Henry Paulson’s time at Treasury has been one pratfall after another. Even so, on Tuesday he managed to outdo himself. Paulson held a “surprise” press conference where he announced that the $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) wouldn’t be used to buy troubled assets after all. Instead, the money will used to bail out insurance giant AIG, provide extra capital for the banks to hoard, and now (this is the new part) give money to “nonbank financial institutions, like insurers and specialty-finance companies” so they can lend to credit-worthy consumers. Isn’t that why we gave money to the banks?
Paulson’s announcement was like tossing a hand-grenade in a San-i-can; it blew the stock market to Kingdom come. Just minutes after the opening bell on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) stocks plummeted to new lows ending the session in a 400 point death-spiral. Wall Street doesn’t like uncertainty and Paulson’s sudden about-face sent jittery investors running for cover. The message to investors is clear, the government doesn’t have the foggiest idea of what it’s doing and is just grasping at straws.
But Paulson’s no fool; he knew exactly what the reaction would be on Wall Street. He simply decided that blowing up the equities market was worth the price of reviving “securitization”–the transformation of loans into securities. You see, securitization is Wall Street’s Golden Goose. It’s the foundation block upon which structured finance and all its complex credit-enhancing derivatives rests. Keep in mind, that all these exotic, financially-engineered products–the CDOs, MBS, and CDS–were all created with one goal in mind; to maximize leverage with minimum capital so that profits can be skimmed off the top. That’s how Paulson managed to walk away from Goldman Sachs with hundreds of millions of dollars in his pockets. It’s a racket.
There’s a myth that credit is contracting because the banks won’t lend. But, in truth, total bank credit expanded by $575 billion over the past 10 weeks. The real problem is that the securitzation market remains frozen.
So now Paulson wants to breathe new life into securitization by providing liquidity for nonbank financial institutions who get their money from the wholesale market. Of course, no one really knows how this will work since these operations are completely unregulated by the federal government. No worries; the charade will persist behind the dodgy claim that “it’s needed to get credit to the consumer”. Baloney. What the consumer needs job security and a pay-raise, not more debt. This is just more Paulson flim-flam.
It was clear that the Treasury Secretary was concocting a new swindle a couple weeks ago when Fed chief Bernanke defended “securitzation” in a speech where he said:
“The ability of financial intermediaries to sell the mortgages they originate into the broader capital market by means of the securitization process serves two important purposes: First, it provides originators much wider sources of funding than they could obtain through conventional sources, such as retail deposits; second, it substantially reduces the originator’s exposure to interest rate, credit, prepayment, and other risks associated with holding mortgages to maturity, thereby reducing the overall costs of providing mortgage credit.”























































November 15th, 2008 at 1:14 am
Bungler…boy, you can say that again. I think I have the reason why…watch the counter in the lower right hand corner. It explains why the bungling at around 1:21
http://www.nbc.com/The_Tonight.....13/836346/
LOL!
November 15th, 2008 at 8:55 am
paulson aint bungling anything, its entirely on purpose… more money down the black hole of “black secret operations”
Man, I wish I could see what they’re spending all that money on.. maybe a moon-base or maybe trying to find out how to get eternal life… or space weapons?
have you guys heard about toxic outgas from computers? http://outgasreport.com
November 15th, 2008 at 2:32 pm
Will Obama sack Paulson? Or will he continue the financial game with someone just like him? Can we expect to see the Fed nationalized?
November 15th, 2008 at 5:12 pm
Anyone who thinks these are just the acts of stupidity or errors or mistakes is a fool. This is cold blooded, premeditated, calculated crime. Very bad acting. as far as the FED, well, The owners of the FED are the ones who put Barak, or should I say Seymor in office.
November 16th, 2008 at 6:37 am
The LAST thing the country needs is Keysianism! Thats the surefire way to collapse the whole thing.
When you have food poisoning you don’t treat it by eating more bad food. You throw it up. It’s unpleasant but it’s what you have to do.
Let the market clear out the garbage, let GM, Ford and Chrysler go bankrupt, it is the best thing that coudl ever happen to them, they can reorganize fire their dead wood and by that I mean the Harvard MBA’s that managed the companies into the ground.
As far as credit goes, you don’t fix a problem that was caused by excessive credit with more credit! That’s intuitively obvious to the most casual observer!
Paul Krugman is an idiot, actually he would have to increase his intelligence by a large factor to raise himself to the level of an idiot.
The answer is simple, let the market clean itself out. Cut, cut and cut more government spending. Cut it to the bone if you can find any bone under all the fat.
Let whomever needs to go bankrupt go bankrupt. Can you imagine GM and Ford managed by people who actually know what they are doing? We need to create products people want to buy overseas. GM and Ford are very capable of doing that but they have get rid of the deadwood and get back to engineering motor vehicles. They are there but the MBA’s only care about next quarters profits, fire them all.
Government is burden to us all. Instead of more government programs we need less or no government at all. Close the overseas bases, bring the troops home, clear out 90% of government agencies, eliminate the income tax and capital gains tax, get off fiat counterfeit money and back it with something then maybe, just MAYBE we can stave off a total collapse.
Again, Paul Krugman is not smart enough to be a moron. You don’t fix a problem caused by excessive credit and spending with more credit and spending.
November 16th, 2008 at 12:22 pm
“There’s more pain to come, but the suffering can be mitigated by sound decision-making and Keynesian policies.”
Keynesian policies???? That is the garbage that got us in this hole in the first place.
November 17th, 2008 at 5:58 am
Here’s a little story. The “good guys” came in and “rescued” the hostages from a crisis. On the way to “freedom” the guns of the soldiers of the good guys kept going off while coincidentaly pointed at the backs of the newly freed hostages they were escorting to safety.
These soldiers were castigated by the press as bunglers and incompetents who couldn’t even clean a firearm much less use one. Nevertheless, the hostages kept getting shot in the back. Moreover, none of the soldiers of the good guys was disciplined or persecuted. They just decided to keep the past in the past and “move on”. Go forward for god and country.
Those who protested these deaths were called racist, anti semite nut jobs. Of course, calling them these names without any proof justified everything. THE END.