You must have it if you are to beat the NWO. You must be principled to lead a moral life, and inspire others to follow you.

Free speach for all, even the idiots.

“I’d rather err on the side of a little too much freedom of speech than on the side of too little”

Allright seriously now, firstly there is no need for you to be calling people retards and talking to people the way you are on here. I mean arent we supposed to be working together? Isnt that why we ar eon this site in the first palce. To get the real news and not be involved in the corporate media?

Secondly, Global Warming, man made Global Warming is a myth. Co2 is taken in by plants, andf they excrete O2. Secondly, we are in a cool down right now. I live in NEw England, and this is on of the coolest summers I can remeber as well as the snow we had last winter and the other compelling scientific evidence thats out there. I am sure you have a rebuttle for this becasue you do know everything it seems, but mainly, there is no need for you to be talking to people the way you are. Apparently you have no capacity to speak like a rational adult and use logic and reason, you prefer to yell and throw a tantrum like a spolied child.

SOMEONE PLEASE KICK THIS GUY OFF THESE FORUMS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

You’re a retard. Deal with it.

—-

@Kim

“Perhaps we can use them as blankets when the global cooling starts to bite.”

Or not, considering “Global Cooling” is just bullshit being sold to retards as a last ditch “well AGW doesn’t matter anyway” ploy.

SO BILLY NO MATES WHY DONT YOU GIVE THE PATRONISING BAD ATTITUDE A
REST…CAUSE NONE OF US ARE INTERESTED..PRICK!!

“but seriously tho, someone want to mention how Gore’s carbon tax is going to help this? I don’t consider the same people making more money from this helping.”

Exactly, it is NOT helping and was never designed to help. It was designed to make US pay for fixing the problem THEY made. If it also convinces many people to deny AGW, then that is just the icing on the cake.

—-

@BeTrueSeekTruth

“A silly excercise. How “green” is polyprolene? All this sillyness for a few key photo ops. You foolish spineless scientists. You should be ashamed of yourselves.”

Although I agree that preventing any further AGW is far more important, if this reduces some of the damage done by AGW while we deal with the root cause, then no harm no foul.

—-

@tom

“only an idiot could dream this up and only another to wright”

Based on your mastery of the English language, my guess is you should not be commenting on the intellectual capabilities of ANYONE.

Secondly, are you saying this will NOT do what it is designed to do, which is to protect one SMALL area from Solar radiation? I know the article is trying to make it sound like these scientists are trying to fight Global Warming, but that of course is typical media BULLSHIT. This is the equivalent of an umbrella – not designed to protect everything, but just one thing.

—-

@Jer

“is this article a joke? if it is it is funny, if it is true then that is very sad.”

So I suppose you would never use an umbrella? It is the same concept – they are not trying to stop Global Warming, they are trying to protect ONE SMALL AREA from it’s effects for at least the short term.

“AND FOR THE BOOKS THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GLOBAL WARMING!!!”

YES THERE IS RETARD, EVEN THE LIARS AND DENIERS DON’T DENY THAT ANYMORE!!!

“we’re in a ‘cool down’ state right now”

No, we’re not. Good try though.

—-

@Phishybongwaters

“the debate lies in the fact that some blame humans, others blame nature, and lots from both sides agree that it’s a natural cycle.”

No, the truth is the VAST majority blame humans, a TINY minority blame the Sun, and neither side says it is just the normal cycle.

You see, the deniers claim it is some unusual Solar event causing it (a cooling Sun making the Earth hotter!) and that it will be counteracted by an even more unusual event (a new Maunder Minimum that is “colder” and “longer” for no discernible reason).

The REAL debate (when you exclude the liars and deniers) is how much CO2 is too much, and what the effects of too much will be.

—-

@Gary

“…And just what is the carbon footprint of producing and transporting THAT monstrosity???”

A very tiny drop in the bucket comparatively, and in this case the scientists have decided that slowing the melt on this glacier is worth it.

“Think about it.”

I have. Have you? It seems not.

Think about it.