 |
Pentagon Preparing For War With The Enemy: Russia
Rick Rozoff
Center For Research On Globalization
Thursday, May 14, 2009
“Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008….[A] possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.Irina Kadzhaev, South Ossetia political scientist, South Ossetia Information Agency, April 2009
“The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining of
the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.
“Under the new realities, Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.” (
On May 12 James Mattis, NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Transformation [ACT] and commander of the U.S. Joint Forces Command, spoke at a three-day symposium called Joint Warfighting 09 in Norfolk, Virginia, where NATO’s Allied Command Transformation is based, and stated: “I come with a sense of urgency. The enemy is meeting like this as well.” [1]
A local newspaper summarized his speech:
“Mattis outlined a future in which wars will not have clearly defined beginnings and ends. What is needed, he said, is a grand strategy, a political framework that can guide military planning.” [2]
He failed, for what passes for diplomatic reasons no doubt, to identify who “the enemy” is, but a series of recent developments, or rather an intensification of ongoing ones, indicate which nation it is.
Last week the head of the U.S. Strategic Command, Gen. Kevin Chilton, told reporters during a Defense Writers Group breakfast on May 7 “that the White House retains the option to respond with physical force – potentially even using nuclear weapons – if a foreign entity conducts a disabling cyber attack against U.S. computer networks….”
An account of his talk added “the general insisted that all strike options, including nuclear, would remain available to the commander in chief in defending the nation from cyber strikes.”
Chilton “said he could not rule out the possibility of a military salvo against a nation like China, even though Beijing has nuclear arms,” [3] though the likely first target of alleged retaliation against equally alleged cyber attacks would be another nation already identified by US military officials as such: Russia.
In late April and early May of 2007 the government of Estonia, which was inducted into NATO in 2004 and whose president was and remains Toomas Hendrik Ilves, born in Sweden and raised in the United States (where he worked for Radio Free Europe), reported attacks on websites in the country which were blamed on Russia.
Over two years later no evidence has been presented to substantiate the claim that Russian hackers, much less the government itself, were behind the attacks, though it remains an article of faith among US and other Western officials and media that they were.
The response from American authorities in the first place was so sudden and severe, even before investigations were conducted, as to strongly suggest that if the attacks hadn’t been staged they would need to be invented.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
Right afterward Secretary of the Air Force Michael W. Wynne stated, “Russia, our Cold War nemesis, seems to have been the first to engage in cyber warfare.”
The US Air Force news source from which the above is quoted added that the events in Estonia days earlier “did start a series of debates within NATO and the EU about the definition of clear military action and it may be the first test of the applicability of Article V of the NATO charter regarding collective self-defense in the non-kinetic realm.” [4]
NATO’s Article 5 is a collective military defense provision, in fact a war clause, one which first and to date for the only time has been used to support the protracted and escalating war in Afghanistan.
References to it, then, are not to be taken lightly.
On a visit to Estonia last November Pentagon chief Robert Gates met with the country’s prime minister, Andrus Ansip, and “discussed Russian behavior and new cooperation on cyber security….”
It was reported that “Ansip said NATO will operate under the principle of Article 5 of the alliance’s treaty, which states that an attack on one ally is treated as an attack on all,” and “We are convinced that Estonia, as a member of NATO, will be very well defended.”[5]
That the repeated mention of NATO’s Article 5 continued a year and a half after the alleged cyber attacks when none had occurred in the interim is revealing.
At the beginning of this month the Pentagon announced that it was launching what it called a “digital warfare force for the future,” at Fort Meade in Maryland under the control of the U.S. Strategic Command, whose chief, Gen. Kevin Chilton, was quoted earlier as threatening the use of force up to and including nuclear weapons.
The initiative was characterized in a news report as follows:
“Lt. Gen. Keith Alexander, also the Pentagon’s leading cyber warfare commander, said the U.S. is determined to lead the global effort to use computer technology to deter or defeat enemies….” [6]
The Pentagon is a synecdoche for the Department of Defense and everything related to its activities is cloaked in the same euphemism, so when pressed the US will insist its new cyber warfare project is intended for defensive purposes only. Any nation which and people who have been on the receiving end of US Defense Department actions know better. The new US cyber warfare command, its rationale based on a supposed Russian threat emanating from a non-military incident in the Baltics over two years ago, will be used to cripple the computer systems of any nation targeted for direct military assault, thus rendering them defenseless, and will be particularly effective for space-based and Star Wars (missile shield, interceptor missiles) first strike plans.
On the same day the report of General Alexander’s pledge to “defeat enemies” appeared another news item reported that “A quasi-classified satellite that will serve as an engineering trailblazer for ballistic missile tracking technologies flew into space Tuesday [May 12].” [7]
It was a Space Tracking and Surveillance System Advanced Technology Risk Reduction (STSS-ATRR) satellite, which “is part of a space-based system for the Missile Defense Agency.
“Sensors aboard the STSS-ATRR satellite and on the ground will communicate with other systems to defend against incoming ballistic missiles.” [8]
A few days earlier the California-based manufacturer Ducommun in a news report titled Ducommun Incorporated Announces Delivery of Nanosatellites to U.S. Army Space and Missile Defense Command announced that “its Miltec Corporation subsidiary delivered flight-ready nanosatellites to the U.S. Army pace and Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command (USASMDC/ARSTRAT) in Huntsville, Alabama on April 28, 2009.”
The delivery was “the completion of the first U.S. Army satellite development program since the Courier 1B communications satellite in 1960.”[9]
Military satellites used for neutralizing the potential of a rival nation not so much to launch a first strike but to respond to one blur the distinction between so-called Son of Star Wars missile shield projects and full-fledged militarization of space.
A recent Russian commentary saw it in just that manner:
“Withdrawal from the 1972 ABM Treaty signified a switch to the testing and deployment of a global missile defense system, with a view to fully removing the deterrent potential of China, and partially that of Russia.
“Washington [is] still trying to eliminate international legal restrictions on the formation of a system, which would theoretically make it invulnerable towards an act of retaliation, and even a launch-under-attack strike.” [10]
Added to which is another “quasi-classified” subterfuge related to a prospective resumption of Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) talks between the US And Russia.
American Assistant Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller stated this week “that the US is not prepared to cut warheads removed from delivery means and kept in storage.” [11]
So in addition to US plans to deploy ground-, sea-, air- and space-based anti-missile systems primarily around and against Russia (Poland, the Czech Republic, Norway, Britain, Japan and Alaska to date), the Pentagon will hold in reserve nuclear warheads for activation without a monitoring mechanism provided to Russian inspectors and arms reduction negotiators.
On May 6 Euronews conducted an interview with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, who warned, “The way it [the US anti-ballistic missile shield] is designed has nothing to do with Iran’s nuclear program. It is aimed at Russian strategic forces, deployed in the European part of the Russian Federation.” [12]
To add to the concerns of Russia and other nations, On April 30 the US established a Navy Air and Missile Defense Command (NAMDC) at the Naval Support Facility at Dahlgren, Virginia.
“NAMDC is the lead organization for Navy, joint and combined Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD). NAMDC serves as the single warfare center of excellence to synchronize and integrate Navy efforts across the full spectrum of air and missile defense to include air defense, cruise missile defense and ballistic missile defense.” [13]
The past two weeks has been a fertile period for stories in this vein and, to bring attention nearer the Earth, the US-based Strategy Page reported from a Russian source that “The United States has bought two Su-27 fighter jets from Ukraine” to “be used to train American military pilots, who may face opponents in them” and that the “US military will use them to test its radar and electronic warfare equipment.” [14]
This was at the very moment that the US client in Ukraine, President Viktor Yushchenko, his national poll ratings plummeting to near 1%, signed a directive to prepare for full NATO membership and a few days after a US military delegation visited the country to inspect a tank unit and to plan “reforming the system of combat training….” [15]
In terms of US training for warfare against the Russian Air Force, the Ukrainian development is only the latest in a number of such activities.
Immediately following the nation becoming a full member of NATO, the US 81st Fighter Squadron flew to Constanta, Romania (in which nation the Pentagon has acquired four new bases since) to engage in combat training against Russian MiG-21s.
According to one US pilot present, “It was pretty neat – you’re sitting in a MiG-21 that will be airborne with a MiG-21 pilot within days. This was an arm of the Soviet Union. These pilots were flying before the Soviet Union fell. They have quite a bit of perspective.” [16]
In July of the next year the US 492nd Fighter Squadron was deployed to the Graf Ignatievo Air Base in neighoring Bulgaria to insure the opportunity for “Air Forces from multiple nations to learn about each other’s aircraft tactics and capabilities.
“The pilots of the F-15E Strike Eagles and the MIG-29s and MIG-21s are sharing knowledge of aircraft and tactics as the exercise wraps up its first week of training.”
A US Air Force colonel was quoted as saying, “Only two of the 38 aircrew members have had a chance to fly against MIGs. By the time the exercise is over, everyone will have had a chance to either fly in a MIG or fly against one.” [17]
A month afterward the US Air Force 22nd Expeditionary Fighter Squadron arrived in Romania for the Viper Lance exercises which “marked the first time U.S. F-16 pilots have trained in Romania” and “where “MiG-21 and F-16 pilots [flew] integrated formations to conduct basic fighter maneuvers, dissimilar air combat training and air-to-ground strike missions….” [18]
This time the quote is from an F-16 Fighting Falcon pilot:
“My flight in the backseat of a Lancer [MiG-21] is a good opportunity to look at different aircraft and it’s a real privilege and an honor. I want to see what they see from their cockpit, and view a new angle of understanding against our adversaries.” [19]
Two weeks ago a US Air Force fighter squadron flew to the Bezmer Air Base in Bulgaria where an American airman said, “This is the first time a USAFE [United States Air Forces in Europe] fighter squadron has deployed to this location….The most rewarding part of this experience is knowing that I am helping the pilots train for war.” [20]
To prepare the US for air combat against the full range of Russian military aircraft, India was invited to the annual Red Flag air combat exercises in Alaska in 2007, war games “meant to train pilots from the US, NATO and other allied countries for real combat situations.
“This includes the use of ‘enemy’ hardware and live ammunition for bombing exercises.” [21]
India provided six Sukhoi SU-30MKI fighters which were “particularly interesting to the exercise as [they are] Russian-made, thus
traditionally considered ‘hostile.’” [22]
May 1st, on the occasion of the Czech Republic taking over the six-month NATO air patrol rotation in the Baltic skies over Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania – five minutes flight from Russia’s second largest city of St. Petersburg – a Czech official boasted “The area we are protecting is about three times larger than that of the Czech Republic. This is a NATO outpost.”
Lithuanian Air Force Commander Arturas Leita announced that “the Baltic countries would probably ask for the prolongation of the air force mission within NATO until 2018.” [23]
From June 8-16 Sweden will host a NATO drill, Loyal Arrow, described as “biggest air force drill ever in the Finnish-Swedish Bothnian Bay,” [24], also not far from St. Petersburg, with a British aircraft carrier and more than 50 fighter jets participating.
That exercise will begin exactly a week after the US-led NATO Cooperative Lancer 09 war games end in Georgia on Russia’s southern flank.
In speaking of the dangers of the last-named but with equal application to all that has preceded it, the South Ossetian Ministry for Press and Mass Media website recently quoted political scientist Irina Kadzhaev as warning:
“Today the situation is much more serious than before August 2008. The then threat endangered only South Ossetia and Abkhazia, but after Russia’s recognition of these states’ independence and the conclusion of agreements envisaging the presence of Russian armed forces on their territories, a possible recurrence of war will not be limited to the Caucasus.
“The new President of the United States did not bring about any crucial changes in relation to Georgia, but having a dominant role in NATO he still insists on Georgia’s soonest joining of the Alliance. If it happens, the world would face a more serious threat than the crises of the Cold War.
“Under the new realities, Georgia’s war against South Ossetia may easily turn into NATO’s war against Russia. This would be a third world war.”[25]
Notes
1) Virginian-Pilot, May 13, 2009
2) Ibid
3) Global Security, May 12, 2009
4) Air Force Link, June 1, 2007
5) U.S. Department of Defense, November 12, 2008
6) Associated Press, May 5, 2009
7) Space Flight Now, May 5, 2009
Pratt & Whitney, May 5, 2009
9) Ducommun Incorporated, April 29, 2009
10) Russian Information Agency Novosti, May 7, 2009
11) Russia Today, May 5, 2009
12) Euronews, May 6, 2009
13) Navy News, April 30, 2009
14) Moscow News, May 11, 2009
15) National Radio Company of Ukraine, April 29, 2009
16) Air Force Link, August 2, 2005
17) U.S. Air Forces in Europe, July 24, 2006
18) Stars and Stripes, August 26, 2006
19) Air Force Link, August 17, 2006
20) Air Force Link, April 28, 2009
21) Indo-Asian News Service, November 26, 2007
22) Avionews (Italy), November 28, 2007
23) Czech News Agency, May 1, 2009
24) Barents Observer, May 7, 2009
25) Ministry for Press and Mass Media of the Republic of South Ossetia, April 27, 2009
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
40 Responses to “Pentagon Preparing For War With The Enemy: Russia”
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 14th, 2009 at 7:08 am
How much you wanna bet that at this very moment in Greece the Bilderbergers are plotting how to get Russia to nuke us so that they can bring in Martial Law, turn off the internet, and seize all media in order to shut the patriot movement down? Just like on Alex’s commercial – We’re on the march, the Empire’s on the run….thing is, they’re running right at us with M-16s and nukes…WHAT ARE WE GONNA DO PATRIOTS?!?!?!
NoName Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 8:23 am
fight back with AK47’s and if a nuke drops… theres not much you can do… probably won’t even hear it comming.
JesuitNWO Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 8:30 am
This sounds like a plausible scenario, because in order to enact the type of sweeping martial law, gun confiscation, and Internet centralization there needs to be a direct imminent threat on the domestic United States. Nukes being mismanaged in Pakistan isn’t going to be enough to bend the American people to the NWO’s will. There will need to be a very legitimate appearing threat that the average person can understand and feel at home. Even many of the gun owners would probably give up their guns in a sweeping patriotic act of nationalism. Look at the type of blind obedience that occurred in WW2, this will need to happen again if they wish to complete their agenda.
The way I see it is this:
1. False Flag attack(s) > Cyber attack shuts down, disrupts economy.
JesuitNWO Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 8:37 am
> Russia threatens U.S. in response to perhaps U.S. aggression towards Iran
> “Muslims” attack us again
> Massive deadly flu released either presented as natural or biological agent from abroad
2. Government immediately responds with virtual overnight shutdown of United States.
> Gun confiscation begins (will be presented as a necessity before a possible war, to protect people from their emotions etc.)
> Non-compliance will be treated with imprisonment in FEMA camp, etc.
> Draft reinstated, non-compliance treated with imprisonment in FEMA camp, etc.
> Travel in and out of U.S. is restricted or shut off
> Forced mass inoculations being, non-compliance treated with imprisonment in FEMA camp, etc.
> Economy begins to crash as a result of shutdowns, gov. responds by accelerated nationalization program of major industry and business
3. War, with whomever is most convenient. You can almost guarantee Iran to be in the list. I believe it will be Russia, China, maybe North Korea, and Iran vs. remainder of NATO and United States. This war HAS to become nuclear eventually. Let’s see how this unfolds.
Jedi Pauly Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 9:19 am
I agree. I believe the U.S. military and the NWO are planning for a global nuclear war. I think they believe they can loose 80% of the American population and then conscript the survivors to continue the war. They are all mad murderers and we are probably doomed. I do not think there is anything the average person can do about it. There is not even much use in preparing for a nuclear war can not be adequately prepared for by the average person.
Pig foot Sam Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:31 am
To give everyone something to do, and understand the sheer madness of nuclear weapons, it is estimated each side still has around 5,000 nuclear warheads. So if you take a map of the USA and of Russia, take a pin and place 5,000 pins over each city, air base, army post, sea port, dam, nuclear reactor, etc., and see what is left of each country. Of course use a few more pins for cities like LA, new York, Chicago, etc., place them as you wish.
There is a most interesting web site showing the fallout levels after the Chernoybl accident and where the fallout spread. Please remember, Chernoybl was a LEAK not a EXPLOSION.
If I can find that link again, I will post it. Have fun with your maps.
Pig foot Sam Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:50 am
Here is the link: Good map.
http://www.unscear.org/unscear.....lmaps.html
Now after you put the pins in your maps, take a pen and color in some more areas around each pin. See what is left then.
Pig foot Sam Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:52 am
Here is the link:
http://www.unscear.org/unscear.....lmaps.html
May 14th, 2009 at 8:33 am
When will the madness end? Does ANYONE recall Hiroshima and the long lasting effects of nuclear war? How about Chernobyl??? Does ANYONE recall the 70’s when the nuclear anti-proliferation treaties came into effect because it was obvious (and still should be!) that Nuclear weapons only have ONE ending – MUTUALLY ASSURED DESTRUCTION!!!! In our grand fight against so-called terrorism, we are far from SAFE! In fact our anti-terrorist, fear-mongering government who accuses ALL other nations not in line with the New World Order as ENEMIES, has made the world a very UNSAFE and scary place! The powers that be bandy about the words “nuclear weapons” like they are water balloons that can simply be tossed at any “enemy” nation for the slightest provocation! Our government demands that other nations abide by the edict that noone should threaten another with Nukes, yet WE do it everyday!!! Its all INSANITY! Somebody ,tell me please, how do we make it STOP???!!! I want off this ride!!!
May 14th, 2009 at 9:17 am
“the White House retains the option to respond with physical force – potentially even using nuclear weapons – if a foreign entity conducts a disabling cyber attack against U.S. computer networks….”
Why should the cyber attack be made by a foreign entity, when the US can attack itself just like it did many times in the past…
Marine Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:08 pm
another fiat threat. out internet security people are on top of it and the government thinks we don’t know the difference!
May 14th, 2009 at 9:29 am
I have been living in Russia for three years, and from all signs here there is no way Russia would entertain the possibility of direct military confrontation with the US. It’s possible Russia could be pulled into a war, for example, if Israel hits Iran, but as things stand now, the likelihood of Russia just deciding to pursue aggression against the States is zilch.
May 14th, 2009 at 9:54 am
Mankind must put an end to war, or war will put an end to mankind.
-John Fitzjerald Kennedy
May 14th, 2009 at 10:21 am
Don’t believe all this hype about Russia attacking the US. More scare tactics. Neither the USA or Russia will engage in mutual annilation.
Now what very well may happen is another war for the control of oil.
Georgia has 3 major piplines running across their country from the Caspian Sea to the Black Sea. 2 of the pipelines are owned by Russia. The newer pipeline is owned by western oil powers and another is planned.
The conflict last fall was a “false flag” event, most likely sponsored or encouraged by the Bush administration in a weak attempt to bolster McCains candidacy. The current President of Georgia, western educated, was close friends of McCains chief campaign adviser. It was this campaign adviser that priviously had been a lobbyist for Georgia here in the US and sponsored trips to Georgia for McCain prior to his taking the presidential campaign position.
Politics aside, there were reports in that conflict also of cyber attacks on Georgia’s military computers. Nothing has been proven. Neither have any reports surfaced of who was indeed the aggressor and wether any US ‘advisors” were involved.
The US placing anti missle system in Poland, close to their border with Russia, was another gigantic mistake on part of the Cheney/Bush administration. Anyone with one ounce of knowledge of the Russians and especially Putin, would know what his and Russia’s reaction would be. Which might have been their (Cheney/Bush) intention all along, to inflame Russia, provide more scare tactics which the Republican party could use in time for the elections.
The long term scarnio is of course simply more money that will go to the US arms suppliers and pentagon budgets.
Marine Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:10 pm
What did we do when they put missles in cuba?? we just did the same thing to them putting missles in poland!
May 14th, 2009 at 10:39 am
Russia and the U.S. are apparently friends. It appears to me that they feign mutual hatred as a pretext to fan the flames of war between the U.S. and other countries, or between Russia and other countries, as the “need” may arise.
Thus has it apparently been since the October Revolution.
I honestly don’t think the use of macro-nukes is in the cards. It is just not in keeping with their penchant for subtlety as they proceed with genocide, with the attempted extermination or near-extermination of entire races or entire genetic lines (yes, I am convinced this is in progress), and with the wholesale rape of property and liberty.
Potentially, the amount of death that is in store for us is every bit as great as could be expected from a major nuclear war.
I think the bombing of Japan was a cathartic act for them, but I don’t believe that they would want to repeat this act in the foreseeable future. I think, for them, it represented a sacrifice for the blessing of the UN.
I think that wars will become more of an internal affair, as the New Order consolidates its grip over the planet. That is, their utility will increasingly be seen, not in conflicts between two states, but in conflicts between a government and a relatively powerless group of people who are not viewed externally as a state, regardless of how those people may view themselves.
I further think that the purpose of having a nuclear arsenal is twofold: 1) to support the nuclear economy, so as to make possible nuclear power, which is now considered an essential component of a serious military; and 2) to have a generous array of employment opportunities for nuclear physicists and engineers, so they have no excuse for working outside the establishment.
Could the leadership go completely insane and decide to change all of these operating rules? Sure, it’s possible, but I think it’s very unlikely. If nothing else, Stalin and Mao should have taught them of the importance of multiple-redundant backup systems.
Again, I believe Stalin was friends with the U.S., but that doesn’t mean that everyone was A-OK with his philosophy of internal government. Mao was obviously a protege of the USSR, and perhaps also the USA, so the same situation applies to him — “Ummm, ooops, our bad. We’ll make sure that doesn’t happen again, where there’s no safety valve when the Paramount Leader blows a fuse. After all, we can’t have our mass-murdering dictators going off the deep end and tarnishing the reputation of the state, now, can we?”
RFP
May 14th, 2009 at 11:21 am
Russia nuking the USA seems to me a likely scenario; or if not a nuke, an EMP. I’ll be interested to hear what Jim Tucker has to say to see if this was discussed.
May 14th, 2009 at 12:04 pm
Holy sweet jesus you people are dumb!
There has only been one threat and will only be one threat and that is China you fucktards.
Russia?? grow a freaking brain you imbecile bastards, Russia’s army/navy is aged, dysfunctional and there is no reason what so ever for the Russians to start a war with anyone, they have energy resources and just want to collect the cash.
This is it, this was my last visit to this fucktard page.
Bon voyage
Madman Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Eh, throw 9 trillion dollars into Russia’s army though… and you have a well polished war machine.
Fucktard or not… that 9 trillion had to go somewhere!
Marine Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
your right mad it went somewhere so its not too far fetched to think they would give it to a forgien threat to enable them to cause genocide for the eliteist. very plausable in my opinion, hell tactically, I would do it why not makes sence!!!!!!
Marine Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:12 pm
thank god!!!
May 14th, 2009 at 12:12 pm
I said this, at 5:49 this morning… on another post, before this article was available.
Being MAD as in pissed off, or MAD as a hatter, must provide me some insight! LOL
Sure, they needed someone to blame when they *the fed* lost 9 TRILLION dollars… oops.
You can fund a lot of false flag attacks and wars with 9 Trillion… I foresee Iran with a nuclear surplus, Russia with new technology, etc… what better way to get people to accept a bank run government, than to have a foreign nation invade, Red Dawn style, secretly funded by our Government… killing off the gun owners, and then magickally have our friends in Canada and Mexico step in and save us… and thus a weakened America becomes a strong North American Union.
Or am I the only one who thinks of such things?
global plantation serf Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Don’t we have the El Supremo Air Force and Navy? This could never happen or those two branches of the military would be TRULY incompetent!
madman Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 7:12 pm
No way in hell 3 planes could hit 3 different targets full of passengers either.
9/11 didn’t happen.
It’s nice to be asleep.
The Air force and the Navy were both told to stand down… they followed orders, and people died. What’s changed ?
Marine Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:15 pm
very tactically plausable madman
May 14th, 2009 at 12:43 pm
The US can’t handle the 2 theaters we are currently entrenched in. Also to note, if martial law is declared and orders to confiscate are enforced there will be an immediate revolt of the people. That makes 3 theaters fighting against insurrgent armies. Add Pak or Georgia to that and it becomes more than laughable.
May 14th, 2009 at 3:18 pm
Hey wait a minute. We are in TWO wars already and we are not winning and they want to fight ANOTHER ONE?
Isn’t this exactly the same as DUMB and DUMBER?
Russia has a LOT of troops and we will be on their turf. On that score alone, they will win. It will be a humiliating defeat. I don’t see this war happening.
Marine Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:18 pm
check history russia has NEVER been conqured and held for very long!!!! they are sovergien and their aggressors pay dearly. ask the stormtrooper of the second world war. they don’t take many prisoners, and they sure as hell don’t give much medical aid to the wounded, more than likely a bullet rather than a bandage.
Artyom Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
If you understand history, you would understand that the Nazis created a group that followed the main army to exterminate Slavic people. Hitler wanted to kill or enslave all west of Urals. When you understand this, you will understand the brutality of the war. My grandma’s sister was just a baby at the time. She was murdered by one of these Nazis. So of course when the Nazis started these killings, Russian soldiers returned the favor. However, there was good stories like my friends grandfather played football against the Wehrmarhkt during the war, just to feel normal again. That being said, Russia doesn’t plot war as these past wars are good reminder how awful. Washington D.C. has a group of War mongers that never stop planning and plotting wars. This is apparent to everyone. Hopefully this will be stopped. US is definitely doing what the article is stating, but it is more for control of resources. The last and current administration is going for broke to control the world. Around the end of Bush’s second term, it is becoming clear that the strategy of PNAC is flawed as no one nation can or should control the world.
May 14th, 2009 at 3:35 pm
luisfreespeech.weebly.com
May 14th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Planning the war with Russia started when Gorby was ousted. Still, before Putin there was a hope in US that Russia can be subjugated. Jewish “economists”, multi-billionaires and politicians as well as the Jews-oligarchs inside Russia, who bought 85% of Russian resources and factories did a lot to enslave Russia. Putin demolished their plans. The biggest provocation was the case of Litvinenko who brought enough Polonium in his stomack to London to release “dirty bomb” and blame it on Putin. That failed, he only poisoned himself. Then, in Georgia, Saakashvili, a graduate of Columbia U., was given the task for the next provocation. His govt. has Jews in central positions; they failed. Now, NATO goes to Georgia. The very nature of provocations, which is the Jewish weapon of choice, is such that being repeated time after time after time, it finally brings the desired pretext for war. God, please, make Putin a superhuman and beat the plans of Jewish communist billionaires (now – trillionaires)!
Titus Sviatoslav Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
Agreed.
The Sabbatian satanist defeat on 8/8/8 must be rectified before they can stage their big event on 9/9/9 – the inverted 666 – the triad of triads – the number that the British use instead of 911!
The satanic forces must take back South Ossetia and Abkhazia before they can complete the event. Time is short.
Pray for Putin and the forces of Good
JesuitNWO Reply:
May 15th, 2009 at 2:07 am
These Illuminati symbolical numbers are another reason I believe I think that things will begin to pick up in late summer to early fall. It’s a shame that people are not only unable to see how blatantly staged the events are, but also can’t grasp the symbolic nature behind the dates, times, and locations. All roads lead to Rome.
Roslyn Reply:
May 14th, 2009 at 11:47 pm
Thank you, Michael and Titus. Oh, that others at PrisonPlanet and InfoWars were as truthful as you two.
May 14th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
CHECK OUT 2 BOOKS BY ANATOLIY GOLITSYN CALLED NEW LIES FOR OLD AND PERESTROIKA DECEPTION.
May 14th, 2009 at 6:26 pm
“War is Peace; Freedom is Slavery; Ignorance is Strength.”
Welcome to Oceania.
May 14th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
http://www.superpowerthemovie.com/home.html
May 17th, 2009 at 3:55 am
[...] tratta del Capo del Comando Strategico degli Stati Uniti d’America, autore a Maggio 2009 di questa dichiarazione. Gli Stati Uniti sono pronti a rispondere con armi nucleari a ciberattacchi. Era ora! Quante volte [...]
May 17th, 2009 at 5:29 am
The truth is there is no 911, it is done thing by American CIA with JEW to hit Muslims. So now the final result of all this will happen when world war III start. If this war starts means all blame will go to America. All Arabs took their money from US banks so that now US is in trouble. US never will be a economic power. In case of Iran, Iran’s right to protect from their enemy, so they can make nuke if Israel can do it. Now Jew use depleted uranium on Gaza shows that Jew use nuke already not Iran. The problem is if Iran have nuke, Israel cannot play game in Middle East scaring Arab. But May gad be peace upon us all. Time of Israel and US over after 60yrs domination of world. I feel that now All Asia should make collision united to protect interest of Asia include Middle East. We know why Germany start world war II it is same reason what US is going to go now. So I am sure the world destruction comes from American. Now US cannot rule EU as Russia plays major threat on Energy, so US has no much to help, Russia is Militarily powerful so they will control Iran to hold their resource Energy. China need to assist Russia in order to have market share. Now at the end Jews and American left behind. This what great Napoleon vision of giant wake up. so it is going to be the end of life’s if this war with Iran starts… May God save us all be peace upon us too.
May 24th, 2009 at 2:11 am
I’m from Russia, Moscow and I’m red, “stupid communist” you say, but In our time situation have changed we are not as our fathers and mothers in Soviet Union. About this problem I can say, that all people are not enemys for themselfs. But our goverments try to make this
artificial war. Russia goverment think less about our people than yours, but your is more agressive against others. People don’t want any war: in Georgia, in Estonia, in Russia too. For example I have a lot of friends from Estonia. But goverments plays theirs aggresive strategies and nothing can change that game. Weapon kills, Humanity don’t need such weapon, as nuclear. We must to develop medicine, genetics and the more important – our society. But not a things which can destroy people!!!