 |
 |
Movies I Made To Counter The BBC’s Argument That “The Final Mystery Of 9/11″ Has Been Solved
9/11 Blogger
Tuesday, July 8, 2008
Recently, I’ve been a little busy making movies. The reason I got started making these movies was to counter the BBC’s claim that the “final mystery of 9/11″ has been solved. They said it two times as far as I know. The first time motivated me to make this:
Then, for good measure, I made this:
Then, they said it again. I got angry, and made this:
Here’s a new video just posted of me at Keene, NH.
Please spread these far and wide. Thank you.
(Article continues below)
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
11 Responses to “Movies I Made To Counter The BBC’s Argument That “The Final Mystery Of 9/11″ Has Been Solved”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 8th, 2008 at 1:29 pm
With a little editing, the BBC hit piece could be used to wake people up. Just take out the lies and disinfo, then add what’s needed to tell the real story.
July 8th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Yep, the BBCs latest attempt at trying to make people believe fire brought down #7, can be completely flipped on them. We can play the real clip of Silverstein with the BBC’s edited version of it. Lets take their fantasy based investigation on with some cold hard science, and science owes no allegiance to anyone so we can always count on science to tell the truth.
July 11th, 2008 at 7:35 am
The BBC spent all that day trying to remove the Jane Standley prophetic piece about the collapse of 7 from youtube, then claimed they had lost ALL their 9/11 TV coverage!?! then claimed it turned up in the 2002 archive section!?!and they want us to believe the Jane Standley Manhatten line 9/11 was on a timer set to cut off (very conveniently otherwise we would have seen wtc7 collapse behind her)at 5.15pm local time!?! surely the producers would have known this and told the anchorman to wind up near to the 5.15pm cut off NY time in his earpiece?!?
July 12th, 2008 at 9:08 pm
What is critical thinking?
It is the intellectual discipline of actively and skillfully
conceptualizing, applying, analyzing, synthesizing, and/or evaluating
information gathered from or generated by observations, experience,
reflection, reasoning, or communication, as a guide to belief or
action.
It is based on universal intellectual values that transcend subject
matter divisions:
clarity,accuracy, precision, sound evidence, good reason, depth,
breadth, and fairness.
However, the most essential aspect of critical thinking is:
ASKING QUESTIONS
i am a bigot and am phobic against people who dont employ critical
thinking to promote answers, justice and truth
“we the people” are supposed to be soveriegn individuals
i concider myself governed by the thoughts and documents that this
nation of states is founded on, and more clearly: the common law that
those thoughts and documents were derived from
until it is established by “we the people” according to the laws
enumerated in those thoughts and those documents: it is my duty to
honor the original intent of life liberty and the pursuit of happiness
i will defend the constitution against all enemies in any form from
anywhere anytime any way i can
right now the best way to defend the constitution is to be versed in
the entirety of its origination, developement, and ultimate
implementaion
the history and the intentions of the men and women on all sides of
the founding of this nation culminating in the declaration of
independance from tyrrany
that is the good fight i fight today, and is the patritic
responsibility of each and every person residing in their respective
states as persons created equal with unalienable rights granted by God
(you may not believe in God) but this land is governed by the
“unalienable” rights regardless
i not only look to leave no victims, or create any pain: but moreso i
respectfully look to enforce the constitution as the standing current
common law affective in this republic
and as a result i possitively look to exact justice on criminal elite
who commit high crimes against this society (as my children and my
heritage are forever affected by their thin crust of evil)
your thoughts?
July 13th, 2008 at 11:15 am
Nice work.
July 14th, 2008 at 1:58 am
Ron Paul in 2001 after 911 said that he supports the afghanistan war and president Bush.
It is all documented on the web. There is also a video on youtube where he says that he
supports the afghanistan war and in another video he says that he doesn’t think that 911
was an inside job and that it is not fair to say the government did it. Ron Paul supports war
and when Alex says he is the good one then Alex is a liar and a whitewasher. Ron Paul said
also “declare war, go to war, fight it and win it” – so he stands behind war – how can he be
the good guy ?
Now think about this: Alex Jones supports Ron Paul to this day and wants you that you
donate your money to him and your support – the guy who said yes to the afghanistan
war so yes that the war can happen.
Why does Alex Jones publish news like “US ‘killed 47 Afghan civilians” while he supports
the guy who made this war possible with his vote: Ron Paul.
This is perverted and sick. Alex Jones will not mention Ron Paul’s “yes” to the afghanistan
war with one word in his show instead he keeps his mouth shut.
It is all documented, there is a full speech of Ron Paul on the net where is says that they
will choose the level of destruction and DEATH against afghanistan and that he supports
G.W. Bush. Ron Paul made afghanistan possbile. And if you support Alex Jones, then you
support Ron Paul and the afghanistan war.
Alex: YOU SUCK by doing this. Alex Jones is FALSE leader you should never trust. He is
sending you directly to hell by telling you that you should support Ron Paul.
Alex, you are a perverted false leader and christian. You are just a show hero
and a false TV preacher. Jesus didn’t support the government and he never would but you do
it as a false perverted leader pig.
You are too dumb to be a leader Alex and to blind to see that you are a FAT leader PIG of
HALF TRUTH.
July 14th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
guy below me.
the way you repeatedly used the words “perverted” and “false” was charming.
Your lack of reasoning why Alex Jones is apparently a false leader (leading what? a website?) was stirring.
The Afghan war rant was barely coherent in a way that puts Mr. Moore to shame.
Dude, how can you ignore the mountains of claims and legitimate evidence that Alex Jones propagates in lieu of this fabled video where a politician, gasp, shows allegiance to the administration? I have seen many recent videos of Ron Paul discrediting the Bush camp, but I suppose I should just take your sourceless word and despise Ron and Alex because of a veering, rabid rant completely devoid of any substance except anecdotal claims. I’ll believe you if you include a freaking hyperlink to at least lend some sort of credibility to your vicious tirade against people who genuinely put their necks out for your own good.
Hell, christian, fat, these are useless words in intellectual debate.
July 15th, 2008 at 7:49 am
http://img440.imageshack.us/my.....otsll6.jpg
July 15th, 2008 at 7:57 am
http://img440.imageshack.us/my.....otsll6.jpg
..
July 15th, 2008 at 8:20 am
quote Ron Paul:
“Mr. Speaker, I support President Bush and voted for the authority
and the money to carry out his responsibility to defend this
country, but the degree of death and destruction and chances of
escalation must be carefully taken into consideration.”
from:
http://www.house.gov/paul/cong.....092501.htm
July 15th, 2008 at 8:33 am
–-
Ron Paul speech:
“Mr. Speaker, I support President Bush and voted for the authority and the money to carry out his
responsibility to defend this country, but the degree of death and destruction and chances of
escalation must be carefully taken into consideration.”
from:
http://www.house.gov/paul/cong.....092501.htm