 |
 |
Mumbai Terrorists Were Aided By Indian Authorities
Series of specific warnings ignored, security measures relaxed, police refused to shoot back
Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet.com
Tuesday, December 2, 2008
Numerous disturbing details now strongly indicate that the terrorists who indiscriminately slaughtered nearly 200 people in Mumbai were aided by some elements of the Indian security apparatus responsible for protecting the city.
It has now been confirmed that the Indian security services received numerous precise warnings that terrorists were planning to arrive by sea and attack the Taj Mahal hotel, but if anything security was relaxed, allowing the terrorists to prolong the attack for days and not hours.
The CIA’s station chief in Delhi told Indian intelligence in September that terrorists were planning to arrive via the sea and attack the Taj Mahal hotel with small arms and/or bombs. Security measures around the hotel were increased in response to the warning but relaxed just days before the attack.
This was just one of a “series of warnings of a possible attack on Mumbai by sea in the months leading up to last week’s devastating onslaught,” reports AFP.
Many Indians are furious at the botched response that allowed the attacks to drag on for days and are incredulous at eyewitness reports of Indian police refusing to fire back at the terrorists as they carried out their rampage with AK-47’s, forcing gangs of citizens to go hand to hand with the armed assailants.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Was a stand down issue ordered or were there terrorists within the police units? Sebastian D’Souza, a picture editor at the Mumbai Mirror, took many of the now infamous photos of the terrorists, but his main concern at the time was the fact that armed police would not shoot at the terrorists despite them being sitting ducks.
“What angered Mr D’Souza almost as much were the masses of armed police hiding in the area who simply refused to shoot back,” reports the Belfast Telegraph. “There were armed policemen hiding all around the station but none of them did anything,” he said. “At one point, I ran up to them and told them to use their weapons. I said, ‘Shoot them, they’re sitting ducks!’ but they just didn’t shoot back.”
“As the gunmen fired at policemen taking cover across the street, Mr D’Souza realised a train was pulling into the station unaware of the horror within. “I couldn’t believe it. We rushed to the platform and told everyone to head towards the back of the station. Those who were older and couldn’t run, we told them to stay put.”
India’s warmongering rhetoric against Pakistan is partly a steam valve to deflect from the fact that they were given a specific warning that this would happen and not only failed to prevent it, but let the whole thing drag out for days.
An obvious effort to pin the blame on Lashkar-e-Toiba and by extension Pakistan, despite the terrorist group’s flat denial of responsibility, is now encapsulated by the suspected manufacturing of evidence.
Satellite phones and identity documents linking the attack to Pakistanis was conveniently discovered by the Indians just as the flight manuals and the paper passports of the hijackers were found immediately after 9/11.
Unsurprisingly, the Indians killed all but one of the terrorists, a clean cut English speaking Pakistani, Azam Amir Qasab, who is singing from the same hymn sheet as the Indians implicating Pakistan and saying he was trained by Pakistan. The corporate media has swallowed the story hook line and sinker, refusing to even raise the prospect that such a confession was obtained through torture.
Again we ask the question, what on earth would Pakistan, who have been making strenuous peace overtures towards India recently, possibly have to gain from sponsoring a brutal attack against innocent civilians the full horror of which is played out on international television for all to see? How can it possibly benefit Pakistan to now have the full might of the U.S. military, with an incoming president who’s made it very clear that he’s fully prepared to expand the bombing raids, trained on Pakistan, along with the suspicion of the rest of the world?
How can that possibly be of any benefit? This wasn’t an attack on the Parliament building. This wasn’t an attempt to decapitate government in any way - it was an indiscriminate assault on innocent people going about their business at hotels, restaurants and subways. It was a senseless massacre that will ultimately help the geopolitical agenda of nobody other than the Indians and the U.S., who now have the perfect pretext to expand bombing raids in Pakistan and entrench themselves in Afghanistan.
As soon as attack in Mumbai began to unfold, despite confusion as to its perpetrators and its motive, U.S. aircraft carriers were moving towards the Pakistan border.
As we predicted right from the beginning, no matter who the real perpetrators were, the attack was always going to be blamed on Pakistan as a means of re-igniting a nuclear cold war that reaped massive profits for the military-industrial complex who armed both sides the last time such tensions peaked at the start of the decade.
Get your ad SEEN by
our millions of monthly visitors AND
support the Infowar. CLICK
HERE for our advertising rates.
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
47 Responses to “Mumbai Terrorists Were Aided By Indian Authorities”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 2nd, 2008 at 5:58 am
it sounds like a false flag operation like 911. but if that’s the case, what did india hope to accomplish ????????? diane sayer (CFR) said on Good Morning America that Biden was being briefed this morning on bio/chem/nuke incedent which might happen in the USA !!!!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lm_xX1Ur43I
goldieshouse.piczo.com
December 2nd, 2008 at 6:19 am
This report is from the 8th November -
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/t.....107111.ece
Shock as top Indian Army officer arrested over bomb attack
The Indian Army has been shocked by the arrest of a senior Military Intelligence officer on suspicion of involvement in a bomb attack by Hindu extremists in western India in September.
December 2nd, 2008 at 6:56 am
History repeats itself.
Will Obama’s first “test” be Pakistan? Yeah, there or Iran. This unravelling in slow-time is like watching some bad Made-for-TV movie!! (complete with too many commercials!!)
December 2nd, 2008 at 7:05 am
Well lets think about it, Iran is not really working for the “neo-cons”. We have blocked attempts to carry out flase flag operations to get a, soon to be nuclear power generating country, to attack back and cause what could create a cold war scenario. So they are thinking ok, we have been caught with our pants down, talking about killing our guys in Iran and blaming it on them like Cheney was caught with his 12 different flase flag scenarios.
So how else can we screw up the middle east and creat conflict that could allow us to use our nukes since you know its been a while since 1945…
Oh wait, were in Iraq and we are linking Pakistan to Al-Qaeda, we have created some tension with some recent attacks in Pakistan. So what if we make Pakistan look bad for standing up against us, and plan an attack on India since both countries possess nuclear weapons.
Cause boy that could have some blowback and give us our little nuclear war race to sell weapons and prolong the war =D
December 2nd, 2008 at 7:08 am
This is madness.
December 2nd, 2008 at 7:31 am
Obviously India wanted a pretext to blame Pakistan, which does occupy a part of India (Jammu & Kashmir). If this was a false flag operation it was not planned or executed well since there were so many witnesses. So many people died for nothing. I hope these people are furious for the rest of their lives at their government which did nothing.
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:04 am
Wow, to know this was coming and to see it unfold before our very eyes.
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:07 am
-Moscow apartment bombings
-NY attack of 9/11
-London attack of 7/7
Each of these false flags had pre-created stories too allowing an uncharacteristic ‘terrorist’ attack from a group that curiously failed to claim responsibility to be easily sold as ‘explainable’ to a gullible public.
Actually, and a point missed by almost everyone here, the more outrageous and illogical the false flag, the more it correctly works the psychology of the masses. Contradictions, a lack of an established group taking clear blame, and a press that seems to have a cheap agenda, but then reveals a deeper REAL agenda, combined with governments curiously positioned to take near immediate ‘retaliatory’ action, are the patterns of the ‘false flag’ process.
Remember, guys, experience is the ***GREATEST*** teacher. Those that always planned false flag attacks may have assumed that certain difficult issues would dominate afterwards, issues that could well backfire, or at least render the usefulness of the false flag as not worth the risk/effort. However, the reality of the Moscow apartment bombings showed that even being caught red-handed setiing up the false flag explosions did not harm the program (sadly, being discovered was a positive for Putin).
My point is that an obvious and simple-minded analysis of false-flag events misses the point. Yes, you can easily identify them as false flags, but so what?. Those that execute them have no concern about being exposed. The intent is the thing, and in today’s world, that’s a very complicated item to discern. Power comes in all forms, and those that crave it exist at all levels. What can you do on the back of a false flag these days? Almost anything, big or small, local or global.
The events in India consumed nothing of value (from the POV of our masters), and damaged nothing that can’t be fixed in moments. If the false-flag was misjudged, however, those that crave more power may see their power decline, and that is always a risk. For India, being mostly hindu, it lacks long term connections with the more important parts of the World. It is a competitor, with no permanent geo-political allies. Pakistan, on the other hand, is the technological powerhouse of the muslim world, and its long-term prospects are excellent.
Today, India is in a much better position than Pakistan. It can only keep this advantage by forcing Pakistan to distinguish itself by maximising its ‘religious’ identity, generating fertile ground for ‘muslim extremism’. Of course, the price India pays for this strategy is constant extremism amongst its non-muslim religious groups as well. India (by which I mean India’s ruling demons) calculates that it gains more than it loses by keeping the fires of religious hatred burning.
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:16 am
Its funny how every is suddenly an expert in Indo-Pak relations. Also I love the way the article quotes the CIA’s claims it had warned India. So we all believe the CIA now?!!
For the record Pakistan has invaded India 5 times, China invaded India twice and the US supported them both every time. India has as of yet never invaded any other country. India went Nuclear after the worlkd refused to support them against Pak aggression. On November 10, 1971 Nixon instructed Kissinger to ask the Chinese to move some troops toward the Indian frontier. ‘Threaten to move forces or move them, Henry, that’s what they must do now.’ This was conveyed to Huang Hua , China ’s envoy to the United Nations. Kissinger told Huang the US would be prepared for a military confrontation with the Soviet Union if the Soviet Union attacked China . In 1999, Pakistan prepared its Nukes for an attack on India . It was Clinton who forced the Pakistanis to back down. This can be verified on the documentary “Countdown to Armageddon”. Pakistan was actually preparing to use its nuclear missiles. Avoiding a Nuclear Catastrophe: Arms Control after the 2002 India–Pakistan Crisis by Carranza M.E
When Pakistan first invaded Kashmir in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1947, the Pakistanis were led by British Generals. British officers helped the Pakistanis plan the attack. British officers on the scene led the revolts of the Islamist factions of Kashmir forces, arresting and murdering Pro-Indian Kashmiri Dogra officers especially in the Gilgit region. They acted as a backbone for the mass of tribal militias and coordinated their attacks. The British have maintained these connections to this very day.
So I think some perspective is required before jumping to conclusions. India has been the victim and is the victim. Dont join her enemies in blaming India.
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:19 am
Correection: US didnt support China’s invasion during Kennedy’s admin. In fact they helped India. This is probably another reason the British killed the Irish anti-British President.
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:22 am
Corection: Us didnt support China when it invaded India during the Kennedy admin. Kennedy actually sent support and weapons. Perhaps this was another reason the British elites killed the Irish President.
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:49 am
http://www.cnn.com/2008/US/12/.....index.html
they say itll be 911 times 10
so i guess thats 9,110
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:53 am
When this first happened I said this very same thing, The security was told to stand down and let it happen
December 2nd, 2008 at 8:57 am
Think about it folks. What was at stake? Hmmmm. Perhaps the Rusky-Sino-backed IRAN-PAKISTAN-INDIA pipeline???!!!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I.....s_pipeline
December 2nd, 2008 at 9:11 am
In September 1947 (one month after partition) India invaded Junagar, Katheur, Manvader and Kashmir. Pakistan army was small and weak and could do nothing; only saved a part of Kashmir (now known as Ajad Kashmir). India even killed thoussand of its own people in the name of emergency in 1969 (Asam), 1984 (Punjab). India waged war agaisnst China over Tibet in 1962 and these are recorded history of contemporary times.
December 2nd, 2008 at 9:13 am
so they are saying basically “if you don’t believe the corporate media lies. we will have biological weapons ready for you”.
great…..
December 2nd, 2008 at 9:13 am
Pakistan’s problems are three and they are:
a) CIA
b) ZIA (The President who was killed by CIA)
c) PIA ( their national airline).
December 2nd, 2008 at 9:18 am
What a load of rubbish! If you look around every corner you will see a conspiracy, but what is under your very noses (and stinks) like hell, is incompetant politicians, lazy bureaucrats and poorly equiped policemen. You cannot expect First world war weapons and probably no bullets to face up to AK 47’s.
December 2nd, 2008 at 9:41 am
God bless Alex Jones. Find out about the MEGA-COLLAPSE of 2009!
http://patriotscave.blogspot.com/
December 2nd, 2008 at 10:19 am
Kumu, what is the job of police forces? To protect and serve? Generally speaking, right? If they were aware of the attacks and they didn’t respond, then they are either total cowards, or it was an operation. I’ve known that it was suspicious from the beginning. It generally is whenever you hear the bullshit that the attack was carried out by a previously unknown group. So, the Indian police are either cowards, or were not to engage the terrorists, by order. As far as the World War 1 weapons go, I know that the Indian military still uses the FN FAL in great number and, as irony has it, the first prototype of the FN FAL appeared in the same year as the AK-47. They each have a date of origin of 1947. The AK-47 is an assault rifle and the FN FAL is a battle rifle. I know that the common beat officer generally only carries the lathi, when on duty, but they do have access to the WWI style rifles that you mentioned, being bolt action .303 Enfields, at the stations, as well as the AK-47, and Browning Hi Power 9mm are carried by some officers. I even recall seeing some footage of a varient of an MP-5 being fired with one hand, well over the shooter’s head. That doesn’t seem to be the most accurate method of aiming an MP-5, to me, but he was doing it. Look at the police officers in Los Angeles, during the aftermath of the bank robbery. The two robbers had AK-47’s, with armor piercing rounds. The LAPD had to hold them off with what they had, until help arrived. They still engaged them with their handguns and shotguns, until the hit the gun store and got some heavier shit like the AR-15. Unless the Indian police were ordered not to engage them, then they remind me of the cop that will hear gunshots in a bad neighborhood and, instead of investigating the incident (because it is a bad neighborhood), will opt to go to the good side of town and run radar on a busy road.
December 2nd, 2008 at 10:24 am
I refused to watch any of this on the faux news channels over the holidays. When everyone asked why I said it was no doubt a false-flag operation to blame on Pakistan. It looks like Pakistan is being set up for regime change under the Obama administration. Obama will get to pull our troops out of Iraq like he said he would — but he’ll just move them a few miles to Pakistan.
December 2nd, 2008 at 11:13 am
LSD is used to make the patsys belive they are playing a video game lol
December 2nd, 2008 at 12:27 pm
how could you take lsd and still accurately aim a weapon? bullshit.
December 2nd, 2008 at 1:19 pm
well it seems to be pre-planned by the indian authorities or perhaps by india and usa, to blame on pakistan and make a reason for attack
December 2nd, 2008 at 1:40 pm
And so it begins as fortold, a future of practiced preaching and denial begins!
December 2nd, 2008 at 1:44 pm
you can shoot a gun accurately on lsd. on shrooms you couldn’t, but a mild hit of acid wouldnt really ruin your shot. i cant imagine a shooty spree on lsd, though. you would lose your composure, get very paranoid. probably get cold feet
December 2nd, 2008 at 1:57 pm
Maybe the they shot and dosed up victims on LSD? I understand they were Coked up too, I thought hardcore muslims outlawed Alcohol.
December 2nd, 2008 at 2:42 pm
Flipping Pak on China is Zbig/Obama goal since 1980.
Flipping Iran on Russia as well.
Hope that don’t backfire.
December 2nd, 2008 at 3:03 pm
It`s obvious that India was subject to some of that good ol` international terrorism-Whoops, I`m sorry!-I meant “american democracy”.
December 2nd, 2008 at 3:26 pm
So.. let me guess
The oil pipeline from Iran into Pak then on to India is now a No go?
Well… Im sure that made some very happy people in the west that were sooo against it
I mean they went as far as to give India a greenlight on all nuclear sites for power generation as long as they didnt take the pipeline from Iran. Even though India is another one of them countries that refuses to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.
India had manytimes told the West.. No we will have both, that this was a good Peace payoff with Pak…… didnt go over so well.
And Now 6 months later the Peace that India and Pak had is POOF!!
December 2nd, 2008 at 3:36 pm
Headline should read “Mumbai Terrorists Were Aided By Indian Authorities, CIA, Mossad and MI6″
December 2nd, 2008 at 4:51 pm
Everybody has a rear that stinks, and everybody here seems to have an opinion that stinks too. Some idiot remarks that out of 188 killed, 80 were Muslims. Where did he dig that information from?
When 10 people with guns and hundreds of hostages are holed up in a building, how is it NOT possible to hold security forces at bay?
All you pseudo intellectuals that question the motive of Pakistan, need to ask. What was the motive for them to support anti-India Khalistani Sikh terrorists in the early 80s?
What was the motive for them to support Kashmiri terrorists, even if their support was only meant to be “moral”. Did these two sets of terrorists only kill military folks, or did they attack civilians too? Between 1982 to 2006 at least a 100,000 Indians have been killed.
What was the motive for the train bombings in Mumbai? Was that Indian Government sponsored too? Was that for a “regime change”? If it didnt happen then under George Bush, an open supporter of India, why would it happen under Obama?
If indeed it is for a regime change, what does it buy a)Obama administration b)Indian government, that both of them are willing to slaughter 200 innocent Indians?
Manufactured evidence? Oh you friggin bunch of defense and investigative experts, was it easy manufacture if they found stuff in the boat these terrorists were supposed to go back to? It’s all just to implicate Pakistan and change administration? All the blood letting of the past twenty years plus and still continuing blood lust of Pakistani jihadis is all a setup for “regime changes”?
Pakistan’s Army cadets graduate from their academy by stamping over a painted flag of India, their only brainwashed goal is to avenge Bangladesh. No matter what happens, they hope to bleed India with a 1000 cuts, a well professed stand of General Zia Ul Haq.
Current administration perhaps does not share the view, but the ISI, a rogue state within state, and the Pakistani Army, without whose blessings the current administration will crumble in matter of minutes, still shares a hatred for India and Hindus that idiots and armchair experts like you can not comprehend.
December 2nd, 2008 at 5:13 pm
One “Rob” says that India waged wars against Pakistan. In 1948, under the garb of tribal invasion, Pakistani army attacked Kashmir, under the leadership of British commanders in disguise! They lost, but held on to territorial gains while UN stepped in and to this day has not been able to resolve.
In 1965 Pakistanis again came, this time hoping that they were better prepared. According to their Military genrals, one Muslim soldier was equivalent to 10 Hindu soldiers and there was no way they were going to lose! Of course, not with American supplied tanks, guns and planes!
In 1971 we had about 8 million refugees knocking on our doors from East Pakistan, and Nixon asked Indira Gandhi to have intercourse with herself. India had to go for the war, with Soviet Union stepping in for their own ulterior motives.
In 1999, they sneaked into the hills of Kargil, and the world knows the rest.
1984 attack on Amritsar temple was a nation saving civil war at best, no doubt mismanaged by Indira Gandhi, but was a much needed action to prevent the temple from being used to run a Government outside of the state Government.
What does all this “history”, have to do with the fact that jihadi scums used lapse security and walked in to create mayhem?
December 2nd, 2008 at 11:59 pm
I wonder how on earth CIA got advanced warning unless ….
December 3rd, 2008 at 12:00 am
I recall all these bombings started after Bush made a historical visit to India.
December 3rd, 2008 at 5:01 am
what seenu subbu said - exactly.
December 3rd, 2008 at 8:54 am
Wayne Madsen, he reports this US/CIA,FBI,MOSSAD-Israeli,UK/EU mass murder agenda, best.
However, SEENU SUBBU has it perfectly historically written for those who can read, in real time (e.g., intelligently, not in sound bites and/or sit com mentality).
GET IT PEOPLE: It is about POPULATION CONTROL and those who have created this WAR AGENDA as its ways and means to (1) MONEY; (2) POWER; (3) ACT ON THEIR CRIMINAL MASS INSANITY AS “MAN EATERS” … WORLD DOMINATION CONTROL.
Why not? After all, it has been this for so long why should the OFFSPRING of the GLOBAL BANDITS not also take their just desserts in the killing fields!
December 3rd, 2008 at 10:54 am
I don’t know how many of you readers had the chance to watch Pronay Roy of NDTV reporting on the Mumbai Terror Attack.
He made a very important statement… Now is the time for all Indian’s to give up some of the liberty and accept a restricted Police state kind of environment.
Does this sound familiar in other parts of the world. Are these not part of the main Agenda of the New World Order????
December 4th, 2008 at 2:14 pm
People are pathetic sheep. As long as the majority of us remain hopelessly ignorant, the government will continue to use their favorite trick over and over again, false flag terrorism.
December 7th, 2008 at 6:09 pm
How long till this same scenario is repeated in L.A.?
The cops aiding the terrorists shooting on citizens?
December 9th, 2008 at 9:25 pm
I think this guy alex is going way too far with his theories which he originally acquired from other authors.yesterday he interviewed the former chief of pakistani intelligence general hamid gul.a former head of ISI,an organization which he has accused of working with the CIA for hatching the ‘9/11 conspiracy’.he is interviewing the same very kind of people he has condemned and spoken against in the past and taking their word for compiling the conclusions of his expert reports splattered all over his website manufactured without an inkling of the actual politico economic situation of the indian subcontinent.he doesn’t know a dime about who gets to gain and who gets to lose from an event of any political significance like the mumbai attacks and his reports are based on the accounts of people with extremely questionable credibilities like a former ISI chief.ISI has been accused of aiding the establishment of taliban regime in afghanistan and woking with CIA in its sinister operations by various non mainstream independent researchers and now alex jones is taking the word of its former head in manufacturing his reports.i am british & i have lived in india for over five years and i have an array of friends in both mainstream and non mainstream journalistic societies in india.believe me,i am well versed with the politico economic situation in the indian subcontinent.At this point of time ,absolutely no political party stands to gain from the mumbai attacks and the prevailing tension with pakistan,neither the hindu fundamentalist parties nor the ruling congress led coalition regime.absolutely nobody is getting more votes after this incident and the popularity of all the national level political parties and leaders has taken a nose dive with an overall anger in the public over the laxity of the government and the overall lack of effort and concern among the politicians in ensuring the safety of the citizens.that is right ,the things that the indian establishment can be blamed for is widespread corruption ranging from medical to civil construction contracts and therefore indulgence in a continuous effort to keep the powers and positions.this is what causes the unpreparedness of the whole establishment in tackling an event like the mumbai attacks.CCTV footage from the CST railway station has clearly shown a group of policemen firing back with their WW2 era 303 guns at terrorists armed with AK47s and grenades.the reason some policemen at the CST station(if these reports are believed to be true for a moment)did not fire has more to do with the obsolete equipment that hasn’t been used in a decade, inadequate training imparted decades ago without any refresher programme midway and absolutely no weapons practice and drills for years undertaken by the railway policemen for tackling such an extreme situation.if the pseudo perpetrators in the indian establishment had to give stand down orders,don’t you think they would have given them to the commandoes tackling the hostage situation at the Taj hotel as the terrorists there had held over a 100 people hostage with more than 8kg of RDX(a quantity of the powerful explosive enough to blow up an entire section of the building) rather than giving stand down orders to a few poorly armed railway policemen who couldn’t do much anyway with their jammed WW2 era rifles.
so people, apply your thought before believing reports manufactured upon the accounts and interviews of individuals who are not neutral to this situation in the first place and generate an awareness among yourself to filter genuine reporting from the reporting of sensationalism that has been going on this website since the mumbai attacks.mr. jones and friends have manufactured these reports quoting people which are clearly not neutral in this event and are in fact blatantly inclined towards pakistan ,without even referring to or consulting a neutral strategic expert on the subcontinent or a strategic expert from the indian side and hatched all his stories with half the truth and half the information providing moribund conclusions to the people who follow his sensationalist reporting.
moreover,it is absolutely inethical to believe a story vehemently accusing the establishment of another country we don’t know enough about for a situation we don’t know enough about in the backdrop of the strategic and political environment we don’t know a thing about.we have no right to blindly extend the critical viewpoints that we have on our governments to other goverments and extend the assumptions that we make about our governments to other governments.it is a moral monstrosity and a worse thing to do than our governments’ policies of division and hatred to apply the corollaries that we have established from events in our own countries to those we know nothing about and simply establishing a nexus between them.
so people it’s high time for you to wake up and realize that people like alex jones are actually furthering our governments’ agenda of fear and hatred and are just making profit out of it by creating unnecessary sensation in order to maintain and enhance the theme of his work and website(which also includes harnessing the fear for the sale of some products).It’s only our own awareness and sincerity that is going to make difference and prevent us from an apparent downturn facing our societies.we need to become aware of what is right and what is not and refine our sense of judgement.only then can we be capable of making the right decisions and taking the right actions.
December 10th, 2008 at 5:22 am
I think this article does not make sense, it has picked up pieces of data and has jumbled it into a conspiracy. Alex Jones needs to look at the history between these 2 nations and he will realize that there has been consistent attacks by pakistan on India please ask him to refer to 93 Bomb Blast supported by ISI backed Dawood Ibrahim, 99 Attack on Kargil by Pak Army backed Terrorist organizations, 2001 attack on parliament, Indian Airlines hijacking. If there were a hidden agenda India would have jumped to that by now - there is no law being tabled like Patriot act, neither India govt is keen on attacking Pakistan - The one thing which has come out of this attack is that Pakistan is a dual state one army the other democratic - Army controls the land, people control nothing except civic works. I think there needs to be more research done by Alex in printing such article which does nothing but questions his previous statements.
February 26th, 2009 at 10:27 am
Очень признателен, действительно полезная инфа.
February 27th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
Мдааа…, а я тут за свои годы, как-то привык ко всему этому, даже внимания на это не обращаю
Вы тоже привыкнете 
February 28th, 2009 at 11:36 pm
Информации, уверен, и так вполне достаточно, чтобы сделать вывод, как не надо делать.
March 17th, 2009 at 1:31 am
Отлично. Стока полезного материала. Тока обновляйтесь больше
March 24th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
А это Вы написали на основе Вашего личного опыта?