Comments on: Sense of Conspiracy

By: Brandon Allen

Brandon Allen — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:47:47 +0000

i love you Miley.

By: Allan Park

Allan Park — Fri, 06 Mar 2009 03:19:01 +0000

sombreros on them. 3. Announce \”I hat you too, ya little s---s.\”

By: Thomas Jefferson

Thomas Jefferson — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:34:23 +0000

Somebody has a First amendment problem at any rate…..

By: blindboy

blindboy — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 11:30:13 +0000

There IS a point where this particular group of Americans WILL be taken seriously i.e as they are dragging these SOBs to the guillotine.

By: Rich

Rich — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:22:34 +0000

You’re all mental. The lot of you.

By: swan

swan — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:02:36 +0000

Thanks so much for all these remarks and complaints about our mass media. By deception, they are trying to wage war. Sound very Mossadish.

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:26:23 +0000

In Steven Jones’ PDF “Answers to Objections and Questions”, to support his claim for Sol-gels/Thermite he states:

“One molecule, described by the EPA’s Erik Swartz, was present at levels “that dwarfed all others”: 1,3-diphenylpropane. “We’ve never observed it in any sampling we’ve ever done,”

However when you look at the link he uses
http://www.newsday.com/news/he.....right-area

You find out Mr. Jones edits out the VERY next line which states

“He said it was most likely produced by the plastic of tens of thousands of burning computers.”

Apparently, Jones felt this was not important enough for his readers to know.

(from above site)

By: Michael

Michael — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:24:04 +0000

Cairo….

Thermite explained…
http://www.debunking911.com/thermite.htm
Check it out yourself.

By: CAIRO

CAIRO — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 06:11:44 +0000

@ don

you say there is no proof that towers 1 and 2 were taking down? hmmm.
I would look at the fact that get fuel doesn’t burn long or hot enough to
melt steel. its scientificly impossible and not mention that there was traces
of thermite at the reckage, thats a key ingredient in demolition explosives.
do your research, you’ll find a million different things that will strike you as
odd. the proof is right there in your face, I guess its up to you whether to
believe it or not. Ohh and I do agree with you that people should be prepared
to stand a long long time going this route.

By: Don

Don — Wed, 14 Jan 2009 05:55:38 +0000

Why does everyone care about a building that came down and hurt no one? The only answer I can think of is that the conspiracy that our government collapsed the twin towers did not play out well, since there is no proof. And the only so called proof is someone heard that they moght bring down number 7. So forgetting the fact two planes that were hijacked flew into the WTC, people continue to go on about this building number 7.

Why not investigate the buildings in which terrorists did bring down. I watched number 7 come down while i was driving on RT 46 east in New Jersey. I did not see it exactly but the same time the radio said it came down, I saw the enormous amount of smoke in the air.

If it burned down or was a controlled demolition, who really cares? No one got hurt.

And one more point. Since mostly everyone here thinks it was our government, do you really think making a stink day after day is going to break them? If this is your stance, prepare to be standing a long time!

America – love it or leave it. I love it and I am proud.