The recent Jaipur and Ahmedabad bombings and the assassination of Benazir Bhutto were CIA/ISI operations. The USA and the CIA WANT to destabilize the Middle East.

TELL THEM TO KICK ROCKS AND SLAM THE DOOR ON THEM.

EVERYTHING BAD THAT HAS HAPPENED TO ANY COUNTRY IN THE LAST 50 YRS HAS BEEN FROM THE RESULT OF THE CIA’S ACTIONS.

THE CIA ARE THE TERRORIST.

Let’s face it, where does the CIA obtain its directive? They don’t work for us (of course), and they don’t work for the politicians (sell out pawn bitches).

This is pure CFR mandate. This is about the “globalization” of the middle east.

Unfortunately, I know “educated” individuals who don’t even realize it, but effectively claim that if it wasn’t in the New York Times or Washington Post or on CNN, it didn’t occur and or isn’t newsworthy. Whereas speaking to these people is better than speaking to a Christian Republican W supporter, it isn’t better by much. And of course these “educated” people have graduated from Illuminati schools. All this tells you is that there is a consistant level of brainwashing that we must all overcome. But alas, most don’t wish, for some reason or another, to deprogram themselves.

Al Qaeda is a CIA organization (funded and trained CIA faction of the Mujahideen). And this group only exists in Iraq because of the CIA.

There are some good comments here already. It’s nice to see.

Yes, this is all smoke and mirrors. Yes, the history we’re taught is pathetic and filled with half truths, propaganda, and outright lies. I really do hate this place and I can’t wait to get the hell out of this fictitious, house of cards malignant planet. I surely hope we wipe ourselves out, because I can’t imagine the universe being infected by the organisms who control this place. These Illuminati bloodlines are the worst forms of life that have ever existed. May they wallow in their own filth and despair prior to amazingly painful deaths.

Therefore, obviously, there are two sides to the Afghanistan War, Pakistan and Iran. If the USA is on Iran’s side (which this time is most certainly the case), then, by definition, it is against Pakistan.

Remember how the jewish soviets of the USSR invaded Poland hand-in-hand with the nazis, starting a little thing we now call WW2. Oh, that’s right, you don’t remember this, because history teaching afterwards attempts to whitewash certain facts.

What you masters do is always infinitely more devious and less straightforward than the stories they give you in you mainstream media. For them, there is no black and white, just successful uses of power, and unsuccessful. Anything that gets the job done is right in their eyes. Only failure is ever defined as wrong.

Blather, like the propaganda in the article above, is simple meant to make the dumber sheeple that feel smarter than the rest because they read ‘The Guardian’ or the NYT, active loudmouths. These loudmouths then explain to the other sheeple why we so need to be at war with ‘Eurasia’ (or ‘Eastasia’, depending on the month of the year).

The way to fight the monsters is to NEVER EVER get involved with the bulls**t minutiae that exists in the mainstream media to ensnare the time and thoughts of the unwary, self-defined, ’smarter’ Human. How were the nazis best dealt with? Daily research every little thing they did, and spend hours arguing with them? Or recognise that they were evil is design, purpose, and execution, and sweep them out of power?

Unless you are researching the daily variations and strategies in black propaganda programs disseminated by psy-op organisations like ‘The Guardian’ and NYT, you actually make yourselves stupider reading such publications. You become like a person who is pretty damned certain that the world is round, but has to argue daily with people that insist that it is flat. From that perspective, you can consider the NYT as one massive TROLL (in the internet meaning of that word).

Q. Why should it be trusted?

A. It shouldn’t

It, and all of its intel, should be regarded subjectively. Like one regards a fictional novel rather than as objective fact.

Why?

Because despite checks and balances, and congressional oversight, within the organization itself, from its very inception, you have on the one hand individuals devoted to the constitution and individuals who seek to undermine it.

Without getting into detail, the result of this internal conflict is that the intel it provides is always going to be laced with uncertainty. This is an inherent feature rather than a temporary ailment. Therefore, such info should generate discussion certainly, but it should never be the BASIS for going to war or making other significant state decisions.

So go ahead and create Intel Agencies, gather information. But always regard them and the intel they provide with skepticism and a sense of humor. Don’t allow them to
assume a role of legitimacy that is not in accord with their very DNA. Don’t be compelled to act on the information they provide. Keep such agencies at the service of society, rather than allowing them to become the masters.

When the Intel agencies are allowed to assume a master role, the lunatics have taken over the assylum.

http://warofillusions.wordpres.....d-chapter/