Comments on: Global Warming? Chicago – Coolest July 8th in 118 Years

By: Economy » Global Warming? Chicago – Coolest July 8th in 118 Years

Economy » Global Warming? Chicago – Coolest July 8th in 118 Years — Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:09:37 +0000

[...] Wednesday’s paltry 65-degree high at O’Hare International Airport (an early-May-level temperature and a reading 18 degrees below normal) was also the city’s coolest July 8 high in 118 years — since a 61-degree high on the date in 1891. Read the full article [...]

By: al gore's oily grin

al gore's oily grin — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 02:06:30 +0000

Bastet, there are several thousand experienced climatologists and other scientists currently fighting to destroy the corporate myth of man-made CO2’s influence on climate change/global warming/call it what you will. Those guys are not in the pay of the oil companies, the only agenda they have is to tell the truth.

On the contrary, it is the oil companies that are responsible for propagating the CO2 myth to further their agenda of a one world government, which they will control. They really don’t give a damn about pollution, or polar bears, or you and me for that matter.

Is that what you want???

By: Global Warming? Chicago – Coolest July 8th in 118 Years « Daily Truth Pills

Global Warming? Chicago – Coolest July 8th in 118 Years « Daily Truth Pills — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 03:10:23 +0000

By: Dan Pangburn

Dan Pangburn — Sat, 11 Jul 2009 11:54:15 +0000

For those who can recognize it, the proof is there that added atmospheric carbon dioxide has no significant effect on average global temperature. Without effect on temperature there is no effect on climate change. The climate change that is going on now is the same climate change that has always gone on as influenced by factors external to the planet. The gullible are being misled by the media hype whose MO is that if it isn’t a disaster, it isn’t news.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 23:53:35 +0000

I’m with you and Al Gore Ive started trading carbon and bought oil shares (cant buy a whole oil company like Al ) and I’m looking into land in Africa as it will be cheap after we have carbon taxed all the ignorant blacks to death ,happy days!!!

By: john

john — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 22:12:01 +0000

Ohh climate change now? But thats not what they have been saying for the past decade +, they just said it would be getting hotter; but i guess when the scientists you want to teach us children, dont even understand why this is really all happening, that they have to change the lie to fit their agenda, so it is now called climate change.

Im not saying i know it all either, and to be honest i dont think any one in the world can truly say why this is all happening. Not everything in life can be answered as much as you may like it to be. So to dive into the whole climate change issue, legislation and laws full forced like the USA is doing, is just plain silly and stupid. Because NO ONE KNOWS.

By: Bastet777@hotmail.com

Bastet777@hotmail.com — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 21:17:23 +0000

Any scientists out there? Please explain to these idiots that that Global warming does not necessarily equate to warm temps and instead= drastic climate flucuations (including extreme cold,) which is why the title has been changed to Climate change as of late. It causes everything to go haywire so warm places can be unseasonably cold and vice versa/ Someone pleas explain this in a scientific manner here to these children. Thank you.

By: Dan Pangburn

Dan Pangburn — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:40:46 +0000

Since 2000, atmospheric carbon dioxide has increased 18.4% of the increase from 1800 to 2000. According to the average of the five reporting agencies, the trend of average global temperatures since 1998 shows no increase and from 2002 through 2008 the trend shows a DECREASE of 1.8°C/century. This separation (there have been many others) corroborates the lack of connection between atmospheric carbon dioxide increase and average global temperature. I wonder how wide the separation will need to get before the IPCC and a lot of others are forced to realize that maybe they missed something.

As the atmospheric carbon dioxide level continues to increase and the average global temperature doesn’t it is becoming more and more apparent that many Climate Scientists have made an egregious mistake and a whole lot of people have been misled.

I am now CERTAIN that added atmospheric carbon dioxide has no significant influence on average global temperature. For some time I was a skeptic regarding the human contribution to Global Warming. After thousands of hours of research I am no longer a mere skeptic.

Many Climate Scientists appear to understand some relevant science poorly (it’s not in their curriculum). With understanding of the missing science and knowledge of accepted paleo temperature data it is trivial to show that added atmospheric carbon dioxide has no significant influence on average global temperature. See the pdfs linked from http://climaterealists.com/ind.....nkbox=true for the evidence, to identify the missing science and to see the cause of the temperature run-up in the late 20th century.

There is still the certainty of peek oil given the finite resource. Research money would be far better spent to modify the dna of some algae that are high oil producers to make them more robust and/or other algae that are robust to make them higher oil producers. (There was Government sponsored research to identify high oil-producing algae in the 90s that was not exploited because of cheap oil at that time) Calculations based on that work show that an open facility (which could be located in the desert) 120 miles on a side using only sunlight, sea water and genetically engineered algae could produce enough oil to meet all liquid fuel needs in the U.S.A. Alternatively, known technology using fast breeder reactors could meet all of humanities needs for energy for millions of years.

By: Johnson

Johnson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:18:47 +0000

INCREASE global warming? Increase the temperature our greatest heatsink the oceans … this is typically done by increasing the amount of solar radiation.

Perhaps we could damage our atmosphere to allow an increase.

By: Johnson

Johnson — Fri, 10 Jul 2009 17:17:36 +0000

INCREASE global warming? Increase the temperature our greatest heatsink the oceans … this is typically done by increasing the amount of solar radiation.

Perhaps we could damage our atmosphere to allow an increase.