 |
Navy Prosecutor In Gitmo Case: “If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane it would’ve hit the dome”
“Bin Laden driver” case contains revealing details
Steve Watson
Infowars.net
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Though the trial the man, dubbed “Osama bin Laden’s driver”, is primarily functioning as a show piece for the Bush administration’s “war on terror”, some interesting information emerged from the Guantanamo Bay naval base yesterday in the form of a direct admission from a US prosecutor that the fourth plane was “shot down”.
The revelation came during assertions from representatives for the prosecution that Salim Hamdan had detailed knowledge of the intended target of the fourth hijacked plane on 9/11.
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
109 Responses to “Navy Prosecutor In Gitmo Case: “If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane it would’ve hit the dome””
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:08 pm
Look at the picture…does that look like plane wreck to you? Check out Lockerbe Scotland and that plane wreck and then look at that one. Where did the wings hit?
Shot down…I doubt it…all the passengers where taken somewhere and murdered like the ‘plane’ that hit the pentagon.
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:14 pm
i figured that one out myself i also think that the story of heroism on that plane is a total fabrication to cover up what really happened
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:15 pm
Oh no! but I thought iwas brought down by super-patriots who fought back bravely against the terrorists! Oh geeez, now who can I believe?!?!
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:17 pm
I read a while ago about people 8 miles away had debris in their yards, that’s what was believed and made some sense to back up being shot down 3 miles up.
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Murdered? Nah. This stuff is cutting edge technology. They were used as the first settlers in an interdimensional colony.
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Unless they blew the living s*it out of it mar…
July 23rd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Karma is a REAL bytch…..
July 23rd, 2008 at 2:21 pm
Wait a minute… If they blew it out of the sky but been telling the American publi it crash on it’s own than the Government been lying all along. And if they lie about a matter as grave as this than they must have lied about the whole 9/11 scam….My God!
July 23rd, 2008 at 2:31 pm
This site is not where flight 93 went down. Loose change revealed that there was not a plane or any bodies at this site. They did reveal however that flight 93 was grounded in Cleveland and the passengers were off loaded. The plane was still operational after the supposed crash. Look at the original version of Loosechange. Planes dont just vanish after they crash. Yet 2 planes on the same day did just that according to the official story. I think the passengers were sadly offloaded to an empty NASA facility. From there one can only imagine what was done to them.
July 23rd, 2008 at 2:44 pm
Loose change opened my mind to ask questions.
And i did.
And i found two things.
1. The government was lying
2. Most conspiracy theorists are full of shit.
I don’t know the truth, but the plane being shot down, is the most logical conclusion.
True anything is possible, but some things are a lot more probable then others.
Why the heck would they take the people off the plane to kill them? Make a lot more sense just to crash the plane easy enough way of killing them.
July 23rd, 2008 at 2:49 pm
Ok, here’s the scenario that I think happened…..
official story:
AA flight 11 and UA flight 175 both depart from boston, bound for Cali, allegedly. Both hit WTC towers.
UA flight 93 departs from Newark, allegedly crashes in Shanksville.
AA flight 77 departs from Dulles, allegedly hits Pentagon.
My scenario:
1- Passengers from AA flight11 & UA flight175 are unknowingly boarded onto the same plane @ Logan Airport in Boston. (Probably flight 175, I think AA11 is one of the 2 planes still listed as operational.)
UA 175 is then shot down over PA, this accounts for the debris field reported to be 3 miles from Shanksville.
2- UA flight 93 departs as reported & is shot down over PA, this accounts for the debris field reported to be 8 miles from Shanksville.
3- AA flight 11 never flew that day. (I think this is one of the 2 planes that wasn’t even scheduled to fly that day)
4- AA flight 77 never flew either. Convenient since it was full of defense contractors & US military personel. (I think this was also not scheduled that day)
I could be wrong on these flight numbers, if so let me know!!
July 23rd, 2008 at 3:00 pm
Even the Challenger which disintegrated upon re-entry, from as high up as you can get, going thousands of mph, left large pieces of debris intact upon the earth. Why then, did this plane completely disappear into little itty bitty pieces, crashing at a much, much, slower speed, and from a much lower height?
July 23rd, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Hey all, pop over to http://wwwblogger.com and see an article by a Aidan Monaghan 907/23/2008)on the failure to disclose identified aircraft parts despite applications to those who should have this information.
In regard to the chauffeur, how is it that the FBI have insufficient evidence to put Bin Laden on their ‘wanted list’ ‘for 911′ but the chauffeur is on trial for it. Very strange these ‘Stalinist show trials’!
July 23rd, 2008 at 3:29 pm
Why would you publish this and still think 9/11 was an inside job? Why would they shoot down flight 93 and keep it a secret if this was an inside job? There are so many contradictions in the 911 truth movement and thats why it’s not moving anymore. What a joke. I would love to debate Alex Jones on his whack show. He needs medication for his condition. Or do they prescribe meds for an extra 21st cromosone?
July 23rd, 2008 at 3:52 pm
Don’t feel too sorry for the offloaded passengers; most of them worked for Defense contractors, and they are probably living with new identities on government pensions. ‘Papilion’ might even be one of them.
One thing is for damn sure. No planes crashed into the Pentagon or into that Shanksville field. Why? Because there was no debris at either crash site, because the US government hasn’t and won’t show us any of the debris that they say they collected at the crash sites, and because the US government completely controlled the disposition of any alleged human remains.
July 23rd, 2008 at 3:56 pm
In order to demolish a building, all you need is to start a fire on a few floors. Why do demolition teams use explosives? After WTC7, it should be obvious all that needs to be done is set a fire.
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:05 pm
john brown
so call alex up and debate him.
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:05 pm
I hope that one day the truth about the 9/11 attacks comes out, but if it doesn’t come out in this world, then it will come out on the Day of Judgement. Everyone will be questioned by the Lord.
Bush and Cheney will go to Hell.
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:07 pm
No evidence ever found of an airplane in PA. EVER!
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:07 pm
Well said, John Payne!
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:07 pm
Hey John Brown I think you should go see the wizard of oz because you seem to be lacking a BRAIN! The government knew it was going to happen and simply helped the terrorists with some extra explosives at WTC. It’s what that slimebag socialist FDR did in WW2 by moving the pacific fleet from California to Hawaii and imposing a trade blockiade on the Japanese. Thus by sacrificing a few thousand innocent people (just like WTC) they were able to get the sheeple of the U.S. to support war.
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:08 pm
“The 4th plane” indeed.Total horse manure. Since no planes hit either the 2 towers or the Pentagon, [ it is scientifically impossible for plastic nosed, aluminum -skin planes to disappear WHOLE , inside 500,000 ton concrete and steel buildings], it, [the "4th" plane] was in fact the _only_ plane, so it was the 1st .
http://onebornfree.blogspot.com/
July 23rd, 2008 at 4:42 pm
Hmmmm. How could it have been shot down when there was no wreckage, hence no plane? Idiot truthers and Alex Jones bots: get your fabricated stories in line.
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:04 pm
John Brown,
first of all you want to talk contradictions, the ‘official’ store is full of them. I suggest you read David Ray Griffin’s book “9/11 Contradictions”. in it he discusses 25 contradictions in the “official” story.
also you must ask yourself, if flight 93 was shot down (and it was) why did the government lie about it at all? I think it would have made most of us feel a little better to think that the military was able to stop one flight.
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
What we have in Pennsylvania are two completely contradictory Official Versions of the fate of Flight 93.
One of the Official Versions says that Flight 93 crashed nose-first into a field near Shanksville, and we have been shown pictures of a smoldering Wiley Coyote nose-first impression in that field, scant debris, and witnesses who claim that “there was no piece of debris more than two feet long.”
BTW, a 100 ton airliner CANNOT bury itself fifty feet into the ground during a nose-first impact unless the ground is liquified swamp mud. Heavy firetrucks and earth-moving equipment were parked at the crash site following the crash, and THEY DIDN’T SINK INTO THE MUD, which proves that the ground at the Shanksville crash site WAS NOT soft enough for an airliner to disappear into.
The second Official Version says that Flight 93 was shot down, leaving a debris field 8 miles wide, but most of the debris was in small fragments. Neither of the two 20-ton engines was found in the debris field, but a 1/2 ton piece of an engine was found.(That’s 1/40th the size of a whole, intact engine!)
Retired US Army Colonel Donn de Grad-Pre claims that a couple of Air Force pilots told him that they personally shot down Flight 93 over Shanksville using two Sidewinder missiles. de Grand-Pre also claims that elements of the US military have been planning a coup d’etate against the US government for more than a decade. (A US military coup against the US government? Sounds like replacing one fascist regime with another to me.)
Reality Check: Two Sidewinder missiles WILL NOT reduce a 100 ton 757 into small fragments. No way.
And consider this: the perpetrators of the 9/11 attacks had a large assortment of fake ‘eyewitnesses’ prepared to give bogus accounts of the WTC and Pentagon attacks on the morning of 9/11. Likewise, the US government had fake ‘eyewitnesses’ prepared to give false testimony at Shanksville.
My conjecture is that the US government wouldn’t have bothered to excavate their Wiley Coyote nose-first plane crash impression into that Shanksville field if they didn’t plan to make it part of their ‘Official Version’ of 9/11. Then they scattered some trash around the site and called it ‘crash debris’.
They may have also scattered some trash from the air, resulting in the ‘8 mile-wide debris field’, or they just arranged for some fake (or nonexistent) ‘eyewitnesses’ to falsely claim that they saw or found the debris within the ‘8 mile-wide debris field’. (Note that we have never been shown any pictures of the debris from the alleged ‘8 mile-wide debris field’.
The bogus story of “Let’s Roll” aboard Flight 93 was created to add a touch of drama and ‘heroism’ to the government’s 9/11 hoax.
What really happened in Shanksville? Probably not much at all, except for a preprepared bogus ‘crash site’ and some preselected liars.
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:05 pm
adfafadfafdaf wrote:
“Hmmmm. How could it have been shot down when there was no wreckage, hence no plane? Idiot truthers and Alex Jones bots: get your fabricated stories in line.”
But a questions begs: Why would anyone with their own confident views (the view the mainstream media pushes) on what happened on 9/11 search out a prisonplanet/infowars story on 9/11, that can only be found by visiting the site directly, usually on the same day the story is posted (frequent visitor of the site), and demonstrate a pathetically out of touch and basic understanding of events, and attack supporters of Alex. Cleary “adfafadfafdaf” is working in govt dis-info, but certainly not worthy of his paycheck.
In fact, maybe its high-time we realized that half the posts on the forums are govt dis-info, with the intent/plan of getting us all to fight and bicker over the minor details. Instead of everyone rising to the bait and responding to this trash, lets get organised and actually talk about issues, share success stories, plan meetups, discuss ways to get the message out. etc etc..
Wouldn’t you agree Alex?
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:06 pm
There was no wreckage because it was shot down. Hence exploded into a million pieces across the Pennsylvania countryside.
Suggestion for adfafadfafdaf: Before calling people “idiot truthers” or “Alex Jones Bots” first briefly examine your own comments for indications of your own idiocy. It could save you considerable embarrasment in the future.
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:18 pm
It’s not a theory if it really happened and you’re not paranoid if they really are out to get you. And if you doubt that go on line and watch Endgame. Another eye opener.
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:36 pm
The wreckage is stored in “Iron Mountain”
Rather than assembling the wreckage to recreate the event, the wreckage is “heavily guarded” in Iron Mountain. Why???
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2aou6c2MOmg
July 23rd, 2008 at 5:40 pm
have to agree with one born free[and Morgan Reynolds]..jets do not melt into buildings..the wings,tail section and engines would have been violently ripped off upon impact,let alone the hollow thin aluminum nose coming out intact on the other side of tower after hitting multiple steel supports and tons of concrete is laughable and impossible..BUT.. a tomahawk missle fired into the tower would do just that..the collision of the jet hitting the tower would have extremely violent and loud..what we apparently saw was lousy video fakery at best..we should have seen half the jet falling to the ground if it/they in fact had hit the towers..highly recommend watching “September clues” and see if you still believe there were ANY jets on 9-11
July 23rd, 2008 at 6:07 pm
More dis-information as my intuition tells me. Flight 93 was supposed to target WTC bldg7, but a true American fighter pilot who unaware of the false flag operation ended the flight doing what he was taught to do,save as many lives as possible. The implosion of bldg 7 (pulled)was required to fullfill the contract between the building owner (insurance) and the responscible terrorists to expedite the the removal of explosives as evidence in WTC bldg 7. If Flight 93 had completed its mission of hitting WTC bldg 7 then we would not be talking about this today. And the biggest Cover-up in history would go un-noticed. To say the Capital Dome only throws you off the trail once again. As the holes in the ozone layers increase so too shall the holes in a giant lie. You reap what you sow.
July 23rd, 2008 at 6:33 pm
Of course the plane was shot down, when was there ever any doubt? More interesting is the fact that the plane was intended to flatten the Whitehouse, the one part of the plan in high level dispute until the last possible moment. Cheney and his people wanted the residence destroyed, ‘Independence Day’ (the movie) fashion. However, the chief psy-ops people argued that the images of a destroyed Whitehouse would dominate the world’s press, and would actually have most of the world cheering.
A compromise was reached. If the New York strikes went perfectly, the Whitehouse strike was up for cancellation. As we now know, the smarter people won out. Even the Pentagon strike, required so that a legal technicality could be met (civilian strikes against civilian targets only within the USA did not allow automatic activation of War Powers), was almost invisible in the press coverage afterwards compared to NY.
Cheney had wanted ‘the people’, ‘the military’ and ‘the president’ to be visible targets. For ‘the government’, his people had deployed anthrax, of course.
Now, as with ‘global warming’, activists make the mistake of debating every last detail with government shills, and the media, a battle that can never be won while the bad guys maintain power. The indisputable fact that 911 was an inside job, a false flag like the earlier Moscow apartment bombings, was proven years ago.
Here’s a question for all of you. DID PUTIN SUFFER FOR ONE SECOND BECAUSE HE WAS CAUGHT RED-HANDED BLOWING UP HIS OWN PEOPLE IN MOSCOW? Actually, he became MORE powerful because the ’smoking gun’ evidence existed against him! Indeed, so little did it matter that the truth of the false flag in Moscow was widely known, that Putin was afterwards able to run rampage in Chechnya, and exterminate a greater chunk of the population there regardless.
Hitler obsessed endlessly about false flags, but in the end discovered that he was far better off saying ‘f**k it’, and just attacking his target without excuse. You see, the people may CLAIM they hate a genocidal strongman, but history shows that once they put such a monster in power, they’ll continue to back him while he acts with complete ruthlessness.
The USA is awaiting such a leader. The democrats will provide one. The people will give that monster the support that the braindead fratboy Bush could never hoped to gain.
Activists, accept the false-flag of 911 as an axiom, and never debate the fact with shills, unless on a public forum bringing the truth to a new set of people for the first time. Instead, incorporate knowledge of this false flag as part of a wider anti-war argument, confronting the forces that are determined to drag our planet into a new global war. And remember, even if you found the ‘holy-grail’ of 911 ’smoking gun’ evidence, it would make things worse now, not better, because the time of the publicly visible Neo-Cons is over, and such evidence would merely seem further proof why the ‘clean hands’ of the democrats are now needed to take us into new wars.
You see you cannot ‘punish’ a politician, now out of power, for crimes carried out when in power, and expect any public interest in the process whatsoever.
“Hey look, I can prove Bush and Cheney did 911″
“Who the hell cares now, Bub, didn’t you notice we already voted them out of power?”
July 23rd, 2008 at 6:36 pm
I have been saying this for a while now: why are those that believe in the official story be here? You are here because you are RATS! GET OUT AND LET US DO WHAT WE DO. WE DON’T CARE FOR YOUR OPINIONS AND PROPAGANDA. ALL YOU PEOPLE DO IS TRY TO CONVINCE US WHAT YOU BELIEVE AND WE WILL NOT HAVE IT!!
TAKE YOUR PROPAGANDA AND STICK IT WHERE THE SUN DON’T SHINE AND BE GONE! THIS PLACE IS NOT FOR YOU! IT’S FOR US!
July 23rd, 2008 at 6:45 pm
WE ALL KNOW THAT THEY(THE GOVERNMENT DID IT)THEY ALWAYS DO IT. GOVERNMENTS ALWAYS DO IT! GET RID OF THEM AND TAKE CONTROL OF YOUR OWN LIVES!
July 23rd, 2008 at 7:28 pm
Read this article and it may explain the statement. The prosecutor was apparently quoting Hamdan, not making his own statement on the events:
http://www.brisbanetimes.com.a.....00620.html
July 23rd, 2008 at 7:34 pm
Ben!
You are a fucking retard and Alex Jones bot. I come here to make fun of you losers.
boeingdriver29 Reply:
February 27th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
GSYHUADBB
July 23rd, 2008 at 7:52 pm
I am of the view that 9/11 must have been an ‘inside job’. Unfortunately, many Americans are disjointed, as to what happened and what to do, as may be expected. Noam Chomsky more or less says what does it matter if people were killed and therefore forget it.
America, as usual you are being too self orientated. Many people of various nationalities were also murdered on that day and many of we, “foreign citizens” could not give a stuff about your murdering government or whether there was an intended takeover or what ever. We want the murderers brought to justice. Can’t happen you say. Well last year in Sydney, a coronial inquiry determined that there was a case to answer by certain Indonesian officer/s for the murder of the ‘Balibo Five’ during the East Timor invasion in 1975. The brief is presently with the Federal Police Commissioner. Maybe noting will happen, but those Indonesian officer/s are subject to international law and maybe they will be wise not to venture out of Indonesia.
A superb example has been set by Simon Wiesenthal, he doggedly tracked war criminals for life, those who did 9/11 should be very aware that they are in someone’s sights. Another example is the recent capture of Radovan Karadzic for alleged war crimes in Bosnia in 1995, he is on his way to the the Hague.
So, whatever happens America, the world is going to treat you as a ‘rogue international state’, if you do not get the treasonous, murdering scum who are responsible for 9/11 and the murder of foreign visitors, no matter how long it takes. the matter should be taken up in a world parliamentary (or similar) inquiry, as is being considered by some international representatives. if you need encouragement look up ‘Edna Cintron’, see her picture at the entry hole of one of the towers and have a heart, as to her fate. (Did she walk through fire?) America you have no soul if you ignore her and her fellow victims. Get the Italian production of “Zero” [on 9/11]sponsored by Mr. Chisea (?) of the European Parliament and see what is being seen by an increasing number of people to expose your government’s evil. So you have your lecture, now get on with it.
July 23rd, 2008 at 8:16 pm
“The tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the “dome” was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.”
From the Brisbane Times
July 23rd, 2008 at 8:22 pm
If the trial is about truth, Is the prosecution trying to prove that Hamdan knows the truth or is he untruthful. If Hamdan is telling the truth then he knew that the plane WAS shot down. If he was untruthful then he did NOT know that the plane was shot down and is making an untruthful statement.
Therefore, neither statement supports the prosecutions theory that Samil Hamdan is knowledgeable about the fourth plane.
OR, the plane WAS shot down, a truth or was NOT shot down, and is therefore an untruth.
The prosecution assumes that Samil Hamdan was telling the truth and that the plane WAS shot down.
The prosecution has decided to assume that Hamdan told the truth and that the plane WAS shot down. They have either proven that their case assumes the plane WAS shot down or they lose the trial. If they prove that Hamdan is truthful and the plane WAS shot down they also prove the Government has lied in the 911 report. The prosecution loses either way unless the trial is a sham Court.
July 23rd, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Couldn’t Hamdan “think” the plane was shot down and is being, as far as he knows, truthful in saying so? He may not know know either way or in fact know nothing about anything to do with 911. Anyone could give testimony in court and think they are telling the truth if they don’t know better.
The above is not my point for posting this. It was just to raise the idea that this was not an admission by a government official. Just seems people were immediately jumping on the band wagon.
I don’t think this is going to go anywhere.
July 23rd, 2008 at 9:21 pm
So where were the plane parts? Different lie to cover previous lie.
There was a blast hole in ground, but no plane.
“….is primarily functioning as a show piece for the Bush administration’s “war on terror”
July 23rd, 2008 at 9:56 pm
“Many people of various nationalities were also murdered on that day and many of we, “foreign citizens” could not give a stuff about your murdering government or whether there was an intended takeover or what ever.”
As a foreigner I DO give a stuff actually. 9/11 is not the be all and end all, the Globalist takeover IS. The murdering governments are all over the planet. This is NOT a US alone problem by any stretch of imagination. Concentration on the twig is all well and good but at some point you may care to take a look at the tree and then the forest.
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:02 pm
In a real court of law you would say that the prosecution was shot down.
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:41 pm
Hey…”JustSoYouKnow”…
Just because you “think” Osama had something to do with 911, doesn’t make it the truth….
Evidence makes it true…..
Errored speculation is all that the 911 comission has spewed forth…They did not test the actual steel before it was shipped away…they only offer hypothetical vapour as their belief..The FBI have no factual evidence linking bin Laden and 911….
there was Denial to the events from bin laden himself… he has not made any admissions…
Asking people in court what they know is the opposite of what they believe….
Knowledge is based on first hand facts……
Belief is based the faith that the second hand or third hand story is true…..otherwise known as “Here say”.
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:43 pm
Oops! Their lies are starting to conflict with each other.
July 23rd, 2008 at 10:57 pm
Oops! Retard truthers’ and Alex Jones bots’ stupidness is starting to conflict with each other. No plane or plane was shot down!?
LMFAO!
July 24th, 2008 at 12:04 am
There simply was not enough debris on the ground to account for a 100 ton airliner, no matter where it fell. There certainly wasn’t enough debris at the preprepared ‘crash site’, with its Wiley Coyote cartoom-cutout impression of a nose-first airliner crash.
Nor was there enough debris on the ground in the ‘8 mile wide debris field’ to account for a 100 ton airliner. Those two 20-ton engines do not just fall apart like a house of cards; they are not made of glass.
July 24th, 2008 at 12:22 am
If Flight 93 was shot down and the debris scattered over an ‘8 mile wide debris field’, why have we never seen any photos of anyone retrieving or collecting any of that debris?
Nowadays nearly everybody packs a digital camera or a cell phone camera. It would have been pretty hard to stop citizens or the press from taking pictures of people spread out over a 8 mile wide area picking up debris and hauling it away.
Instead we have no pictures of any debris, no pictures of people picking it up, and no pictures of anyone hauling it away. None of the above. Nothing.
Besides, if they were planning to shoot Flight 93 down, why did they go to the trouble of preparing that fake Wiley Coyote crash site? They would be setting themselves up with two conflicting events — an explosion that blew the plane to pieces in flight, and the preprepared Wiley Coyote nose-dive crash site.
Conclusion: Flight 93 was not shot down, and it didn’t crash nose first into that Shanksville field. In fact there was never any airliner there at all. I don’t think that ANY real airliners were used anywhere for the US government’s 9/11 attacks.
July 24th, 2008 at 1:00 am
Wake up people!! elephant in the livingroom time!!
where are the plane parts, debris, look up other plane crash photo’s
like the greek plane crash a few years back, the greek plane crashed into the side of a mountain at the same speeds reported in 911, engines, seats, recognisable parts are visable.
wake up where are the parts???
the crater left looks bogus its supposed to be a 100 ton plane in there!!
Norad stands down no air defense!!
No scrambled fighters!!
They are conducting a drill the same day same senario!!
Cell phone calls from 30,0000 feet (cant be done)!!
people from a cave in a third world country did it with box cutters!!
i dont want to be right some people cant accept that this is right
mark
http://www.speedy-specs.co.uk
July 24th, 2008 at 1:13 am
Gregory
You had some points about the lack of photos, but you ruined it at the end.
Not one person that was on the rooftops throughout the city watching tower 1 burn, not knowing exactly the cause, challanged the news outlets by stating that they did not witness a plane that was witnessed on TV.
Not one.
Because they all saw a plane.
The no-plane disinformation theory is a rat trap.
July 24th, 2008 at 4:50 am
Enough rats to go around as is. Did anybody see the first tower go down, outside of people already in New York?
July 24th, 2008 at 5:16 am
The govt should just come out and admit they did it. I really doubt anyone would do anything about it anyway. The neocons would say they did it for our own good. The libs would say, “well it doesn’t affect me so who cares?”
July 24th, 2008 at 5:30 am
fyi- use of box cutters was debunked.
So the publics lying eyes were right!
A hole in the ground is just a lie. A cover story.
I still hold that it was shot down BECAUSE it was out of control of the conspiracy.
Hitting the dome would have automatically initiated Martial Law… automatically.
If there was martial law that day, we wouldn’t be here discussing this.
Some brave pilot, disobeyed stand down orders and shot that plane down.
July 24th, 2008 at 5:50 am
Correction/update to my prevous post [page3 here] . It seems very clear to me now [yes, I'm a little slow!] that there were no planes anywhere involved in crashing into buildings , or land[93], although planes were obviously flying around all 4 “attack” sites.
To be clear, no plane crashed in Penn., no planes hit the 2 towers [ it is scientifically impossible for plastic nosed, aluminum -skin planes to disappear WHOLE , inside 500,000 ton concrete and steel buildings], and no plane flew “through” the outer walls of the Pentagon.
http://onebornfree.blogspot.com/
July 24th, 2008 at 5:59 am
Examining minute details are fun but quite a few poison pills or red herrings are there by design. Their purpose is to discredit you and confuse you and get you going around in circles. When you pound minute details of it into the ground, you diverge from what should be a common goal. Here’s what 90% can agree on. At the very least, they knew about it and let it happen as the hijackers planned. In the middle ground, they knew about it and cleared a path to maximize the chances for success because it suited their goals. At the extreme end, they planned the whole thing caper from top to bottom because it served their agenda extremely well. It doesn’t matter which camp you pitch your tent in, none of us want to live outdoors anymore. We want to go home to the real America that Thomas Jefferson helped build and the one Andrew Jackson took back when he so effectively destroyed the central bank. I love you guys but “knew about it and let it happen” is all we need. The rest of it does not serve our goal at this time.
July 24th, 2008 at 6:11 am
Isaiah 28:15 >>
New American Standard Bible (©1995)
Because you have said, “We have made a covenant with death, And with Sheol we have made a pact. The overwhelming scourge will not reach us when it passes by, For we have made falsehood our refuge and we have concealed ourselves with deception.”
Isaiah 33 is also very interesting.
July 24th, 2008 at 6:54 am
Hey Laurie
What on earth are you talking about?
Just because I questioned the validity of the article you now think that I am backing the official story?
Just because a defendant says the plane was shot down and that statement is repeated by the prosecutor, as he quotes the defendant, does not suddenly make it a fact that the plane was shot down. I am not debating whether the plane was shot down or not, I am debating the source or the claim – which I feel has been misquoted.
Now, if there was an admission by pilots that they shot the plane down then we would have something to look into.
July 24th, 2008 at 7:43 am
These people who believe 100% that there was a massive conspiracy behind Sept. 11 are asleep at the wheel.
July 24th, 2008 at 7:55 am
Google pictures of the ValueJet crash in the Everglades….where is that plane?
Let me guess…it was another government cover up also….right?
July 24th, 2008 at 8:09 am
Hey Justsoyouknow,
I guess reading comprehension is not for you. The title says “NAVY PROSECUTOR”. I did not know that a NAVY PROSECUTOR was defending Gitmo prisoners.
July 24th, 2008 at 8:11 am
@randomguy
Your wasting your breath with this group…
@estanislao
hitting the dome would have instituted marshall law? None of the other events initiated marshall law….why would the dome also being hit institute marshall law?
Your logic is beyond flawed.
July 24th, 2008 at 8:40 am
@FK
I think 9/11 was a cover up. Change my mind.
July 24th, 2008 at 8:57 am
Buh-jeezus F’ing Mithra!! Do some research. Find out when the airplanes were actually decommissioned (hint: not on 9/11). http://www.rumormillnews.com/c.....read=90306
July 24th, 2008 at 9:33 am
@peaceful american
I think the bigger task is that the .0001% of the world who think 9/11 was a cover up need to prove to the rest of us it was.
How much explosives would it take to bring down WTC 1 and 2?
How come no one saw anyone ever wiring them for demolition?
How come no one ever saw WTC 7 wired with explosives?
How come our govt. cant hide wiretapping, but they can cover up 9/11?
How come you all say that WTC 7 was structurally sound after 1 and 2 came down but there is a picture showing structural damage from the 18 floor down?
http://www.debunking911.com/wtc7swd.jpg
July 24th, 2008 at 9:36 am
@teleaf
When I read it, it sounded very clear that the lawyer in question was part of the prosecution and his comment referred to the driver overhearing UBL and his aide say “If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane it would’ve hit the dome”
July 24th, 2008 at 9:40 am
A plane, possibly Flight 93 (Shanksville) was shot down by Major Rick Gibney. He received an award for this from his Dakota Govenor:
http://piratenews.org/flight93.html
Somehow, this news that has been around for years gets passed over.
July 24th, 2008 at 9:40 am
@FK
Tell me why NORAD stood down that day?
July 24th, 2008 at 10:00 am
NORAD did not stand down that day…
There was much failure that day…all around. It was a confusing sitution and no one reacted well…then again, this was uncharted territory…
http://911research.wtc7.net/planes/analysis/norad/
As for your assertion they “stood down”…I am pretty much used to you guys guys twisting everything to fit into your nice, neat box.
July 24th, 2008 at 10:34 am
Do not accept what is-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1V5iCUBEUx4
July 24th, 2008 at 10:51 am
To FK – 2 months before 911 fbi & cia had a “bombfinding experiment” with dogs and everything, it lasted for 2 weeks. ask someone who worked there.
July 24th, 2008 at 10:52 am
Frank Costa:
Major Rick Gibney and the Governor of Dakota can lie to us, can they not?
Dave:
Sorry, Dave, but if you don’t examine and present the ‘nuts and bolts’, or the minutiea, of a case, you don’t really have a case.
Also: when you’re talking about paid or elected Officials of the US government and the US military, ‘knowing about it and letting it happen’ makes them accessories to the crime itself. For example, if a police officer knew that an armed bank robbery or a murder was being planned, and he ‘knew about it and let it happen’, he would be considered an accessory to the crime and he would be made to stand trial along with the robbers and murderers who actually carried out the crime.
July 24th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Someone get Steve to tidy up that lead. I challenge him to write a 7-word sentence as his lead. He’s got a lead that’s so wordy and complicated he can’t even write it properly. Break it into two sentences or something. Or spend some money and hire an editor with a degree. They’re downsizing in newsrooms across the country so you should be able to find a disgruntled, smart reporter or copy editor to give your site that much more of an edge.
July 24th, 2008 at 11:33 am
tjeckler…how about more info, how about links (to something other then an alex jones website), how about pictures…
right now…your two line blurb tells me absolutely nothing.
July 24th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Hey Tealeaf
I guess comprehension isn’t your strong point either. Where did I saw he was defending Gitmo prisoners. He was repeating what had been said.
Learn to do some research and you will see that there is more to this story. Just because something is posted on this site doesn’t mean no more research is necessaey.
“If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane it would’ve hit the dome,” Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks.
The tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the “dome” was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.”
From the Brisbane Times – look it up and make up your own mind.
July 24th, 2008 at 1:12 pm
yeah, you’re right, absolutely nothing you blind christian.
The bush-administration is a loving company which is building a safe and secure america?? And there is no NWO, its just a peace – making global company!! I am just mislead.
Cos I dont have pictures from the bomb-planting.
WAKE UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
July 24th, 2008 at 1:34 pm
tjeckler
pretty defensive…
I had no ideal what your post referred to…
I asked for more info….and what do I get..the standard response from a retarded, duped aj follower…
Where is the Valujet in the Everglades…
No one answered that….no one answered anything…
All I get is speculation, swags and theory…
Here was/is your chance to sway me…but no…
Kepp gobbling up aj’s gizm….he spews it daily and ya’ll love suckling on it.
July 24th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Poor FK. No one is answering your questions, why?
maybe cos youre milking for something, it doesnt matter if you got proof, then you say its just made up, for aj,s profit. I love the new world order, cant wait for the final atom-bomb war!
July 24th, 2008 at 2:04 pm
FK . Why are you here, at this site at all? Go to “jesus camp” there you maybe find someone who gives you some answers.
But it seems like you ate like everybody else; no one knows, but we are building our own puzzles with things we find on the net.
The thruth will come to everybody before 2012, i think it will come next year already!
July 24th, 2008 at 2:57 pm
tjeckler…
Why am I here? Its interesting to see.
Whats a matter? Sad because there are people like me on here questioning?
Its ok for ya’ll to question everything, and by golly, they better jump with answers right now mister.
But when people of a differing opinion show up here and ask questions, we are told to wake up, or called neo-cons…
Heres me in a nutshell:
I think we went into Iraq for the wrong reasons but now feel if we pull out at this time it will become a bigger mess.
I hope we can peacefully work with Iran.
I think money (stock market, corporations…etc) has caused our economy of today…not a masterminded NWO plot.
I think that UBL was responsible for 9/11, not our govt.
I am a retired soldier who was in Iraq 2004-2005.
And I think its funny how the articles on here have altered titles from what was actual said, or by whom…..case in point, the Navy prosecutor at GITMO.
July 24th, 2008 at 3:20 pm
FK. Give me a proof that UBL did it, or at least a link.
Google ; amero, nau.
I also hope for a peaceful ending to this mess bush-admnstr. built.
But in the Old testament you can read about ; that, when there is peace in israel and palestinia jesus will come down the hill of armageddon(= a big mountain between israel and palestinia).
How the peace will come is thru conciussness or (BUT i hope not)thru
the war they now talking about. I mean A atombomb in palestinia and one in iran; it will also be “peace” after that.
I if you didnt know ; ufos are our relatives-angels.
And they gave moses good help when he needed it.
I hope they will come down soon, jesus, buddha, mohammed, haile selaasie are also welcomed.
July 24th, 2008 at 3:24 pm
And the possible attack of iran has nothing to do with oil? 70% of the worlds oil is in iran. And opium is good business too, therfore afganistan.
I understand that you would like too feel that you have done something patriotic in irak, but sorry.
July 24th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
newfy777 said: “..jets do not melt into buildings..the wings,tail section and engines would have been violently ripped off upon impact,let alone the hollow thin aluminum nose coming out intact on the other side of tower after hitting multiple steel supports and tons of concrete is laughable and impossible..BUT.. a tomahawk missle fired into the tower would do just that..” .
In good forensic science procedure, if a murder has been committed, say by stabbing or shooting, the scientist[s] examine the body of the victim to determine the type of weapon [type of knife or gun/bullet ]most likely to cause the damage inflicted [type and nature of wounds] .
It is no different for a building damaged by, it is claimed, aircraft flying at the physically impossible speed of 560mph at 600ft [250mph being the absolute max for a large jetliner at that height, given air density], or a missile, as you claim.
Even though in this case the bodies of the victims [the buildings] no longer exist, many photos of the wounds inflicted on the buildings[the victims] still exist.
The wounds inflicted on WTC1 +2 show none of the characteristics of missile , or for that matter, aircraft damage. Close inspection of the steel beams inside the “entry wound” perimeters for both buildings, show many to have been cut straight through [most likely via explosive charges- certainly not by aircraft wings], some beams even bend outwards, indicating that the placed charges blew the beams outward, when surely if an aircraft did in fact penetrate the buildings in one piece, [or a missile] ALL, or nearly all, beams would be automatically pushed inwards as if the building had been “stabbed” by a giant knife, or hit by a giant bullet [i.e plane or missile] .
Since no planes hit the buildings[fake videos], and missiles could not possibly inflict the type of “entry” wounds that exist[ed], and most beams are not pushed inward but many are cut straight across at an angle , some even pushed outwards- shaped charges of some description seems the most likely cause of the “entry” holes. [Although, in my opinion the same types of explosives used to make these entry holes did not bring down the towers- the post collapse damage, amongst other things is simply not consistent with the types of damage caused by explosives in demolition. See: http://drjudywood.com/ for a far more plausible explanation .
The “wound” characteristics for the Pentagon indicate that either a missile or shaped charges were used.
boeingdriver29 Reply:
February 27th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
You are wrong. At 600ft the aircrafts max speed would be around 350kts or 402mph. That is of course if the aircraft were not flown above there VMO. I don’t think someone who is going to fly into a building would be concerned about over stressing the airframe prior to impact so there is a possibility that these aircraft were doing 560mph.
July 24th, 2008 at 7:01 pm
Well FK… We hightailed it out of Vietnam and now they have a thriving economy and actually like Americans.
July 24th, 2008 at 7:14 pm
higher dimensions will bring us massive peace soon so , BE KIND!!
July 24th, 2008 at 7:25 pm
I went to afghanistan, and i was thinking i was doing something good. but i came back here and i’ve been thinking alot, and this is all Bullshit. You want to do something patriotic ? Join the paramedics, or the firefighters, or the Red Cross. But irak, iran and all that, its all bullshit. tjeckler is right.
July 25th, 2008 at 2:27 am
Magnetometer data from alaska.edu shows the earth’s magnetic field shifted with every 9/11 “event”. This includes the plane-shaped holes appearing in the towers. The World Trade Center was destroyed with directed energy weapons. See this analysis by former Clemson University Professor of Mechanical Engineering Dr Judy Wood for info on the magnetometer data:
http://drjudywood.com/articles/erin/erin5.html
July 25th, 2008 at 2:30 am
The 9/11 Truth Movement,
Free Energy Suppression
and the Global Elite’s Agenda
http://www.checktheevidence.co.....;Itemid=60
July 25th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
hey fk,
check out “september clues” on youtube, its the work of professional video analysts of 20+ years. i think you might find it interesting.
July 25th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
Osama Bin Laden is just the scapegoat. 9/11 was a military exercise . . . No hijackers were involved . . . and they are still alive too. No second plane at WTC, thats for sure. That video is nonsense. A total Fugazi!! I have seen several live feeds that clearly show the explosion and no plane ever anywhere near the WTC. Research! Are you Smarter than a 5th Grader!?
July 25th, 2008 at 5:35 pm
Truthy Tim said: “Magnetometer data from alaska.edu shows the earth’s magnetic field shifted with every 9/11 “event”. This includes the plane-shaped holes appearing in the towers. ”
Maybe I’m missing something, but despite the Magnetometer data from alaska.edu, I can see no evidence at this point in time that DEW can cut the precise hole shapes as are[were] on display in both WTC 1+2.
However , I agree with you, DEW seems by far the best explanation to date for the free fall collapse of both towers, given the other evidence ["toasted" cars, "melted" steel beams, steel girders turned to dust in mid air on camera etc. etc.]
Prof. Judy Woods research in this area [i.e. post collapse photographic evidence of WTC physical damage anomalies] , blows Jones and his bunch of simpletons “research” out of the water , simply because Ms. Woods uses scientific procedure correctly by collecting ALL possible data and photographic evidence before attempting a hypothesis for the probable cause of those free fall collapse speeds.
http://onebornfree.blogspot.com/
July 25th, 2008 at 5:46 pm
FK said: “How do you want me to prove it? Give my name? So i can end up on your enemy of the state list?”
How would giving your name prove anything? You lost me. And surely, by defending the governments version of these events, you are a friend of the state. I, on the other hand , who claims there were no planes and that the towers were probably brought down by Direct Energy Weapons technology, would be an “enemy of the state”. No, oram I missing something ?
FK said: “You believe 9/11 was an inside job, I believe UBL did it. I dont think much will change that thought process in either of us.”
I for one, have no problem with your belief, and I have no interest or incentive to change what you believe. I just disagree with you. Feel free to carry on with your delusions, I’ll keep mine.
http://onebornfree.blogspot.com/
July 25th, 2008 at 5:51 pm
FK said: “How do you want me to prove it? Give my name? So i can end up on your enemy of the state list?”
How would giving your name prove anything? You lost me. And surely, by defending the governments version of these events, you are a friend of the state. I, on the other hand , who claims there were no planes and that the towers were probably brought down by Direct Energy Weapons technology, would be an “enemy of the state”. No, oram I missing something ?
FK said: “You believe 9/11 was an inside job, I believe UBL did it. I dont think much will change that thought process in either of us.”
I for one, have no problem with your belief, and I have no interest or incentive to change what you believe. I just disagree with you. Feel free to carry on with your beliefs, I’ll keep mine.
http://onebornfree.blogspot.com/
July 26th, 2008 at 9:32 pm
This is just the same as the so called 4 suicide Bomber’s on 7/7 there were no suicide bomber’s in London, just 4 stupid git’s who thought they were on a drill, but remember Alex Jones and Jeff Rense and their so called truther’s are calling us no planer’s, nut job’s for saying it, I’m afraid folk’s they have painted themself’s into a corner, they are so bent on proving everthing with documentation that they can’t use the brain they were born with, anybody with two brain cell’s working who looks at those film’s of so called planes hitting steel and concrete building’s know’s That what they are seeing is impossible, They have blinded themself’s, a lot of people here have woken up to the Awful Truth that we’v all been had by both side’s, also the loose change lot have rumbled it too, because they know we’r not going to buy any more of their crappy film’s, so you see it’s not only Alex Jones that can go on a Rant, and as I’v said before.
“LET THE REVOLUTION BEGIN”
July 27th, 2008 at 8:56 am
what a stupiy little hole….
the hole has fooled many americans…..
to find only scraps on that field is amazing,,,, they said a plane hit the ground…
TRY smashing a plane into the ground and tell me what happens….
NOT A BIG plane… JUST a model plane… scale size…
when you smash a petrol power r/c jet into the ground…
the jet will survive… it will still be there and it will just look like a plane crash,,, a smashed plane…..
do experiments with r/c planes… they will not disappear….
your plane will be there for you to fix…
then when you finish that experiment… i want you to get a BAZOOKA and fire it into the ground… the bazooka’s hole represents a missile from a plane…. or even a gun…
just shoot a gun into the ground and see the size of your hole…
just like a missle…
now crash an r/c plane into the ground… see the difference…
July 27th, 2008 at 2:46 pm
Most of the valu jet wreckage was underwater and had to be recovered by divers; therefore, crash site photos would show little wreckage.
July 27th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
Mexican news reported that the jet was shot down when it happen.On the other hand ( like all the time ) our news lied about the whole thing ordeal.
July 27th, 2008 at 4:23 pm
7-27-08
Well Gary G. Dean, I have more than 2 brain cells and I say you are full of shit. My address is 100 North Main #921, Memphis, TN 38103 and my phone is (901) 526-1411, and my email address is charlesrcurbo@aol.com. I am a lawyer in Memphis and I ain’t hiding from nobody; you MF’s. I got eyes, and I know fucking cell phones do not work at 35000 feet. I’ve seen buildings imploded live with my own green eyes and buddy 9-11 was a fucking inside job.
July 27th, 2008 at 6:21 pm
And the plane targeted for WTC7 never got off the ground.
After the path was cleared from the removal of the other two towers, a third plane was to slide up the middle, a ‘hat trick’ if you will. But it never made it, so WTC7 had to collapse on explosives alone, without the distraction of a third plane.
July 27th, 2008 at 8:11 pm
Yes Charles I’m sure an Educated Idiot like you has got more than two brain cells, but are enough of them knocking together, I agree with you Mate it was an inside Job and the MSM whores are in it up to their scrawny little neck’s by faking those film’s right from day one,they’v even fooled the like’s of Alex Jones and Jeff Rense who I have the greatest respect for on most of the stuff they do, the point I was making is that they’v been doing this kind of crap since Pearl Harbour, taking out a President in broad Daylight, etc, etc, et’al, and any time soon their gonna do it again, we’v all sat around talking about 911 for so long that we’v all given them the time to set up 100 911’s, I fell for those 911 film’s like, 911 in Plane Sight, all the loose change one’s, even to the point where I copied 500 of them and posted them all around my town with 2000 flyers as well, how many times have you got off your Backside Charles and done that, the biggest hurdle you or any one has to climb to see the Awful Truth of 911 is this Charles, there were no Highjacker’s, and no Bloody Highjacked Planes, that was just the cover story, and as I said before no suicide Bomber’s in London just four stupid saps thinking they were playing game’s, that was Blair’s cover story, and untill you and everybody else can get that into their thick Head’s Charles they are going to play you and everybody else like Fiddle’s, untill you find yourself being frogmarched into one of their concentration camp’s, but hey Charles, at least you’ll have a Great Job sitting around a big table making widget’s for Woolworth’s, Oh I almost forgot I live about two block’s away from David Icke, so if you know where he lives then you’v got me wired Mate. Have a Great day.
July 27th, 2008 at 9:04 pm
Cary G. Dean:
I agree with you that there are MF’s who have been killing presidents in broad daylight, etc. since at least Kennedy when a coup was pulled on this country. Maybe I misunderstood you. I do not understand what you are talking about when you claim “the films were faked” and no planes hit the WTC. They may have been drones with no passengers, but there were thousands of people who watched the planes in person. I know a few who were there. You would have to be a complete idiot to believe that two planes did not hit the WTC. The GD Bush family are the biggest dope dealers in the world. Hell, I know several dozen junkies who have worked on that bastard’s oil rigs bringing heroin onto his oil platforms into the Gulf off the Louisiana coast and to the Louisiana shore from there. I lived in Little Rock for six months and met hundreds of people who had snorted coke with Bill Clinton and his brother Roger, and I saw hundreds of old polaroids with Clinton looking like Scarface at the end of the movie with his head in a pile of coke. I even personally went to meet the mother of his bastard half black kid. Everybody in Little Rock knew that Clinton was the bastard son of Winthrop Rockefeller and about Mena, Arkansas. Hell, if you are not familiar with the trial of bodies he left in Arkansas to get where he is, you ain’t been around. I’m 53 years old and I’ve been watching this shit for 30 years. I aint marching to no fucking FEMA camp. Like I said, I ain’t hiding, and I ain’t gonna run either. When They come for me to take me to a camp I am gonna take a few of those NWO sob’s with me. Goodday, Sir.
July 28th, 2008 at 2:01 am
Ok Charles I’m glad we’v got the bullshit out of the way, yes we are both pissed off with putting up with this shit for the last 30 year’s, I’m 59 my friend and yes I’m fully aware of Barry Searl and his DEA Buddy’s, we both know the Bush and Clinton Family’s are the biggest drug’s runner’s on the planet, we both knew there was more to each other than cat calling, I’m not going to sit on the 911 roundabout with you because it’s just too late in the day and we both know we’r round the corner of somthing so horrible that it’s going to kick 911 into touch, I call myself these days an investigative researcher it’s all I do 12 hour’s a day, I don’t know about you but I knew there was somthing wrong hour’s after the so called attack’s and I’v been researching it ever since, ok charles we’r both on the same page mate, if you want to see what I’m up to go over to my blog here
http://www.thehomebizbloke-big.....gspot.com/ my whole bio is on there, and yes I’m with you mate when they come knocking on my door I’m going down fighting. Catch up later
July 28th, 2008 at 9:19 am
RULE THROUGH DEBT MASSA KEEPS THE SUCKERS SHACKLED TO DEBT
MASSA MUST HAVE FREEDOM. MASSA DOES NOT WANT TO PAY FOR WAR.
MASSA MUST HAVE ASSET ACCUMILATION. MASSA LOVES TO MIND CONTROL.
MASSA WILL END UP OWNING EVERYTHING
July 28th, 2008 at 9:21 am
MASSA LIVES OFF OF INTEREST PAYMENTS MASSA OWNS THE “LEADERS’
July 28th, 2008 at 1:42 pm
9/11 was an inside job. Get a rope.
July 28th, 2008 at 3:02 pm
These guys that say there were NO planes…..
Moles to discredit the whole truth movement.
Thats all
July 28th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
7-28-08
I received an e-mail from Cary G. Dean today and tried to reply and here is what my reply was:
Charles Ronald Curbo, Attorney #6585
Mailing Address: P.O. Box 322, Memphis, Tennessee 38101-0322
Physical address: 100 North Main #921, Memphis, TN 38103
Phone (901) 526-1411
FAX (901) 521-9660
Cell (901) 650-3344
E-Mail: charlesrcurbo@aol.com
The original message was received at Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:46:10 -0400 (EDT)
from imo-d22.mail.aol.com [172.18.157.196]
*** ATTENTION ***
Your e-mail is being returned to you because there was a problem with its
delivery. The address which was undeliverable is listed in the section
labeled: “—– The following addresses had permanent fatal errors —–”.
The reason your mail is being returned to you is listed in the section
labeled: “—– Transcript of Session Follows —–”.
The line beginning with “<<<” describes the specific reason your e-mail could
not be delivered. The next line contains a second error message which is a
general translation for other e-mail servers.
Please direct further questions regarding this message to the e-mail
administrator or Postmaster at that destination.
–AOL Postmaster
—– The following addresses had permanent fatal errors —–
(reason: 554 Error: no valid recipients)
—– Transcript of session follows —–
… while talking to pmin.vip.spray.net.:
>>> DATA
<<>> QUIT
<<< 554 Error: no valid recipients
221 Bye
… Deferred: 421 pmin01.st1.spray.net Error: timeout exceeded [0x488dfa92000e59c1]
Message could not be delivered for 3 hours
Message will be deleted from queue
Final-Recipient: RFC822; cgd@lycosmax.co.uk
Action: failed
Status: 4.4.7
Remote-MTA: DNS; pmin.vip.spray.net
Diagnostic-Code: SMTP; 554 Error: no valid recipients
Last-Attempt-Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:58:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imo-d22.mx.aol.com (imo-d22.mail.aol.com [172.18.157.196]) by imr-m07.mx.aol.com (v107.10) with ESMTP id RELAYIN3-4488dcda2235; Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:46:10 -0400
Received: from Charlesrcurbo@aol.com
by imo-d22.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r9.4.) id i.d1e.2cf024ac (39331);
Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:29:16 -0400 (EDT)
From: Charlesrcurbo@aol.com
Message-ID:
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 09:29:14 EDT
Subject: Re: Just checking? (trust but verify)
To: CGD@lycosmax.co.uk
CC: Charlesrcurbo@aol.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=”—————————–1217251754″
X-Mailer: 9.0 SE for Windows sub 5045
X-Spam-Flag:NO
X-AOL-IP: 172.18.157.196
What the fuck is up Mr. Dean?
July 28th, 2008 at 9:54 pm
“If they hadn’t shot down the fourth plane it would’ve hit the dome,” Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks.
“The tribunal’s chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the “dome” was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.”
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/200....._hamdan_dc
——————————-
Can’t you people read? Col. Stone was quoting the towel head.
Even if it is bull, the general public will read it as such.
This is a prefect straw man set up to be knocked down by the sheeple giving us a black eye.
Thanks Steve.