The warmaholics’ fantasy

John Jenkins
The Australian
Tuesday, January 6, 2009

THE warmaholics are fond of using the phrase “official records going back to 1850″, but the simple facts are that prior to the 1970s, surface-based temperatures from a few indiscriminate, mostly backyard locations in Europe and the US are fatally corrupted and not in any sense a real record.

They are then further doctored by a secret algorithm to account for heat-island effects. Reconstructions such as the infamously fraudulent “hockey stick” are similarly unreliable.

The only precise and reliable temperature recording started with satellite measurements in the 1970s. They show minuscule warming, all in the northern hemisphere, which not only stopped in 2000 but had completely reversed by 2008 (see graph).

The warmaholics also contend that global mean temperature and sea level rises are at the upper range of the Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change’s projections. Well, no, actually they are not.

Sea level rises since 1900 are of the order of 1-2mm a year, which is indistinguishable from tectonic movement, and the IPCC computer projections are simply completely wrong.

(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)

The warmaholics argue that they have been able to model all of the complex processes occurring on the earth, below the oceans and in the atmosphere, and yet also admit in the same breath that they cannot predict the single biggest transfer of energy that dwarfs all others on the planet: ElNino.

How can the two statements be resolved? They can not: the computer models cannot predict either weather or climate.

Some scientists argue that human-induced changes to CO2 levels are more sudden, but this also does not stand up to scrutiny.

Cataclysmic volcanic eruptions have often placed more greenhouse gases into the atmosphere in few minutes than man induces in a decade. But, more importantly, they fail to explain how it is possible for concentrations of CO2 to have exceeded 6000 parts per million (about 20 times present levels) and yet for temperatures to have been cooler than today’s average? How is this possible if CO2 is the predominant driver of temperatures?

Clear and unambiguous evidence against the warmaholics is dismissed with consummate ease. For example, freezing temperatures across the northern hemisphere and growing Antarctic ice sheets are explained away with unproven theories such as deep ocean currents and ozone hole-induced winds.

And this in the same year that the theory of human-induced ozone depletion was shattered by hard scientific findings that the rate constant for one of the critical reactions in the computer models of chlorofluorocarbon-induced ozone depletion was in error by a factor of 10 and as a result CFCs alone cannot be responsible for observed ozone depletion.

The warmaholics, drunk on government handouts and quasi-religious adulation from left-wing environmental organisations, often quote the consensus of scientists as being supportive of the Anthropogenic Global Warming theory and use the phrase “4000 scientists agree with the IPCC report” repeatedly.

But again this does not stand up to scrutiny. The vast majority of the IPCC report is what-if scenarios, but all the what-if scenarios are centred around chapter nine, because it is this chapter that says “we humans are responsible”.

If chapter nine is wrong (that is, if the computer models are wrong) then the rest of IPCC computer projections are just useless hand-waving.

Full story here.

• 
• Social bookmarks
• 
• Email this article
• 
• Print this page

Comment Terms Of Use

4 Responses to “The warmaholics’ fantasy”

1. Forced Freedom Says:
   January 6th, 2009 at 9:52 pm

   I think the Warmaholics are really closet Alcoholics and have had quite a few too many. They are soon to wake from their bizarre drinking binge to a world that is beginning to awaken with them and boy, I get the feeling they are gonna be a bit angry, pissed even, maybe just downright livid, possibly even raging. LOOK OUT Mr. Whore Gore.

2. Gill Says:
   January 7th, 2009 at 3:05 am

   Totally and absolutely true.
   I don’t have a higher qualification than an Advanced Level in Geography, and that was taken 25 years ago, but as soon as I heard the Global Warming myth I knew it was BS. That said, this must have also been realised by other people with even higher qualifications in Geography than myself and yet……no one said anything.
   This would therefore imply that Global Warming was and Invention with a Purpose rather than an actual happening.
   Sea levels WILL rise when Ice Increases…..and this would mean…….the world is getting COLDER.
   Ah well…….it was bound to happen that one way or another it would become obvious that the whole Global Warming Fiasco was a big, greedy Lie.
   As for Mr Gore…….I wonder how he feels about being a total laughing stock on planet Earth.

3. Ben Says:
   January 7th, 2009 at 3:19 am

   Science is science and politics is bs. It’s sad that politics and economic agendas are coloring the critical thinking of many on this issue. As the planet warms various self regulating mechanisms come into play. Detractors of global warming point to these things and say ‘See, the planet is actually getting colder’. If only that were the case. Mean planet temperature is on the rise, the recent disturbances in the Atlantic Conveyor belt show something is wrong. We already know that as the temperature rises the planet will re-enter an ice age. This is part of the self regulating mechanism of the planet. I am opposed to a carbon footprint tax as I feel that is part of an economic agenda and serves no real purpose.

4. GWScam Says:
   January 7th, 2009 at 4:43 am

   “Science is science and politics is bs”

   By the time this is all over I believe science will also be universally known as bullshit too. Everything is energy.