Ethan A. Huff
Dec 5, 2012
An Australian mother who desperately tried with all her might to protect her young daughter from being poisoned with vaccines has lost the battle, according to News.com.au. Judicial tyrants in the Victoria region of Australia recently ruled that the eight-year-old girl, whose mother had chosen to avoid vaccines and instead feed her child organic, biodynamic, and unprocessed foods, would have to subject the girl to the government-mandated vaccine schedule from here on out into the future.
The mother, who has not been publicly named due to legal restrictions, had made the conscientious and informed decision from the time when her daughter was first born not to have the child vaccinated. Instead, the mother chose to administer safe, side effect-free homeopathic immunizations to her daughter, in addition to feeding her healthy food and clean water, and exposing her to fresh air, dirt and other natural immunity boosters.
But trouble arose when the little girl’s father, who is divorced from the mother and lives elsewhere, decided to have the girl vaccinated behind her mother’s back while in his custody. According to reports, the father secretly allowed his new wife to take the girl to a medical center and have her vaccinated several years back for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough), hepatitis B, polio, HIB, measles, mumps and rubella (MMR), and meningococcal C, in total violation of the mother’s trust.
State decides homeopathic remedies are ‘ineffective,’ orders mother to inject her child with poison
All the dedication and hard work that the young girl’s mother had invested into keeping her daughter safe from being injected with formaldehyde, mercury (Thimerosal), aluminum, monosodium glutamate (MSG), and the dozens of other chemical adjuvants commonly added to vaccines, in other words, was destroyed in an instant with just a single covert visit to a state-run medical office. And the vindictive former husband who allowed it all to happen told a family court later that he had planned to continue “secretly vaccinat[ing]” the girl against her mother’s wishes.
The mother, whose hopes for her child’s health had been grossly violated, tried to stop her former husband from continuing to have the girl vaccinated by filing an injunction against him. But when the issue was finally brought before family court Judge Victoria Bennett, it was determined that, because a senior pediatrician from Royal Children’s Hospital personally believed there was not enough evidence to prove the efficacy of homeopathic immunizations, the girl’s mother would have to continue having her daughter vaccinated in accordance with the official vaccine schedule.
So the state, rather than the parent, has once again made the final determination about what will be forcibly injected into a child’s body, proving that parental sovereignty is no longer recognized and respected by many that occupy positions of power in government. And if parents are no longer free to choose what medical procedures are appropriate for their own children, then there is no more freedom, and tyranny has won.
Sources for this article include:
This article was posted: Wednesday, December 5, 2012 at 6:08 am