Jan 31, 2013
Obama’s nominee for secretary of defense told Congress he will ensure the US can strike Iran, if necessary. Former Senator Chuck Hagel, who was criticized for his dovish stance on Iran, has made an apparent U-turn by saber-rattling towards Tehran.
Hagel addressed Congress ahead of his confirmation hearing on Thursday, stressing that although there is “time and space” for negotiation with Iran, “the window is closing” on a diplomatic solution.
“If confirmed, I will focus intently on ensuring that [the] US military is in fact prepared for any contingency,” Hagel said in a write-up of questions and answers for the confirmation hearing obtained by Reuters.
He also wrote that Iran needs to show signs that it is ready to negotiate seriously: “If Iran continues to flout its international obligations, it should continue to face severe and growing consequences.” However, Hagel warned that the US must be “cautious and certain” before taking action.
Hagel also outlined his “unshakable” commitment to maintaining the longstanding US alliance with Israel. Previously, Hagel was an outspoken critic of what he called the “Jewish lobby” in Washington, which he deemed the main barrier to a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine.
He has also questioned the efficacy of sanctions on Iran meant to curb Tehran’s nuclear program, arguing that sanctions enacted alongside international partners would be more effective.
Hagel’s stance on Iran had previously drawn criticism from Republicans in Washington, who regarded his position as too soft.
Hagel’s about-face on his Iran policy has prompted some confusion in Washington over his outlook on the Middle East.
“There’s a lot of misleading information out there about the senator’s views on Middle East policy. Senators are going to want to hear from Chuck Hagel directly on what his view is and what is the administration’s view,” said Mark Jacobson, a senior fellow at the German Marshall Fund and a former staffer on the Senate Armed Services Committee.
Hagel is expected to be grilled by Republicans over his proposed policies later on Thursday during the hearing. Six Republicans have already pledged to oppose Hagel’s nomination, dismissing his candidacy as “too philosophically opposed” on issues such as the Middle East and atomic weapons.
Hagel’s turn towards more aggressive rhetoric in the run up to the confirmation hearing seems to be pandering to his critics by offering a more aggressive position on Iran and supporting Israel.
Last year, President Obama repeatedly urged Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu to desist in his calls for a military strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities.
Obama stressed that the financial sanctions on Tehran were a preferred method to curb Iran’s nuclear ambitions. However, he did note that no options would be taken off the table to prevent Tehran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.
RT’s Gayane Chichakyan suggested that the nomination of Hagel might be a way of toning down the war rhetoric in Washington. However, the possibility of a less aggressive strategy has angered some in Washington.
“Since the beginning of the attack campaign against Chuck Hagel over these two months or so, many of the attackers have withdrawn their objections,” said Chichakyan, suggesting that maybe they received confirmation behind closed doors that Hagel would not do anything drastic upon assuming the post of secretary of defense.
This article was posted: Thursday, January 31, 2013 at 12:44 pm