Comments on: Has the new Batman plundered its plot from 9/11?

By: Pirate News

Pirate News — Sun, 27 Jul 2008 02:26:29 +0000

The movie poster from The Dark Knight is from a scene in Book 2 of The Dark Knight Strikes Back, where Batman flies his batjet into a skyscraper, to “terrorize” Lex Luthor, who was running the shadow govt behind his hologram president. The Dark Knight Strikes Back Book 2 was written just weeks before 9/11/2001, and turned in to publishers on 9/12/2001. Metropolis (NY City) was flattened by Lex Luthor’s govt bombers, to consolidate his control of the police state, which already passed the “Freedom FROM Information Act”, and to genocide 5-billion of the 6-billion humans on Earth (just liek the NWO program). Miller even includes caracatures of Donald Rumsfeld and Rabbi Ari Fleisher protecting Lex Luthor.

“It gets even weirder. I turned in the second book on Sept. 12. And there are events in it that people are going to think I did the whole thing after the attacks.”
-Frank Miller, NPR Fresh Air from WHYY, November 14, 2002
http://www.npr.org/templates/d.....diaPref=RM
http://www.npr.org/templates/s.....yId=841850

In “Comic Book Superheroes Unmasked”, on History Channel in 2003, NY City Jew Frank Miller confessed to prior knowledge of the 9/11 Massacres, and appeared genuinely afraid for his safety. HC reported that comic books have always sold war to the sheeple, to trick stupid kids into volunteering to kill and be killed.
http://video.google.com/videos.....mp;tab=wv#
http://store.aetv.com/html/pro.....l?id=73020

The media mafia is now trying to spin Dark Knight Strikes Back as being written AFTER 9/11. But even Book 3 was composed before 9/11/2001. The series was originally published in three 80 page issues. The first issue was released on December 5th, 2001 and the last two issues were supposed to come in six week intervals. The second issue was released in January of 2002. The third and last issue wasn’t released until July 31st, 2002.
http://everything2.com/e2node/.....%2520Again

Frank Miller’s new propaganda book has Batman, or another hero, attacking Bin Laden.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/new.....Laden.html

By: christar

christar — Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:26:16 +0000

@Brock
You hit it right on the nose Brock.
Your examples are excellent.
There is clearly numerous similarities and references to 911 in this movie, all dione intentionally.
I agree that it was an obviously “pro-administration” movie released in a time when Bush’s and the Republican’s approval ratings are at historical lows.

By: Emule

Emule — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 07:54:59 +0000

try this one New York = New Amsterdam. Amsterdam is where Ann Frank was taken from her hiding spot.

http://www.google.com/search?c.....gle+Search

By: Andrew

Andrew — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 05:40:10 +0000

YEAH RIGHT, the comic book was written YEARS AGO, I am talking like 20-30 years before this movie, so there is where the plot is coming from, not from 911

By: Brock

Brock — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 03:32:20 +0000

Honestly, I’m not even that prone to conspiracy crap but this is Warner Brothers and they’re being way too obvious….

Let’s review the facts. In the movie there are many terrorist references:

- Joker is literally described as a “terrorist” and blows up a hospital (the only possible 9-11 reference).
- terrorists are described as wanting to create chaos for no other reason than chaos itself. This is false, as terrorists are generally politically motivated. ie. due to our (or Israel’s) occupation of their land.
- Batman does his own illegal wiretaps on millions of people and says it’s worth it to catch Joker.
- Alfred desrcribes his own experience of hunting a thief hiding in a forset, saying that in order to catch him they: “burnt the whole forest down”. A metaphor for “collateral damage”.
- The whole movie involves both police and Batman “ruffing up” the “bad guys” in order to get information. The line between good cop/bad cop is crossed by Batman and goes into physical abuse/torture. This would be all fine and good, as the Batman from the graphic novel is more violent, however, the movie uses this as one of its major themes.
- Joker makes a tape similar to the reporter that was murdered by beheading by al qaeda and sends it to the news networks. The only difference being that the murder happens off camera.

…there are many more connections which the creators of “the Dark Knight” want us to make between the movie and our current situation but I’ll let you find them…

Let’s face it smart people made this movie, they didn’t conveniently forget the effect of their images and metaphors on the audience. Whether it be film, or tv, or books a mention of the word ‘terrorist’ will invoke certain ideas and images.

Basically this movie is saying that illegal spying is okay, that torture is okay, that collateral damage is okay and that the terrorists have no motive other than chaos. Oh, and that Batman says it’s okay, kiddies. It’s a thinly veiled attempt to promote a pro-administration stance from the governments’ friends at WB.

And for the record, I’m a huge Batman fan (the dark version too) and I hated this movie, aside from the Joker. The rubber bat suit has to go….watch “Batman Dead End” instead…much more accurate and better portrayal.

By: patty

patty — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 02:22:27 +0000

Now it has gone too far. I believe something fishy about 9/11, but trying to connect everything in existence to 9/11 is crazy talk. Any of you people who actually believe this need to get out more. So what the writer of this article is saying is any movie with explosions and psycotic villains is connected with 9/11. ya, Jog on.

By: Adex

Adex — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:29:22 +0000

No, the movie had nothing to do with 9/11, period! Not the imagery, not the plot, nothing. not once on the hour and a half that i was in the theater did i think of 9/11. Nope. Never crossed my mind. Oh and the fact that Cloverfield had anything to do with 9/11 is just retarded. Cloverfield was design ed to be a new take on a genre. Thats all.

By: christar

christar — Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:08:42 +0000

Yeah I kinda noticed I was being a little hypocritical myself, but I couldn’t help it.
LOL.

By: MotherBrain

MotherBrain — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:45:52 +0000

Isnt that a bit much christar? I mean, think about it. We are discussing whether a movie about a fictional comic book character is a propaganda tool of the global elite to further their plot to subdue and and control the world’s masses. it’s a little silly. Just a little. Way I see it, the movie reflects the times, which makes it relevant to the viewer. And for someone who “defends” free speech, you sure are quick to try and stamp out Nemesis_Enforcer’s opinion.

By: christar

christar — Mon, 21 Jul 2008 17:40:32 +0000

@martin
you said;
” this is little more than a poor attempt to stir up some weak minded people into a paranoid frenzy.”

I disagree.
I believe prisonplanet is a forum for the expression of free thought and speech.
we are all discussing this movie and offering our thoughts on it.
Something you don’t see at FAUX News.
Calling us names like “weak minded” and “paranoid” only show that you are threatened by our freedom of thought and expression, and are trying to supress it by humiliating and demoralizing us.

The Neocons are looking to recruit a good man like you for their mind control propaganda. Who knows,maybe one day you will grow up to run of the American death camps. I’m sure you will be proud of yourself as you sadistically toss all the “weak minded..paranoid” people into the furnaces.
I bet you are a rich kid.