- Prison Planet.com - http://www.prisonplanet.com -
Syria Intelligence Being Manipulated EVEN MORE than in Iraq War
Posted By admin On September 10, 2013 @ 4:30 am In Featured Stories,Prison Planet,Tile | Comments Disabled
White House – Not U.S. Intelligence Agencies – Prepared Report about Syrian Chemical Weapons
Washington’s Blog 
September 10, 2013
The Obama administration is manipulating intelligence about Syria in exactly the same ways  that the Bush administration did to justify the Iraq war.
Specifically, the Obama administration is copying Bush’s playbook of trying to kick UN weapons inspectors out of the target country so they can’t finish their investigation .
The Bush administration also famously “stove piped” information from the war hawks directly to the president – cutting out the normal vetting process by intelligence agencies .
Likewise, IPS reports  today:
Contrary to the general impression in Congress and the news media, the Syria chemical warfare intelligence summary released by the Barack Obama administration Aug. 30did not represent an intelligence community assessment, an IPS analysis and interviews with former intelligence officials reveals.
The evidence indicates that Director of National Intelligence James Clapper culled intelligence analyses from various agencies and by the White House itself, but that the White House itself had the final say in the contents of the document.
Former intelligence officials told IPS that that the paper does not represent a genuine intelligence community assessment but rather one reflecting a predominantly Obama administration influence.
In essence, the White House selected those elements of the intelligence community assessments that supported the administration’s policy of planning a strike against the Syrian government force and omitted those that didn’t.
In a radical departure from normal practice involving summaries or excerpts of intelligence documents that are made public, the Syria chemical weapons intelligence summary document was not released by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence but by the White House Office of the Press Secretary.
It was titled “Government Assessment of the Syrian Government’s Use of Chemical Weapons on August 21, 2013.” The first sentence begins, “The United States government assesses,” and the second sentence begins, “We assess”.
The introductory paragraph refers to the main body of the text as a summary of “the intelligence community’s analysis” of the issue, rather than as an “intelligence community assessment”, which would have been used had the entire intelligence community endorsed the document.
A former senior intelligence official who asked not to be identified told IPS in an e-mail Friday that the language used by the White House “means that this is not an intelligence community document”.
The former senior official, who held dozens of security classifications over a decades-long intelligence career, said he had “never seen a document about an international crisis at any classification described/slugged as a U.S. government assessment.”
The document further indicates that the administration “decided on a position and cherry-picked the intelligence to fit it,” he said. “The result is not a balanced assessment of the intelligence.”
Greg Thielmann, whose last position before retiring from the State Department was director of the Strategic, Proliferation and Military Affairs Office in the Bureau of Intelligence and Research, told IPS he has never seen a government document labeled “Government Assessment” either.
“If it’s an intelligence assessment,” Thielmann said, “why didn’t they label it as such?”
Former National Intelligence Officer Paul Pillar, who has participated in drafting national intelligence estimates, said the intelligence assessment summary released by the White House “is evidently an administration document, and the working master copy may have been in someone’s computer at the White House or National Security Council.”
Pillar suggested that senior intelligence officials might have signed off on the administration paper, but that the White House may have drafted its own paper to “avoid attention to analytic differences within the intelligence community.”
Comparable intelligence community assessments in the past, he observed – including the 2002 Iraq WMD estimate – include indications of differences in assessment among elements of the community.
[A] “senior administration official” indicated that DNI Clapper had “approved” submissions from various agencies for what the official called “the process”. The anonymous speaker did not explain further to journalists what that process preceding the issuance of the White House paper had involved.
That article suggests that the administration had originally planned for the report on intelligence to be issued by Clapper rather than the White House, apparently after reaching agreement with the White House on the contents of the paper.
But Clapper’s name was not on the final document issued by the White House, and the document is nowhere to be found on the ODNI website. All previous intelligence community assessments were posted on that site.
The issuance of the document by the White House rather than by Clapper, as had been apparently planned, points to a refusal by Clapper to put his name on the document as revised by the White House.
Clapper’s refusal to endorse it – presumably because it was too obviously an exercise in “cherry picking” intelligence to support a decision for war – would explain why the document had to be issued by the White House.
Efforts by IPS to get a comment from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence suggest strongly that Clapper is embarrassed by the way the Obama White House misrepresented the Aug. 30 document.
Opponents of the proposed U.S. strike against Syria could argue that the Obama administration’s presentation of the intelligence supporting war is far more politicised than the flawed 2002 Iraq WMD estimate that the George W. Bush administration cited as part of the justification for the invasion of Iraq.
Remember, Clapper is the guy who blatantly lied to Congress and the American people  about NSA spying. And even he wouldn’t touch this thing with a 10-foot pole.
In addition, Daily Caller noted  recently:
The Obama administration has selectively used intelligence to justify military strikes on Syria, former military officers with access to the original intelligence reports say, in a manner that goes far beyond what critics charged the Bush administration of doing in the run-up to the 2003 Iraq war.
According to these officers, who served in top positions in the United States, Britain, France, Israel, and Jordan, a Syrian military communication intercepted by Israel’s famed Unit 8200 electronic intelligence outfit has been doctored so that it leads a reader to just the opposite conclusion reached by the original report.
And Fairness and Accuracy in Reporting points outthat – as bad as the Iraq war propaganda was – at least Colin Powell actually played  the intercepted communications:
Recall that Powell played tapes of Iraqi officials supposedly talking about concealing evidence of banned weapons from inspectors–which turned out to shownothing of the kind . But Powell at least played tapes of the intercepted communication, even as he spun and misrepresented their contents–allowing for the possibility of an independent interpretation of these messages. Perhaps “mindful of the Iraq experience,” Kerry allows for no such interpretation.
Indeed, the U.S. government itself admits that it doesn’t have clear evidence  that Assad was behind the chemical weapons attack, high-level intelligence officials think it might have been the rebels  who used such weapons, Congress members who have seen the classified intelligence from the U.S. government arenot impressed , and top chemical weapons experts are skeptical .
Article printed from Prison Planet.com: http://www.prisonplanet.com
URL to article: http://www.prisonplanet.com/syria-intelligence-being-manipulated-even-more-than-in-iraq-war.html
URLs in this post:
 Washington’s Blog: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/syria-intelligence-being-manipulated-exactly-like-iraq.html
 exactly the same ways: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/proof-that-u-s-is-once-again-fixing-the-intelligence-around-the-policy-to-justify-war-in-syria.html
 kick UN weapons inspectors out of the target country so they can’t finish their investigation: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/08/debunking-u-s-claims-about-un-weapons-inspections.html
 cutting out the normal vetting process by intelligence agencies: http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2003/10/27/031027fa_fact
 reports: http://www.ipsnews.net/2013/09/obamas-case-for-syria-didnt-reflect-intel-consensus/
 blatantly lied to Congress and the American people: http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/fact-checker/post/james-clappers-least-untruthful-statement-to-the-senate/2013/06/11/e50677a8-d2d8-11e2-a73e-826d299ff459_blog.html
 noted: http://www.dailycaller.com/2013/08/29/verify-chemical-weapons-use-before-unleashing-the-dogs-of-war/
 actually played: http://www.fair.org/blog/2013/09/01/which-syrian-chemical-attack-account-is-more-credible/
 nothing of the kind: http://www.consortiumnews.com/Print/2011/021811a.html
 doesn’t have clear evidence: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/u-s-admits-no-imminent-threat-from-syria-no-clear-evidence-assad-ordered-chemical-weapons-attack.html
 might have been the rebels: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/high-level-u-s-intelligence-officers-syrian-government-didnt-launch-chemical-weapons.html
 not impressed: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/classified-intelligence-doesnt-prove-anything.html
 skeptical: http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2013/09/exclusive-top-chemical-weapons-expert-says-syrian-deaths-could-have-been-caused-by-industrial-accident.html
Copyright © 2013 PrisonPlanet.com. All rights reserved.