- Prison Planet.com - http://www.prisonplanet.com -
Pope Catholic; night follows day; IPCC found telling pack of lies about sea level rises
Posted By admin On May 26, 2010 @ 3:27 am In Sci Tech | Comments Disabled
London Telegraph 
May 26, 2010
IPCC lies, cheats, distorts again. Yes, all right, it is a bit of a “dog bites man” or “pizza found to contain mozzarella and tomato resting on dough base” kind of story. But on the day in which Britain’s new Prime Minister announced in the Queen’s speech that one of his government’s main goals is to “combat climate change”, it’s perhaps just as well to remind ourselves of the kind of junk science and misinformation that is inspiring his green policies. (Hat tip: Barry Woods)
This one comes from the great Canadian blogger Donna Laframboise , who has noticed that the most recent report (2007) by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change liberally cited a scientific paper which wasn’t published until 29 months after the cut off date for submissions.
“Ah what’s 29 months between friends?” you might say. But as Laframbroise rightly observes it strips the process of its integrity.
If IPCC authors are to accurately describe the scientific literature, an agreed-upon cutoff date is required. If expert reviewers are to comment on the IPCC’s use of that literature, they must be afforded adequate opportunity to examine it.
More sinister still, though, is the way the IPCC report has twisted the paper – by one David G Vaughan of the British Antarctic Survey – for its own ends. Here’s what Vaughan’s paper said about the West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS).
Since most of WAIS is not showing change, it now seems unlikely that complete collapse of WAIS, with the threat of a 5-m rise in sea level, is imminent in the coming few centuries.
Note that phrase “it now seems unlikely”.
Now see how the IPCC interprets Vaughan’s paper:
If the Amundsen Sea sector were eventually deglaciated, it would add about 1.5 m to sea level, while the entire West Antarctic Ice Sheet (WAIS) would account for about 5 m (Vaughan, 2007).
Yes, yes, IPCC no doubt it WOULD. But as the report you cite to prove it made pretty explicit: IT AIN’T GOING TO HAPPEN.
Article printed from Prison Planet.com: http://www.prisonplanet.com
URL to article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/pope-catholic-night-follows-day-ipcc-found-telling-pack-of-lies-about-sea-level-rises.html
URLs in this post:
 London Telegraph: http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100041030/pope-catholic-night-follows-day-ipcc-found-telling-pack-of-lies-about-sea-level-rises/
 great Canadian blogger Donna Laframboise: http://nofrakkingconsensus.blogspot.com/2010/05/more-ipcc-mischief.html
 Image: http://purewaterfreedom.com/
 The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider: http://www.prisonplanet.com/the-ipcc-consensus-on-climate-change-was-phoney-says-ipcc-insider.html
 IPCC’s River Of Lies: http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipccs-river-of-lies.html
 Hansen colleague rejected IPCC AR4 ES as having “no scientific merit”, but what does IPCC do?: http://www.prisonplanet.com/hansen-colleague-rejected-ipcc-ar4-es-as-having-%e2%80%9cno-scientific-merit%e2%80%9d-but-what-does-ipcc-do.html
 New errors in IPCC climate change report: http://www.prisonplanet.com/new-errors-in-ipcc-climate-change-report.html
 IPCC: International Pack of Climate Crooks: http://www.prisonplanet.com/ipcc-international-pack-of-climate-crooks.html
Copyright © 2013 PrisonPlanet.com. All rights reserved.