    Yeaaaa! Go April Go!!! WE ARE WITH YOU!!!

    they cannot dismiss concrete evidence!

    if ever it were the case then you will file it at an International Court:
    thier globalist weapons in their own asses!

    we’re all with you!

49. Eric Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:10 am

    F**K YEAH, give it to ‘em!!

50. keir36 Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:12 am

    Brave brave girl! Ha sthis been piked up by any mainstream press? and Alex you’re getting an interview together right??

51. whiteknight Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:24 am

    I wounder what there first offer to April will be,10 million.I hope lots of you Americans show up for the court dates,and maybe even put a watch up infront of her house.You need to keep this lady safe.

52. Redbendad Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:41 am

    Go April!

53. maninwarren Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 11:59 am

    You’re right, keir36, she’s very brave. Watch the Right-Wing Spin Machine swarm her like piranhas on a bleeding cow if this gets any traction in the MSM.

54. k Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 12:29 pm

    Crazzzzy woman… The Kool-aid is tasty. They knew is was hitting the pentagon and not somewhere else because the voices that speak to the woman also spoke to them.

55. dondon Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 12:32 pm

    Did U hear that the FBI claims that they don’t have anymore footage from the Pentgon on 9/11, I heard this on CNN a couple of weeks ago, hopefully this will make them liars give up the footages that they obtained.

56. Jock Doubleday Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 12:41 pm

    April is courageous. Look for her “suicide” in the news in the next few weeks. The agents of the Illuminati will set it up just perfectly. There may even be a suicide note talking about how she was “depressed” over the lawsuit, or something.
    Jock Doubleday
    http://therevolutionwillnotbeorganized.org

57. s.bonn Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 12:54 pm

    hey april sock it to them!

58. Sean Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 1:12 pm

    GOD BLESS HER!!!

59. Tex Hexman Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 1:17 pm

    The truth is dead. Long live The Truth!

    SOLIDARITY!
    (click my name for music of dissent)

60. wow Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 1:23 pm

    WOW! Just look at the people in here who believe this! Unreal! Do us a favor? Keep your people out of our forum? Thanks!

61. Larry Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    what I find interesting is: do you know how whenever O Reilly or Hannity talks to truthers on their show (Kevin Barrett, Jim Fetzer) and one of the first fucking things they bring up as a weapon is “you’re disrespecting the victims’ families that died on 9-11!!”——well, here we have an actual victim of 9-11 saying she’s going to sue and doesnt believe the official fairy tale—–now watch the tables turn and if this is mentioned at ALL in the media, they will say she “April Gallop—-victim of 9-11″ is a kook—-thus “disrespecting the victims of 9-11″—-which they claimed we have been doing!

62. Randy KW Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 2:23 pm

    Where is the rubble and scaring on the building from the wings on the “alledged 767″ that hit that building (the pentagon).

63. Chunfla Burlbe Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 3:30 pm

    You all already know that nothing will come out of it because that is the American way when it comes to wrestling with arch demons like Bush, rumsfield , condensed rice and the likes. Foaming around the mouth and swearing into your beer won’t amount to much.becuase in the world ahead only direct action is needed. Until people have been buried alive and burn’t into crisps by the government in broad day light, fat lazy i – Don’t-care- americans will go about discussing the latest expensive latte pee from star bucks. That my friends is the truth. All these criminals will live to a ripe old age and pass away comfortably in their sleep, while you supposed good americans will live and regret every minute they have set up for you and then will pass on to the other side screaming and gnashing your teeth with excruciating searing pain.
    You all will deserve it for nature always presents the future you decide and since in our collective retarded brain stupor we put and allowed these spawns of the devil to rule over us, what do you expect. Pimms and strawberries in paradise?
    Until every ‘real’ american eschews the immediate material comforts and delusions, accepts that nothing is relevant to life except freedom and truth and accepts he or she has nothing to lose as he/she was born without material possesions off the womb, and decides enough is enough,- we are not going to take it anymore, goes ape and gets down for full frontal assault by any means necessary to restore the dignity assigned by nature. We are all freaking doomed to be raped, abused and sacrificed by our ruling american satanic rulers.
    and we will be deserving of every freaking second of the harrowing diabolical molestation

64. T. Harper Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 3:43 pm

    I’ve come across 3 conflicting official sites regarding the Pentagon attack. I have links and commentary to back up what I consider a possible cover-up after the fact…

    Pentagon Attack Cover-Up?, Pentagon Attack on 9/11/01
    http://z3.invisionfree.com/CIT.....wtopic=277

65. Bio Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 4:25 pm

    It’s about time, we need all the “other” people that were there and injured to come forward to say what they know and hold people accountable for their evil deeds or total incompetence!

66. nick d Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 4:32 pm

    We need more true patriots like April, not ignoramuses like some of the people who post things in comments of articles like this saying “this will go nowhere” “nothing is going to happen because that’s America for you” and then they go on to say “only direct action will work now” ignoring the fact that this is, in fact, direct action in our country.

67. Social Viability Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 4:35 pm

    Uh, oh.

    Are we really going to have a legal proceeding that examines the evidence of what hit the pentagon?

    What fun!

    I would love to be a fly on the wall watching the 9/11 perpetrators squirm over this.

    Criminals run your society and all you have to do to dissolve their power is to stop using their money. The money is the control mechanism that keeps all of us economically enslaved. When we stop using the currency that they supply to us, the Federal Reserve will dissolve and the politicians they employ will be out of a job.

    Don’t fight the system:
    Replace it
    http://socialviability.com/

68. Pam Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 6:47 pm

    You know its never gonna happen. Too many higher ups will not let it happen. Look at what is happening now. The stupid main stream media will not let it out. Too many people only want to watch the main stream news. If it isnt on the so called real news then they will not beieve it. Just as Alex says people will see it & they just say it isnt real Never happened doesnt exist. I have an ex husband who works at the border patrol & he sees this stuff everyday, but he will not do anything about it because he doesnt want to lose his job. Its total bullshit. People are scared to death to believe anything is happening. The government is gonna fix it. I have high hopes that the people will WAKE up, but unfortunatly i think its gonna be after people are pushed against the wall, then they will fight. At least most will. I DO BELIEVE THAT!!!

69. Line in the sand Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 6:48 pm

    To the GOV spys on this sight take heed—–>(we are coming for the ones who commited this act of treason)—>SOONyour move<—

70. INFERNO Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:25 pm

    #21
    I do agree that Alex could put a link up so people could enter their zip code and be able to locate other patriots close to them to be able to form tyranny watch groups…
    How about it Alex,can this be done?
    this would be a very effective way to organize groups together to create “resistance pockets” that could in the case of mass round up of citizens, engage said stormtroopers and possibly keep citizens from going to the gulags,ie; FEMA camps,I don’t think the soldiers that are being deployed on our turf in actuality will fire on their own people,on the other hand,the several million U.N./Chinese/Russian/? soldiers that have been here training since the 90’s won’t have a problem doing it,after all they don’t give a damn about our Constitution,our soldiers deep down do..and because of that,they will turn and join the citizens and fight the oppressors.This is a time that All Americans,citizen or soldier to recognize our common enemy…fear not the citizen soldier private,for I will have your back if you will have mine…

    INFERNO

71. Dave310 Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:30 pm

    I applaud April for doing this, but I don’t have much hope that the case will be heard. I wonder if they’re trying to put too much info in this law suit.

    I can see some judge getting turned off by the stuff dealing with PNAC and the plane not actually hitting the building. They’re gonna label her a conspiracy nut and toss the case.

    On the bright side, I guess it’s good that people can see all of the different charges she’s making. (She was actually in the building, maybe she can help wake people up.)

    What can we do to support her with this case?

72. caleb Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 8:43 pm

    Thanks chris, truthplz, no msm coverage is what i expected but i wanted to make sure, much appriciated. hopefully enough people will get behind this woman and support her to the end, hopefully that way it will force its way onto american telivision. amazing this story coming out of america is being reported by quiet a few media outlets around the world but not in america? i guess murdoch the dog has pretty much blacklisted any corruption stories involving federal government, what a coward. cheers guys

73. Fin MacCool Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 9:33 pm

    i just hope the Crown/NWO does not murder/”suicide” this honorable heroic American. as a fellow citizen, I can only aspire to her courage. Just remember, Cheney is the cloven hoofed one.

74. johnny Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:11 pm

    I have a lot of respect for this officer for having the courage to pursue this law suit and wish her the best.I think she has a legitimate case against the government because the government can not provide one iota of proof that a plan stroke the Pentagon for the simple fact that it was not stroke by an airliner.There were 83 video tapes confiscated from the local merchants by the F.B.I. Immediately following the explosion ,why does the government refuse to release these tapes and clear up this mystery and proof there claim.The answer is simple they can’t .Dick Cheney claim that he entered the Pentagon at 9:58 when in fact he entered at 9:28 and was in a bunker giving stand down orders as the plan was approaching and this was sworn to by the secretary of transportation.A good lawyer could tear the governments defense to treads if it should go to court .The kicker is that it will never get passed a federal judge because a federal law suit must be approved first by a judge to see if it the case has merits .Does anybody seriously believe that a person that derives his wealth and power from the government is going to take a stand against them in a case of this nature .This courageous young lady is going to find out that she wasted a lot of time.

75. bug-eyes Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:18 pm

    I just hope that alex jones gets stomach cancer and it lasts really, really long so he can suffer the way he deserves to suffer for spitting on the graves of 3000 innocents lost on 9/11.

    he and his followers are lower than shit.

76. Publius Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:50 pm

    Bugeyes wrote:
    “I just hope that alex jones gets stomach cancer and it lasts really, really long so he can suffer the way he deserves to suffer for spitting on the graves of 3000 innocents lost on 9/11. he and his followers are lower than shit.”

    Bugeyes, I have a few questions I’m hoping you may feel generous enough to answer.

    First, by questioning the Official Conspiracy Theory, how is Alex Jones “spitting on the graves of 3,000 innocents?”

    Second, how does your desire to see Alex Jones suffer an agonizing, slow death align with your concern about “3,000 innocents”?

    Third, why are people “lower than shit” because they do not believe the same things as you, or who find the evidence behind the government account of 9/11 to be less than persuasive?

77. swan Says:
    December 18th, 2008 at 10:55 pm

    Wonderful news. And I hope her attorney, William Veale, is as excellent as I have heard. We, the truthers and patriots, are thrilled about this courageous law suit. Let the people start taking the time to find out the truth. Don’t trust the Zionist controlled, corporate and military controlled, mass media.

78. Larry Says:
    December 19th, 2008 at 4:36 am

    bugeyes—–what do you say to the families of the victims who believe the government is covering up 9-11? They are “spitting on the graves of their OWN relatives?” Do you realize it takes MORE faith to believe the governments conspiracy theory of 9-11? It was a day of miracles for those who accept the official theory: buildings collapse due to fire alone, gravity alone causes pulverization of concrete, skyscrapers fall for absolutely no reason–even when planes DONT hit them, a boeing 757 makes a hole only 20 feet wide with no wing damage visible to the Pentagon, 2 of the 4 planes evaporate leaving behind virtually ZERO debris (Pentagon/Shanksville), a plane somehow manages to enter restricted airspace (near Pentagon) and manages to strike the nerve center of our entire military and also the most protected and survielled building on the planet—-despite there being an anti-aircraft battery built in the Pentagon that could have blasted the plane out of the sky before it even hit the Pentagon. the nose of Flight 77 was able to pierce THREE rings of the Pentagon, despite the fact that the official story says the reason there was very little debris is because the plane vaporized—but it was still able to go through THREE rings. A plane ‘vaporizes’ (Pentagon) yet we are still able to identify dead bodies by their fingerprints——another miracle: fire can vaporize a plane, but it cant vaporize human flesh—–all this takes WAY more faith to believe.

79. Arlene Johnson Says:
    December 19th, 2008 at 2:45 pm

    Combine the two explosions in this with what the Foreign Minister of Denmark said about his hearing an explosion several minutes BEFORE the plane arrived, and you have a done deal. Could the explosions have been what stopped the watches of the victims in this inside job of a crime on 9/11/01? I think so.

    For more inside information on 9/11, check out my internationally acclaimed e-zine on my Web site at the icon that says Magazine, because you deserve to know the truth beginning with the fourth edition. Then, just keep reading, because I am still publishing about 9/11.

    Peace,

    Arlene Johnson
    Publisher/Author
    http://www.truedemocracy.net the home of The Journal of History

80. Patirot X Says:
    December 20th, 2008 at 7:32 pm

    I hope you win. Your victory will be one for every American. Power to the people.

81. magicHandPuppet Says:
    December 21st, 2008 at 12:52 am

    This is an incredible development. I am not yet involved with the 911Truth movement. However, if someone from that movement or others is reading – please consider creating a fund to help support the legal fees in this case and to promote publicity of it. I will donate!

    -magic

82. Wilde Says:
    December 21st, 2008 at 11:32 pm

    Adding to Larry’s credible list [#82] of incredible and highly illogical officially accepted events surrounding 9-11, why would the prime target in any terrorist attack threaten the lives of vulnerable children by remaining in their presence long after being aware a second passenger jet had crashed into the center of a major city? The only logical reason that the secret service didn’t whisk him away to a safe zone was the fact they knew he was already in one.

    “From World War I to Korea and Vietnam, presidents have lied to the American people because they believed that if the American people knew the truth, they would not support the move for war. The track record of the U.S. news media in the 20th century is one of regularly going along with fraudulent efforts to get the nation into one war or another by the administration in power.” Robert McChesney and John Nichols – US journalists & authors.

83. Marie Says:
    December 23rd, 2008 at 11:54 am

    I am with you 100%….pray for peace and truth to be shown….fight the good fight….

84. bandido Says:
    December 24th, 2008 at 2:22 pm

    I pray to God that this is NOT thrown out. The evidence points the finger at the defendants.
    Just how do you fit an airline into a 20 ft hole. Pictures before the roof collapsing clearly show the windows in both sides of the hole intact! No titanium parts, no engines. B>S> I’ve seen testimony to Congress by an Asian guy who claims to be in the same secure room at the pentagon with Dick Cheney. His claim was that a military personel was informing the VP how far out the missle was every minute or so. When it came within 5 minutes of hitting the pentagon, Cheney was asked by the military guy “do the orders still stand, sir?” Cheney blurted out “have you hear anything to the contrary?” Some Judges are corrupt in this country. I pray that you get an honorable & moral court. Just look at all the Superior court cases demanding proof of Obama’s birth cert. Apparently nobodey in the U.S. has “standing”
    to question his qualification to be our next Commander in Chief. Obamas coverup is better than Cheney’s, but both deserve life sentances at Abu Graib, Cuba!

85. WagTheDog Says:
    December 25th, 2008 at 9:23 pm

    911 was a wag the dog scenario and nobody knows who the real criminals are yet. It kills me, but I read over at http://subvertednation.com that the real criminals are easy to find.

86. Andy Fun Says:
    December 26th, 2008 at 1:29 am

    I will be prayering for her and her attorney. She needs all the support we can give her since the national news media won’t.

87. mr_bad Says:
    December 26th, 2008 at 8:39 am

    All the evidence she needs is that picture above. NO PLANE ! CASE CLOSED ! PUT THOSE MURDERERS BEHIND BARS !

88. Deb Says:
    December 27th, 2008 at 11:14 am

    How can we persuade a major media outlet to pick up and run with this lawsuit story? It explains all the inconsistencies with the official story that many of us have been declaring for years. It has to break out–how about MSNBC? Only the outcry of millions of we truthers will result in the investigation this country must have. Hooray for April Gallop and to her we say–NEVER give up on this pursuit of the truth.

89. Audie Says:
    December 29th, 2008 at 2:05 am

    Mrs. April Gallop, you’re a better man than I.

90. .DJ.O.R.B. Says:
    January 5th, 2009 at 9:16 am

    INFORMATION IS THE BEST WEAPON TO USE AGAINST THESE NEO-SCUM BASTARDS !!

    IT’S TIME FOR ALL INFOWARRIORS TO STEP UP, STEP FORWARD, AND POLLUTE THE
    WORLD WITH OUR COLLECTIVE KNOWLEDGE OF CONSCIOUSNESS. 1 LOVE !!!!!!!!!!!

    TIME TO GIVE POWER BACK 2 THE PEOPLE, GIVEN BY THE PEOPLE, & GIVEN 4 THE PEOPLE

    AND SO BEGINS THE REVOLUTION ……………………………………………………………………….

    ………”RON PAUL”……………………….”ALEX JONES”………………………….”DAVID ICKE”……….
    …..FOR PRESIDENT…………….FOR VICE-PRESIDENT………….FOR SECRETARY-OF-STATE……..