 |
Japanese Orbiter Finds No Evidence Apollo Missions Landed On Moon
Pravda
Tuesday, May 26, 2009
There is something wrong with US mission to the Moon. The legendary space mission is still shrouded in mystery. Mankind still has a number of reasons to cast doubt on the miracle of inter-planetary flights. Many people still say that US astronauts have never landed on the Moon.
Japan’s Kaguya lunar orbiter took several pictures of the site, where Apollo 15 and Apollo 17 supposedly landed in 1971 and 1972. If the astronauts had ever landed there, they should have left a lot of equipment on the site, including the rovers, on which they traveled on the surface of the Earth’s satellite. The pictures, which the Japanese rover took, showed not even the slightest hint of the US presence on the Moon.
There was only a spot of dust seen on the photograph of the site, from which Apollo-15 blasted off on its journey back to Earth. The spot, NASA said, was a firm evidence of Apollo’s presence on the Moon.
It is an open secret that the Moon’s entire surface is all covered with a thick layer of dust. US astronauts took many pictures of their shoeprints on the Moon’s surface. Joseph Skipper, a researcher of lunar and Martian anomalies, has many questions about the evidence, which the lunar dust provides. A number of images, made by the US astronauts showed their lunar rover standing at a distance from the landing module. There can be no wheel tracks seen on the pictures – as if the rover had flown from the lander to the site where it was photographed.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
One may assume that the lunar ground was too hard for the wheel tracks to appear in it. However, there are many shoeprints in the dust around the rover. They can be seen even underneath the rover, although there are no wheel tracks on the ground at all.
Many people say that the US astronauts have never landed on the moon and that the entire mission is a fake. Others say that the missions took place, although the astronauts did not land on the Moon every time they traveled there. They could probably exaggerate their success to baffle the USA ’s major rival in the space race – the USSR.
It is not ruled out, though, that the discovered anomalies can be explained. They can be probably connected with certain peculiarities of the lunar dust and its interaction with electrostatic charges. However, serious scientists prefer not to throw too much light on the subject.
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
81 Responses to “Japanese Orbiter Finds No Evidence Apollo Missions Landed On Moon”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 26th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
*-> HERE: Stream and Download ALL the best interviews and rants from the Alex Jones Show Archives:
http://alex-jones-archives.politicsfiles.info/
Backup your favorite episodes, don’t miss any!
May 26th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
somehow this does not surprise me after all the lies amerika has told[sold] the world,I await confirmation of this news.joy oh joy oh joy if anything can bring down amerika the fourth reich this will
Talisman of Truth Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 3:56 pm
Don’t let this be about Russia vs. America… let it be about finding the truth. Let it be about Russia sending people to the moon!
Marine Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 6:13 am
I watched the live feed as a kid on the Apollo missions. when they drove the lunar rover there was dirt and dust flying every where when they were showing off. so if there were no tracks, and no lander bases, no rovers(x2) Therefore, there is no evidence then there was no missions. So it was the great lie of the 20th century. Why wouldn’t we go back and colonize the moon? It is only logical to do so to further space exploration. it is easier to launch missions from there than earth. A space station is least efficient to install into orbit and the most dangerous as history has shown. A Terra base is more efficient to install and least dangerous. you have a whole planetoid to protect the base.
Jedi Pauly Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 7:35 am
There is another possibility that you may not have considered. Maybe the mission did happen the way we saw it on TV. Perhaps there are other beings from other worlds visiting the moon and they removed the evidence for their own curiosity or some other reason.
Champion Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:06 am
It was a hoax. Just go back to the time in question and do some research and you will see it was nigh on impossible to put a man on the moon back in the 60’s with that technology they had then. The US were desperate and have become the nation of smoke and mirrors for a long time. Their motto is if we can’t do it deceive the nation and rest of the world into believing we have. I am sure there is not a sensible person left alive today that doesn’t understand what the US and it’s institutions are all about.
Daniel Boone Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
hey Paulie, I hear you make good meatballs.
Marine Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 6:29 am
Don’t be in such a hurry for America to fall! We fall the whole world falls. There will be no future for any country. Many millions will perish and many more will suffer untold levels of hell. So being a caller of this “doom” is not conducive. Why do you think we are exhausting all of our traditional ways to STOP this illegitimate government and keep the balance at the same time. We are not animals!!! We are American Citizens, intelligent, compassionate, and generous. We feed the world with our grain. Now imagine this! We fall into total and complete civil war and we stop exporting ALL food products to the world. Do the math how many millions if not billions will perish from total starvation. This is the reality of how serious and deadly this could be. True patriots are, and always will be concerned about the decisions they make on the effect of how many others will pay as well for their decisions. If we stop exporting to other countries how long do you think before those armies from those parts of the world try and invade us for our “Grain Belt” of this nation. Think it is not possible. All aspects of this scenario are very possible and real. Then what would we do? We are torn apart in a civil war, no federal military for defense, no effective way to fight a foreign invader. Use nukes? That would spell our total and complete destruction. Pay attention to the big picture of tactics and strategy. Not the mental retardation of shoot first and ask questions later.
A Canadian Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 6:44 am
Marine…you…are a fucken moron. WTF makes you think that your pathetic country would make one bit of difference to any of us elsewhere in the world..INCLUDING Canada.
You should take your conceited attitude and shove it up your FAT American ass.
You think you are so mighty..and ooohh the world would be lost without America..
Well guess what!!! Most of us…couldn’t care less for your American filth, ignorance and lies.
I say..fuck you…
Ricko Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 10:32 am
Hey hey hey – cool it.
Let’s all just get along. Smoke some pot and shake hands.
Paulie Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
Wow! You have the cheek to call someone ignorant. Ha ha! Take a deep breath bro. Last time i looked it was a round world, and we’re all living on it together. The bilderberg group isn’t concerned by your so called border with the u.s., so leave your patriotism at the door (It’s all in your head!)…. How is your North American Union coming along these day’s anyway? You should use that anger more constructively, like protesting the Trans Texas Corridor.
JWP Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Canadians are such arrogant, asshole….gasbags! Here is a country that basically gave what little culture that did exist and gave it to the Indians, Paki’s and Chinese….who have swamped their 2nd rate country by mass immigration. It is easy for Canada to sit by and comment on what other “relavant” powers are doing worldwide….Russia, US, China, Germany…..hell Canada’s GNP is smaller than Texas or California….or New York. Canada contributes “NOTHING” to the world stage…either Militarily, Financially….In fact Canadians are viewed by most in the world as a boring country that sells it passports….I would much rather be an Amerikan with some personality and balls! Canada…GO FUCK YOURSELF….
No Marine Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 7:55 am
Your country really did a good job in the past, esp in WWII.
But stopping bragging yourself in such a way. Your country is consuming more than 25% of the whole world’s resources rather than helping the other countries now. You are exporting nothing but carbon dioxide. Nearly half of the carbon dioxide emission is from your country. It is your country who invades the other countries just for Oil.
Cars made in your country are awful. Just take a look at GM and Chrysler. No one is fond of their products. GM is an expert in making war machines. However, wars are not needed. Even you American people buy Toyota and Honda which are from Japan.
There is no such a great country in the world that everyone would perish if your country fell.
michael Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:07 am
FYI dude NWO have been introducing mass ammounts of legislation to stop us from growing food. hr645 and there are several others that are taking away our ability to grow food to eat for ourselfs not to mention to sell to other countrys.there are 4 huge farms in the midwest area that are respossible for 40% of our wheat here and they are all 4 going bankrupt,that means the food shortage is closer than most realize. so dont worry about exporting anything cause we wount even have enuff for ourself
binky11 Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:25 am
We fell, and the whole world IS falling. The United States is seen as a pariah by most of the non-Western world. No one would really care about this, except that we always made such a big deal out of exporting freedom. All we’ve exported recently is death and mayhem in the name of Christianity and big oil. Did you see the bible quotes on all of Rumsfeld’s stationery from the last 8 years? Quotes about the Muslim world having to be destroyed before Christ can return? That’s what we’re exporting. Are you into 911 truth at all? I know plenty of Marines who are, since no real military man could ever accept the lame government explanations for the WTC collapse or the fact that there is no jumbo-jet wreckage anywhere at the Pentagon or Shanksville, Pa. “crash sites”. (actually elaborately planned ’stage sets’ complete with belching black smoke(Pentagon) from tire fires set in dumpsters. When the towers fell, and I really thought we were being attacked by a foreign power, I felt frightened and sad and angry. I also surprisingly never felt so patriotic in my life. But now, after studying the events of those days in light of the many revelations available on the internet, I’m simply freaked out and afraid of my own government. They HAD to have done it. Have you even watched Loose Change? America’s world status right now depends entirely on the Chinese, who can call our debts any time they want to. Wal-Mart owns this country. Of course, being a Marine, you really want to accept the old school definitions of what America really stands for. But that conquering, anti-Nazi nation of Andy Hardys is long gone. It disappeared with Nixon and LBJ and Vietnam, and is never coming back. The events of 911 are really just the culmination of the elite’s plans that commenced on 1/22/63. I believe in the phrase “Semper Fidelis” also, but my faithfulness is not to the latest scams of the multi-national billionaires that define the USA today. My loyalty is to constitutional framework that is the real foundation of this grand experiment called the USA. By the way, we use food as a WEAPON more than you know. Our food exports are part of a chess game, a pawn in political intrigues and dirty wars where millions can starve or survive depending on who we deem worthy. How do you feel about the utter waste of Marines in the Middle East. They’re over there to secure oil for the Cadillacs that GM has been subsidized to build with taxpayer’s ‘bailout’ money. The world used to love our culture despite our fascist military and social tendencies. Even our movies and music have fallen to such a commercially generic cookie-cutter level that the rest of the world could care less these days. What the world still wants from us is our technology. That’s about it.
May 26th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
Sounds like someone’s still sore about losing the space race…
Matzo Man Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
The Japanese?
I'm So Bored With The U-S-A Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 3:55 pm
Pravda, the source of the article, is a Russian news service that used to be the official propaganda outlet of the Soviet government.
CivilianResistance Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 5:22 pm
This may be propaganda from the Russian media, but not likely in this case. This was brought up in the corporate media years ago. i remember reading about this. That the japanese planned for this and the planned pictures will unveil the truth about the apollo missions. Until now that was forgotten news. I was waiting for the news to finally come and here it is. I remember researching the missions and the lunar mission photos. Some photos by experts noted they were doctored and manipulated. Photography experts also concluded in many of the photos that there were two light sources based off the shadows the light casted off the rocks. Further evidence even showed that the flag seemed to be “waving” in the wind which would be unlikely since there is no atmosphere on the moon. finally, many scientists disbelieve the lunar landings due to the fact the earth is surrounded by a giant ring of radiation created by solar activity. the ring, is a few thousand miles beyond the earth’s atmosphere between the earth and moon therefore allowing orbital missions by astronauts but not anything further that earth orbit. Otherwise if astronauts, in their little spaceship passed through this ring, which they inevitably would to reach the moon, would become gravely ill or even die. Making the missions damn near impossible. SO, either way, is it too hard to believe the US lied?
I'm So Bored With The U-S-A Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
There are more light sources in space than the sun, as light reflects and refracts off of planets & moons, and on a surface that, as you point out, has no atmosphere, this would be even more evident.
The waving of the flag can be explained by it absorbing vibrations from movement near its base, which was far more flexible than a regular flagpole.
As far as Van Allen radiation, that’s probably your best argument here – even then, it’s not constant, nor is it evenly distributed around the planet, and is actually considered only “moderately dangerous” for humans – but I grew up in Florida, lived in Cape Canaveral, and have seen so many rocket launches that I find the idea of a hoax unlikely.
(”Many” is also a hard word to quantify.)
Remember, Nazis like Von Braun had been planning space launches for many years by the time they made it to NASA, and, after receiving a blank check from the US government to further their goals, I think it’s fair to say that they were certainly industrial enough fellows to make it there.
Hell, these are the same guys that killed thousands of jews using slave labor to hollow out mountains for their experiments – they were ruthlessly driven & I rank this type of speculation along the lines of a hollow or flat earth.
daggaz Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Flag “waving” – Its not waving at all. Its made of cloth, with only two poles to extend it, and tho they tried as hard as they could, they couldn’t smooth the material out. I have a book with hundreds of lunar landing photos, you can see the ripple pattern is identical in nearly all the shots. Changes are when they tried to smooth it out some more.
“Light from camera equipment” – What a joke. The uncut sunlight on the moon is STRONG and not filtered or scattered by any atmosphere, and the astronaughts are literally surrounded by mirrors. Polished aluminum and steel surfaces, actual mirrors, their goldplated visors. Even their suits or rocks with light albidos cast reflections.
“No stars in the photos” – Go out with your best camera and take pictures at night. Or just look thru your photo albums for night photos. Oooooh! Spoooooky, no stars! Its a conspiracy, the government must have been IN YOUR HOUSE erasing all the stars! No. Starlight is faint despite their apparant radiance (our eyes are millions times more sensitive than camera film) and film needs a longer exposure time to pick this up. Even in modern times, imagine trying this with 1970’s equipment.
“No rover tracks in the photos” -Bullshit. Their are tracks all over the place, you can see them clearly in thousands of photos. But yeah, I can pick ONE photo out of the many with a low angle, where the rover has been parked for hours and the astronaughts have been walking around it obliterating its tracks with their footprints, and bam! the conspiracy is true.
“Interstellar radiation makes spaceflight impossible” This actually has a grain of truth, but is still false. Radiation levels in outerspace are much higher than here on earth, tho astronaughts do enjoy a small amount of shielding from their vehicles. Luckily as well, the sun wasnt nearly as active during the lunar landings as it has been in the 90’s. Still, the incidence of cancer among NASA astronaughts is much higher than in the general population, exceeding even that of the crew of commercial airliners who have thousands more hours of elevated exposures, and some of our old hero’s have in fact, fallen. Look it up.
LRRP 1968 Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 4:35 am
Yes a Russian news organization that used to a propaganda outlet much like FOX, CBS, NBC and ABC, yet for all that STILL more reliable than the US propaganda outlets.
Aussie Bob Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 1:52 am
Propaganda….propaganda…?
What about the recent claim by the Chinese that their astronauts had achieved their first space walk.
The footage was scrutinized and “torn apart” by the U.S. media which “proved” the Chinese “astronauts” were actually in a water-tank…!
Makes us all wonder doesn’t it……?
Aussie Bob.
May 26th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
I thought that they left a special mirror on the moon so lasers could be used to measure the distance.
I also thought they left some equipment to measure “moon quakes” that reports back here.
I’m not really into the 3-mile tall towers supposedly there that they (NASA) are allegedly trying to hide. The evidence is interesting to look at though.
daggaz Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
They did. The mirror is actually three mirrors set perpendicularly, so that any light that strikes it from any angle reflects back to the point of origin. This is the same principal used in the paint in the green highway signs, there are tiny micro-cube-mirrors embedded in the stuff. Ever wonder why they always light up like that?? Universities around the world use these mirrors to measure the moon’s orbit by bouncing lasers off of them. Pretty hard to cover up that kind of stuff from the international academic community. This story is a giant, collosal joke.
SeaBottomDweller Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 4:37 am
Well, you don’t need manned missions to put junk on the moon…now would you?
May 26th, 2009 at 4:11 pm
i would like to see the pictures and photograhs that it took up to date it would be pretty interesting to see
May 26th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
While I highly doubt the US faked any of the moon landings or findings – I do feel there is definately something fishy about the US’s involvement with the moon.
My first guess would be that we have already secured a base their secretly to pre-emptively assert US dominance over the moon in the next few decades – but the truth could be stranger than fiction!
As for the mirrors there – I never felt that was a compelling argument – as they could certainly be position remotely – even back in the 60’s…
LRRP 1968 Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 4:35 am
I agree I don’t think they were faked but we did NOT get the whole story
May 26th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
Pravda was the populist paper (for the masses) in Soviet Russia as opposed to Izvestia which was the serious paper for the party elite. After the breakup of the Soviet Union, Pravda was set adrift from the state and its financial support and so its journalists decided to go even more downmarket to remain afloat and it has ended up like American supermarket tabloids The Globe and The National Enquirer. Consequently, it is possible that this story is total fantasy, but I guess that if it isn’t then in a very short time the shocking truth of NASA duplicity may all come out.
Speak_Only_What_U_Know Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 5:31 am
Where in the heck do you get this information? That is just not true at all. Although Pravda has been somewhat westernized and dabbles in strange occurance and discovery, Part of its appeal, it can and often does provide valuable news information that is not made available through America’s political mouthpiece, the propaganda laced corporate owned television networks and newspapers. Like every other newspaper or new source in the world Pravda puts a Russian spin on things. The point I hope to highlight is that inspite of the few government inspired contributions to Pravda, a large percentage of what is reported in or by Pravda actually has sources outside of Russian control.
Marine Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 6:33 am
nothing is outside russian control in their press or tv.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:12 pm
Hmm, propaganda 1001….lol I love how they say that major scientist prefer not to throw too much light on the subject? Hmm, how come. Something is definitely fishy about the lunar landing. And in this day and age of “closed circuit” television, it wouldn’t surprise me too much anymore that NASA exaggerated or made the whole thing up to beat the russians who were definitely far ahead of NASA at one point during the space race, until they started running into a series of sabotages… i mean errors.
May 26th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Having done some research into the matter I can now report that the resolution of the Japanese orbiter’s camera is 1 pixel = 10 metres (33 feet). Since the width of the Apollo Landers is only 30 feet, and the length of the Lunar Rovers even less, it is hardly surprising that these objects do not show up in the orbiter’s images.
storky Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
No shit! Moon landing conspiracists always fail to mention the resolution of the detection devices that are incapable of spotting the leftover hardware much less vehicle tracks or footprints.
Hey Moe, Larry . . . I can’t see, I can’t see . . . ’cause my eyes are closed!
May 26th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
I know there are conspiracies, but I’ve never bought the idea that the U.S. faked the moon landings.
I'm So Bored With The U-S-A Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
I agree – Those 2 “Secret Space” documentaries on VideoGoogle are really fun, though.
May 26th, 2009 at 9:23 pm
just admit the fact that we r jst a bunch of losers……
May 26th, 2009 at 9:29 pm
THEY DIDNT LAND ON THE MOON ..IT WAS JUST A DESERT IN NEVADA OR SMTHIN..GOOGLE IT UP..ITS A FUKIN JOKE
Aussie Bob Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 1:26 am
G’day mate,
the latest info is that they duplicated the landscape in the middle of Australia in the Great Simpson desert where the very same/similar terrain exists.
Another theory is that they used the props and sound stage from “2001: A Space Odyssey” the award winning movie directed by Stanley Kubrick.
Cheers, Aussie Bob.
May 26th, 2009 at 10:33 pm
Alex, pull this story immediately. This conspiracy theory has been so thoroughly debunked that it is a complete farce within the international scientific community. Having this poorly written (Japanese ROVER??), poorly thought out, patently false strawman argument up in your scientific section only serves to devalue the entire site. Please use an iota of discression in the future, remember, your journalistic integrity depends on it.
Marine Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 6:41 am
OH MY A CRITIC OF CENSORSHIP!!!! All stories are to be reported under free press whether you choose to believe or not is up to you the individual. Not for one to decide who reads what. Remember the First Amendment. Use your right not to read, listen, watch, turn the channel, get the hell up and leave!! But do not inflict your “CHOICES” on the “CHOICES” of others. This is the very reason this country is in the mess its in today, Ya federalist fuck!!!
dno7956 Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:34 am
you are right, marine
May 26th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
The Japan rover was a little off course. It needed to be in Hollywood where the scam was filmed.
Daggaz, you don’t work for the Govt. do you. Just curious.
daggaz Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
I am a 32 year old physics and engineering student who switched over to nanotechnology. I am also an ex-pat, and wouldn’t set foot in the fascist cess-pool you call the “United” States if you put a gun in my back. My latest chemistry teacher, Niels Harrit at the University of Copenhagen where I study, is the co-author of the nano-thermite in the WTC article. I know bullshit when I see it. “The moon landing was faked” story is ten times the bullshit as the “official version” of 9-11. Both are patently false and easily proven so.
daggaz Reply:
May 26th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
And Hey, MLB
The Japanese didnt send a rover, they sent an orbiter. There1s a world of difference, or do you just not bother with the details?
Passerby Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 5:11 am
Sometimes the worst thing about being a “truther” is embarrassment due to one’s fellow truthers, right daggaz?
Marine Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 6:48 am
Well where your at and your opinion says it all. YOUR A FUCKING TRAITOR AND A COWARD, HOPE YOUR FOREFATHERS ARE PROUD OF YOU. I LOOK FORWARD TO RIDDING THE WORLD OF YOUR SPINELESS WORTHLESS NO HACK PIECES OF AMPHIBIAN SHIT THAT YOU ARE. YOU HIDE BEHIND EDUCATION AS YOUR DEFENSE, BUT, WE KNEW THE WORLD WAS FLAT AND THE SUN REVOLVED AROUND THE EARTH TOO! TO THE TUNE OF HOW MANY PEOPLES LIVES WERE SNUFFED OUT BY THE “EDUCATED” YOUR A DISGRACE AND A COWARD SIR! I HOPE YOUR CHILDREN GET TO SEE YOU EXPOSED IN THIS WAY. THEN YOU GET TO EXPLAIN YOURSELF WITH YOUR “EDUCATION”.
Steve Williams Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Uh… just reminding everyone that dear, sweet little ol’ grandmothers visit this website trying to get info about whatever because they’re worried and concerned as well. And one thing older ladies really don’t like is the gratuitous use of potty-mouthed profanity. They may curse and swear in private as circumstance might dictate, but they don’t like it done in public.
And none of us would be here if our grandmothers hadn’t been here first. So let’s make all those grandmas at least a little bit happier by not freaking them out as much.
Grammar lesson time: that’s “you’re” and not “your”. The two terms have completely different meanings and can’t be used in place of the other. “Your” is used when referring to what another person possesses, while “you’re” is used when referring to what another person is.
Passerby Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:25 am
I was showing daggaz some solidarity because of the idiot who suggested that if you don’t buy into every anti-government conspiracy theory then you must be a government shill. I trust that is not your view.
Whatever, that is sure some impressive chip that you have on your shoulder.
A Patriot Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 9:29 am
Agreed!
Still – there is a suprising lack of Transparency regarding the moon when it comes to NASA – an agency which is supposed to be under “civilian” control…
Passerby Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
I also agree with your point and, in fact, would go further to suggest that the lack of transparency concerns not only the moon, but also Mars and all of NASA’s other activities including the Shuttle program. Possibly, however, you know that Richard Hoagland (of Enterprisemission.com) is the most prominent proponent of this conspiratorial view of NASA, but he is certainly no friend of the moon landing hoax theory as you can see here:
http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm
May 27th, 2009 at 12:08 am
The orbiters camera (the one for surface shots) is only capable of such a low resolution, that 10 meters (~33f) shows as one pixel. That means the pictures CAN NOT verify if there is equipment in the Sea of Tranquility or not. It took me maybe 15 minutes to verify this article as BS (although I had my doubt from the start, since the source was Pravda, and Pravdas source was Pravda too!). Please PP, do the research so your readers will have news they can count on. News that wont make them look ridiculous, if believed.
May 27th, 2009 at 3:03 am
pull this crap now , it demeans this site
May 27th, 2009 at 4:19 am
So did they take pics of the huge alien space base that is on the dark side of the moon? You know the one found out by William Cooper
His movie here http://topdocumentaryfilms.com.....-our-time/
May 27th, 2009 at 5:07 am
Shortly after the “first” Russian spacewalk, “Popular Mechanix” published a special edition exposing the walk as a hoax. First, they showed that the original film was shot in black and white, with the color later added. Then, a frame-by-frame analysis revealed frames with air bubbles and frames with tethers. In other words, the entire sequence was filmed under water.
A few years ago, I attempted to purchase another copy of this special edition. (My original was loaned out and never returned.) The lady at the PM archives department assured me that such an issue was never published.
So, if someone has managed to keep their copy intact, I would imagine it very valuable.
Passerby Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
Maybe the “special edition” was a CIA special produced to denigrate the Soviet Union during the Cold War (like the 9-11 PM special was produced for the DHS). Given the changed world circumstances they might now want to cover this propaganda effort up.
May 27th, 2009 at 6:29 am
man..really cant believe that with all the evidence of us not landing on the moon..there are still all these die hard,brain dead ,assholes that will make up any kind of excuse that we did. the big one is we would lie like that,it couldnt be faked, or the really big one…I watched it on t.v..as for the moron that said looks like the japs are mad at losing the space race…huh…and the russins knew we failed,and thats why theyve never gone there. this is great..I allways said if they could take pictures of the moon,there would be nothing there..and this proves it…we americans are just a big bunch off lying morons…
May 27th, 2009 at 6:41 am
I’d like to know how the astronauts managed to get past the Van Allen radiation belts. I think there’s a good possibility the moon landing was a hoax.
May 27th, 2009 at 7:32 am
Of course the REAL story is, the radical Sierra Club types threatened to sue NASA for littering the Moon, so in a covert operation they sent Billy Mays & a few hundred gallons of ‘Kaboom’ up there to clean up the tracks…I’ve always thought Mays was a little ‘out there’…
May 27th, 2009 at 7:40 am
Here’s a crazy idea. There is another possibility that you may not have considered. Maybe the mission did happen the way we saw it on TV. Perhaps there are other beings from other worlds visiting the moon and they removed the evidence for their own curiosity, or some other reason. This could be evidence of alien intelligence if the left behind equipment is all gone!
gimmeabreak Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:03 am
Dont leave the keys in your moon rover even if you do plan to come right back. lol
May 27th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Check out the work of Eric Hufschmid and Bart Sibrel to learn more.
May 27th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Did this Japanese Orbiter see the US flag that Armstrong supposedly placed into the ground while it “waved” in a non atmospheric situation.
Grab your telescopes people. I have yet to see a US flag on the moon. Let alone 6 of them.
There are six U.S. flags on the moon planted by the Apollo astronauts (Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16, and 17).
What about the Russian flags, The EU flag, India Flag! What happened to all these flags. There must be a google earth image showing us one of these flags. If there are telescopes that can find new planets beyond Pluto, I’m sure there must be a telescope that can simply see a couple flags on the moon. Yes/No?
gimmeabreak Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:08 am
The hubble telescope couldnt possibly see something as small as a flag or a rover on the moon. Why would NASA want to put an end to all this moon landing debate by showing photographic evidence of a moon landing? Oh I forgot, I’m not an astro physicist so my question must be stupid.
dogg Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
But the hubble can find new planets beyond pluto, hmmmmmm!
Have you ever seen sateltie images of earth? They can zoom in pretty close to see what someone is eating.
Point these satelites towards the moon and lets get this conspiracy over with!
I just did a google earth shot and can clearly see cars on the streets, people too. Lets see the rovers on the moon. The flags could be hard to see standing but as Aldrin said he saw the flag fall over when taking off from the moon. It would probably be much easier to see a flag lying down in an aerial shot anyways.
You are not stupid.
Passerby Reply:
May 28th, 2009 at 4:50 am
All of the flags, which were made from artificial fabric, would have disintegrated and rotted away years ago due to the effect of ultraviolet light.
May 27th, 2009 at 8:48 am
The moon is made of green cheese!
I don’t know why green instead of purple or blue or red, but I do know it’s made out of cheese.
I think it’s made out of cheese, so therefore, it is. And don’t anyone even DARE contradict me because I already know I’m right!
May 27th, 2009 at 10:35 am
…They reckon the moon already has “hostiles” living there, that’s why they had to fake the moon landings.
…But then again I believe there are beings living under the surface of the earth – so I must be a kook
May 27th, 2009 at 11:06 am
If you compare the source of light from the photographs of the supposed moon landings, they are likely from studio lighting and NOT of the sun.
It should not matter that they were on the moon, the light would still be from the sun which should still resemble “Natural” light as if on earth.
If you compare any photo utilizing studio lighting there is a DEFINITE difference and all the photos from the moon landing appear to be studio lighting NOT from the SUN.
May 27th, 2009 at 11:20 am
One good excuse would be the things left over on the Moon could be stolen by the aliens.
If the Apollo Moon Landing was a fake, I think it would be a bigger lie than the 911.
Incriminally Sane Reply:
May 27th, 2009 at 11:39 am
Not necessarily, When was the last time you heard the government say or do ANYTHING that had an ounce of truth or validity in it?
They have lied about EVERYTHING that they have done since around the time the FEDERAL RESERVE came into being!
Here you are seeing the final part of their plan unfolding and it is going to get very ugly very soon!
May 27th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
goog god. everyone knows that when aliens pee on the moon, they write their name with the pee, eliminating any footprints or wheel tracks.
May 27th, 2009 at 12:49 pm
man..still cant belive you morons…we faked be cause WE COULDNT DO IT…and WE STILL CANT DO IT…the luna cap,had the tech. of an wrist watch..no real computers…the van allen radiation belt…all you assholes say I still think we did it….that tells me you guys dont research anything…thats why you believe oswald killed jfk,thats why you guys think a bunch of rag heads from a cave flew some planes into the twin towers…no research…just..uh I seen it on t.v…man what a bunch of ass wipes
May 27th, 2009 at 1:55 pm
nothing alive can survive the trip to the moon
solar radiation would kill them
if it were possible to go-japs wouldb ve already been there.
theyll be the first,
in about 50 years
May 27th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
If landing on the moon was soooo successful. Why hasn;t the US been back in nearly 50 years?
May 27th, 2009 at 4:24 pm
If you must have a NASA moon conspiracy at least let it be one that stands up better to rational scientific scrutiny than the Apollo moon landing hoax conspiracy. See:
http://www.lunaranomalies.com/fake-moon.htm
May 31st, 2009 at 3:08 am
There’s a mountain of evidence that they faked it. Here’s a partial summary of it.
http://www.booktalk.org/we-nev.....t6028.html
June 1st, 2009 at 12:55 pm
You people are forgetting one thing here. The Russians were monitoring these missions from their command bases and if they detected a hoax, their telemetry would have detected it
June 2nd, 2009 at 5:49 pm
[...] Read more… [...]
June 7th, 2009 at 11:25 pm
thanks !! very helpful post!