Symmetrical Collapse
NIST lamely tried to explain the symmetrically collapse as follows:
WTC 7’s collapse, viewed from the exterior (most videos were taken from the north), did appear to fall almost uniformly as a single unit. This occurred because the interior failures that took place did not cause the exterior framing to fail until the final stages of the building collapse. The interior floor framing and columns collapsed downward and pulled away from the exterior frame. There were clues that internal damage was taking place, prior to the downward movement of the exterior frame, such as when the east penthouse fell downward into the building and windows broke out on the north face at the ends of the building core. The symmetric appearance of the downward fall of the WTC 7 was primarily due to the greater stiffness and strength of its exterior frame relative to the interior framing.
NIST can’t have it both ways. If the exterior frame was so stiff and strong, then it should have stopped the collapse, or - at the very least - we would have seen a bowing effect where tremendous opposing forces were battling each other for dominance in determining the direction of the fall.
In real life, the thick structural beams and “stiff [and strong]” exterior frame used in the building should have quickly stopped any partial collapse, unless the support columns were all blown. At the very worst, we should see a 1 or 2 floor partial collapse.
NIST said that WTC 7 fell at 40% slower than freefall speed. But it collapsed alot faster than it would have if the structural supports were not all blown away at the same instant. 40% slower isn’t very impressive — that’s like arguing that a rock falling through concrete 40% slower than a rock falling through the air is perfectly normal.
Again, why did the building collapse at all, given that the thick structural beams should have quickly stopped any partial collapse?
article continues below
NIST said fires alone brought down Building 7, but other office fires have burned longer and hotter without causing collapse.
No Explosive Sounds
NIST also said:
“No blast sounds were heard on the audio tracks of video recordings during the collapse of WTC 7 or reported by witnesses.”
Oh, really?
What about this, this, this, this, this and this?
Moreover, as discussed below, high-tech explosives don’t necessarily make the same loud “booms” that dynamite make.
And why were there residues for high-tech explosives at ground zero (and see this)?
And what about the pools of molten metal at ground zero for months? And why was the at and under the ground at the site of WTC 7 as hot as the ground under WTC 1 and 2?
And the New York Times wrote that partly EVAPORATED steel beams were found at WTC 7. But normal office and diesel fires are not NEARLY hot enough to evaporate steel. Hydrocarbon fires fueled by diesel (which was apparently stored at WTC 7) and normal office materials cannot evaporate steel. Steel does not evaporate unless it is heated to at least 5,000 degrees Fahrenheit. Everyone agrees that fires from conventional building fires are thousands of degrees cooler than that.
And why didn’t NIST address the obvious pre-knowledge by everyone around and well in advance that 7 was going to come down?
And why didn’t NIST address what these experts say?:
- The former head of the Fire Science Division of the government agency which claims that the World Trade Centers collapsed due to fire (the National Institute of Standards and Technology), who is one of the world’s leading fire science researchers and safety engineers, a Ph.D. in mechanical engineering (Dr. James Quintiere), called for an independent review of the World Trade Center Twin Tower collapse investigation. “I wish that there would be a peer review of this,” he said, referring to the NIST investigation. “I think all the records that NIST has assembled should be archived. I would really like to see someone else take a look at what they’ve done; both structurally and from a fire point of view. … I think the official conclusion that NIST arrived at is questionable.
- Two professors of structural engineering at a prestigious Swiss university (Dr. Joerg Schneider and Dr. Hugo Bachmann) said that, on 9/11, World Trade Center 7 was brought down by controlled demolition (translation here).
- Kamal S. Obeid, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Berkeley, of Fremont, California, says:
“Photos of the steel, evidence about how the buildings collapsed, the unexplainable collapse of WTC 7, evidence of thermite in the debris as well as several other red flags, are quite troubling indications of well planned and controlled demolition”
- Ronald H. Brookman, structural engineer, with a masters degree in Engineering from UC Davis, of Novato California, writes:
“Why would all 47 stories of WTC 7 fall straight down to the ground in about seven seconds… ? It was not struck by any aircraft or engulfed in any fire. An independent investigation is justified for all three collapses including the surviving steel samples and the composition of the dust.”
- Graham John Inman, structural engineer, of London, England, points out:
“WTC 7 Building could not have collapsed as a result of internal fire and external debris. NO plane hit this building. This is the only case of a steel frame building collapsing through fire in the world. The fire on this building was small & localized therefore what is the cause?”
- A Dutch demolition expert (Danny Jowenko) stated that WTC 7 was imploded
- A prominent physicist with 33 years of service for the Naval Research Laboratory in Washington, DC (Dr. David L. Griscom) said that the official theory for why the Twin Towers and world trade center building 7 collapsed “does not match the available facts” and supports the theory that the buildings were brought down by controlled demolition
August 22nd, 2008 at 4:51 am
Ever wonder which side these NIST guys are on? Notice the connection that is drawn in the passage below between murder and lying.
John 8:44 YOU are from YOUR father the Devil, and YOU wish to do the desires of YOUR father. That one was a manslayer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of [the lie].
Think about this. These people are on the side of the illuminati-eugenicists who wish to KILL 80% of the current population. They created and backed people like Stalin, Mao, Hitler etc. who once in power did two main things..lied so they could kill and then lied about killing. Most importantly, they killed those who would have exposed their lies.
Why are the Devil and his “children” liars and manslayers or murderers? Because they hate the truth and they hate God’s creations…the earth and man. How can I be so certain? Easy, they ceaselessly attempt to destroy the earth and man.
So I say..keep on lying you liars. You’re just making clear who your loyalty rests with.
August 22nd, 2008 at 5:49 am
The thing which I always hear them say, is the reason the buildings collapsed is from suddenly having to deal with the weight of the falling structure above…
Here is my point…..
The building structure has been dealing with the weight of the upper floor for Years…..
If any floor was suddenly collapsing in a fall to the subsequent floor below, the lower floors at that time would be relieved of that extra weight of the upper falling structure… twelve feet or less later, the building would return to dealing with its usual weight bearing, less the debris that was lost to the upper exterior….
The fires would not have any effect on the steel other than warming it slightly…the fires would have lessened the weight of the building and her contents….
in conclusion, on September 11 , the lower floors had less structural weight to deal with than it did for the previous 30 years it was standing…..
there was explosives….
August 22nd, 2008 at 7:25 am
Send them a note letting them know what you think.
http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/contact.htm
They’ve lost all credibility with me. How can we trust anything they say now?
August 22nd, 2008 at 7:43 am
This building was built like a bunker. It was much stronger than any other building in NY. If small office paper fires could do that, NY people should be very afraid, and all those living in high rise.
August 22nd, 2008 at 7:54 am
Excellent article. You just about said it all, except for one thing I’m still scratching my head over: Mr. Sunder actually said, and I quote verbatim, “Buildings were not designed to withstand airplane impacts.” Yikes. If anything shows this man’s disconnection with reality (or, the ease with which he lies) this is it.
Request: can someone articulate exactly what NIST is, their place in the heirarhcy of the government and who, ultimately, is in charge? Can’t be poor Mr. Sunder, who probably has a gun at his head.
Thanks.
J. Ciolino
NYC
August 22nd, 2008 at 8:05 am
Sheesh, everybody seems to expect perfection around here. Do you have any idea how hard it is coming up with a plausible hypothesis that would explain an impossible event? C’mon! Give them some credit for their effort! Only tax dollars can buy this kind of entertainment!
August 22nd, 2008 at 8:26 am
In a just country (not the US, for sure), these NIST guys would be in prison, along with the rest of the conspirators.
August 22nd, 2008 at 8:27 am
i woke up this morning and happened to catch the nist briefing on cspan. wow, what a bunch of crap! after one hundred years of building design and only now, for building 7, they have a new “phenomenon”, ‘thermal expansion’. it is hard to believe that they got any engineer to stand up and attest to this. basically they are saying that they could not find a credible explaination,(without admitting foul play)so they discovered a new “phenomenon”…they made sh*t up! what a disgrace! very sad indeed…i feel for the victims and survivors who clung to some credible reason, yet found none!
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:54 am
They still have not answered the obvious questions, brought up by their own investigators.
What was the source of the partly evaporated steel members found in the debris by the NIST investigators which concerned them enough that they reported to the NY Times “they could not have been caused by fires”?
Why was the steel not analyzed, nor any of the debris analyzed for thermite residues as required by LAW and NFPA guidelines?
August 22nd, 2008 at 2:39 pm
Just like the ‘official story’. They know they can tell us whatever they want because they know that we won’t do anything about it.
August 22nd, 2008 at 4:09 pm
people if you want to see how evil our government is please goto
youtube and punch in “Taxi To the Dark Side” and watch it there are 8 parts to this please this is important to know.
August 22nd, 2008 at 4:26 pm
Since the explanation is so obviously illegitamate I think the best avenue would be to advertise them out as frauds. Why not invest in a full page ad blasting them as completly sold out and lacking any credibility to even deal with this issue any further. That could lead to the avenue of a completely new investigation that is not biased and finding ways to cover up the truth. Someone somewhere would print the building design specs that people need to understand so they can demand Justice against the real criminals who took the building down.
August 22nd, 2008 at 5:03 pm
There’s a recent post on this over at One More Promethean
http://www.onemorepromethean.com/
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:31 pm
Basically according to the NIST wtc7 was a card house. A critical card, on the 13th floor (lucky 13) fell -office fire thermal expansion- then, the cards inside the building toppled because of this card that fell on the 13th floor. Then, the outer cards which depended on the structural integrity of the inner cards also fell all at once .. makes a lot of sense, for a card house.
In the Mexico City earthquake of 1985 that shook for 50 seconds at 7.8 to 8.1 magnitude these large office buildings remained afoot .. maybe there were no ‘fires:’
http://libraryphoto.cr.usgs.go…..ake%7C1985
If I were the NIST I would go back and take a look at these survivors and see how they did it.
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:40 pm
http://libraryphoto.cr.usgs.go.....ake%7C1985
my previous address did not ‘paste’ correctly. This should work. These are buildings that survived without ‘40%’ free-fall collapse 7.8 to 8.1 shaking in Mexico City 1985.
August 22nd, 2008 at 9:43 pm
Personally, I believe Osama Bin Laden brought down WT7 personally! Yeah! Sure! he was there grading his nefarious plotters’ performance of their duties. And while everyone’s attention was riveted by the fires in the other two buildings, he raced through WT7 with several tons of thermate on his back, placing the charges at super duper speed! Of course, no one saw him. That’s because he’s so evil the sunlight won’t bounce off his body and he’s invisible!!!
August 22nd, 2008 at 11:37 pm
They said it was a “domino effect” at the base, and included the penthouse in the collapse timespan, apparently without admitting it. Shameless but snappy. They could’ve said it took 5 minutes to collapse if the penthouse had beeen blown out in a giant blaze of glory about 5 minutes earlier. Haha, funny, NIST, really funny.
Of course “domino effect” is a phrase often used when describing controlled demolition collapses. Check all the documentaries and news reports on CDs, you’ll hear it quite a bit.
August 23rd, 2008 at 3:35 am
It was a ‘domino’ effect. I remember when I had my dog, a doberman pinscher and I bought dog food in 20 pound sacks. The sack of dog food had a string attached to it. You pull that string and the whole nice neat string sealing the dog food bag unravels, if you found that right string to pull on, if it was the wrong one you just made it tighter.
So it was with WTC7. NIST conclusion was that this building was built like a bag of Alpo Dog food. One string, unravelled it. 13th floor unravelled it. Some stupid fires below would make the whole building crumble. I’m sorry, I think you are lying. I don’t thing the whole building would crumble just because there were some supposed breakdowns below. Above, there were no fires. They were structurally sound from the 13th floor all the way up to the 47th. So were all those floors made out of recycled coke cans? Why did they crush?
August 23rd, 2008 at 7:48 am
I can’t help but think that the various authors so puzzled by the government’s whimsical “analysis” of 9/11 events must be the same folks involved in it. I mean, are such writers truly so stupid they cannot follow their own ample evidence to its logical conclusion? How many news stories, blogs, books, videos, web sites and expert accounts are needed til we realize we are being lied to? The only analysis needed now is not whether there is in fact a 9/11 conspiracy, but what to do about it. Should we write strident letters of protest to our lying, hypocritical politicians? Initiate another worthless FOIA request or lawsuit in our criminally complicit courts? Cast our votes in a rigged election? Maybe call our local militarized police who view all activists as terrorists? While we stand here slack-jawed and hypnotised over the latest assault on reason, our enemies laugh at how easily we are lulled into a stupor. By the way, most skyscrapers in the US don’t even have a 13th floor– they number from 12 to 14.
August 23rd, 2008 at 8:22 am
Man these guys are really desperate now because the truth is spreading far and fast.
These straight out lies from so called “experts” is only proving 9/11 was indeed an inside job.
You can’t fool the conscious people anymore. We have awoken.
August 23rd, 2008 at 1:59 pm
Commentary Last Updated: Jan 4th, 2007 - 01:08:31
——————————————————————————–
Following Zakheim and Pentagon trillions to Israel and 9-11
By Jerry Mazza
Online Journal Associate Editor
Jul 31, 2006, 00:19
Email this article
Printer friendly page
Think of this as part two of Recherche du trillions perdu, my Online Journal article on Dov Zakheim, former Bush appointee as Pentagon Comptroller from May 4, 2001 to March 10, 2004. At that time he was unable to explain the disappearance of $1 trillion dollars. Actually, nearly three years earlier, Donald Rumsfeld announced on September 10, 2001 that an audit discovered $2.3 trillion was also missing from the Pentagon books. That story, as I mentioned, was buried under 9-11’s rubble. The two sums disappeared on Zakheim’s watch.
Yet on May 6, 2004, Zakheim took a lucrative position at Booz Allen Hamilton, one of the most prestigious strategy consulting firms in the world. One of its clients then was Blessed Relief, a charity said to be a front for Osama bin Laden. Booz, Allen & Hamilton then also worked closely with DARPA, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, which is the research arm of the Department of Defense. So the dark card was shifted to another part of the deck.
Judicial Inc’s bio of Dov (linked below) tells us Zakheim was/is a dual Israeli/American citizen and an ordained rabbi and had been tracking the halls of US government for 25 years, casting defense policy and influence on Presidents Reagan, Clinton, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. He is, as I described him earlier, the bionic Zionist. In fact, Judicial Inc points out that most of Israel’s armaments were gotten thanks to him. Squads of US F-16 and F-15 were classified military surplus and sold to Israel at a fraction of their value.
Judicial Inc also points out that Israel, a country of 4.8 million Russian and Polish Jewish émigrés, flies on one of the biggest Air Forces in the world, thanks to Dov. Conflict of interest here? Depends on what you’re interested in. That is, in 2001 Dov was CEO of SPS International, part of System Planning Corporation, a defense contractor majoring in electronic warfare technologies, including remote-controlled aircraft systems, and the notorious Flight Termination System (FTS) technology that could hijack even a hijacked plane and land or crash it wherever.
More from the resume: Wikipedia points out that Zakheim is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations and in 2000 a co-author of the Project for the New American Century’s position paper, Rebuilding America’s Defenses, advocating the necessity for a Pearl-Harbor-like incident to mobilize the country into war with its enemies, mostly Middle Eastern Muslim nations.
As to Dov’s hell-raiser lineage, Judicial Inc points out that Grandpa Zakheim was born in 1870, Julius Zakheim (Zhabinka), in the Ukraine, a Russian rabbi who married a relative of Karl Marx. He was a Menshevik/Bolshevik and played a leading role in the 1905 turmoil that paved the way for the 1917 Bolshevik Revolution. The Bolshevik master plan called for the state of Israel, which was chosen for its proximity to the world’s oil and an area of religious significance.
Dov’s Father, Rabbi Jacob I. Zakheim was born in 1910 and reared in Poland’s swarm of Zionist hard guys, read assassins and bombers. His Polish town, near Bilaystok, also brought us Yitzhak Shir, and family friends included Menachem Begin and Moshe Arens. Dov’s father was an active member of Betar, formed in 1923 in Riga, Latvia. Its goal was to control the Middle East (and its oil). It was known that the Jewish people needed their own country and they chose Palestine and claimed it a Jewish state “on both sides of the Jordan.”
Betar was in essence a terrorist organization formed because Zionists were sick of being chased from and arrested in country after country. They wanted both a place to escape and a base for their power. Betar joined forces with the Haganah, Irgun, and Stern gangs. With no prospect of a Jewish state in sight, they argued that armed struggle against the British was the only way. Since Britain occupied Palestine and was containing them they went on a blood feast of bombings that killed hundreds of British soldiers. The British pulled out, but the Zionists continue to maul the Arabs to this day.
For a concise history on the Formation of Israel in 1947, I suggest this link to theocracywatch.org.
For an interesting look at “The United States and the Recognition of Israel: A Chronology” compiled from Harry S. Truman and the Founding of Israel by Michael T. Benson, link above. For a rounded look at Israel, see Wikipedia.
Returning to Dov: he was born in Brooklyn in 1943 and attended exclusive Jewish schools, spent summers in Israel Zionist camps, which trained the Zionists of the future. As to Dov’s formal education, he graduated from Columbia University in 1970 and the University of Oxford in 1972. From 1973 to 75, he attended the London school of Jewish studies, described as a “Harry Potter” type cauldron; among the subjects Jewish supremacy, Advanced Bible, Talmud, Jewish Mysticism, Holocaust, Anglo-Judaica, and Zionism. After, he was ordained a Rabbi. From 1975 to 80, Zakheim was an adjunct professor at the National War College, Yeshiva University, Columbia University and Trinity College, Hartford, Connecticut.
As he stepped into the Reagan administration, he talked them into funding development of the Lavi Fighter at a cost of $3 billion. The Lavi was a total flop and Israel dropped it, though it owed $450 million in contract fees that were cancelled. Israel, according to Judicial Inc, also created a story that China was eager to buy the Lavi. Zakheim convinced Reagan that China had to be sandbagged. Reagan gave Israel $500 million for its lost contracts. Reagan then threw in a wing of F-16’s as a bonus and sign of good will. Do we see a pattern here, personal, familial, career-wise, of over-the-top Israeli advocacy?
Again, during Zakheim’s tenure as Pentagon controller from May 4, 2001, to March 10, 2004, over $3 trillion dollars were unaccounted for. Additionally, military Information was jeopardized and military contractors billed the US for Israeli items: $50 million dollar fighter jets were rated as surplus and the list rolls on. As the scandal of the missing trillion dollars surfaced and Dov resigned, Israel was handed the finest fighter jets in the US inventory while 15 percent of US jets were grounded for lack of parts. In whose best interest was this?
But Dov is not alone. He is one of an elite group of Jewish Americans/Israelis who inter-marry and enter government. They and their Christian counterparts are called neocons and their sole purpose is directing US policy. Most of them are dual citizens and few serve in the US military. Think of Paul Wolfowitz, Elliot Abrams, Richard Perle, Ben Wattenberg, to mention a few. Whether their motivation is anger at the Muslim world, seen as a religious and territorial enemy, or a deep-rooted reaction to the Holocaust, the culmination of European anti-Semitism, their reactionary militarism becomes a world-threatening force unto itself. Hence our concern.
Dov and the World Trade Center
Perhaps not coincidentally in May 2001, when Dov served at the Pentagon, it was an SPS (his firm’s) subsidiary, Tridata Corporation, that oversaw the investigation of the first “terrorist” attack on the World Trade Center in 1993. This would have given them intimate knowledge of the security systems and structural blueprints of the World Trade Center. From the ’90s through 2001, WTC Security was handled by Securacom, a Kuwait-American firm, on whose board Marvin Bush, the president’s brother, sat. After 9/11, Securacom was let go, changed its name to Stratosec, and was delisted from the Stock Exchange in 2002.
According to Conspiracy News.net writers Shadow and ‘Pax’ in Dov Zakheim and the 9/11 Conspiracy, (and I suggest you look at this link) “According to the SPC website (4), a recent customer at that time was Eglin AFB, located in Florida. Eglin is very near another Air Force base in Florida-MacDill AFB, where Dov Zakheim contracted to send at least 32 Boeing 767 aircraft, as part of the Boeing /Pentagon tanker lease agreement. (5)
”As the events of September 11, 2001 occurred, little was mentioned about these strange connections, and the possible motives and proximity of Dov Zakheim and his group. Since there was little physical evidence remaining after the events, investigators were left only with photographic and anecdotal evidence.
“There is a photograph of the Flight Termination System module, from their site.(5). Note it has a cylindrical shape, and is consistent with the size and shape of the object observed under the fuselage of flight 175.
“The Boeing lease deal involved the replacement of the aging KC-135 tanker fleet with these smaller, more efficient Boeing 767s that were to be leased by Dov Zakheim’s group. The planes were to be refitted with refueling equipment, including lines and nozzle assemblies.”
(Remember both Flight 175, that hit the South Tower, and Flight 11, that hit the North Tower, were Boeing 767s. Flights 77 and 93 were 757s.)
“In the enlargement of flight 175’s photo, we can clearly see a cylindrical object under the fuselage, and a structure that appears to be attached to the right underside of the rear fuselage section.
”When seen in comparison, it is obvious that the plane approaching the Trade Center has both of these structures-the FTS module and the midair refueling equipment, as configured on the modified Boeing 767 tankers. Of particular interest is the long tube-like anomalous structure under the rear fuselage area of flight 175-this structure runs along the right rear bottom of the plane, as it also does on the Boeing 767 refueling tanker pictured.
”After considering this information, I [the author/s] am convinced that flight 175, as pictured on the news media and official reports, was in fact a refitted Boeing 767 tanker, with a Flight Termination System attached. Use of this system would also explain the expert handling of aircraft observed in both New York and Washington investigations, which has been officially credited to inexperienced flight school students.
“Since the refitted 767s were able to carry both passengers and a fuel load, as shown in this photo, it is likely that the plane designated Flight 175 was in fact a refitted 767 tanker, disguised as a conventional commercial passenger plane.
“As shown in this photo of a 767 being serviced, the FTS unit, when in position, would be small and unobtrusive enough to be fairly innocuous (at least to casual observers, such as passengers). The smallest circle indicates the size and position of the anomaly depicted in the photos of Flight 175. The larger circle, which is the size of the engine housing, shows the size of the anomaly in relation to the engine. Note the size and position of the open hatches on the engine housing, which would tend to discredit the widely held theory that the anomaly is an open hatch or cargo door.
“As the . . . diagram shows, all flights involved in the events traveled very near many military installations, and appear to have traveled in a manner suggesting guidance and possible transfer of the control of the planes among the bases.
”Since the evidence from the World Trade Center site was quickly removed, there is little concrete evidence of the involvement of Dov Zakheim, who has since left his position at the Pentagon. However, the proximity of Eglin AFB to MacDill AFB in Florida and Dov Zakheim’s work via SPC contracts and the Pentagon leasing agreement on both of these installations, combined with SPC’s access to World Trade Center structural and security information from their Tridata investigation in 1993, is highly suspicious. Considering his access to Boeing 767 tankers, remote control flight systems, and his published views in the PNAC document, it seems very likely he is in fact a key figure in the alleged terrorist attacks in New York City on September 11, 2001.”
EDITORIAL RESPONSE TO READERS’ COMMENTS:
”In response to some of our readers who have questioned our premise that it was Rabbi Dov Zakheim who ‘called for’ the Pearl Harbor type of incident, we here at Conspiracy News Net acknowledge that the PNAC document was written by the likes of William Kristol and Donald Kagan, and therefore as the real brains behind the agenda they are the ones calling for it in a literal sense. However, we do stand by our assertion that the Rabbi called for it as well, insofar that he signed his name onto this document. If he signed it he agrees with it and therefore he is calling for it.
”Some of you have argued that we are singling out Rabbi Zakheim because he is Jewish, implying that we are pushing some sort of twisted anti-Semitic agenda while noting that he is not the only one who signed the PNAC document and therefore wondering why our article is about him and not the others. We do not mean to imply that the Rabbi acted alone, our article simply points out that Rabbi Zakheim had access to things like structural integrity, blueprints and any number of important facets of information about the WTC through his work with TRIDATA CORPORATION in the investigation of the bombing of the WTC in 1993.
“That he had access to REMOTE CONTROL Technology through his work at System Planning Corporation (SPC). That he had access to BOEING AIRCRAFT through a lease deal HE BROKERED while working at the Pentagon.
“ . . . Finally that he was part of a group of politically radical Straussian Neo-Conservatives, who, through their association with PNAC, called for restructuring of the Middle East, noting that a Pearl Harbor type of event MAY BE NEEDED to foster the frame of mind required for the American public to accept such a radical foreign policy agenda. In light of all this information we here at Conspiracy News Net stand by our statement that Mr. Zakheim not only called for the slamming of the WTC Towers on 9-11, but he activity took part in their demolition by providing the logistics necessary for such an attack to occur.”
Coda, a Bitter Frosting on the Cake
Whether or not you agree in whole or in part with these findings, here is an eye-opening article originally from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette by Milan Simonich. It is titled Army unit piecing together accounts of Pentagon attack, and from it comes this striking information in paragraph six . . .”One Army office in the Pentagon lost 34 of its 65 employees in the attack. Most of those killed in the office, called Resource Services Washington, were civilian accountants, bookkeepers and budget analysts. They were at their desks when American Airlines Flight 77 struck.”
Apart from the question of whether it was F 77 that struck the Pentagon, it is more than ironic that accountants, bookkeepers and budgets analysts, the very people who could pick up the financial frauds were struck. Especially since the hit was directed supposedly at the Office of Naval Intelligence.
Nevertheless, Dov is busy at his Booz Allen job, involved in Strategic Services and who knows what other dark plans as we speak, even as the Middle East is under heavy fire once again from Israel and its fervid ally, the US government.
Jerry Mazza is a freelance writer living in New York. Reach him at gvmaz@verizon.net.
August 24th, 2008 at 8:52 am
If the truth were told about this, and the myriad of atrocities commited by our government, there would be chaos and possibly revolution. The power structure is in no way prepared to allow this to happen. Reality must be subverted at all cost by this bogus system. Yes, there is treason, and yes, there is murder, but, I am sad to say, none of the networking we do about these seemingly self-evident truths will ever be broadcast on the six o’clock news. We need a new platform. Oh!………
August 24th, 2008 at 12:04 pm
What the report proves for sure is that NIST is incapable of doing the type of work they were supposed to do and a public move should be undertaken to disband the organization and take away their funding.
August 24th, 2008 at 3:11 pm
And I saw both small and great, free and in bondage take a mark on their rigt arm or fore head for without it no man could buy or sell,and he who would not take the mark or worship the beast had their heads cut off, Revelation! Dam I hope im not around when that goes into operation. Imagine having a million bucks in the bank and not being able to buy a snickers bar, its scary as hell folks and it’s coming, you know it is, God doesnt make mistakes. Keep up the fight and God bless every one of you beautiful people.