….right, its obvious to everyone but you apparently, you provide

no link, there are no clear photos, you don’t even know what side of the building you’re talking about.

here ya go : http://911research.wtc7.net/wt.....fire3.html

There is an extreme to both sides of every argument. For example you think we all allowed ourselves to be brainwashed and our only concern is the order issued to us. Your old enough to know what assuming does. Your remind me of far left hippies with unrealistic dreams of the way the world should be while protesting every evil you find. Everyone is wrong if they don’t agree with you huh?

http://www.prisonplanet.com/ri.....legal.html

but seriously, who would want to “debate” a truly sick individual like you anyway? to justify speaking ill of the dead because somebody disagrees with you on who killed those people on 9/11? it doesnt get any lower than that. me and your mother are not proud. the last 3 girls you failed to get to sleep with you are not proud either, and just a tip? your disgusting ways probably have something to do with the “failure” part of that.

They dont like people seeing the WTC7 damage because it goes against their theories. When showing the collapse, they start the video AFTER the mech penthouse fell. If you look at an aerial pic of WTC7 (before 9/11) and see how much of WTC7 needed to fall for the penthouse to collapse in that manner, you realize WTC7 fell in a progressive collapse and it definitely wasn’t at “free fall” speeds.

Regarding the use of thermate/thermite. Why wouldn’t all controlled demolitions be done with thermate? It is so much cheaper then dynamite or TNT, and according to the truthers, it can withstand airliner impacts, falling steel and concrete, water damage, jet fuel and still will go off without making the distinct and extremely loud bang bang bang that are heard for miles when a real controlled demolition goes off.

As far as nobody noticing the miles of det cord etc that needed to be snuck into highly secure buildings, undetected by any of the bomb sniffing dogs, what about securing it to areas that were not accessible by doors like the inner 47 columns? The bad guys would have had to cut walls to access those inner columns undetected over a period of many months. Now, truthers will tell you some floors had been powered down the weekend before because Scott Forbes said so, but in reality, they couldn’t prep one floor clandestinely over a weekend, let alone the entire building.

Regarding the Pentagon. I like to ask them if they were in DC or Virginia, and saw a missile, which looks and sounds nothing like a 757, would they be easily fooled into thinking it was a 757? Are they that dumb too? They ignore the eye witness reports of seeing the plane hit. The like to mention the planes maneuvers being impossible right before they say it wasn’t a plane, they like to ignore the pictures of the bodies, engines, luggage and the FDR data, all to make their fairy tales appear like reality….Whats really sad is they dont seem to realize their self proclaimed leaders probably know these are all bullshit theories, yet they continue to make movies and spew the lies because they are making MONEY!!!! They call others “sheep” because they think others haven’t seen what they have or that they are ignoring the facts, when in reality, the truthers are the Sheep. They blindly follow the truther sites, without ever doing any independent research.

A good example, on top of the replies this post will get, is they always repeat already debunked claims. Ive heard so many people on this site talk about GW Bush’s brother owning the security company of the WTC’s…..Anyone who has looked outside the truth sites knows this isn’t true at all, but they keep repeating it so newbies will latch on to their theories…..As if you could just flash a family tree and bypass security at a building housing the CIA, State Dept, military etc……

Basically, they dont really care about the truth, they care about themselves and feeling important. Every time I reply and debunk their claims, they ignore it as if it didn’t just happen and they move on to another claim or simply call me names or say I work for the CIA or something like that. Ive offered everyone to debate me on truther radio program but nobody has the balls. Ive offered to meet them in person to debunk the CIA claims, since Im home on leave right now, as you can imagine…………..No takers….

Sad sick people they are, but fun to fuck with……

Its not OK for me to talk about your dead mom but you can disgrace 3000 Americans by making up bullshit lies about how they died,that your not even man enough to defend? please. Your so fucking dumb it’s not even funny. You probably should be seen by a doctor. The fact that you actually beleive the shit you spew is scary..Most truthers know in the back of their mind that they are wrong. In fact, most dont even know what the official story is but are so sure it’s wrong. How stupid is that?

I mentioned my job description because a dumb ass child was making comments that I dont know what its like to have a real job. Again, and just like you, truthers can’t talk about the bullshit theories so they only talk about me.

You sure do make allot of penis size comments and call me “little boy” often..Are you trying to tell me something Chris? Did the lack of a mothers presence effect your sexuality? It’s ok if it did, not that you have the nuts to do so, but Obama will now let you serve! So, once your able to put down the joy stick and loose enough weight to see your balls, maybe you can join and see how “fake” this war on terrorism is……

I look forward to another reply only about me, nothing about 9/11, and another reply of why you cant debate me on the radio, and how you dont have the time, and your always working blah blah …Translation, your afraid Ill school you and make you look even dumber then you already do….if it’s possible..

1) Whack nuts whos prior job really had nothing to do with terrorism, special operations, etc and who think it was a controlled demo, remote control planes, US did it, Alex Jones types.

2) People whos job did have applicable experience, and they have legitimate questions, like me, but do not think anyone but Al Qaeda did 9/11 or that it was a controlled demo. (IE. Bob Baer ) But, you guys, as you always do, will take their comments WAY out of context or imply the mean something more then they do. IE. Bob Baer saying “evidence points to an inside job”. Meaning, people were in places, airports, that helped high jackers, technically an inside job, but not the entire plot done by Americans or Jews…

I suggest really looking at the claims of the people who REALLY have applicable backgrounds..

Maybe the whole idea of Western-style government, banking and politics exists on the basis of corruption? It cannot be outright denied. Maybe the idea of Western-style government is for liars, slavers and control freaks?

It seems that the US law enforcement agencies are so weak that they cannot investigate some areas of their own government.

When Bernanke refuses to let Congress audit the Fed, he needs to explain why. Well, it’s a simple principle.

“If the Fed’s books are OK, why won’t Bernanke let them look?”
“If the 9/11 Official Version is OK, why don’t the CIA, FBI and NSA let them look?”

They should be saying “Fine, here’s all the information, please look. You will find that everything we say checks out. Please add more details if you find them.”

And if some people try to prevent this, they need to explain why. They need to explain why they want to prevent objective and honest research.