Comments on: New 7/7 Bombing Photo Contradicts Official Story

By: Ron

Ron — Thu, 16 Jul 2009 00:45:50 +0000

I hope the Brits are not as gullible as the Yanks.

By: Pirate

Pirate — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 09:45:22 +0000

Real life isn’t a Quentin Tarantino or Sam Peckinpah movie – blood doesn’t get sprayed “EVERYWHERE”. In any case, blood-stains don’t stay looking like blood for very long, so if you’re looking for bright red smears, you’ll not find many, especially in photographs taken some time after the event, which most of the Underground train shots clearly were. There are, however, a number of shots of blood on the BMA building in Tavistock Square. The reason you don’t see many photos with body parts is that those generally don’t get released to the media, who aren’t that keen on publishing them, either. That said, there are again some photographs from Tavistock Square that do show bodies.

By: Blagnarok

Blagnarok — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:18:51 +0000

Jess, actually you are way off. The sacred mountain actually is a volcano. God’s outstretched arms and fury that pours from above are the pillar of smoke flame and ash that rise for miles from a volcano and rain fury on the population. The fact is the early zeolites worshiped the volcano god over all other gods. They called the force behind the volcanoes “Yahweh,” and they followed his pillars of smoke and fire throughout the land conquering whatever lands surrounding the volcanoes had not been completely decimated by their lord’s wrath. Then they would settle on what’s left of the land, watch the burnt land regenerate in a year or two and say how their god is the god who brings life from death. Whoa to those who call upon themselves the fiery fury of the lord through sin.

And who call upon the fiery fury through sin, those who build the altars and groves upon the mountains. Those who worship at the asherim, the high places on the mountainside. They would plant and tend to the holy groves of their most sacred crop, because their holy plants would grow better on a hillside facing the sun. Why was their crop most sacred? Because among it’s many uses it was made into sails which opened the way for humanity to conquer the seas.

Deuteronomy 33:19 They shall call the people unto the mountain; there they shall offer sacrifices of righteousness: for they shall suck of the abundance of the seas, and of treasures hid in the sand.

The holy plants that were grown by the enemies of the nomadic Isrealite tribes were groves of cannabis hemp trees with an abundance of fruit. Which they would “sacrifice,” or smoke at the religious altars and temples in order to become closer to the gods. (Keep in mind those who attended the asherim were not monotheists like the Jews, but Pantheists. The Jewish god was just one of many in ancient Isreal before the domination of the violent zealots, forever carrying with them the fury of their volcano lord, Yahweh.

By: Blagnarok

Blagnarok — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:52:53 +0000

I agree this photo is misleading. You can come to any conclusion you want about this. I mean what exactly are we looking at. There is a white and black area under the worker that is shaped like a clothing iron. If that’s supposed to be the hole from the blast it actually looks like it came from something sitting on the floor. Look how the damage to the seats appears to be much more violent than the damage to the floor. In order to damage the seats that much, I would say the hole in the floor would have to be larger in order for the bomb to have been under the floor. Such sever lateral damage could not come from such a small hole…

But then, is that iron shaped white and black part really the hole from the blast, or was it from some fire or melting debris caused by the blast? Is the real hole larger and just cropped off from the image at the bottom. Do we see just the edge of the metal sticking up where that little red wire is?

Also, how thick is the paneling on the floor. Were the bombs under the vehicle itself or within the vehicle under a floor panel?

This photo raises more questions than it answers, and really isn’t worth this much attention in my opinion. Just the fact that they were running drills about the buses exploding at the same exact time it happened should be enough to indicate something fishy is going on.

By: The_Thinking_Scotsman

The_Thinking_Scotsman — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 16:12:55 +0000

I hear what you are saying and yeah, their are many things that have not come to fruition but like my mother always said ‘there is no smoke without fire’.
Do I beleive theres a giant conspiracy? YES but do i come to Alex’s website and then go act like a dictphone? NO because like Alex and other truth movement speakers/researchers they encourage you to do your own research/Investigating.
When I first started looking into conspiracy stuff approx 10/11 years ago I just gave it a fleeting glance evertime I had a length amount of spare time but after 9/11 I started to get in too deep where that was all i could see or was interested in, I almost got out of that cycle then the 7/7 bombings dragged me back in. Now i feel this whole Flu thing has yet again got me sat at my computer watching videos and reading articles, Its not that i do not beleive, its not that i do not want tooo act either but trying to wake people up is like getting blood out of a stone.
If there was a GOAL except reading/watching that i could help or become a part off, then yeah, i definatly would be part of it, some might ask why i do not make my own GOAL and acheive that wether its just a mass protest or taking over a TV broadcast I have 2 simple reasons, 1: I cannot get enough people too ‘wake up’ to join me (Since 9/11 Ive probs only managed to get around 20 people locally that i know off to look into it and wake up, I may have woken more people with the DVD’s Ive distrubuted but i can oly say approx 20) AND my 2nd reason: I have MS (Relapsing/Remitting) and i can only walk unaided approx 100 yards/cant stand up for long and need to take frequent ‘nps’ through the day as the fatigue is horrendous.

One of the main reasons it is difficult to wake people is that they do not have the time to commit to reading and watching stuff on the computer and the ones that do manage to fit it in, they find it takes its toll on their relationship with their partner as u become suspicious of everything and question even the smallest incidents. Please do not think I don’t think its a noble/worthy cause, i just think that its a cause that is not suited for everybody. Another reason some people turn a blind eye even though they know something is wrong with ‘the picture’ is because ‘Ignorance is Bliss’ as the saying goes. People dont want to be sitting trembling in bed thinking ‘are they gonna be attacked’ or ‘is this the last night of normality’ I,myself have had sleepless nights where my brain is running threw scenario upon scenario, I sometimes just wish sometimes malevolent beings would appear and give us (inc. the NWO) something else/bigger too think about.

By: The_Thinking_Scotsman

The_Thinking_Scotsman — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 15:35:22 +0000

I don’t think this has been covered by any of the 7th July London bombings but has anyone ever noticed that in any of the pictures of the wreckages and the people their isnt any visable blood or boddy part? (Obviously there’s bloood on the injured from their wounds) BUT, surley when a person ‘Detonates’ their is going to be blood smattered EVERYWHERE?? even more so in an enclosed space like the tube train/tunnel? I would have thought that their would at LEAST be a pool(s) of blood and possibly footprints from passengers that should have stepped in pools of it? Also, why dont we see body parts? I know if there were any that they would unlikley be broadcast due to the graffic nature but i do not recall any video’s or documets mentioning that either.
If there is 7/7/05 Truth videos or documents that mention this, could someone kindly give me the names of the videos or even link me too them please?

The 9/11 & 7/7 ‘Incidents’ and the stories that go with them are pharsical at best, their are more f’ing holes in the STORIES than a fishing net ffs!!

TTS

By: Notfooled.

Notfooled. — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:10:22 +0000

Furthermore: no one thinks that it is “fun” to think it was a missile. The problem here is that you like to dismiss the EVIDENCE which points in the DIRECTION of a missile. All of this is neither here not there at any rate since the Pentagon missile assertion is the weakest link of the event as the strongest evidence is at the World Trade Towers where the documented evidence of controlled demolition is much stronger & is evident in the near free fall speed at which the towers disintegrated as there were 47 steel core columns which would have prevented the building from collapsing but suspiciously gave way offering no resistance in a complete violation of the laws of physics. The video evidence clearly shows the towers SHEERING off & tilting to the SIDE but for some unknown reason the building underneath it STILL collapsed & explosion squibs were clearly notable occurring WELL below the demolition wave. Game over Reconut as this event has been exposed for the sham that is was.

By: Notfooled.

Notfooled. — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 01:02:19 +0000

& don’t reply with the nonsense that they all “died” in the attacks because then why they hell did the State BOMB Afghanistan? Why did they round up suspected terrorists in Guantanamo? Why have they not been brought to stand trial for their crimes? Furthermore: at least 7 of the alleged hijackers were reported as alive & well just days after the attack. So who the hell piloted the planes? How the hell can you dismiss the evidence which contradicts the official version when the official version has disintegrated & the government itself even ADMITTED that they do not even know the identities of those who committed the attacks.

By: Notfooled.

Notfooled. — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:54:01 +0000

The sardonic nature of your post betrays your hateful agenda. Furthermore: who says that all of those alleged “witnesses” are credible? Should not the credibility of the so called witnesses be assessed in a court of law? Oops I forgot: there was never any cross examination of the witnesses in question during a trial to determine the guilt of the accused in the attacks. Ergo: the “testimony” of the alleged “witnesses” can only ever be regarded as hearsay & it certainly not irrefutable “evidence” of an airliner. Furthermore: when the hell are the accused ever going to be brought before a court of law so that justice for the crimes can be had? If the accused terrorists did do what they are accused of doing then when the hell are they going to be ARRESTED & TRIED in a court of law? If the government is so confident of the case against the accused why are they not prosecuting them in a court of law & getting convictions.

By: Notfooled.

Notfooled. — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:45:34 +0000

That’s hilarious coming from a spook like Reconmarine. No one in their right mind is going to e-mail you so you can sic intelligence agents on those who respond & HARASS them turning their lives into HELL for the crime of reporting the truth about you control freak monsters. Let’s debate out in the OPEN right here. The only reason you want people to respond through e-mail is so that you can TRACK & HARASS them into abandoning their truth reporting. Furthermore your spelling mistake was much worse than Warior’s as yours denotes a whole DIFFERENT term while at least warior still refers to the same term. The New World Order is going to be conquered.