Many, if not most, Americans now recognize that the US government’s rationale for the Iraq War, which has already resulted in the deaths of more than 4,000 US troops and the deaths of more than 100,000 Iraqis (by the most conservative of estimates), was based on lies that were generated by the CIA, the Pentagon, and the White House.

To those who doubt that the US government would have perpetrated the 9/11 attacks to create an excuse for the Iraq War, I ask this: “If the US government would lie to start a war that has killed more than 4,000 Americans and 100,000 Iraqis, why would you assume that the US government would not also stage the 9/11 attacks to provide an excuse to launch that same war of aggression?” I seems pretty naive to me to think that the US government that lied to start the Iraq War would not also commit the 9/11 attacks to provide an excuse to start that same War.

9/11/2008 was not the first time that the US government staged a false flag attack on US citizens and US troops to provide an excuse to launch a war of aggression. In 1898 the US government blew up its own battleship, the Maine, in Havana Harbor, killing 266 US seamen, in order to create an excuse for the USA to launch a war of aggression against Spain, in which the USA siezed control of the Spanish colonies of Cuba, Peuerto Rico, Guam, and the Philippines. Photographs of the Maine’s hull show that the explosion came from within the hull, not from the outside, proving that the US government’s ‘Official Version’, which blamed a Spanish bomb attack for the destruction of the Maine, was a lie.

– Gregory Fegel

That thought was “Damn those Israelis.”

Contrary to NIST & the US Government, there is overwhelming evidence to conclude that the planes seen on TV were the result of SFX special effects (TV fakery).

Many try to suppress this obvious fact, but to exclude other theories out of hand w/o examination is not only disingenuous, it’s simply denial (a defence mechanism) and only results in a misinformed, skewed opinion.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-0XrU70Lc-U

There were no planes entering the WTC Towers on 911. Perhaps all the related films about 911 produced before and since were made to condition the public into acceptance of the official “planes” fantasy. Any discussion of planes on 911, passengers, hijackers, etc. all continue to help keep the fantasy alive.

Believing the government’s fairytale of planes colliding with the Towers is the main problem w/ fully understanding 911. The media was broadcasting fake, manipulated images of planes. Superimposing a plane on 911 was done w/ Wescam technology; it provided a single “live” feed from which all the TV networks broadcast. Other videos & images started to appear in the days, weeks & months following 911. All of them have anomalies & impossibilities which can only be explained by excluding planes.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=xpUKwpwSRwc

Real planes would have been a potential liability for the perps on 911. It was easier to control the outcome of the event with much less risk by using the media to broadcast fake imagery. Real jets might miss their targets, get shot down, suffer pilot or computer errors, destroy or prematurely detonate any explosives, passengers could have overtaken the hijackers, and/or the plane might not inflict enough perceived damage to make a collapse believable.

A single fact which cannot be refuted is that a hollow aluminum plane (especially fragile wings) cannot slice through steel beams and concrete without any damage to the plane. News footage showing an airliner gliding into a Tower without any resistance is a cartoon. Aluminum planes are not built for impact and crumple immediately upon contact with solid objects; even a small bird can rip through a jet’s wing.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=MCVwuf_AMFs

Furthermore, a large speeding jet’s vortex trails behind it creating a highly active atmosphere which follows in its path. Had a real plane impacted a WTC Tower, real film footage would have recorded the airliner’s vortex interacting with and violently dissipating the smoke from the alleged crash and the adjacent North Tower. No vortex literally means no planes on 911 (TV fakery).

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xlj1mVD2-HM

During the South Tower “impact”, fake TV footage shows a WTC Tower sealing itself around the plane during the alleged penetration. Still another too incredible to believe anomaly is the width of the plane’s purported gash didn’t match the width of a Boeing 757’s wing span. Another widely publicized video shot by Scott Myers shows the forward fuselage of the “jet” exiting the South Tower, though other shots later reveal no exit hole.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=NCLL6h6-vvc

To consider the media footage showing a plane slicing thru steel and concrete as reality is ludicrous. There were no planes; only spoofed images, manipulated witnesses and falsified evidence. America please wake up; the media was a complicit partner that was in on the crime from the beginning. In fact, the TV psyop 911 couldn’t have been pulled off without the mass media’s assistance.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=eoxaU16MntM

Actually “no planes on 911″ is the only explanation that makes any sense. There are far too many disturbing questions left unanswered which only TV fakery can address.

Besides all the other impossibilities mentioned, why are there several “hijackers” still alive; some are even suing the US government to recover their reputation and stolen identity.

Why have so many of the purported plane “victims” not been listed in the Social Security Death Index? …and their families not claimed their death benefits.

Why are there missing passenger lists and zero so-called Middle Eastern hijacker names on the flight manifest?

Why in the entire history of aviation has a plane never disappeared from a crash – yet on 911, four of them did in a single day? All plane parts are numbered; not one plane part from 911 has been identified by its number.

How could supposedly inexperienced “pilots” who couldn’t even fly a Cessna…

* threaten & subdue everyone on board a large airliner
* break into the locked cockpits w/ their hands
* kill all the ex-military pilots and copilots

…then navigate a large Boeing jetliner above the clouds all over several states without airport tower assistance, with nav systems & radios turned off, and fly with pinpoint accuracy into a building that they couldn’t even see?

It’s common knowledge amongst pilots that a Boeing 757 cannot fly at 500+ MPH at sea level – the air is too thick. That’s an airliner’s cruising speed attained at high 30,000+ ft. altitudes.

You can call Boeing; even they admit that – and they have been recorded in phone conversations recently saying so.

When an airliner is close to the ground it’s either taking off or landing. If forced to throttle to cruising speed at low altitude, it would break apart in mid-air.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=x2upl977dsY

Exposing “no planes on 911″ is probably the most important story to people beyond chemtrails, depleted uranium poisoning and nanotech genocide.

Americans are TV hypnotized, drugged up, dumbed down and so utterly dependent that in general they are incapable of critical thought and are disinterested in discovering how the media is adversely affecting their lives.

No planes on 911 and deception by the media is the Holy Grail of 911. It marks the beginning of an Orwellian double-speak mind-set which is now accepted as normal by the populace.

No-planes on 911 is highly important as it exposes the real perps behind this mass murder and offers justice to the thousands of people killed that day.

Without the covert deception by the media in collusion with the enemy in control of America’s military intelligence, 911 could not have happened.

The media was directly involved in 911 and together with a criminal government has helped diminish Americans’ freedoms and launch unending wars against innocent nations.

Don’t even consider making another comment on 911 till you have watched the “September Clues” video series:

http://www.livevideo.com/video.....part1.aspx

With so much evidence pointing to collusion between the military industrial complex, the US government and especially the media, very few have sought relief in the court systems, or via conventional mass media. Morgan Reynolds has filed numerous suits in federal court to no avail. His latest attempt and subsequent appeal were both summarily squashed before having even been properly heard. You can read the details on his website.

http://nomoregames.net/index.php?page=911

If one seeks only that evidence which fits the official explanation, then that is what you will find. That’s not science, it’s not objective thinking, it’s not even good common sense.

It is impossible in the real world for a plane to behave in such manner as per the official account. So long as you continue to deny that one simple concept you will be forever lost in endless pursuit of an answer that will never come.

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/.....ng_videos/

# # #

the silent ones and the supposed “more enlightent” people who you/we could write to:

Madonna
Bono
Bob Dylan ..nothing wrong whit the gov. nowadays huh?
Roger Waters…
P-diddy
Pearl Jam
TOOL
Rage against the MAchine guys
System of a down
..any one else?! i bet there are tons

Who’s hot in Hollywood?
Richard Gere is a buddhist..
Susan Sarandon
Tim Robbins
Wesley Snipes ..should be quite pissed off
Morgan Freeman
Johnny Depp
Keanu Reeves
..to name a few
..basicly anyone who has been “pro” something..i’m sure they’d like to be pro freedom and peace too.

These are the people who can reach people, you know?!

Alot of people sit infront of computers all day and write a lot, so how about writing a nice and polite e-mail about 9-11 TRUTH to these people.

9/11 Chronicles Part One: Truth Rising :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-yscpNIxjI

Could be a good idea to send this link to them so they’d know it’s mostly the young un-known people who have to do all the work and put them selves on the line while they make their movies or recording ther upcoming album

Write to celebs.

check out this site I found. he says he’s found a way to not inhale the chemicals.
http://www.rawair.net

Just as on 9/11, firefighters have done interior attacks of highrise fires for decades. You seem to insist that ANY temperature increase, no matter the duration of exposure, will potentially cause the symmetrical and simultaneous failure of a highrise bilding that has many structural steel supporting columns. If your silliness had a shred of truth to it, no interior highrise firefighting attacks would ever be permitted, and the entire operation would be simply become a race to facilitate rescue/evacuation not only of the building, but of the potential surounding footprint that could be affected by the “assured” structural collapse. Someone mentioned on another article that they thought you were paid to post your comments. I find that hard to believe. If you are being paid, no matter how much, those paying you are getting nothing for their money.

Oh, and I want to say, “nice post,” Jim. Nice to have some measured, educated responses mixed in with the general craziness. The only problem is that you’re confusing people like AlphaOmega with scientific facts, which have no relevance in his world. The metalurgical properties of construction grade structural steel don’t require that he even be aware of the quest for a Grand Unified Theory, yet those basic properties that are relied upon around the world in thousands of highrise building projects are beyond his scope of understanding – or acceptance.