Regular readers may recall on August 1st a posting where I stated my views on the NCDC report being produced by Dr.’s Karl and Peterson of NCDC (National Climatic Data Center) called Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. They also had a little help from Susan Hassol, writer of the HBO Special Too Hot Not to Handle, produced by none other than Laurie David. That explains the “emotionally based graphics” in a science document.
I wrote then:
To say the least, I’m shocked that NCDC’s leadership has changed from being the nation’s record keeper of weather and climatic data, to being what appears to me now as an advocacy group. The draft document reads more like a news article in many places than it does a scientific document, and unlike a scientific document, it has a number of what I would call “emotionally based graphics” in it that have nothing to do with the science.
About the same time, Dr. Roger Pielke Jr. revealed that Ms. Hassol appeared to simply move some of her website’s claims into this self-proclaimed official U.S. government “highly influential scientific assessment.”
In that posting, Dr. Roger Pielke Jr also noted that we had a post outlining how NCDC had used a photoshopped image to illustrate flooding. Something of a no-no in “science” document:
article continues below
Image above taken directly from the CCSP report. Read more here
And finally you may also recall the posting where I advertised for comments on the NOAA CCSP report, shown below:

Dr. Ben Herman of the University of Arizona was kind enough to offer a guest post outlining the flaws of this document. You can read his essay here.
Dr. Herman writes:
It is my feeling that these bullets and the additional detail discussions contain much information that requires further input due to it being still controversial, incomplete, and in some instances very misleading.
Readers were invited to submit comments to NCDC about the CCSP Report, and I’m pleased to report that many of you did. The National Chamber of Commerce also got involved, and submitted a very strong rebuttal to this document.
Chris Horner writes on NRO Planet Gore:
…the U.S. Chamber pointed out that a preponderance of the 21 reports that had purportedly been “synthesized” had not actually been produced yet. Sure, that sequence sounds odd in the real world, but is reminiscent of the IPCC, to which the USP appealed as the authority for certain otherwise unsupported claims (though the IPCC openly admits that it, too, performs no scientific research). This is a point we also made in our comments. I’m informed that NOAA has now agreed to publish the underlying documents first and then put out their desired USP. The Chamber should have a release out soon.
…Key absurdities included breakout points in the Executive Summary of “Urgency of Action,” “Irreversible Losses,” “The Future Is in Our Hands” and ‘Tipping Points” (even though nowhere else did the document actually offer a discussion of “Tipping Points” that could be summarized), as well as calls for adoption of a certain policy agenda, all in a supposedly scientific document.
What a concept; publish the basis for the claims first, THEN publish the document that outlines the claims (The CCSP report seen above). But nobody is rushing anything, right? “Tipping points” with no definitions, calls for policy? That’s advocacy, not science.
We’ll keep a watchful eye on this as there remains potential to “synthesize” abuse of the public trust.
My sincere thanks to everyone from this blog who provided comments and insight. And lets give the U.S. Chamber of Commerce a salute for taking point on this. Lots of people contributed to forcing this change; including Pielke Jr and Senior, Joe D’Aleo of Icecap, Fred Singer, Pat Michaels, Steve McIntyre, Chris Horner, Marlo Lewis, and dozens of bloggers who helped get the word out, plus thousands of readers.
Warning, strong opinion follows: This report’s contents and the “cart before the horse” way it was produced is the biggest official “crock” perpetrated on the American public I’ve ever been privy to. On a personal note, there are days when I struggle to keep doing this, at times I think I’ll just shut down the blog, turn off the surfacestations website, and return to a normal and hassle free life. Days like this keep me going.























































August 21st, 2008 at 6:46 am
Jesus, even when they seemingly WIN one, the liars can’t helo themselves but lie!
“Skeptics win one! NOAA/NCDC to pull the CCSP report”
PULL? As in not publish? Apparently NOT. DELAY is the word he was looking for, but he chose to LIE instead!
“I’m informed that NOAA has now agreed to publish the underlying documents first and then put out their desired USP.”
So, the CCSP report WILL be published, they are just agreeing to publish the underlying documents first! So much for “PULL”!
Liars never change, they just keep on lying!
August 21st, 2008 at 9:11 am
“PULL” means just that…it does NOT mean: “NEVER TO BE PUBLISHED EVER AGAIN”. I’m a Journalist & Graphic Artist that has done years of work on various Magazines, and this Article is simply stating (for a particularly interested, but possible ignorant audience) the overall effect of the critiques.
To state that the site “PULLED” an Article does NOT necessarily imply that that Article will never again appear. ESPECIALLY SINCE he clarified the details latter in his Article. His HEADER is simply sensational, but NOT inaccurate. He CLEARLY points out that the Article WILL appear again, in the future, but only in the proper sequence. So, instead of defaming, you’d do better to keep your mouth shut. As the saying goes: “Better to be suspicioned a fool, then to open your mout &
August 21st, 2008 at 9:12 am
“BETTER to be suspicioned a FOOL, than to open your mouth & remove ALL DOUBT!”
August 21st, 2008 at 9:15 am
“PULL” means just that…it does NOT mean: “NEVER TO BE PUBLISHED EVER AGAIN”. I’m a Journalist & Graphic Artist that has done years of work on various Magazines, and this Article is simply stating (for a particularly interested, but possiblY ignorant audience) the overall effect of the critiques.
To state that the site “PULLED” an Article does NOT necessarily imply that that Article will never again appear. ESPECIALLY SINCE he clarified the details latter in his Article. His HEADER is simply sensational, but NOT inaccurate. He CLEARLY points out that the Article WILL appear again, in the future, but only in the proper sequence.
So, instead of defaming, you’d do better to keep your mouth shut. As the saying goes: “Better to be suspicioned a fool, then to open your mouth & REMOVE ALL DOUBT!”
August 24th, 2008 at 11:46 am
Toxic brand poisoning. America is a brand nation of theme park faux realities and this is why the liars keep on lying, it is their BRAND OF TOXIC SHOCK and the addiction is at the tap root … Russia says the west is dying and with this brand of lying, who could not!?
August 24th, 2008 at 4:40 pm
http://www.onemorepromethean.com
September 1st, 2008 at 12:26 pm
TO ALL…I’ve got a feeling that BILLY NO MATES..aka Kamakase as got a vested interest in the BULLSHIT GLOBAL WARMING RELIGION..he reckons he runs his own Business..now if you think of it logically are the items he’s “FLOGGING” got any thing to do with this con ..like Solar Panels,Wind Generators….MAKES YOU WONDER HEY?????