 |
Holdren & Company: The Neo-Malthusian School
Jurriaan Maessen
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, July 14, 2009
In the same year that Obama science czar John P. Holdren spoke his mind in Ecoscience, he wrote an article for the book The No-Growth Society, in which a gathering of Neo-Malthusians makes the case for depopulation policies to be implemented in order to avoid impending doom and destruction.
In the book all the contributing authors advocate the ‘no-growth society’, which means there should be no growth in the number of people consuming the earth’s natural resources. In the introduction, economist Mancur Olson presses the point that more government regulation and control is absolutely necessary in order to reach the state of no-growth, or zero population growth (ZPG):
‘Another characteristic that no-growth societies have is an extraordinary degree of governmental or other collective action. (…) Whether it became so by choice or by necessity, a no-growth society would presumably have stringent regulations and wide-ranging prohibitions against pollution and other external diseconomies, and thus more government control over individual behaviour than is now customary in the Western democracies.’
The next author, Kingsley Davis (who is credited for coining the terms “population explosion” and “Zero Population Growth” or ZPG), explores by which means the state of no-growth could be achieved.
‘If ZPG were the supreme aim, any means would be justified. By common consent, however, raising the death rate is excluded; also, reducing immigration is played down. This leaves fertility reduction as the main avenue. (…) If then, the means is birth limitations, why not take measures to reduce births? Why not simply limit each couple to two births, with sufficient penalties to discourage three? The response of the Population Establishment is that this would be “compulsion”. Although plenty of compulsion has been used to lower death rates, it is not to be used to lower birth rates. On the contrary, the right of couples to have the number of children they want has been declared by policy leaders to be “a fundamental human right.”
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Then he laments the voluntarism of people to decide how many children they wish to have and launches an idea for a propaganda-campaign. Knowing perfectly well that bearing children is a natural inclination inherent to our species, he advises something cunning:
‘Built into the social order, therefore, are values, norms and incentives that motivate people to bear and rear children. (…) Respected leaders of society are not about to disavow them, nor is the general public likely to do so. Accordingly, what is strategically required, if one wants to be a population policy leader, is a formula that appears (emphasis added) to reduce reproduction without offending the mores that support it. The formula is to interpret the social problem as an individual one and the solution as a technological matter. Thus “fertility control” becomes control by the woman, not by society; and the means becomes a medically approved contraceptive. (…) The respectability of this approach to population policy is reinforced not only by its appeal to health and medical authority and its link with science (reproductive physiology) but also by its preoccupation with parenthood and children. “Family planning” and “planned parenthood” implicitly feature the family. Nearly every family-planning booklet depicts on the front two radiantly happy offspring, and on the inside implies that every woman’s main concern is her children, a concern that alone justifies her limiting their number.’
Davis asserts that ‘if ZPG is the goal, “existing values” are not a help but a hindrance (…).’
‘Ironically’, Davis continues, ‘the “voluntarism” so much emphasized by the Population Establishment, if consistently advocated, would be unacceptable. A regime of complete freedom in reproduction would be anarchy.’
Davis however is not at all enthusiastic about family planning. According to him, it’s not effective enough:
‘If family planning policies, even when broadened somewhat as they have been in the last few years, are not likely to bring about ZPG, then additional and more drastic measures may be required.’
Holdren’s contribution, Population and the American Predicament: The Case against Complacency, departs from the same point as did his surprisingly revealing scribbling in the Ecoscience monstrosity. Humans are a virus, and their prosperity on earth (and the United States particularly) needs to be put to a halt as soon as possible. In the piece, Holdren puts forth several rhetorical questions. The first being:
‘Do the potential consequences of continued population growth in the United States justify systematic measures to hold fertility at replacement level if it should show any tendency to rise again?’
His second ‘question’:
‘Should such measures be used to push fertility well below replacement (…)?’
Of course, he answered these questions in great detail in the infamous Ecoscience document as well as propose concrete measures, such as forced abortions and other horrendous criminal suggestions. In the no-growth article though, Holdren only hints at such measures, starting out by illustrating the ‘moderate position’ formulated at the time by the National Commission on Population Growth, which recommended that ‘the nation welcome and plan for a stabilized population.’ Right out of the gates, Holdren makes clear that this recommendation is far too soft for his taste:
‘The specific issues (…) justify, I believe, a greater sense of urgency than the Commission’s recommendations convey.’
In Two Cheers for ZPG, sociologist Norman B. Ryder also prescribes reducing the number of births:
‘Assuming that ZPG is not to be achieved by purposeful elevation of the number of deaths, in order to terminate population growth under current conditions we must reduce the number of births to the number of deaths, a reduction by 46 percent. This is a heroic prescription indeed, considering that, barring the grossest of departures from our traditions of freedom, we have confident knowledge of no policy weapon which can nudge fertility down (or up) more than a trace.’
He comes to the conclusion that even a ‘massive propaganda campaign’ would not be effective enough to quench the Malthusian thirst for more death.
This book, with all its willingness to deceive the public, is illustrative of the Neo-Malthusian mindset that Holdren and company propagate so passionately.
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
55 Responses to “Holdren & Company: The Neo-Malthusian School”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 14th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
They need to cuff holdren and put him in the loony-bin!
used to be prud brit Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
NO I THINK THIS GUY NEEDS TO PRACTICE WHAT HE PREACHES AND KILL HIMSELF , AFTER HE KILLS ALL HIS FAMILY
I WISH THIS GUY LIVED LOCAL TO ME
I WOULD GET WOULD PAY CRACKHEADS TO RAPE HIS FAMILY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RMT Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 4:27 pm
Your comments are way out of line — not funny at all. In combating this, we are NOT to become the same sadistic scum that they are. Do us all a favor and keep your posts *ethical and rational.*
Garrett Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Well said, RMT
used to be prud brit Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 11:57 pm
I also agree that my comments were disgusting , just the same as that what he said.
as for irrational I don’t think it was ITS FACT.
If this guy said ” he wanted to kill my family”which he has,i I have the right to defend them.
I do agree we should have a non violent approach but some time people get my back up and I want to smash them.
I apologise if I offend you that was`nt my intention
pro freedom-oregonopps Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 12:43 am
Jane Bergermeister interview was canceled at the last minute. This is the most important eugenics and genocide information to date….Jane Bergermeisters most recent interview with Dr. Carley. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yq2lBwf8g80
Also here is a link to my you tube channel with important chemtrail/nano machine videos http://www.youtube.com/oregonopps
Air Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 2:29 am
Fuck-em. Fight fire with fire. Why do you think gun sales have rocketed?
Will you peacefully say NO to the doctor and the person holding you down when you’re taking the swine flue vaccine(s)? Or will you take that needle and shove it in the eye of the beholder?
Air Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 2:33 am
And I thought it was a little funny. Freedom of speach and all that.
Were you insulted? Shall I call the insult police for you?
jimshores Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 3:39 am
RMT(really moron talk),give us some example of your rational,ethical approaches to dealing with crazy,dangerous weirdos who want to kill us now. We are waiting.
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 1:49 pm
If ZPG were the supreme aim, any means would be justified. By common consent, however, raising the death rate is excluded; also, reducing immigration is played down. This leaves fertility reduction as the main avenue. (…)
I think here they are mistaken in downplaying the immigration problem. Frankly, they don’t go far enough and should take some lessons from the California Eugenistic Goethe about limiting immigration. All stats show that this is the number one factor of population explosion in the US. In fact, whites are reproducing at a far lesser rate than minorities, particulary those of Mexican and Central Americans descent. So if their goal here is just to limit population growth of all Americans without regard to the dire effects that immigration has (on the population factor), they will end up with a predominatly ethnic/Hispanic, mostly Catholic, heavily reproducing, fertile culture that they really won’t be able to control.(Unless of ocurse, they chose to ultimatly kill them off.) They must consider cultural issues when discussing the population problem. Such as the fact that many of these immigrants consider having many children a sign of machismo and acute masculinity. Without any regard to these ethno-centric social factors, every experiment they undertake is bound to fail.
LukeLuke Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 3:15 pm
They are scared of White Europeans as in their world of breeding we are the people of progression. Think what the world may have been like if Europe had not exploited the rest of the world. White folks would into Aeronautics, Engineering, Civic Improvement, electronic communication, advanced computing, Electrical power maximising brain power for technological dicoveries.
Now think of Joseph Conrads description of when the British first sailed around the coast of Africa and the effect of seeing steamboats had on the native population, without Imperialism you could suggest that people living outside Europe would still be living as they had for thousands of years.
Now I believe that is untrue as we all mix with different races and Intelligence is the same amongst all peoples it seems and I personally have made no contribution to civilisation but to the Eugenist who is the threat?
LukeLuke Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 3:25 pm
Also anybody with a heart once they have read Malthus should think what a disgusting man. It is not the people whom are the problem. Its the ruling class that exploits them that is the the cause of the extreme poverty, not population growth.
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
LUkeLuke,
I see what you mean but it doesen’t really jive with what classical Eugenics, esp. the Nazi kind was all about which was about white race promotion. Could be that amongst these Eugenics there are different factions wanting entirely different outcomes. (perhaps Fabians vs. Nazis or some such thing). But historically, Eugenics and Social Darwinism where against immigrants and the like. Charles Goethe and the Planned Parenthood dame, I forget here name, where are just two such examples, to say nothing of Hitler and his legions of course, and most Social Darwinists both American and British. More recently, The Cheney-Kissinger ethno-targeted bio terrorism population reduction is another example. This targets specifically certain minority population and third world countries such as Philappines , Mexico and Peru. Does anyone know where this Holden stands on race specific issues in regard to population control?
American Dummy Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
The neozionists want to eliminate the white population totally and so far they are acheiving dramatic results.The facts speak for themselves.
Go Queenslander Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 8:39 pm
They want more immigration of third world people who are easy to control and they want population control of people who would come up against them and rebel.
jimshores Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 3:53 am
Re: Mexican invaders, they are cannon fodder for the NWO who are thieves who act as a group by conspiracy and will violently move to attain their objectives and are lawless in their pursuits. Our leaders are traitors and should be deal with accordingly.
WAKE UP FOOLS! Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Our Gun Rights are being taken away as more congressmen are bought off. They will try to force H1N1 Sine Flu vaccinations probably before year’s end. We are now headed straight down the barrel of a gun towards some sort of armed conflict. Stay informed with the latest information, newsclips and wake people up ASAP at http://www.thegrandawakening.com/
LukeLuke Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Steven,
Just as a small source of evidence,
http://www.eugenics-watch.com/....._sasl.html
Look for Dr Saleeby. He was a Syrian Eugenist based in London in the early 20th century. G K Chesterton called him out many times as he struck him as a disgusting example of their crypto science, this suggests a tendecy even then toward social standing and not race. We know Malthus studied poor white families .I do agree with you though it is a mix of Liberal Fabianism and Nazi/British/American Eugenics. There are differing factions. I do not know Holdrens stand on race. He probobly pretends to be a social Darwinist but deep down has an admiration of Dr Josef Mengele.
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
Luke Luke,
Neo-Malthusians are anti-immigration. FAIR is just one example. Malthus and the Social Darwinists where mostly about race hygience, eg. White Race promotion and survival. I will check out this Eugenists you mention above but there were Eugenists in many countries and they did not of course all adhere to white race promotion. But having said that, this tends to be the standard.
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 5:00 pm
An anti-immigration site that celebrates Malthus:
http://www.fairus.org/site/New....._ctrl=1906
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Here is an example of an American race based Eugenists from California. Very influenctial amongst accademia:
http://digital.lib.csus.edu/exhibits/goethe/
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
Charles M. Goethe, like his contemporaries, promoted a mythological vision of California as a Garden of Eden and as the crucible for the creation of, according to Luther Burbank, “a magnificent race, far superior to any preceding it.” Central to the fulfillment of California’s Arcadian promise was the preservation and perpetuation of the state’s frontier “race,” specifically the “white pioneer stock.” To this end, Goethe elevated a particular rendition of history, emphasizing in his voluminous writings the settlement of California by “those blue-eyed, blonde empire-building Nordics.” Goethe promoted the preservation of Gold Rush towns such as Whiskeytown, One-Horse Town and Flea Valley, as a primary means of protecting and celebrating California’s vibrant pioneer past.
For Goethe, Jedediah Smith was the quintessential white pioneer. To honor “this great pathfinder and explorer,” Goethe paid for the creation of the Jedediah Smith Grove in Mill Creek State Redwoods Park in Del Norte County through the Save-the-Redwoods League. Goethe later had a commemorative plaque placed at the memorial grove, which continues to perpetuate his vision of California’s white pioneer history: “To Jedediah Smith, referred to as ‘Bible-Toter,’ first white man to cross from the Mississippi to the Pacific, thus starting the train of events which made California the 31st star in our flag.”
——————————————————————————–
“An American of pioneer stock does not have adequate sized families when he knows he cannot properly feed, clothe, educate them in competition with immigrants from lands where wages for a whole month hardly equal his earnings for an hour.”
Charles M. Goethe, Sierran Cabin…from Skyscraper, p.
Steven Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Immigration Study Commission
Charles M. Goethe founded the Immigration Study Commission in the early 1920s to investigate the influx of “low-powers” to California, especially Mexicans and Southern Europeans, whom he alleged were endangering the state’s pioneer heritage. Alarmed by the apparent “over-breeding” of “Mexican peons” (who “multiply like rabbits”) and the “under-breeding” of “old American-Nordic” families, Goethe (using a term coined by Theodore Roosevelt) publicly railed against the dangers of “race suicide.”
In addition to the problem of “differential fecundity,” Mexican immigrants, according to David Starr Jordan, brought “with them bubonic plague, small pox, and typhus fever,” and place a heavy burden on California’s economy. To address these perceived problems, Goethe with UC Berkeley professor Samuel J. Holmes and other notable Californians, pressed for implementation of strict immigration caps against Mexicans. Throughout the twentieth century, most recently in the approval of Proposition 187 in 1994, Californians have repeatedly advocated legislation based in similar xenophobic perspectives.
American Dummy Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Just another name for Jewish population control.
nixon Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 11:36 pm
holdren is the eichmann to
obamas hitler
will wal mart supply the zyklon b
July 14th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
I just wanted to share some ideas that are working for me.
I have joined Glenn Beck’s 9/12 group and the people are waking up to Alex’s films.
It is so easy, just go in and talk about the constitution and give them Freedom to Fascism.
Most of them already know this is a left and right game. Now we are going to parades and town events handing out hundreds of Obama Deceptions, Freedom to Fascisms.
Go do it, the people are waking up in this group and these people are already starting to see the lies in the corporate mainstream media. I tell them I think Glenn is trying to tell us the truth but at the same time he can’t because it is Fox News.
We will never stop until these bastards are out and free humanity can prevail.
The globalists will be taken to court and found guilty of crimes against humanity!
Thanks
malevolent entities Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
lol glen beck fox news shcill 9/12 .. erm he called for all 9/11 truthers to be arrested or whatever and called them terrorists.. amusing
jimshores Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 4:17 am
Beck is an obvious fraud, a bogus broadcaster who will command you lemmings to jump off the cliff when you become effective. 90% of talk radio hosts are propagandists who probably are CIA. Alex is about all we have and maybe all we need. KLIF in Dallas doesn’t have anyone that is not bogus. KlIF stands for KEEPS LISTNERS IGNORANT FOOLS especially-John David Wells (Wells smells). The used car salesman turned expert on everything, Ed Wallace is as bogus as Al Goree and just as stupid. I am monitoring Jeff Bolton (no nuts) this morning and he is praising the CIA (who advertises on the air daily). Wells goes on vacation once a month and goes to DC (probably to get instruction and BLOOD MONEY). Wells is pro FED, is for curfews and anti 911 truth. He calls himself conservative, and thinks we believe him. Rush is mush, Hanity is insanity.
S.Bonn Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 8:13 am
hanity is neural linguistic programming{language programming}look on youtube theres an explanation on there that explains this.very interesting subject!
July 14th, 2009 at 12:52 pm
Wow, great choice obama. If you want lunatics in charge, that is. Yet another douche-bag. Why is it that all the truly useless eaters are living in capital cities? Maybe if we got rid of all the politicians, lawyers, and bankers, we would have enough useless eaters gone to bring us down to these so-called sustainable levels. Im willing to give it a try!
July 14th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
This site has stirred the pot. I was reAding post at web site called news hounds after alex said they were obama lovers. Wow the people over there are bashing this site as a bunch of lunatics and how we all should be in jail for hate speach (postings). I SAY WE BOBARD THERE SITE WITH ALL KINDS OF POSTINGS AND DONT STOP. WE WILL SHOW THEM HATE SPEACH. They deleted my post and dont want to hear them after I insighted the truth of this subject and this man. Lets bombard there site……. NEWS HOUNDS….
NEWS HOUNDS SITE IS A BULLSHIT SITE AND THEY SUCK.
Air Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 2:48 am
If there is no crazy lunatics trying to take over the world and kill most of us… then all our anger and hate speeches are pointed at no one, and we’re all crazy ourselfs.
So what’s their problem? I think they know that too many of us know hehehe. They’re scared.
Spread a little love
Mark Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 5:12 am
“BOBARD” “SPEACH” ???
Are you retarded?
July 14th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
And what the fuck is this fuckn pin head faggot gonna do.LMAO wat a fuckn moron. Your a real brainiac lets fuckn kill people.Who actually fuckn thinks about this?The truth is jim if this did happen life would be to perfect.And I wouldnt even kill these cunts Id tie them up and let them see how fuckn loud and proud we would be without them.Not a select few all of us.As 1 AS A PEACEFUL WORLD.Now that would kill them.
July 14th, 2009 at 1:26 pm
This guy’s video on youtube has been so popular that Obama
Called him personally. He said that he was very disturbed with the video and
Invited him to the White House. Obama also said he wanted the White House to
Handle the Press and not to talk about the video or the White House visit. That’s interesting.
Watch it now. This may be the best six minutes invested in
Your future
You may have to turn your Sound Control up some.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA
jimshores Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 4:29 am
Mr Grumpy, I agree about the video. Every one in America should watch this great Patriot.
July 14th, 2009 at 1:30 pm
These psychopaths speak as if they have complete control over the world.
I will rule myself and decide how many children I want to have, I will have 10 with my wife if we wish.
Refuse the message of humans are bad and just random mutations.
WE ARE HOLY
July 14th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
This is all sorts of screwed up.
July 14th, 2009 at 1:35 pm
This guy’s video on youtube has been so popular that Obama
Called him personally. He said that he was very disturbed with the video and
Invited him to the White House. Obama also said he wanted the White House to
Handle the Press and not to talk about the video or the White House visit. That’s interesting.
Watch it now. This may be the best six minutes invested in
Your future
You may have to turn your Sound Control up some.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jeYscnFpEyA
July 14th, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Holdren, you sick fuck! Get your pale, withering hands off of women’s wombs! You cannot and will never control us!
You and your anti-human, fascist eugenicist cult WILL be defeated by a free, autonomous humanity. We are unstoppable now. We control our own destiny. We will smash your agenda to pieces and dash your hopes into the ground.
The dead are rising all around the globe and realizing the horror of government — it’s too late for you.
-AN
http://www.twitter.com/autonomy_now
jimshores Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 4:34 am
Holdren better hold on to his ass. His evil deeds have caught up with him and will bring down the rest of the TRAITORS TO THE HUMAN RACE along with him. Anybody who dosen’t come over to the patriot side now, is not worth saving.
July 14th, 2009 at 2:29 pm
In my lifetime, the world population has grown from about three to three and a half billion to over 6.7 billion as of a year ago. I am 43.
So, the catastrophic effects of overpopulation Holdren and Ehrlich and other Neo-Malthusians have been predicting since the 1970’s and 1980’s have yet to come true. This is certainly reason to at least take their basic idea of “overpopulation” with a grain of salt (though, it certainly does seem possible that the Earth could become overpopulated at a future time — almost all animal populations to outstrip their environment from time to time).
Similarly, however, this is also cause to question those who say that a powerful cabal of elites has been planning radical depopulation over the same period (since the 1970’s and 1980’s). If they have been planning something like this (and I certainly do believe their is an elite), they are definitely slow starters. Maybe, it is not as easy as it sounds to wipe out 90-95% of humanity while doing your best to maintain your vast holdings of wealth. Hmmmm!
If there is such a cabal, they are certainly a bunch of underachievers. They would make Bart Simpson look ambitious. (If indeed you do exist, take that!)
So, let’s check out the score:
Neo-Malthusians: goose-eggs
Depop. Conspiracy Theorists: strike out
Logic: batting 1,000 as always
July 14th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
I think this fucking asshole should set an example and have himself beheaded on the do nothing
mass media. Shit i might even watch TV for that reality show.
July 14th, 2009 at 6:06 pm
One world government and currency is rapidly approaching.
We are being engineering politically, socially, econiomically, emotionally, and physically.
We aint gonna stop it at this point people.
We passed that point long ago. Long ago.
I don’t like the way THE OWNERS are going about it.
In their arrogance, they treat us like pets.
They have compassion for us, but only like we are their useful pets.
Its why they went forward with the “Green Revolution” in the 60’s and 70’s- they saved about a billion people worldwide who would have starved to death.
Think about it. Why did they do that?
Its because the do they love us – but if its between us (the masses) and them- it’s a no brainer. It would be like you choosing between your dog and your son.
I hate THE OWNERS for their arrogance and greed.
As if there great wealth and power, mostly accumulated through generations of nefarious activity, buys them WISDOM. Thats how delusional their astronomical wealth has made them.
But THE OWNERS are RIGHT about one thing.
One world government is the ONLY measure that could save us ALL, even THE OWNERS….from THIS FATE: (Be sure to watch the end)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....p;index=13
jimshores Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 4:52 am
Tobage,Thanks for the opportunity to view your reccomended video. I noticed that some of the explosions looked like what happened to the twin towers at 9-11. You will never see this quality on tv, thats why tv is dead; they killed themselves or death by the NWO more accurately.
July 14th, 2009 at 7:13 pm
People who advocate mass depopulation like Holdren and his goons reminds me of a video game called “Half-Life 2″. If you’ve played it, you would know that the a powerful alien race, known as the Combine, invades and takes over Earth, then imposes the “Suppression Field” on the humans, which decreases the birth rate to zero, and humans currently living would be the last to live. No young children are present. The game has got a very post-apocalyptic, non-vibrant, and almost void-like kind of setting. Present-day Earth would be something like that if such atrocious depopulation methods were to take place right now.
Russian K Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 11:02 am
Good game and point beaten it twice few years back, but after reading robots can feed on humans anythings possible now.
JA Reply:
July 15th, 2009 at 8:38 pm
Yeah, freaky eh? Military robots devouring dead humans… Not even the machines in The Terminator movie series were that vicious, gruesome, and bloodthirsty for flesh, organs, blood, and bones!
July 14th, 2009 at 11:10 pm
http://www.population-security.....future.htm
This was all advocated in a 1972 report titled “The Report of The Commission on Population Growth and the American Future” commissioned by the Nixon administration. It was written by the Rockefeller Commission. You know, those Rockefellers……..
July 15th, 2009 at 1:57 am
Does anyone know if this Holdren guy is Jewish?
July 15th, 2009 at 5:35 am
Justin Timberlake is perfect in every single way possible. They should study his DNA.
July 15th, 2009 at 6:04 am
This is NOTHING NEW.
It has been around since Dennis Meadows and company wrote THE LIMITS TO GROWTH in 1975 whcih was a report card on THE CLUB OF ROME’s report on population control, resources control, etc.
AND this is as the article suggests a NEO-MALTHUSIAN concept.
I am not surprised. All the ILLUMINATI want to lower world population, control resources (for their benefit) and have a ONE WORLD GOVERNMENT AND CURRENCY.
I AM SURPRISED THAT OTHERS ARE SURPRISED BY THIS!!!!!!!
July 15th, 2009 at 7:45 am
Typical ivory tower idiot, totally out of touch with reality, and reaching these murderous and bizarre conclusions about “fixing society” without any justification.
July 15th, 2009 at 10:02 am
Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars – http://www.poorwiseman.net/Ope.....etops.html
July 27th, 2009 at 7:53 am
766Aja exgcelokirtz, [url=http://uimjcdhuawme.com/]uimjcdhuawme[/url], [link=http://hwvtmosuncqh.com/]hwvtmosuncqh[/link], http://cxynktjucvhl.com/