Thursday, Sept 17th, 2009
I have repeatedly argued that “naked” over-the-counter credit default swaps (CDS) should be banned (“naked CDS” is the term I coined to describe the situation where the buyer is not the referenced entity. There is at least some economic usefulness for the referenced company itself buying CDS as an insurance policy; so this essay will not comment on that situation).
I’m in good company, of course, as many economists and financial advisors have warned of the dangers of CDS:
But CDS seller are now saying everything is fine, that they are making changes which reduce risk, and that the danger has passed.
As an article in Bloomberg notes today:
A year after the bankruptcy of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc., credit-default swaps have lost their stigma for disaster.
So are CDS really safe now?
Not So Safe
Well, initially, before we can even begin to have an intelligent discussion about this issue, it is important to note that the commonly-accepted figures for the CDS losses suffered due to Lehman’s bankruptcy have been understated.
And it is also important to acknowledge that the government’s proposed regulations of CDS (if they ever pass) won’t really fix the problem. Indeed, a leading credit default swap expert (Satyajit Das) says that the new credit default swap regulations not only won’t help stabilize the economy, they might actually help to destabilize it.
And it should be remembered that the overwhelming majority of derivatives are held by just 5 banks. So the people behind the effort to reassure everyone that CDS are safe again are the too big to fail banks, desperate to restart the toxic asset and exotic instrument gravy train.
As Nouriel Roubini said last month:
This is a crisis of solvency, not just liquidity, but true deleveraging has not begun yet because the losses of financial institutions have been socialised and put on government balance sheets. This limits the ability of banks to lend, households to spend and companies to invest…
The releveraging of the public sector through its build-up of large fiscal deficits risks crowding out a recovery in private sector spending.
CDS are an important way of creating leverage (for example, last year, the market for credit default swaps was larger than the entire world economy). So there is a huge (although wrong-headed, in my opinion) incentive to underplay the risks of CDS.
And don’t forget that credit default swap counterparties drive company after company into bankruptcy, and that – once a company the counterparties aare betting against goes bankrupt – the counterparties cut in line in front of all of the bankruptcy creditors to get paid (and see this). In other words, there are other problems caused by CDS other than destabilizing the economy as a whole.
The Bigger Problem
Perhaps most importantly, CDS sellers – like the big sellers of other financial products – know that the government will bail them out if CDS crash again. So they have strong incentives to sell them and to recreate huge levels of leverage. Indeed, the same dynamic that led to the S&L crisis also leds to last year’s CDS crisis, and will lead to the next crisis as well. So – while CDS might be a particularly dangerous type of “weapon of mass destruction” (in Buffet’s words), the financial looters will probably find some way to loot on the public’s dime, no matter what happens to CDS, unless they are they are meaningfully are reigned in (or broken up).
In other words, the bottom line is that – yes – CDS are still dangerous. But – just as a killer, unless restrained, could use a paper weight to kill – the too-big-to-fails would just use some other instrument even if naked over-the-counter CDS were banned. Taking away a convicted murderer’s gun might be a good first step. But if he is still free to cause harm, he may very well kill again.
This article was posted: Thursday, September 17, 2009 at 3:41 am