- Prison Planet.com - http://www.prisonplanet.com -
Military Spending is INCREASING Unemployment and REDUCING Economic Growth
Posted By admin On November 12, 2009 @ 5:09 am In Money Watch | Comments Disabled
Washington’s Blog 
Thursday, Nov 12th, 2009
I have written extensively  on the fact that this is not a normal cyclical recession, and we’re not in the type of “jobless recovery” which we’ve had a couple of times in the last 50 years. Unemployment will continue rising in America for some time, which will make a real, sustainable recovery very difficult.
The heads of two Federal Reserve banks are now saying  something similar:
Janet Yellen, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, and Dennis Lockhart, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, warned that rising unemployment could crimp consumers, restraining the recovery. Consumer spending accounts for about 70 percent of economic activity.
But instead of doing anything to encourage a sustainable recovery in employment – such as rebuilding America’s manufacturing base, or breaking up the too big to fails so that the smaller banks have a chance to grow and lend more to individuals and small businesses (see this  and this ) – the government has simply thrown money at the banks.
Moreover – contrary to what you might have heard – PhD economist Dean Baker pointed out  yesterday that America’s massive military spending on unnecessary and unpopular wars actually lowers economic growth and increases unemployment:
Defense spending means that the government is pulling away resources from the uses determined by the market and instead using them to buy weapons and supplies and to pay for soldiers and other military personnel. In standard economic models, defense spending is a direct drain on the economy, reducing efficiency, slowing growth and costing jobs.
A few years ago, the Center for Economic and Policy Research commissioned Global Insight, one of the leading economic modeling firms, to project the impact of a sustained increase in defense spending equal to 1.0 percentage point of GDP. This was roughly equal to the cost of the Iraq War.
Global Insight’s model projected that after 20 years the economy would be about 0.6 percentage points smaller as a result of the additional defense spending. Slower growth would imply a loss of almost 700,000 jobs compared to a situation in which defense spending had not been increased. Construction and manufacturing were especially big job losers in the projections, losing 210,000 and 90,000 jobs, respectively.
The scenario we asked Global Insight to model turned out to have vastly underestimated the increase in defense spending associated with current policy. In the most recent quarter, defense spending was equal to 5.6 percent of GDP. By comparison, before the September 11th attacks, the Congressional Budget Office projected that defense spending in 2009 would be equal to just 2.4 percent of GDP. Our post-September 11th build-up was equal to 3.2 percentage points of GDP compared to the pre-attack baseline. This means that the Global Insight projections of job loss are far too low…
The projected job loss from this increase in defense spending would be close to 2 million. In other words, the standard economic models that project job loss from efforts to stem global warming also project that the increase in defense spending since 2000 will cost the economy close to 2 million jobs in the long run.
Note 1: Global Insight is:
Recognized as the most consistently accurate  forecasting company in the world.
Note 2: A paper  published in 2007 by the The Political Economy Research Institute at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst entitled “The U.S. Employment Effects of Military and Domestic Spending Priorities” concludes:
We present in Table 1 our estimate of the relative effects of spending $1 billion on alternative uses, including military spending, health care, education, mass transit, and construction for home weatherization and infrastructure repair…
As we see, defense spending creates 8,555 total jobs with $1 billion in spending. This is the fewest number of jobs of any of the alternative uses that we present. Thus, personal consumption generates 10,779 jobs, 26.2 percent more than defense, health care generates 12,883 jobs, education generates 17,687, mass transit is at 19,795, and construction for weatherization/infrastructure is 12,804. From this list we see that with two of the categories, education and mass transit, the total number of jobs created with $1 billion in spending is more than twice as many as with defense.
Note 3: I honor the brave veterans and active-duty soldiers who have served our country. They are not responsible for the policies of the civilian leadership. Indeed, if you talk to soldiers, many will tell you they think we are involved in wars we shouldn’t be in.Note 4: I am for a strong defense. That’s not what this is about.false linkage of Saddam and 9/11 , and false claims that Saddam had WMDs. Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz says that the Iraq war will cost $3-5 trillion dollars. 
But we got into the Iraq war based on the
(Incidentally, torture also reduces our national security ).
Article printed from Prison Planet.com: http://www.prisonplanet.com
URL to article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/military-spending-is-increasing-unemployment-and-reducing-economic-growth.html
URLs in this post:
 Washington’s Blog: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/11/military-spending-is-increasing.html
 written extensively: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2007/08/unemployment.html
 saying: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/33826707/ns/business-economy_in_turmoil/
 this: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/10/white-house-still-defending-myths-about.html
 this: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/10/breaking-up-too-big-to-fails-will-not.html
 pointed out: http://www.cepr.net/index.php/op-eds-&-columns/op-eds-&-columns/defense-spending-job-loss/
 Image: http://www.efoodsdirect.com/gmoPeople.html?aid=14&adid=12
 accurate: http://www.ihsglobalinsight.com/accolades
 paper: http://www.peri.umass.edu/fileadmin/pdf/working_papers/working_papers_151-200/WP151.pdf
 false linkage of Saddam and 9/11: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/04/5-hours-after-911-attacks-rumsfeld-said.html
 $3-5 trillion dollars.: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/03/07/AR2008030702846_pf.html
 this: http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/24/world/middleeast/24terror.html?_r=1&oref=slogin
 this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7460-2005Jan13.html
 this: http://www.motherjones.com/news/featurex/2007/03/iraq_effect_1.html
 this: http://www.fromthewilderness.com/free/ww3/100102_against_war.html
 this: http://www.counterpunch.org/feingold09292005.html
 this: http://www.atimes.com/atimes/Middle_East/JE07Ak01.html
 reduces our national security: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2009/04/torture-reduced-us-national-security.html
Copyright © 2013 PrisonPlanet.com. All rights reserved.