blah blah blah

Like that’s news to anyone? One instance of such doesn’t mean EVERY instance is such.

jSmith:”have you even bothered to check the “archives” section to see if he has posted anything on the arrests and ‘convictions’ of the ‘three’ you mentioned?”

LOL – HAVE YOU????

Watson didn’t mention the most pertinent facts.

crap journalism, or deliberately manipulative and deceitful – you decide.

In case you are that seriously ignorant, history has demonstrated again and again that governments of ‘powerful people’ tend to seek MORE POWER and CONTROL over the citizenry using any of the various ‘invented’ tactics like “false-flag” operations, psyops, and especially, the use of ‘patsies’ – ie: most properly known as “scapegoats” with which to blame any contrived acts of violence or ‘terrorism’. This game can go as far as creating the illusion of ‘justice’ ( or is it more like “just us”? ) by proxy of a ‘trial’ ( oftentimes where the REAL exonerating evidence is precluded from this ‘trial’ ).

As to your berating the messenger ( in this case: PJ Watson ); have you even bothered to check the “archives” section to see if he has posted anything on the arrests and ‘convictions’ of the ‘three’ you mentioned? Were they convicted on “unrelated” charges or were they convicted based on questionable ‘evidence’? Once again, did you check through the archives to find any of this out?

As to your VERY broken English; You would do more for your credibility if you educated yourself better in the proper use of the English language, and in proper English grammar! Your spelling errors ( if they were such ) also belie your inability to communicate effectively! In other words, most elementary school children could have written this piece better!

-JSSmith

imo your constant suggestions that nobody is interested in blowing up american civilians and western infrastructure are efforts to ABSOLVE american guilt.

If you flatout deny the possibility of people genuinely (and from their perspective – legitimately) LOATHING the USA – you don’t have to address the reasons why.

So job done! It’s all madeup – there is no threat – there is nothing to do – no explanations to give – NO CHANGES TO BE MADE.

BRAVO!

“Al qaida is a fabreekashun – but watch out for dem mexcins!!!! Dey coming I tell ya!”

Mad.
———–

A Paytriot: “Perhaps Watson should have mentioned the conviction of the 3 – but nothing in his article is incorrect – and that’s why he provides sources – as always trust, but verify!”

Perhaps!?

Or perhaps it’s lieing by omission? LOL

And BTW – his sources are the same sources that also accuses of being inveterate liars, untrustworthy press-whores…….etc. But they have “authority” when Watson quotes them?

Of course the article is incorrect. And Watson surely deliberately left out the 3 convictions – so that he could pursue his BS that “there is no terrorist threat – nothing is wrong – carry-on as you were……”

Watson says: “In every single major terror bust or terror alert we have proven the ….. charges to be cooked up nonsense…..”

Which is why one person was aquitted of charges, and another 3 found guilty, with no verdict reached by the jury on the others?

What “evidence” has prisonplanet got that the jury didn’t have? Why did the jury find 3 people guilty and failed to return verdicts on the others?

If the jury are right, then Watson is not only dead wrong but he is also undermining faith in british justice – just to push his agenda that “there is no terror threat”. Maybe there is little reason to have any faith in UK justice anyway – fine – but how does Watson already know the jury was wrong? from behind a computer keyboard?

So it’s clear why Watson didn’t mention the convictions. But maybe it’s just “a mistake” – an “oversight”……. In which case – sloppy isn’t it?

Why such a ridiculous effort to suggest there is no threat from islamic fundamentalist terrorism AT ALL?

Of course governments attempt infiltration of terror groups – and even instigate terror – a la Shayler and Gadaffi – but claiming to have proven EVERY single case to be bogus is a ridiculous claim for Watson to make.

Watson: “In a series of reports following the August 10th scare, we traced the source of the alleged attack plot to Pakistani and British intelligence and were … able to confirm that the story was nothing more than a manufactured ploy to frighten travelers at the height of the holiday season.”
–

Does that claim need attacking? Surely it is obvious how it is patently untrue? The dudes found guilty yesterday? They’re going to jail – for what then? For some total hokey story that even prisonplanet can uncover sat at a keyboard!? Sure……

That governments over-react and exploit such situations is not a surprise to anyone, is it? But that fact in no ways means there is no genuine threat – it does not mean “ALL terror plots are bogus.”

So – the backline of this story seems to be Watson saying THERE IS NO THREAT – THEREFORE THERE CAN BE NOTHING USA IS DOING WRONG (TO CAUSE A THREAT)

And for Watson to mention the 3 convictions would undermine his FALSE thesis that “there is no threat”.

Hence the article is A LIE BY OMISSION.

Even A Patriot defends Watson saying “maybe” it should have been in there.

Maybe?

Well, clearly it wasn’t in there. If it was in there he couldn’t make those stupid suggestions that there is no terror threat at all.

And if there’s no real threat then everyone can keep going along as they are – like the commenter here and his air-travel.

Sit down – watch a video. Carry on…….

Now I’d just like to say that will overall I like Alex Jones and his work, I see him calling the kettle black as he attacks the “fear mongers” while his approach is fear mongering as well. He doesn’t offer much as far as solutions.

What is need is for people globally to REJECT the concept of nations and authority. People need to realize that there is absolutely no need for them and “patriots” are BAD. Patriotism is BAD! What we need is a society that utilizes administrators and people who act as voices representing respective communities in systems that don’t govern but rather advocate positive progress.