NewsMax.com logo
 August 26, 2003 
      Vote in Poll: Do You Support Arnold?      
 

  Home · Late-Night Jokes · Archives · Cartoons · News Alerts · U.S. News Links · PriorityGrams
  Int'l  News Links · MoneyNews · Contact Us · NewsMax Store · Classifieds · Get Your Site Listed
 

NewsMax Magazine
Click Here

Crystal Clear Water
Click Here

Christian Book Club
Click Here

optimalgain.com
Click Here

GoldLine.com
Click Here

BBBOnLine Reliability Seal

 


Congress Was Warned Two Months Before 9/11 Attacks
Jeff Johnson, CNSNews.com
Thursday, Sept. 19, 2002
Capitol Hill -- The lead investigator for the joint House and Senate inquiry said in the committee's first public hearing Wednesday that Congress was warned that Osama bin Laden was planning a large-scale attack against U.S. or Israeli interests two months before Sept. 11, 2001.

There was "a modest, but relatively steady stream of intelligence information indicating the possibility of terrorist attacks inside the United States," according to the joint committee's staff director, Eleanor Hill.

"They generally did not contain specific information as to where, when and how a terrorist attack might occur and generally are not corroborated by further information," she said in a prepared statement.

Based on information gathered by the committee, there were a total of 28 pieces of intelligence information gathered after June 1998 that hinted bin Laden wanted to strike the U.S., including 11 indicating an imminent attack after March 2001.

Additionally, 12 so-called "intelligence indicators" lead analysts to believe that al-Qaeda would use airplanes to strike targets in Washington, D.C., and New York.

Specific details were lacking from those "indicators," Hill said, and the reports were frequently from sources with questionable credibility and could not be corroborated.

That lack of corroboration did not stop intelligence officials from issuing a sobering warning in a briefing to congressional leaders in July 2001.

"We believe that [bin Laden] will launch a significant terrorist attack against U.S. and/or Israeli interests in the coming weeks," the warning stated. "The attack will be spectacular and designed to inflict mass casualties against U.S. facilities or interests. Attack preparations have been made. Attack will occur with little or no warning."

Hill told the committee that adequate resources were not dedicated to analyzing the bin Laden threat because of competing demands within the government.

"The intelligence community responds to its "customers." Customers being other parts of government that are tasking them to come up with intelligence on certain items," she explained. "There were customers that they had to satisfy, they felt they had to satisfy and were told to satisfy on topics other than al-Qaeda."

Rep. Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, echoed the feelings of many members of the committee with her response to the disclosures.

"If it could have been prevented, that bodes well for the future," she said, "but we'll all be haunted by the guilt associated with that, and that's not even good enough punishment for us."

Sen. Richard Shelby, R-Ala., ranking Republican on the Senate Intelligence Committee, had opposed an independent inquiry into the attacks. He now supports such a probe.

"Our inability to detect and prevent the Sept. 11 attacks was an intelligence failure of unprecedented magnitude," said Shelby.

He noted that many members of Congress, who had been unwilling to consider that an "intelligence failure" preceded the attacks, "are now convinced of it."

The Bush administration and Republican leaders in both the House and Senate are on record as opposing such an independent probe.

Shelby complained in television appearances Wednesday that the committee was not getting the cooperation it needed from the intelligence community.

"Absolutely not," he told NBC's "Today" show.

Pelosi cautioned all involved with the government's intelligence efforts that their full cooperation with the joint committee''s investigation was non-negotiable.

"If any of these agencies of government in the intelligence community are not dealing honestly with us, and by that I mean being forthcoming with information," she warned, "I believe there will be hell to pay."

Copyright CNSNews.com

Read more on this subject in related Hot Topics:

War on Terrorism

Editor's note:
FREE - 4 Months to NewsMax.com`s Magazine. Check It Out - Get four FREE

Back

Email E-mail this page to a friend

Print Printer Friendly Version

E-mail a Comment to NewsMax

Reprint Information

 
Ruddy
Limbaugh:
Justice Moore, Pt. 2
Weyrich:
Islamic Threat
Smith·CyberWar:
Al-Qaeda Plans Underwater Attack
Frisa:
Arnie, Rudy, Bloomy
Left Coast Report:
Hollywood Hypocrites
Perry:
Youth4Arnold
O'Reilly:
In the Magazine!
Morris:
In the Magazine!
Malkin:
In the Magazine!
Reagan:
In the Magazine!
Nemets
Putnam
Trulock
Koch
Kalellis
de Borchgrave
Glueck & Cihak
Metcalf
Poe
Roberts
Hirsen
LeBoutillier
Farber
Putnam
Horowitz
Lucom
Wheeler
Bruce
Gallagher
Aldrich
Alden
Farrell
Liebmann
Melrose
Malzberg
Limbacher

americanvision.org
Click Here

thoseshirts.com
Click Here

Matrix Direct
Click Here

banner
Click Here

 
Home Money News E-Books PriorityGrams Archives Late Nite Jokes NewsMax Mall
Cartoons News Links Magazine Classifieds Contact Us Advertise


NewsMax.com Privacy Statement

All Rights Reserved © NewsMax.com