Even NASA’s Hansen admits it is ‘not particularly important’ — Prof. mocks ‘hottest decade’ claim as ‘a joke’
Climate Depot 
Jan 14, 2011
There they go again. The global warming establishment and the media are crowing about 2010 being in a tie for the “hottest year” ever. Everyone from Senator John Kerry to Joe Romm are screaming that this is “proof” the planet is burning up in a Co2 induced hell — and it’s your fault!
It is time for Climate Depot to do a point-by-point rebuttal to the latest round of temperature data nonsense. Let’s begin:
Below are excerpts from the January 13, 2011 UK Telegraph’s coverage  of the warmists’ claim of the “hottest year” ever.
UK Telegraph Headline Claim: “Flood warnings: hottest year confirms global warming say experts — Last year was the joint warmest on record, according to new figures from NASA, that experts say confirm the case for man-made climate change.”
Climate Depot Response: This is pure politics, not science. The “hottest year” claims confirm the case for political science overtaking climate science. The “hottest year” claim depends on minute fractions of a degree difference between years. Even NASA’s James Hansen, the leading proponent of man-made global warming in the U.S., conceded the “hottest year” rankings are essentially meaningless. Hansen explained  that 2010 differed from 2005 by less than 2 hundredths of a degree F (that’s 0.018F). “It’s not particularly important whether 2010, 2005, or 1998 was the hottest year on record,” Hansen admitted on January 13.According to NASA , none of agencies tasked with keeping the global temperature data agree with each other. “Rankings of individual years often differ in the most closely watched temperature analyses — from GISS, NCDC, and the UK Met Office — a situation that can generate confusion.”
Meteorologist Dr. Ryan Maue of Florida State University ridiculed the “hottest year” rankings and Hansen’s admission that it “was not particularly important” which year was declared the “hottest.” “Well, then stop issuing press releases which tout the rankings, which are subject to change ex post facto,” Maue demanded in a January 14 commentary at WattsUpWithThat.com .
The “warmest year” claim falls apart even further when you look at even slightly longer time scales. Climatologist Patrick Michaelsexplained to USA Today on January 12 : “If you draw a trend line from the data, it’s pretty flat from the 1990s. We don’t see much of a warming trend over the past 12 years.” Also note that the planet has warmed since about 1850, the end of the Little Ice Age.
The declaration that we are experiencing a tie for the “hottest” year is purely a political statement because these claims are based on year-to-year temperature data that differs by only a few hundredths of a degree. NASA asserts that the trend over the last decade is the most important factor, but this claim does not hold up to scrutiny either. See: German Climate Professor Werner Kirstein Slams ‘Climate Religion': Refutes claims of ‘hottest decade’ as ‘a joke’ — ‘Determining a global avg. is a tricky business and in the end is only a theoretical value’ 
MIT’s Richard Lindzen: Earth is never in equilibrium : ‘Global warming enthusiasts are arguing that the past decade has been the warmest on record. We are still speaking of tenths of a degree, and the records themselves have come into question’
MIT’s Richard Lindzen: ‘Lull in warming was unsurprising, given an earlier ‘obsessing about tenths of a degree in the 1980s and early 1990s’ : ‘Global temperature just fluctuates. I think the best explanation is the ocean. The timescale for ocean circulations can be decades.’
Meteorologist Art Horn: ‘To say the 2010 was tied with the warmest year on record is essentially meaningless when viewed in a true historical context’ : ‘The reason they do not give this record its true historical context is because their statement is really political’
Science Corrupted: It’s ‘the hottest year on record’, as long as you don’t take its temperature — Activist James Hansen’s claims based on ‘pure conjecture’  — Hansen’s Climate Con: ‘The parts of the world which GISS shows to be heating up the most are so short of weather stations that only 25 per cent of the figures are based on actual temperature readings’
2007: Team of Scientists Question Validity of a ‘Global Temperature’  – Excerpt: “Discussions on global warming often refer to ‘global temperature.’ Yet the concept is thermodynamically as well as mathematically an impossibility, says Physicist Dr. Bjarne Andresen, a professor at The Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen. “It is impossible to talk about a single temperature for something as complicated as the climate of Earth.” “A temperature can be defined only for a homogeneous system. He explains that while it is possible to treat temperature statistics locally, it is meaningless to talk about a global temperature for Earth. “The globe consists of a huge number of components which one cannot just add up and average. That would correspond to calculating the average phone number in the phone book. That is meaningless. Or talking about economics, it does make sense to compare the currency exchange rate of two countries, whereas there is no point in talking about an average ‘global exchange rate.'”
Are Modern Temperature Changes ‘Unprecedented?’ The Data Clearly Reveals Modern Temp Changes To Be Normal — ‘Unfortunately for all alarmists, the real data reveals the bogosity of their claims’
Scientists continue to bail out on man-made global warming, especially since the Climategate scandal. See: SPECIAL REPORT: More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims – Challenge UN IPCC & Gore – Dec. 2010 
UK Guardian Claim: “This is despite less solar activity and the onset of La Nina, an irregular cycle that brings cooler temperatures to the Pacific Ocean”
Climate Depot Rebuttal: Actually, much of 2010 was dominated by a strong warming El Nino. La Nina did not kick in until later in the year.
UK Guardian Reports: “Bob Ward, of the Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment at London School of Economics said: ‘The evidence is overwhelming that human activities are driving climate change, and the public should not be fooled by those who seek to delay and prevent action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by claiming that the Earth is cooling or that carbon dioxide does not cause warming.’”
Climate Depot Response: Here is the heart of the warmist “hottest” year claims. We must act now to prevent climate doom. Those darn meddling skeptics are keeping us from passing meaningless and purely symbolic  climate bills! Poor Bob Ward, he is now lamenting that no seems to care about the claims of the “hottest year” during the midst of a brutally cold and snowy winter. Ward asked : “Yesterday’s announcement that 2010 tied for the warmest year ever recorded on Earth was ignored by nearly all UK media outlets. How can this be?”
The answer is obvious. No one is buying the manufactured tripe surrounding claims based on fractions of a degree. The public instinctively knows these claims are motivated by pure politics. Get used to it Mr.Ward. NASA’s James Hansen’s old bag of tricks no longer works. The public has figured out the tricks and won’t be fooled again.
UK Guardian Reports: Daniel J. Weiss, who directs climate strategy for the Center for American Progress, told the Washington Post, said the figures should force the world to take action. “Hopefully, this new data will finally convince congressional climate-science deniers that global warming is real and that action is urgent,” he told the Washington Post.
Climate Depot Response: Once again, politics is driving the “science.” We see how “scientific” data is telegraphed by leading government global warming institutions to promote specific policy objectives. Sorry Mr. Weiss, passing a meaningless climate bill thatObama’s own EPA admits would not impact global Co2 levels — let alone global temperatures — is not going to translate in taking “urgent” action. See: For Shame: NAS Pres. Ralph Cicerone Turns Science Org. into political advocacy group: $6 million NAS study is used to lobby for global warming bill 
UK Guardian Reports: Dan Weiss added: “To reject this latest evidence is like ignoring strange spots on a chest X-ray and continuing to smoke.”
Climate Depot Response to Dan Weiss: Dan, you have your metaphors all mixed up. It should be: “To accept these latest claims by quack doctors — like James Hansen , Michael Oppenheimer  and Kevin Trenberth  — is like ignoring reams of evidence that they should have their licenses revoked for repeated malpractice.”
You would have to question the diagnosis of any “doctor” who is pushing his costly and purely placebo remedies on a patient who is not even sick. As warmists like Kevin Trenberth  grow more and more desperate and see every weather event as more “proof” of man-made global warming, the more apt metaphor for them would be “witch doctor.” Note: Morano and Weiss debated on ABC News: Seehere . Also See: Watch Now: Climate Depot’s Morano on Fox News Mocking ‘Climate Astrology': ‘This is now akin to the predictions of Nostradamus or the Mayan calendar’ — Morano: ‘There is no way anyone can falsify the global warming theory now because any weather event that happens ‘proves’ their case…Man-made global warming has ceased to be a science, it is now the level of your daily horoscope’ — Gore [in 2006 film] did not warn us of extreme blizzards and record cold winters coming’
Even more strange are claims that the record snow is caused by man-made global warming. See: Basic Chemistry For Climate Science Mental Midgets : Excerpt: “Temperatures in the US have been running far below normal. Cold air holds less water than warm air. So if you say ‘snow cover in 49 states is due to more moisture in the air from global warming’ – then you have absolutely no idea WTF you are talking about.The air is not warm, and Sea Surface Temperatures are also running well below normal. The widespread snow cover is due to cold, not the imaginary warmth inside your computer model.”
UK Guardian Claim: “In another marker of climate change, Arctic sea ice cover was the third smallest since record-keeping began in 1979.”
Climate Depot Response: The “record” is based on just 30 years. It is odd the media or the warmist propagandists make no mention of Antarctic sea ice which has been at or near record highs. It is odd that they do not note that global sea ice in December 2010 was well above normal. See: NSIDC Shows Global Sea Ice Extent Almost 1 Million Km^2 Above Normal 
Since the low point of Arctic ice in 2007, it has rebounded. [Note: Even the low point of Arctic sea ice extent in 2007 was not caused by CO2 driven warming. Multiple peer-review papers found it was due to high pressure days, ocean currents and “unusual winds.”  — see links below]
Arctic ice rebounded significantly in 2009 from the low of 2007. (by an area more than one and half the size of Texas in 2009 ) In 2010, Arctic sea ice extent GREW by over 7,000 Manhattans in 3 years! Also see: The Area Of Thick Arctic Ice Has Doubled In The Last Two Years 
The warmists are ignoring  the record ice growth in the Antarctic  and the fact that global sea ice recently hit a 30 year high. See:Antarctic Sea Ice 30,000 Manhattans Above  Normal — Antarctic Ice Above Normal 83% Of The Time Since Mid-2007  & See: Perspective on Arctic Ice : Mockery: ‘You can see why some ‘scientists’ at NASA and NOAA want to re-engineer the world’s economy over a possibly missing ice cube.’
Warmist Claim: “Derek Arndt, who heads the climate monitoring branch at NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center in Asheville, N.C., said the new data should be viewed in the context of the record retreat of snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere at the end of the melt season…”
Climate Depot Response: Arndt’s claim is bizarre, misleading and intellectually dishonest. See: Ministry Of Truth Announces ‘record retreat of snow cover in the Northern Hemisphere’ – But it was the ‘second largest winter snow cover on record’