 |
Global Warming Meltdown: Climategate!
Alan Caruba
Warning Signs
Monday, Nov 23rd, 2009
For those of us “skeptics” and “deniers” who have been jumping up and down, pointing at the Sun, and saying, “See, it’s the Sun that determines how warm or cool the Earth is. See it? Up there in the sky?” The truth about some of the scientists behind the global warming hoax has finally arrived.
The hoax has its roots in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), an instrument of the United Nations Environmental Program, for whom global warming was the open sesame to achieving a one-world-government by scaring nations into signing a treaty that would control their use of energy, the means of producing it, and require vast billions to be sent to less developed nations in exchange for “emitting” greenhouse gases.
Energy is called “the master resource” because, if you have lots of it, you can call your own shots. If you don’t, you are condemned to live in the dark and keeping people in the dark about the global warming hoax was essential.
For years the IPCC has been controlled by a handful of the worst liars in the world, utterly devoted to taking actual climate data and twisting it to confirm the assertion that the Earth was not only warming dramatically, but that humanity was in peril of rising oceans, melting glaciers and polar ice caps, more hurricanes, the die-off of countless animal species, and every other calamity that could possibly be attributed to “global warming”, including acne.
So, around November 20, when some enterprising individual hacked into the computers of the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit (CRU), making off with thousands of emails and documents that demonstrate the level of collusion and deception being practiced by its scientists.
It’s a climate hoax expose that some are calling the revelations a “little blue dress” while others are comparing it to the Pentagon Papers. It has also been dubbed “climategate.”
As James Delingpole wrote in the Telegraph, one of England’s leading newspapers, “Conspiracy, collusion in exaggerating warming data, possibly illegal destruction of embarrassing information, organized resistance to disclosure, manipulation of data, private admissions of flaws in their public claims and much more” was revealed in the 61 megabites of confidential files released on the Internet for anyone to read.
The conspirators had a visceral hatred for scientists who challenged their phony statistics and climate data, but they also agonized over the difficulties of hiding a long established climate cycle such as the Medieval Warm Period. At one point it was left out of a graph that famously became known as “the hockey stick” because it depicted a ludicrous sudden rise in warming, ignoring the previous natural cycle.
At the heart of the revelations were the intense efforts to ensure that no legitimate scientist, particularly those dissenting from the various IPCC reports, would be allowed to participate in the peer review process. Peer review is an essential element in science as it permits other scientists to examine and test the data being put forth to substantiate a new interpretation or discovery.
The IPCC reports were the basis by which popular media such as National Geographic, Time and Newsweek magazines could spread the lies about a dramatic “global warming”, passing them off to an unsuspecting and scientifically illiterate general public. At the same time, the lies were integrated them into school curriculums and maintained by Hollywood celebrities, politicians and others, duped or deliberately ignorant.
To this day, otherwise legitimate news media outlets continue to trumpet and repeat absolute nonsense about “global warming” like brain-dead parrots.
Now that Hadley CRU and its conspirators have been exposed, there truly is no need to hold a December UN climate change conference in Copenhagen; one in which nations would be required to put limits on “greenhouse gas emissions” even though such gases, primarily carbon dioxide, have nothing to do with altering the Earth’s climate.
And that is why you are going to hear more about “climate change” and far less about “global warming.” Hidden in such discussions, intended to justify legislation and regulation, is that the Earth’s climate has always and will always change.
It is, for example, shameful and deceitful for the EPA to claim carbon dioxide is a “pollutant” that should be regulated. The same applies to “cap-and-trade” legislation with the same purpose.
Billions of taxpayer dollars have been wasted on studies of global warming and poured into agencies such as NASA that have lent credence to the global warming hoax.
“The U.S. taxpayer has much exposure here in the joint projects and collaborations which operated in reliance upon what the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit was doing,” says Christopher C. Horner, a longtime global warming skeptic. “There are U.S. taxpayer-funded offices and individuals involved in the machinations addressed in the emails, and in the emails themselves.”
Horner, the author of “Red Hot Lies”, said that the initial revelations “give the appearance of a conspiracy to defraud, by parties working in taxpayer funded agencies collaborating on ways to misrepresent material on which an awful lot of taxpayer money rides.”
The climate, defined as long term trends, and the weather has nothing whatever to do with human activity and suggesting it does reveals the depth of contempt that people like Al Gore and his ilk have for humanity and those fleeced by purchasing “carbon credits” or paying more for electricity when their utility does.
The East Anglia CRU charlatans have been exposed. Most certainly, the United Nations IPCC should be disbanded in disgrace. It belongs in a museum of hoaxes right beside the Piltdown Man and the Loch Ness Monster.
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
November 23rd, 2009 at 5:16 am
“Hadley CRU” does not exit. The Hadley Centre (UK Met Office) and the CRU (Climate Research Unit of the University of East Anglia) and two differenet entities.
Jim Shores Reply:
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:17 am
GORE GATE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
November 23rd, 2009 at 5:46 am
And yet like all good religious fanatics the carbon zealots still fail to see the writing on the wall even when written in large letters in black & white
http://www.openyoureyesnews.com/tag/climate/
November 23rd, 2009 at 6:05 am
Picking at straws, a hoax and fraud is obvious. But for the religious believers in AGW, this is like Gore is no longer the annointed one.
November 23rd, 2009 at 6:06 am
Hey have more respect for Nessie, there is way more evidence that she is alive and well than there is for CO2 induced warming!
November 23rd, 2009 at 8:35 am
What is beyond amazing is that the 2004 US Presidential election involved a drug addict, sexual deviant, sadist coward against a lying, thieving, narcissist. The winner, who was reelected, has severely damaged the US economy with senseless Middle Eastern wars and encouraging Wall Street theft. The loser wishes to make billions while napalming what is left of the US economy.
What is more amazing than even that is the fact that these two evil parasites are voted in the top ten of popularity polls every years. What this indicates is that most Americans would like to be just like these two! This is the problem, because Americans truly do vote for who they believe in.
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:07 am
The problem is not that the data is skewed and false — we already knew that — the problem is that people are still so thick and arrogant about how “right” their beliefs are that even in the face of all this evidence THAT THE ENTIRE MOVEMENT WAS A FRAUD, the believers will believe regardless. In a time of so much potential and so much information right at our finger tips, people seem stupider and more shallow than ever. This is the real battle, getting people to examine the TRUTH of the issue as opposed to the sizzle, which is what the MSM presents ad nausium.
Here is a music bomb that might help:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cl_Sqi2ZAp0
pitofdoom Reply:
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:27 am
Baffled by bull s---, people love wallowing in it,
makes them feel smart, important & knowledgeable!!
Hubris in the grand derision of delusional self.
November 23rd, 2009 at 10:15 am
I would like to ask Hulme, Jenkins or Shackley to define what is meant by UK DE-CARBONIZATION????
(tyndall-targets.doc/ item 5. Research Outcomes).
Also, as unbelievably satisfying as the CRU leak maybe, we are not out of the woods yet. Copenhagen approaches and we need to stay sharp. Remember, Copenhagen is not about temperature, it is about CO2 so do not allow yourselves to be distracted.
There is no substance which traps in heat.
1096645745.txt
From: Stefan Rahmstorf To: Eystein Jansen Subject: [Wg1-ar4-ch06] Ch6-Climate Sensitivity Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2004 11:49:05 +0200 Reply-to: stefan@xxxxxxxxx.xxx Cc: wg1-ar4-ch06@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Hi co-authors,
here are some thoughts on what to say on climate sensitivity in our chapter – this is an
attempt to focus on the main, simple messages for policy makers. (I think we should try
retaining those important messages and not lose sight of them amidst all the details,
complexity and caveats.)
The main policy-relevant question could be phrased as follows: Does the past climate
history tell us how sensitive the climate system is to CO2?
I submit that the answers to this we get from different time periods are the following.
Deep Time:
Reconstructions are too uncertain (and boundary conditions too different, e.g. continents
in different places, different ocean circulation) to draw quantitative conclusions about
sensitivity to CO2,
Rahmstorf then continues with two historical examples presented as evidence which, in reality, are nothing of the sort.
I have traced this AGW fraud back to 1872, John Tyndall and his book: Contributions to Molecular Physics in the Domain of Radiant Heat. To understand how AGW fraud has been perpetrated thus far, Tyndall’s book serves as a crucial source of reference. This book is the origin of the fallacious arguments about CO2 and water vapour being the strongest absorbers of heat and thus the most important document for the fallacy of “greenhouse gases”.
Tyndall repeatedly draws the false conclusion that CO2 and water vapour are the strongest absorbers of heat (greenhouse gasses) while at the same time, in reference to oxygen and nitrogen, stating quote: “In fact my conclusion is that these gases are practical vacua to radiant heat, and that the mixture of oxygen and nitrogen which constitutes the body of our atmosphere is the same.”
So was Tyndall ignorant of the fact that oxygen and nitrogen have a melting point of 54.36 K and 63.15 K respectively, while CO2 is still solid ice up 194.65 K and water is ice up to 273 K? Or was he a sophist with an agenda to frame CO2 and water vapour as the main culprits in the AGW fraud this far back?
It is a clear act of deception to imply that a gas has no ability to absorb heat. A gas is a gas by virtue of the fact that it has absorbed large amounts of heat, if it had not it would remain as ice. The substance with the lowest melting point is by definition the most powerful absorber of heat, which places OXYGEN at 20% and NITROGEN at 79% of the atmosphere, as the most important atmospheric gases in the “domain of radiant heat”. If our current understanding of atmospheric gases is based on Tyndall’s work and the conclusions he draws in this book, Contributions to Molecular Physics in the Domain of Radiant Heat, then it is not so surprising that AGW fraud has occurred. This book is clearly the origin of AGW fraud and is a very interesting example of 19th century sophistry.
Also very important to note at this time, is the close association of John Tyndall to the originator’s of Social Darwinism, Eugenics and later, Hitler’s genocidal Nazi’s. Such names as Thomas H Huxley, and Sir Francis Galton among others. A social group of which Tyndall a was prominent member. This small clique of characters are responsible for human suffering on such an enormous scale that to allow any one of them to influence modern society in any way whatsoever, even from the grave, is a direct crime against humanity. Mankind will never be safe until history is rewritten with full acknowledgment of these criminals and their collusion in the current danger we are now confronted with in the form of AGW fraud, with such ominous agendas as “DE-CARBONIZATION”.
Don’t believe AGW is a fraud, know it!
http://www.spinonthat.com/CO2.html
Jim Shores Reply:
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Crucify Gore
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:17 am
Open Letter to John Gibbons Irish Times Journalist and Global Warming alarmist
Couldn’t resist having a look at your propaganda website.
Whether you are aware that the whole issue of man made climate change is a fraud being perpetrated on us or you are willingly participating in this fraud I do not know.
The fact is that AL Gore has been exposed as a liar and a charlatan not by a “few sceptics working for the oil industry” but by 1000’s of responsible climatologists is obviously beyond your limited research ability. British climatologist Lord Monckton refutes 35 of Gore’s so called facts in his film “an inconvenient Truth” which should be more properly tiled “Convenient Lies”.Gore has been criticised by a High Court judge in London for being ‘alarmist’ and ‘exaggerated’. Ruling that the film could be shown in schools as part of the climate change resource pack, Mr Justice Burton warned it must be accompanied by new guidance notes to balance Mr Gore’s partisan views. Mr Justice Burton said former US vice-president Al Gore’s film, An Inconvenient Truth, was ‘one-sided’ and would breach education rules unless accompanied by a warning
A couple of basic facts for you to digest before you get too excited before the coming circus of Copenhagen.
1 Carbon dioxide is not a pollutant. Your phoney “ Reduce your carbon footprint” campaign ignores the fact that carbon compounds form the basis for all known life on Earth! It also ignores the fact that CO2 is vital to life because it is to all vegetation what oxygen is to all animals. It is food! More CO2 is better than less because it would provide for more abundant crop yields, healthier forests, and would reduce the spread of deserts.
2 Co2 -the relatively small amount of it that is present in the atmosphere in comparison to other greenhouse gases- does not cause a rise in temperature but rather the reverse is the case. You will of course like your mentor in the new Church of Climatology have ignored the evidence of the medieval warming period which produced the now totally discredited “hockey stick”. It a bit of an inconvenient truth to have to admit that the climate was significantly warmer when there was no industrial activity.
3 the United Nations Climate Change panel has been exposed by former climatologists who sat on it- not by a few pesky sceptics- for the junk science that it espouses. Manmade global warming – opps! must call it climate change now is a political agenda and the science was to fit the “facts” around this agenda. This fitting of the facts involves presenting falsified data and exaggerated claims. For example why would Al Gore buy a new condo on the Florida Coastline if as he states s there will be a 20-foot rise in sea level “in the near future.” Maybe he’s a fan of deep sea diving. Check out the club of Rome for the origins of the anthropogenic global warming scam. Why else would scientific reports be edited by UN Climate change bureaucrats and not the scientists themselves.
4 Computer modelling is not an accepted scientific standard by responsible scientists for predicting anything. The parameters can be manipulated to get a desired result.
. Her are some quotes from the charlatans in the club of Rome.
“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
- Club of Rome,
premier environmental think-tank,
consultants to the United Nations
“We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public’s imagination…
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts…
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.”
- Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
“The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations
on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models.”
- Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research
“The models are convenient fictions
that provide something very useful.”
- Dr David Frame,
climate modeller, Oxford University
“I believe it is appropriate to have an ‘over-representation’ of the facts
on how dangerous it is, as a predicate for opening up the audience.”
- Al Gore,
Climate Change activist
“It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true.”
- Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace
Proffessor Steven Scnieder quoted above was a poster boy for global cooling in the 1970’s and was predicting a new ice age!.
This phoney environmentalism is also linked to the sinister agenda 21 which most local authorities on this island have signed up to. This has led to the ban on traditional light bulbs being replaced by the low energy mercury ones. How have we allowed ourselves to arrive at this insane situation where life giving Co2 is regarded as a poison but real poisons like the neuro toxin Mercury is mandatory in light bulbs and by the way are also present in the swine flu vaccines. Thousands of people in Iraq including troops have died from depleted uranium. Thousands of people die every year in Africa and Asia from poisoned waters caused by toxic emissions from big corporations who have themselves joined in the great effort to “save the planet” What utter hypocrisy. Where is the clamour to tackle real environmental problems? Our politicians have been conned into believing in this phoney environmentalism.
In conclusion while you and other government websites throughout Europe and the world will trumpet your phoney environmentalism with inane ideas like curbing carbon footprints and carbon offsets etc who will be the chief beneficiaries of your work to save the world? Follow the money as they say. It is no coincidence that families like the Rockefellers and Al Gore and members of the Club of Rome have set up banks and companies to collect carbon taxes. In other words it’s simple. Con the people with fear mongering lies and people will cough up in the form of taxes to make the scamsters richer. If man made global warming is a scam you will ask, then why do responsible people, governments and various agencies promote it? Well the best way to tell a big lie is to get people to tell it who believe in it. This is what Hitler and others did throughout history. It’s not a new phenomenon. Thus to give you the benefit of the doubt you are unknowingly helping to perpetrate one of the greatest scams against mankind. Get out of your propaganda mindset and do a little research outside of the area of those who are being paid to prop up the political agenda which is to “prove” that global warming exists. You might be disillusioned initially but at least you will be enlightened and no longer a willing tool of the phoney environmentalists who couldn’t give a toss about the environment.
November 23rd, 2009 at 11:33 am
Perhaps the MOST EFFECTIVE QUESTIONS you could ask environmentalists is why is the govt suddenly on your side after years of fighting them? And then ask them if they want to pay CLIMATE TAXES on everything that they use daily?
November 23rd, 2009 at 12:12 pm
Remember when the UN and our government tried to convince us that global warming was man made? Those were some crazy times werent they?
http://www.warnthepeople.org/be-prepared.html
November 23rd, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Wide Awake! That was incredible!!!!!
But, we can’t stop here! We have more problems.
Bioterrorism Evidence
Taken from Jane Burgermeister’s website theflucase.com
“Evidence that an international corporate criminal syndicate, which has annexed high government offices inside the United States, is intent on carrying out a mass genocide against the people of the United States by using an artificial (genetic) flu pandemic virus and a forced vaccination program to cause mass death and injury and depopulate Americans in order to transfer control of the United States to WHO, the UN and affiliated security forces (UN troops from countries such as China, Canada, the UK and Mexico, etc).”
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:19 pm
Now what will Al Gore Do? His billion dollar scam is a hoax. Oh, dear what wil he do now to make a living? Run for President at Walmart, Mc Donalds or scoop ice cream at Ben & Jerry’s, Holycow Batman maybe you and Robin can swing over and give him a cleansing enema with Red Kryptonite and clear his conscience.
November 23rd, 2009 at 2:53 pm
It doesn’t matter. The elite who rule our “democratic” governments will easily tell all mainstream media to twist the story into nothing happened and the masses of stupid sheeple in the world will go back to eating the grass. The politicians will say” too bad”, we’re passing it anyway, I mean look at all the money we are getting from the stupid sheeple in this scam. And nothing will change. The only thing that has changed is the people who DO pay attention have the smoking gun (mushroom cloud) to point to when history points out the scam the powers that be shoved down the throats of every man woman and child in the world for their own greed.
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:27 pm
This is a horrible story of how criminals on the loose and capable of doing anything these days, even hacking into poor innocent computers and stealing the data.
This makes me so mad when I think about what happened and how yet someone else has become a victim to the crime of data theft and hacking that it makes me wish this law to monitor all internet activity would be taken up by the next meeting of the UN and EU and done on a world-wide basis, so I can die at peace with myself, knowing my children will be safe and secure after I am gone.
November 23rd, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Gore’s Whores have been bitch slapped.
November 23rd, 2009 at 6:44 pm
Nice article by Mr. Caruba. I see Glenn Beck has also jumped on the bandwagon.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....r_embedded
Glenn is a day late and a dollar short but it’s still nice to see him on the right side of the issue.
November 23rd, 2009 at 7:14 pm
ed cozy is absolutely correct with everything he says- in his own cosmic fruitcake mind that is.
These are the kind of sheeple that call in to or are the guests on George Norry’s Coast to Coast AM show. Nuff said. Oops, I just remembered, Alex Jones is also a semi-regular guest on with George, right before the lastest on ‘aliens’, ‘time travel’, ‘remote viewing’, ‘chupacobras’, ‘ghosts’ and other such whacked $hit. Well that should’t hurt Alex’s credibility, nor should the way Alex promotes David Icke as a great man and expert on things after the guy said that the queen and Bush sr. and Kris Kristofferson are all shape-shifting reptoids, nor should Alex’s other ‘expert’ Alan Watt calling television a jewish/illuminati plot with an openly coded term ‘te-LEVI SION’.
(Don’t nobody tell the ADL) I checked out that site you linked to ed–you need help dude.
November 23rd, 2009 at 7:55 pm
Official Solicitation for Climate Process and Modeling
Teams Proposals
The official solicitation for proposals for the Climate Process and Modeling Teams (CPT) is now available on the NSF website.
The key aim of the Climate Process Modeling Team concept is to speed development of global coupled climate models and reduce uncertainties in climate models by bringing together theoreticians, field observationalists, process modelers and the large modeling centers to concentrate on the scientific problems facing climate models today.
CPT activities are supported by NOAA, NASA and NSF NOAA is NWO funded
http://www.climate.noaa.gov/
November 23rd, 2009 at 8:16 pm
UNgate:
Bioterrorism Evidence
Taken from Jane Burgermeister’s website theflucase.com
“Evidence that an international corporate criminal syndicate, which has annexed high government offices inside the United States, is intent on carrying out a mass genocide against the people of the United States by using an artificial (genetic) flu pandemic virus and a forced vaccination program to cause mass death and injury and depopulate Americans in order to transfer control of the United States to WHO, the UN and affiliated security forces (UN troops from countries such as China, Canada, the UK and Mexico, etc).”
November 23rd, 2009 at 8:37 pm
WHOgate is next!
November 28th, 2009 at 11:20 am
Great site, thanks! I really love it!