Whats to say that the attackers weren’t Indian Hindu as opposed to Muslim?

For that matter, witnesses as reported in the Guardian and BBC, said the attackers were White with blonde hair and punked hair styles:

Mumbai Attackers “White Foreigners,” “Neatly Dressed” with “Blonde” and “Punkish” Hair

Policeman and onlookers tell an unheard tale

From The Guardian: http://www.guardian.co.uk/worl.....cks-india4

One police officer who encountered the gunmen as they entered the Jewish centre told the Guardian the attackers were “white”, although this could mean they were paler-skinned Indians from the country’s north. (Or it could mean they were actually white, as the police officer himself said. – my comment)

“I went into the building late last night,” he said. “I got a shock because they were white. I was expecting them to look like us. They fired three shots. I fired 10 back.

From The BBC: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7752625.stm

Cafe attack

Not far across town, Judith Rosta, a German teacher from Vienna, had completed a shoot for a music video for two Indian singers and was walking past the market at Colaba, the hip, touristy hub of posh south Mumbai, with her Russian girlfriend, Valentina.
She says she was buying papayas when she noticed three men on a motorcycle stopping on the road and taking out “big guns”.

“They wore white jeans and T-shirts. They were shouting, getting agitated and waved their guns around.

“I dropped my shopping and began walking away towards my hotel. Minutes later, a friend called up saying that there had been a bloody incident of firing in the area,” she says.

Leopold Cafe owner Farzed Jehani: ‘A grenade was thrown in to the restaurant’

Hours after the shooting at the Leopold Cafe, a cult city cafe and a favourite hangout of foreigners and locals alike, the place smelt of stale beer and bleaching powder.

Broken crockery from a market stall lay strewn on the sidewalk. Fresh blood stains on the bullet-pocked wall were mixed with the old betel- leaf spit stains.

Locals say the orgy of killings in Mumbai began here. Three men walked into the cafe, drank beer, settled their bills and walked out. Then they fished out guns from their bags and began firing.

Gaffar Abdul Amir, an Iraqi tourist from Baghdad, says he saw at least two men who started the firing outside the Leopold Cafe.

He was returning to his hotel from the seaside with a friend when he saw two men carrying bags and brandishing AK-47s walking in front of them, shooting.

“They did not look Indian, they looked foreign. One of them, I thought, had blonde hair. The other had a punkish hairstyle. They were neatly dressed,” says Mr Amir.

As the two girls fell near the cafe, he saw the two men quickening their steps towards the Taj Mahal hotel further up the road.

A few minutes later, gunfire was heard from the hotel, and much later, Mr Amir heard that gunmen had taken guests hostage.

It’s striking that so few truly understand the basis of our Constitution. Arguments that the Constitution is somehow a divinely-inspired document show either a lack of education as to the ideas and principles behind the tenets of the document, or a deliberate attempt to pervert the true intent of the philosophies behind the Constitution. In no way are the Constitution or the Bill of Rights Christian documents. The philosophical underpinnings of each of these documents stem from Locke and Cooke, primarily Locke.

Read the rest – http://beholdtheforce.blogspot.com/

What is the evidence that these were their identities?

Better get a bigger picture, folks…

* * * *

British Authorship of Mumbai Terror Spilling Out

November 28, 2008 (LPAC)–London newspapers are headlining British involvement in the ongoing terror attacks in Mumbai, India.

The London Mirror, November 28, headlined its coverage: “SEVEN MUMBAI GUNMEN ARE FROM `LEEDS AND HARTLEPOOL’” and continued, “Seven of the terrorists … are British, Indian government sources claimed yesterday. They said two British-born Pakistanis are under arrest. And another five suspects are said to have been born and raised here.

“Two of the seven are from Leeds, one is from Bradford and one from Hartlepool, the sources claimed…. The Hartlepool suspect was allegedly found in the … Taj Mahal Palace hotel. …. The man from Bradford and one from Leeds were allegedly discovered on the 17th floor of the Oberoi-Trident Hotel…. A second man from Leeds was allegedly captured near a jetty after a gang of around 25 terrorists landed in Mumbai by boat on Wednesday.

“The suspects were allegedly found with documentation, possibly including passports, which revealed their origin. The sources say they also spoke to each other in a heavily-accented Punjabi common in UK Pakistani communities.”

The Mirror reports that British Prime Minister “Gordon Brown yesterday urged caution, saying it was premature to draw any conclusions. He said Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had not told of him of any evidence at this stage that Britons were behind the massacres.”

The Mirror comments, “If the terrorists are Britons, the UK security service will have to urgently discover how they slipped through the surveillance net…. Since the early 2000s Britain has had an unwelcome reputation as a haven for Islamic radicals.”

The Daily Telegraph headlined its story, “MUMBAI ATTACKS: ARE THEY BRITISH? British police have flown to India to establish whether any of the terrorists who killed 150 people in the Bombay massacre had links to the UK.”

The Evening Standard, under the headline “Mumbai siege gunmen are from Britain,” reports that Security sources have told the Standard that “it is known that dozens of British-born Pakistanis have traveled to Pakistan in recent years to train in its [terrorist] camps. One source said recently: `The camps are full and many of the people inside are Brits.”

Briefed on the two Brits being arrested as gunmen in Mumbai, Lyndon LaRouche said: “This phenomenon is suggestively similar to the number of Saudis or people with Saudi pedigrees who were involved in the 9/11 attacks in the U.S. in 2001.”

EIR Exposed British Role As Terror Haven in 2000

November 28, 2008 (LPAC)–On Jan. 11, 2000, Executive Intelligence Review Counterintelligence Director Jeffrey Steinberg submitted a memorandum, on behalf of the Editors of EIR, to then-Secretary of State Madeleine Albright and eight other top Clinton Administration national security officials, as well as leaders of both the House and the Senate, calling for Great Britain to be put on the State Department’s list of state sponsors of terrorism. The Steinberg memorandum exclusively drew upon official government documents from India, Egypt, Israel, France, Algeria, Peru, Turkey, Germany, Libya, Nigeria, Yemen and Russia–all in the form of diplomatic demarches, protesting London’s harboring and supporting of hardcore terrorist organizations.

In light of the ongoing Mumbai attack, it is noteworthy that the Steinberg memo to Albright began by noting that the issue of Britain’s role in supporting international terrorism “has been recently highlighted, as the result of the December 1999 Indian Airlines hijacking, and the response of the British government to the request of one of the freed Kashmiri terrorists, Ahmed Omar Sheikh, to be given safe passage to England. Mr. Sheikh, a British national, was tried and convicted in India, for his role in the kidnapping of four British nationals and an American in 1995. He was sentenced to five years in prison on November 1988. Initially, the British government announced that it would provide Mr. Sheikh with safe passage to Britain, and would not prosecute him or make any effort to extradite him back to India.”

The recurring pattern, documented in the EIR memorandum, was that the British government provided safe-haven and political protection, as well as financing, to known terrorists, and turned a blind eye when mosques in Britain were used as recruiting grounds for terrorists, who were then sent to training camps, and on to live operations. Russia strongly protested the role of British mosques in recruiting terrorists who went for training in Afghanistan, throughout the 1990s, and wound up in Chechnya.

The EIR memorandum was published in the Jan. 21, 2000 issue of Executive Intelligence Review, and was widely circulated, at the time, among governments around the world. Secretary of State Albright never responded to the EIR document.

I asked myself this question after 9/11. Who has the most to gain? How does a homegrown Muslim group benefit from this? One Jewish couple is killed and automatically Muslims are blamed? I personally don’t have the answers, but I have been listening to my India friends who have more knowledge about India politics than Paul Watson, they are leaning towards they believe it is a false flag operation. Some of them are leaning toward the ‘Hindutva terror core’ others think it could be Pakistan. The Muslims in the north are very poor and not well educated.

Lets get all the facts together including the understanding of their own domestic policies. In all due respect Paul, I don’t know if you really are aware of many of India’s domestic issues. Whether it is Muslims, intelligence agencies, local extremist Hindu groups or extremist Muslim groups lets first look at the history, domestic politics.

You know that the train bomb was a false flag operation. I have been to India and took time to ask about the local issues. Even North India and South Indians are so different.