Comments on: Kevin R. Ryan: Demolition access to the WTC Towers

By: Dan

Dan — Sat, 18 Jul 2009 19:39:48 +0000

Thank you Kevin Ryan for your efforts! This is such a comprehensive article my head is swimming seeing all the complicity between all the players in the game. Maybe I missed it, but Dresser Industries manufactores the drill bits than can be controlled by computer and I think I was the Saudi’s who used them to drill under the border into Iraq.

By: Rayn

Rayn — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:34:24 +0000

…everyone but the government is doing the theorizing about what would “melt” steel, while the goverment knows, lies about it, and still continues to obstructs justice.

By: Rayn

Rayn — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:27:20 +0000

I will “keep thinking what [I] want,” reconmarine, regardless of whether YOU give me permission to, or not. You are not my superior officer, and this isn’t the Marines. However, I’d like to thank you for being among THE FEW that admit that the “official stories” put out by our government are just “silly theory sources,” which was part of my point. And, if these versions are just silly theories, they happen to come from the same government with the only access to all physical evidence from 9/11 – that promptly hired “Controlled Demolitions, Inc.” to “clean up,” INSTEAD OF FULLY, CAREFULLY INVESTIGATING THE SCENE OF THE CRIME, and quickly sent almost all of the steel from the ruins of the Twin Towers overseas to China to be recycled, destroying some of the best evidence possible. With most evidence destroyed by our government, the one entity with full access to it, everyone but the gover

By: Rayn

Rayn — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:52:36 +0000

Thanks. Much appreciated. Check out http://www.myspace.com/falseflagterrorism . If you check out the video section, and read the comments, you’ll see just how many people are guilty of double-thinking their way through the trauma of 9/11/01.

By: LRRP 1968

LRRP 1968 — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:07:02 +0000

There is no source sillier than the government, Dick Cheney and the Kean Commission.
the Kean Commission was so transparent it was they want everyone to know what a sham it is, like they were trying rub our noses in it daring us to challenge it knowing the controlled media would say nothing and ask no questions.
Has anyone in the corporate media ever eve one time asked a single probing question about the inconsistencies in the official story?
What are questions off-limits? Why are witnesses gagged and testimony classified?
like they always tell us: if you have nothing to fear then you have nothing to hide. If it is all on the up and up they why are they hiding so much. Why was so much evidence destroyed?

The whole thing is total BS, that you are unable to see through it doesn’t say much for your ability to reason.

By: FFTDJ

FFTDJ — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 17:05:23 +0000

Check out the youtube vid “A FEW QUESTIONS FOR RICHARD GAGE.”

The author, one “911TRUTHINATOR”, has blocked comments about what appears to be a faked-video image that allegedly shows an upper part of the south tower’s core standing firmly for some time after the collapse.

By: LRRP 1968

LRRP 1968 — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 16:14:30 +0000

How is lying abotu who actually did it respecting the people who does on 9/11.
If someone in my family were murdered I’d want to know
who really did it, you know with like evidence and stuff.
Dick Cheney’s non-oath, secret and non published testimony does NOT constitute evidence in any world I am familiar with.

By: used to be proud brit

used to be proud brit — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:52:02 +0000

I think something that is always overlooked is that these buildings were strategic in the running and security of the u s.
Then if you think about it what would happen if a foreign power took over the country ?

Would there a plan be in place to demolish any strategic building ?

You would`nt want the enemy to know you tactics would you ?

This came to my mind when i first watched it on TV and saw one collapse ,before any of this started to come out about discrepancy`s.

There is no doubt to me that all nations must have a plan like this, you could not risk being invaded and lose all your security to the invader`s cold you ?

As for devices being planted in the buildings I think that it`s 100 %
But I don’t think its just restricted to just those buildings,I think that ALL buildings MUST be rigged up if they are strategically important for national security.
It would be the safest way to ensure the security.
Obviously they would`nt say this because nobody would work in a building rigged to be blown up would they ?

I`am no security but the people in charge have hundred`s if not thousands of them.

So i think if you work in a gov building anywhere in the world where the have a formidable war machine , and are security minded.

YOUR PROBABLY SITTING IN A BOMB!!!!!!!!!!!

By: LRRP 1968

LRRP 1968 — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:27:46 +0000

It’s a little hard to tell, the fakes only make slightly less sense. I apologize. Sometims I can tell, and I have never responded to any of the really obviously fake ones. The “so” comment is just like you though, no evidence cited, no attempt to dispute points or offer any counterpoints. As far as your intellectual” replies. The only thing I have seen from you is uncritical repitition of the government reports, denial, insults and appeal to “hundreds of experts” none of whom are ever identified.
As far addressing the real issues you conveniently let them go as opposed to actually debating my points above in my two posts to this article.
I can understand you ignoring the points in my first post, there is no debating those facts, well I guess the same goes for the 2nd one.

From what I can tell your arguments boiled down the core are:

1. The government says they didn’t do it. Therefor they didn’t
2. the government hired investigators to “prove” they didn’t do it
3. It would be too hard for the government to do it and keep it secret
4. That the government changed their story 3-4 times proves they had no plan and there for could not have done it
5. Anyone who tried to use actual science and engineering concepts to study the event and use in the debate is just a tin-foil hat wearing Bush hater.
6. The government is too stupid and incompetent to pull it off

Did I get that right?

By: LRRP 1968

LRRP 1968 — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 12:17:38 +0000

The NIST commission was not given the right question to answer. the question was loaded to pre-determine the outcome.
The task was to form a scenario as how to planes could have brought the buildings down. It was like asking “If pigs could fly what would they look like?”
the real question is “How did the buildings come down?” or “Can pigs really fly or not?”
I think we can all agree we’d get a more realistic answer from the 2nd question than the first.
The NIST “experts” had only one qualification that was important – they were all receiving government paychecks. That is what is normally referred to as a “conflict of interest”. You don’t ask an executive from Ford to run a study on who makes the best car, or ask Clyde Barrow to investigate bank robberies.