Guardian Unlimited
Go to:  
Guardian UnlimitedSpecial reports
Home UK Business Online World dispatch The wrap Weblog Talk Search
The Guardian World News guide Arts Special reports Columnists Audio Help Quiz

Special report: the anti-war movement


  Search this site

Go to ...
Special report: anti-war movement

Anti-war movement: archived articles







 In this section
Terrorism Act 'used to halt protest'

Mystery death of anti-war student

Don't mention the war to the Germans ... the Gulf war

Andrew Murray: Hostages of the empire

William Shawcross: They should be ashamed

Italian gays march for rights against Vatican and the law

Demo ban threat to Westminster

God's word is no defence for anti-war vicar

Mike Marqusee: No compromise with anti-semitism

Peter Preston: The world won't forgive or forget

Banned pupil is 'silly girl' says judge

Pupil protester asks court to lift school ban

Return to action

Kid power

Bestseller success for anti-US war books


Civil rights

Terrorism Act 'used to halt protest'

Jamie Wilson
Wednesday July 16, 2003
The Guardian


The civil liberties group Liberty claims police breached the human rights of anti-war protesters at a Gloucestershire RAF base by using powers under the Terrorism Act to stop them demonstrating.

Liberty has called on the Commons select committee on home affairs to investigate alleged breaches of the European convention on human rights at RAF Fairford, used by American B-52 bombers during the Iraq conflict.

Liberty's report, Eight Weeks of Counter Terrorism in Rural England, says there was a policy of serving section 44 orders against demonstrators to stop protests. The orders give police absolute powers to stop, search and disperse people they believe are terrorists or are about to take part in terrorist acts.

A spokesman for Liberty said: "We would like to know who gave the order to use anti-terrorism legislation to curb legitimate protest."

Simon Hughes, Liberal Democrat shadow home secretary, said: "In any society there must be a balance between liberty and security, and it is always difficult to strike a fair balance faced with the threat of terrorist acts. However, on the basis of the evidence in the report, I believe the policing of the demonstrations at RAF Fairford got the balance wrong."

A Gloucestershire police spokeswoman could not comment for legal reasons, but said civil proceedings had been started "with regard to the use of legal powers during the policing of RAF Fairford" during the Iraq conflict.

Special reports
The anti-war movement
Iraq
Afghanistan

Useful links
28.01.2003: Guide to anti-war websites




Printable version | Send it to a friend | Save story





UP

Guardian Unlimited Guardian Newspapers Limited 2003