<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nervous China may attack India by 2012: Expert</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 18:51:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Your Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-2#comment-433761</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-433761</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Bharat Verma,
	Congratulations! If you Google for your latest article &quot;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&quot;, you will find more than 9,000 web pages! We have been talking about &quot;potential threat number one&quot; for ten years since George Fernandes. Now you are telling us the real thing will happen within three years. The world is shocked!
	To make your argument more convincing, I would like to offer the following humble suggestions just for your kind reference:
	1. Your article begins with a clear statement that &quot;China will launch an attack on India before 2012&quot;. You should use this as the title of the article rather than &quot;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&quot;. You know that to say something &quot;may happen&quot; is quite different from that to say &quot;will happen&quot;. I believe you are confident, but you also need to show you are serious and responsible. And it would be much better if you explain in a few words why the attack is set exactly before 2012 but not, say, before 2015?
	2. According to your article, the first of the &quot;multiple reasons&quot; for China to attack India is the Chinese economy has been deadly affected by the world recession, which &quot;is creating an unprecedented internal social unrest in China&quot;. But the Chinese leadership has declared that China&#039;s GDP growth in 2009 will be at 8%. It is worse that many economists in the world are also saying that China&#039;s target of 8% growth can be achieved. You should tell the world in a clear way that they are lying.
	3. The second reason is external and &quot;appears to be equally dismal&quot;: &quot;Obama&#039;s policies wisely denies Beijing&#039;s international strategic space&quot;. But US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has declared that US-China relations are the most important bilateral relationship in the 21st century. Madam is going to visit India. You should tell her that we don&#039;t like such nonsense.
	4. The third reason is &quot;the growing irrelevance of Pakistan is increasing the Chinese nervousness&quot; and &quot;a sinking Pakistan will team up with China to teach India &#039;the final lesson&#039;&quot;. We can do nothing about that. But you should emphasize that &quot;our enemy&#039;s friend is our enemy&quot; is an eternal truth.
	5. Please don&#039;t talk too much about the Indian &quot;Civil Administration (has been) ceding control of 40 per cent of the Union&#039;s territory to the Maoists and 10 percent to other insurgents&quot;. Otherwise the Chinese would say that you are doing the same to &quot;divert attention from the brewing internal dissent&quot;.
	6. Please don&#039;t say again that the Communists firmly believe that &quot;Chinese race is far superior to Nazi Germany&quot;. Germany is our democratic friend in the West and she has done nothing wrong as far as Indo-China relations are concerned. Otherwise people would say you are crazy.
	7. I salute you memory. Yes, more than 50 years ago, in the Cold War time, Chairman Mao did say that &quot;the east-wind should prevail over the west-wind&quot;. But now you don&#039;t need to poorly change it into &quot;the east-wind to at least prevail over the other east-wind, i.e., India&quot;. You might not be aware that the Chinese once named India as the Western Heaven.
	Dear Sir, if you follow these suggestions and modify your article, you will make an explosion in the Internet. Your magazine &quot;Indian Defence Review&quot; will be the best seller of the year and your financial situation will be improved in a big way.
	By the way, your article revealed a top secret that &quot;the Chinese covertly ordered their other proxy, North Korea, to conduct underground nuclear tests and carry out trials of missiles&quot;. You should have informed an intelligence agency to make a big money before making it public.
	Best wishes,
                                Your friend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Bharat Verma,<br />
	Congratulations! If you Google for your latest article &#8220;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&#8243;, you will find more than 9,000 web pages! We have been talking about &#8220;potential threat number one&#8221; for ten years since George Fernandes. Now you are telling us the real thing will happen within three years. The world is shocked!<br />
	To make your argument more convincing, I would like to offer the following humble suggestions just for your kind reference:<br />
	1. Your article begins with a clear statement that &#8220;China will launch an attack on India before 2012&#8243;. You should use this as the title of the article rather than &#8220;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&#8243;. You know that to say something &#8220;may happen&#8221; is quite different from that to say &#8220;will happen&#8221;. I believe you are confident, but you also need to show you are serious and responsible. And it would be much better if you explain in a few words why the attack is set exactly before 2012 but not, say, before 2015?<br />
	2. According to your article, the first of the &#8220;multiple reasons&#8221; for China to attack India is the Chinese economy has been deadly affected by the world recession, which &#8220;is creating an unprecedented internal social unrest in China&#8221;. But the Chinese leadership has declared that China&#8217;s GDP growth in 2009 will be at 8%. It is worse that many economists in the world are also saying that China&#8217;s target of 8% growth can be achieved. You should tell the world in a clear way that they are lying.<br />
	3. The second reason is external and &#8220;appears to be equally dismal&#8221;: &#8220;Obama&#8217;s policies wisely denies Beijing&#8217;s international strategic space&#8221;. But US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has declared that US-China relations are the most important bilateral relationship in the 21st century. Madam is going to visit India. You should tell her that we don&#8217;t like such nonsense.<br />
	4. The third reason is &#8220;the growing irrelevance of Pakistan is increasing the Chinese nervousness&#8221; and &#8220;a sinking Pakistan will team up with China to teach India &#8216;the final lesson&#8217;&#8221;. We can do nothing about that. But you should emphasize that &#8220;our enemy&#8217;s friend is our enemy&#8221; is an eternal truth.<br />
	5. Please don&#8217;t talk too much about the Indian &#8220;Civil Administration (has been) ceding control of 40 per cent of the Union&#8217;s territory to the Maoists and 10 percent to other insurgents&#8221;. Otherwise the Chinese would say that you are doing the same to &#8220;divert attention from the brewing internal dissent&#8221;.<br />
	6. Please don&#8217;t say again that the Communists firmly believe that &#8220;Chinese race is far superior to Nazi Germany&#8221;. Germany is our democratic friend in the West and she has done nothing wrong as far as Indo-China relations are concerned. Otherwise people would say you are crazy.<br />
	7. I salute you memory. Yes, more than 50 years ago, in the Cold War time, Chairman Mao did say that &#8220;the east-wind should prevail over the west-wind&#8221;. But now you don&#8217;t need to poorly change it into &#8220;the east-wind to at least prevail over the other east-wind, i.e., India&#8221;. You might not be aware that the Chinese once named India as the Western Heaven.<br />
	Dear Sir, if you follow these suggestions and modify your article, you will make an explosion in the Internet. Your magazine &#8220;Indian Defence Review&#8221; will be the best seller of the year and your financial situation will be improved in a big way.<br />
	By the way, your article revealed a top secret that &#8220;the Chinese covertly ordered their other proxy, North Korea, to conduct underground nuclear tests and carry out trials of missiles&#8221;. You should have informed an intelligence agency to make a big money before making it public.<br />
	Best wishes,<br />
                                Your friend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Your Friend</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-2#comment-433324</link>
		<dc:creator>Your Friend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 01:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-433324</guid>
		<description>Dear Mr. Bharat Verma,
	Congratulations! If you Google for your latest article &quot;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&quot;, you will found more than 7,700 web pages! We have been talking about &quot;potential threat number one&quot; for ten years since George Fernandes. Now you are telling us the real thing will happen within three years. The world is shocked!
	To make your argument more convincing, I would like to offer the following humble suggestions just for your kind reference:
	1. Your article begins with a clear statement that &quot;China will launch an attack on India before 2012&quot;. You should use this as the title of the article rather than &quot;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&quot;. Linguistically, to say something &quot;may happen&quot; is quite different from that to say &quot;will happen&quot;. I know you are confident, but you also need to show you are serious and responsible. And it would be much better if you explain in a few words why exactly before 2012 but not, say, before 2015?
	2. According to your article, the first of the &quot;multiple reasons&quot; for China to attach India is the Chinese economy has been deadly affected by the world recession, which &quot;is creating an unprecedented internal social unrest in China&quot;. But the Chinese leadership has declared that China&#039;s GDP growth in 2009 will be at 8%. It is worse that many economists in the world are also saying that China&#039;s target of 8% growth can be achieved. You should tell the world in a clear way that they are lying.
	3. The second reason is external and &quot;appears to be equally dismal&quot;: &quot;Obama&#039;s policies wisely denies Beijing&#039;s international strategic space&quot;. But US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has declared that US-China relations are the most important bilateral relationship in the 21st century. Madam is going to visit India. You should tell her that we don&#039;t like such nonsense.
	4. The third reason is &quot;the growing irrelevance of Pakistan is increasing the Chinese nervousness&quot; and &quot;a sinking Pakistan will team up with China to teach India &#039;the final lesson&#039;&quot;. We can do nothing about that. But you should emphasize that &quot;our enemy&#039;s friend is our enemy&quot; is an eternal truth.
	5. Please don&#039;t talk too much about the Indian &quot;Civil Administration (has been) ceding control of 40 per cent of the Union&#039;s territory to the Maoists and 10 percent to other insurgents&quot;. Otherwise the Chinese would say that you are doing the same to &quot;divert attention from the brewing internal dissent&quot;.
	6. Please don&#039;t say again that the Communists firmly believe that &quot;Chinese race is far superior to Nazi Germany&quot;. Germany is our democratic friend in the West and she has done nothing wrong as far as Indo-China relations are concerned. Otherwise people would say you are crazy.
	7. I salute you memory. Yes, more than 50 years ago, in the Cold War time, Chairman Mao did say that &quot;the east-wind should prevail over the west-wind&quot;. But now you don&#039;t need to poorly change it into &quot;the east-wind to at least prevail over the other east-wind, i.e., India&quot;. You might not be aware that the Chinese once named India as the Western Heaven.
	Dear Sir, if you follow these suggestions and modify your article, you will make an explosion in the Internet. Your magazine &quot;Indian Defence Review&quot; will be the best seller of the year and your financial situation will be improved in a big way.
	By the way, your article revealed a top secret that &quot;the Chinese covertly ordered their other proxy, North Korea, to conduct underground nuclear tests and carry out trials of missiles&quot;. You should have informed an intelligence agency to make a big money before making it public.
	Best wishes,
                                Your friend</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Mr. Bharat Verma,<br />
	Congratulations! If you Google for your latest article &#8220;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&#8243;, you will found more than 7,700 web pages! We have been talking about &#8220;potential threat number one&#8221; for ten years since George Fernandes. Now you are telling us the real thing will happen within three years. The world is shocked!<br />
	To make your argument more convincing, I would like to offer the following humble suggestions just for your kind reference:<br />
	1. Your article begins with a clear statement that &#8220;China will launch an attack on India before 2012&#8243;. You should use this as the title of the article rather than &#8220;Nervous China may attack India by 2012&#8243;. Linguistically, to say something &#8220;may happen&#8221; is quite different from that to say &#8220;will happen&#8221;. I know you are confident, but you also need to show you are serious and responsible. And it would be much better if you explain in a few words why exactly before 2012 but not, say, before 2015?<br />
	2. According to your article, the first of the &#8220;multiple reasons&#8221; for China to attach India is the Chinese economy has been deadly affected by the world recession, which &#8220;is creating an unprecedented internal social unrest in China&#8221;. But the Chinese leadership has declared that China&#8217;s GDP growth in 2009 will be at 8%. It is worse that many economists in the world are also saying that China&#8217;s target of 8% growth can be achieved. You should tell the world in a clear way that they are lying.<br />
	3. The second reason is external and &#8220;appears to be equally dismal&#8221;: &#8220;Obama&#8217;s policies wisely denies Beijing&#8217;s international strategic space&#8221;. But US secretary of state Hillary Clinton has declared that US-China relations are the most important bilateral relationship in the 21st century. Madam is going to visit India. You should tell her that we don&#8217;t like such nonsense.<br />
	4. The third reason is &#8220;the growing irrelevance of Pakistan is increasing the Chinese nervousness&#8221; and &#8220;a sinking Pakistan will team up with China to teach India &#8216;the final lesson&#8217;&#8221;. We can do nothing about that. But you should emphasize that &#8220;our enemy&#8217;s friend is our enemy&#8221; is an eternal truth.<br />
	5. Please don&#8217;t talk too much about the Indian &#8220;Civil Administration (has been) ceding control of 40 per cent of the Union&#8217;s territory to the Maoists and 10 percent to other insurgents&#8221;. Otherwise the Chinese would say that you are doing the same to &#8220;divert attention from the brewing internal dissent&#8221;.<br />
	6. Please don&#8217;t say again that the Communists firmly believe that &#8220;Chinese race is far superior to Nazi Germany&#8221;. Germany is our democratic friend in the West and she has done nothing wrong as far as Indo-China relations are concerned. Otherwise people would say you are crazy.<br />
	7. I salute you memory. Yes, more than 50 years ago, in the Cold War time, Chairman Mao did say that &#8220;the east-wind should prevail over the west-wind&#8221;. But now you don&#8217;t need to poorly change it into &#8220;the east-wind to at least prevail over the other east-wind, i.e., India&#8221;. You might not be aware that the Chinese once named India as the Western Heaven.<br />
	Dear Sir, if you follow these suggestions and modify your article, you will make an explosion in the Internet. Your magazine &#8220;Indian Defence Review&#8221; will be the best seller of the year and your financial situation will be improved in a big way.<br />
	By the way, your article revealed a top secret that &#8220;the Chinese covertly ordered their other proxy, North Korea, to conduct underground nuclear tests and carry out trials of missiles&#8221;. You should have informed an intelligence agency to make a big money before making it public.<br />
	Best wishes,<br />
                                Your friend</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bootroll</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-1#comment-431937</link>
		<dc:creator>bootroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 07:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431937</guid>
		<description>I think you will find that a China/ India war very nearly happened in the 1960s - which is in my lifetime, the Chinese were incredibly aggressive and got right up to the border but suddenly and mysteriously seemed to change their mind at the last minute and retreated:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War 

The severity of the fighting has been played down and there were many rapes by Chinese on Indian women, basically the might of the Chinese Liberation Army could have rolled in and taken feeble India with ease. 

Also, the Han Chinese - the largest ethnic group in China by far, is incredibly cruel and racist towards other groups in China, let alone any other ethnic group on the planet.

www.realclearworld.com/articles/2009/07/09/chinese_nationalism_beget_chinese_racism_96900.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you will find that a China/ India war very nearly happened in the 1960s &#8211; which is in my lifetime, the Chinese were incredibly aggressive and got right up to the border but suddenly and mysteriously seemed to change their mind at the last minute and retreated:</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sino-Indian_War</a> </p>
<p>The severity of the fighting has been played down and there were many rapes by Chinese on Indian women, basically the might of the Chinese Liberation Army could have rolled in and taken feeble India with ease. </p>
<p>Also, the Han Chinese &#8211; the largest ethnic group in China by far, is incredibly cruel and racist towards other groups in China, let alone any other ethnic group on the planet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.realclearworld.com/articles/2009/07/09/chinese_nationalism_beget_chinese_racism_96900.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.realclearworld.com/.....96900.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CHANAKYA</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-2#comment-431912</link>
		<dc:creator>CHANAKYA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431912</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha ! This crap of China attacking India is nothing new. When ever the huge expenditure on arms to be justified, they take names of unseen forces. How m,any times Russia invaded US to justify the expenses in both countries ? This is cool game of capitalists who want to cool their***** at the expense of poor innocent civilians in their respective countries. Our citizens are too weak to protest such expenditures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha ! This crap of China attacking India is nothing new. When ever the huge expenditure on arms to be justified, they take names of unseen forces. How m,any times Russia invaded US to justify the expenses in both countries ? This is cool game of capitalists who want to cool their***** at the expense of poor innocent civilians in their respective countries. Our citizens are too weak to protest such expenditures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incriminally Sane</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-2#comment-431557</link>
		<dc:creator>Incriminally Sane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431557</guid>
		<description>All these little tidbits of Shit going to hit the fan is just the method of control of you through the fear that it instills in the majority of mankind and they expect you to cry for the Government to show up as the Knight in Shining Armor to save you from the evil that is out to get you because of your freedoms. 

Swamp land, Arizona, You get the picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these little tidbits of Shit going to hit the fan is just the method of control of you through the fear that it instills in the majority of mankind and they expect you to cry for the Government to show up as the Knight in Shining Armor to save you from the evil that is out to get you because of your freedoms. </p>
<p>Swamp land, Arizona, You get the picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Incriminally Sane</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-1#comment-431551</link>
		<dc:creator>Incriminally Sane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:43:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431551</guid>
		<description>You just keep on believing that and when the reality of how this planet hits you like a ton of bricks, just think back to the fool on Prison Planet that tried to warn you of the Global Corporation.

You are not immune from the selection process when they pull you in to determine whether you are going to live or die for the Corporation. BELIEVE IT, you have been fooled!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You just keep on believing that and when the reality of how this planet hits you like a ton of bricks, just think back to the fool on Prison Planet that tried to warn you of the Global Corporation.</p>
<p>You are not immune from the selection process when they pull you in to determine whether you are going to live or die for the Corporation. BELIEVE IT, you have been fooled!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dr. Know</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-1#comment-431384</link>
		<dc:creator>Dr. Know</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431384</guid>
		<description>Yea, here&#039;s the &quot;New World Order&quot; in a nutshell: Last man standing wins. Pathetic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yea, here&#8217;s the &#8220;New World Order&#8221; in a nutshell: Last man standing wins. Pathetic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBS</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-1#comment-431378</link>
		<dc:creator>JBS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431378</guid>
		<description>&quot;A leading defence expert has projected that China will attack India by 2012...&quot; Uh huh.

That says it all since leading defence &quot;experts&quot;? are all stupid, bought and paid NWO zombie propagandists.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;A leading defence expert has projected that China will attack India by 2012&#8230;&#8221; Uh huh.</p>
<p>That says it all since leading defence &#8220;experts&#8221;? are all stupid, bought and paid NWO zombie propagandists.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wayne</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-1#comment-431191</link>
		<dc:creator>wayne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 20:53:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-431191</guid>
		<description>see a documentry last nite about billy meier,one of his prophecies talks of china attacking new dehli with wmd within nxt few years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>see a documentry last nite about billy meier,one of his prophecies talks of china attacking new dehli with wmd within nxt few years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: norcal-2</title>
		<link>http://www.prisonplanet.com/nervous-china-may-attack-india-by-2012-expert.html/comment-page-1#comment-430873</link>
		<dc:creator>norcal-2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:32:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.prisonplanet.com/?p=16071#comment-430873</guid>
		<description>I would like to ad that many think because we took a long time securing Iraq that we are somehow a weak military and I would ad that, it was not a war but a nation building police state that was set up to control resources and a chance to use outdated machinery and sell off the old stuff to the new govt. and then develop new stuff for the future wars, this has been going on since vietnam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to ad that many think because we took a long time securing Iraq that we are somehow a weak military and I would ad that, it was not a war but a nation building police state that was set up to control resources and a chance to use outdated machinery and sell off the old stuff to the new govt. and then develop new stuff for the future wars, this has been going on since vietnam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
