 |
Top Advisor to U.S. Military Confirms The War on Terror Is a Hoax: “There is No Battlefield Solution to Terrorism”
George Washington’s Blog
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
A leading advisor to the U.S. military, the Rand Corporation, just released a new study called “How Terrorist Groups End: Lessons for Countering al Qa’ida“.
The report confirms what we have been saying for years: the war on terror is a hoax which is actually weakening national security (see this, this and this).
As today’s press release about the study states:
“Terrorists should be perceived and described as criminals, not holy warriors, and our analysis suggests that there is no battlefield solution to terrorism.”
Can we drop the “war on terror” charade now?
Prison
Planet.tv Members Can Watch
Fall Of The Republic
Right Now Online -
Don't Miss Out! Get
Your Subscription Today!
CANCER CONSPIRACY? Are
"they" suppressing the cure? Will YOU
be the next victim? Learn
the Secret Truth! - READ FULL STORY
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
29 Responses to “Top Advisor to U.S. Military Confirms The War on Terror Is a Hoax: “There is No Battlefield Solution to Terrorism””
 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |  | |||||||
| By N2H | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 30th, 2008 at 6:42 am
The fact of the matter is that most formally educated people are not religious, largely because their world becomes evidence-based, rather than faith-based. This does not mean they don’t love the world and people as much, but their experience becomes more personal than if they followed a prescribed religion. The exclusion of atheists and agnostics from the movement is short-sighted in addition to being cultish for some basic reasons: Most are already familiar with “waking up”, for instance to a world in which physical evidence does not back up the existence of Santa Claus, or one or many anthropomorphic gods, or the resurrection of a man and his subsequent deification. Evidence-based people are crucial because the movement is enhanced when it is not based on any lies, although some take liberties with the truth to make points which do not require such liberties to be taken. Unfortunately, taking liberties with (being sloppy about) the truth also alienates the evidence-based community.
This message is from a scientist who is convinced of plenty of physical evidence that the official story of 911 is invalid, and that the hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS is very weakly supported. I understand the need of some to compartmentalize their rational and spiritual understandings, but do not accept the need to merge rational with irrational for majority consensus. Alex should stop alienating atheist, agnostic and scientist “truthers”. There is a false religious/a-religious paradigm being promoted to our detriment.
July 30th, 2008 at 6:59 am
JC ! Well Said if the people would just realize reality .
July 30th, 2008 at 7:09 am
Tell us something we don’t already know!
‘War BY terror’ is what is actually happening, a US gov/ globalist/media driven psychological terror of invisible fictional enemies who could strike you at any instant from anywhere at anytime.
A strategy designed to control the masses and to impose all kinds of draconian laws to ‘protect your freedoms’ whereas in actual fact they are taking your freedoms away bit by bit.
‘A nation of sheep begets a government of wolves’….as ‘How can we protect freedom abroad while deserting it at home’
- Edward R. Murrow.
July 30th, 2008 at 7:23 am
The only way to stop Al Qaida is to stop funding the CIA and there black ops. So that will never happen because then they will just bring in more Black Tar herion from Afghanistan.
July 30th, 2008 at 8:04 am
What really makes me laugh is that this world is governed by the morons who make lies look as if they are the truth.
Even a little child can see that Bush has commited war crimes and what the people need to do to make a change in this world is to wake up.
Even though, that is truly not enough. The government itself, the politicians who still know what is right from wrong must wake up first and stand up.
Because seriously, how the hell can we even expect a frigging revolution to happen in this era? This whole Democracy has made too many people couch patriots, so look what is happening on the internet now, 95% of the Bush supporters are couch patriots, and the rest is prob veterans or retarded.
Anyhow, the question is, do you think we can stop their fascist agenda? My answer is no.
July 30th, 2008 at 9:01 am
We can’t stop fascism? Now that’s a truly ignorant statement.
We create the idea, so why in the world do we allow fewer criminally insane brains to create THEIR idea, rather than the GOD (the meek who inherit the earth), the many — create the idea of what it already is, it’s simply a lapse in our memories:
INALIENABLE RIGHTS.
Duh.
July 30th, 2008 at 10:10 am
The people promotong the New World Order it truth are the mega slaves of their own trapped mindset, they have created for themselves a fools paradise. When they awake to learn that they are not the same frequency of the coming new paradign, they will then know they have missed the boat, and their fools paradise will be down the drain.
July 30th, 2008 at 10:23 am
JC said:
“The fact of the matter is that most formally educated people are not religious, largely because their world becomes evidence-based, rather than faith-based.”
I disagree.
We live in a faith-based world and that’s a fact.
If every “religious person” on this planet were to be raptured off [or whatever] tomorrow afternoon….this planet’s population would still be “faith based”.
I see the problem as “faith”. NOT faith in religion or God… that is an oversimplification in my opinion.
People who do not have faith in religion STILL espouse “faiths”. These folks have merely REPLACED any faith in religion for faith in/that……..
Faith that [our] government is good..
Faith that leaders will always try to do what’s “best” for their country and people.
Faith in “democracy and freedom”
Faith in SCIENCE.
Faith in the “american dream”
Faith in the media.
Faith in the election process.
Faith in congress.
Faith in the judicial system.
Faith in “the party”.
Faith in “the market”
There is a problem with blind, dogmatic faith in this world…and it certainly extends well past “faith in God”.
I always shake my head a little when people who don’t believe in “religion” laugh and joke about what suckers “people of faith” are… all the while forming their belief systems based upon “blind, dogmatic faith” themselves.
Science is as charlatan as ANY cult.
e.g.
If you don’t pay us a tithe..the guys in the white robes [who atheists worship without question] will not use their “science” [fact-based or not..] to SAVE YOU from BURNING IN EARTH!
Repent your sins consumers!
Only SCIENCE can save you!…erm or God! I guess it depends on YOUR faith.
The Church Of Global Warming is a good example.
The Church of Democracy.
The Church Of Fox.
The Church of WMDS
The Church Of Security.
The Church of University.
The Church of The Federal Reserve Bank.
The Church Of Racism.
The Church of Eugenics..oops Overpopulation.
it goes on and on.. there are NO shortages of examples of BLIND, DOGMATIC faith…. far, far outside that of any “religion”.
To cry out that atheists or educated people do not contribute to problems of this planet that are promulgated through misplaced and dangerous dogmatic belief systems [ usually based on GUILT and FEAR..like many religions..] is a falsehood.
Faith IS a mindset. Faith in “religion” is no different that any other dogma and frankly it doesn’t matter a whit to me as far as exposing the lies of 911 are concerned.
My faith is stronger than your faith?! okaaaaaaay.
Let he who is without [SOME KIND OF FAITH] throw the first stone.
July 30th, 2008 at 10:33 am
Not only the war on terror is a hoax, in reality it is a war on consciousness.
July 30th, 2008 at 10:39 am
“This message is from a scientist who is convinced of plenty of physical evidence that the official story of 911 is invalid, and that the hypothesis that HIV causes AIDS is very weakly supported.”
Not much of a scientist.
July 30th, 2008 at 11:07 am
Of course it’s a hoax. It’s really the “War on Terra.” As in the war on Earth.
It’s a war being fought against us. And most people don’t even know it.
“Look not far afield for danger. It is often the wolf WITHIN the fences that can do the most damage.”
-Frank Herbert
July 30th, 2008 at 11:33 am
“Science is as charlatan as ANY cult.”
Neon,
I’m not sure I’d really disagree with you in spirit. I think faith in anything can be exploited and abused and prevent advancement. I know a lot of “scientists” who are very faith-based, while being a-religious, to their folly. It’s really the heart of my point that people can’t truly be divided this way. Science, in its purest form is pure reason informed by verifiable observation. But scientists, like anyone else have limited brain capacity, and consequently do take certain premises on faith. And the politics and finance that corrupt science undermine the essence of pure science. Religious people, while their greater understanding is from faith, can use reason very effectively. In effect, there’s one premise that is not likely to be proved, and impossible to disprove, which distinguishes these people: The existence of an anthropomorphic God defined in traditional texts.
I’ll rephrase my main point: Atheists, rationalists, agnostics (who are more represented in the formally educated community…which I would not suggest is intellectually superior, or even necessarily more “educated” at all… SHOULD NOT be excluded from this movement because they are capable reasoners of immense value, and because they are not truly different from those whom some would suggest are their opposite. Whether God grants them, or their are inherent, we have certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness/property.
July 30th, 2008 at 11:38 am
“Not much of a scientist.”
Are you suggesting you’ve evaluated volumes of literature and found the opposite to be obvious? Or are you suggesting that since you think I am a “Scientist” (i.e. a member of the Church of Science), I should believe every null hypothesis handed down from authority?
July 30th, 2008 at 11:43 am
No. I’m suggesting you’re not much of scientist.
July 30th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
“No. I’m suggesting you’re not much of scientist.”
Oh, I see. No reason required. The tooth fairy told you.
Cheers!
July 30th, 2008 at 1:18 pm
The war on terror is a hoax, a tool to promote the NWO. 9/11 was an inside job.
That being stated, any time I hear a reference to the RAND corporation I envision a coiled rattlesnake ready to strike. They can not be trusted for anything. They may put up a benevolent facade, but unless you are a part of the occult NWO conspiracy they are not interested in your well being.
July 30th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
It is not a war on terror, that’s why no solution. It is a terror war.
July 30th, 2008 at 1:24 pm
I’m an atheist, yet I must confess I haven’t seen a scientific study that proves there’s no god. Anyone?
July 30th, 2008 at 1:39 pm
Who could be a potential terrorist? As long as there is one human being on the planet, that last person could still be a terrorist or potential terrorist? The US Christian leadership has done nothing more than take out the word “evil” from their Bible and replaced it with “terror”. Who could be evil? Even their own book says that EVERYONE is evil….which basically means that everyone is also a terrorist. The only way to get rid of evil or terror is to remove all the people? Sounds like Bush policy doesn’t it?
July 30th, 2008 at 1:58 pm
manbearpig – “I’m an atheist, yet I must confess I haven’t seen a scientific study that proves there’s no god. Anyone?”
Because God does exist, that said, you should really consider bringing your soul to the true faith and welcome God and his son Jesus in your heart.
It’s like evolutionists out there that keep claiming earth and universe was formed by a big bang (non sense), evolution does not provide any evidence, actually, it never did. Creationism is the truth. Evolution is not. Creationism is what gives better answers to understand how God made his wonderful creations.
I believe God’s first creation was angels and if I’m not mistaken Satan rebelled against God long before earth was made. Nothing in our world or universe was made by coincidence or an explosion. Universe couldn’t have appeared out of nowhere as if it had personal desires like “I want to show up for the earth inhabitants to see me!”, someone created it and it was God who created it. Even in our planet nothing comes up out of pure coincidence, imagine a cup or a computer, it would be silly to say it was created by a Big Bang (lol).
That said I’ll make a big note: FOR EVERY CREATION THERE’s A CREATOR!
July 30th, 2008 at 2:10 pm
To see what’s really behind George “skull&bones” Bush’s “order of death”, you need to see the documentary “the lightbringers – the emissaries of jahbulon (history of freemasonry)” – as W’s lord (of darkness) is actually named jahbulon and their real enemy all of humanity:
http://video.google.com/videop.....iQKciNjRCA
Another film worth watching is “the illuminati”:
http://video.google.com/videop.....igL9-K2SCA
July 30th, 2008 at 2:51 pm
ShenK – “FOR EVERY CREATION THERE’s A CREATOR” you say…
Well, I happen to believe in the evolution theory – which on the other hand doesn’t mean there’s no god. It just says that we’re related to all the other “creations” – or creatures – as well.
Anyway – my point is that whereas science does not automatically rule out the existence of a god – or gods for that matter – well, to me the bible isn’t exactly proof of god’s existence either.
For all I know, we could all just be part of a ultra-hi-tech-inter-dimensional-video game of somekind reaching its’ last and final level…
July 30th, 2008 at 8:45 pm
JC said:
I’ll rephrase my main point: Atheists, rationalists, agnostics (who are more represented in the formally educated community…which I would not suggest is intellectually superior, or even necessarily more “educated” at all… SHOULD NOT be excluded from this movement because they are capable reasoners of immense value, and because they are not truly different from those whom some would suggest are their opposite. Whether God grants them, or their are inherent, we have certain inalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness/property.
JC thanks for you thoughts, i certainly agree.
July 30th, 2008 at 9:03 pm
ShenK,
now they have changed their mind about the BB theory and deny it usually. evolutionists usually change their mind about every one of their points when it is convenient, when it is proven as false or simply doesnt make sense any longer. it is a religion of its own.
Still on THIS subject of fighting the NWO, we need to unite and be on the same page and leave the other issues for the party after we win our country back. because we just need to win.
along the way to the finish line im sure that any athiests will see that God is real.
one really GOOD proof is that Alex is the ONLY person to have infiltrated the Bohemian Grove and not be placed in jail. No hassles, he walks right in, grabs the proof, has them admit it later in the news that it is true and now shed light on the satan worshippers.
so, i believe that without God, Alex would be in jail right now or never got in like he did and no one would have learned the truth about that owl worshiping/mansexfest meeting place. so so weird. and they think that us Christians are weird? cmon.
July 30th, 2008 at 9:11 pm
You’re both wrong. We were not created by “God”, nor did we evolve from pond scum.However, that has nothing to do with our current problem.During the Vietnam war we were fighting the “Communists”. Then the “war on drugs”. Now we’re battling “Terrorists”. What next, the boogey man? As long as we are divided by race and religion we will never win. United we stand, divided we fall. I think we are doomed to fail because of our own stupidity.
July 30th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
http://www.creationapologetics.....uotes.html
“Another reason that scientists are so prone to throw the baby out with the bath water is that science itself, as I have suggested, is a religion. The neophyte scientist, recently come or converted to the world view of science, can be every bit as fanatical as a Christian crusader or a soldier of Allah. This is particularly the case when we have come to science from a culture and home in which belief in God is firmly associated with ignorance, superstition, rigidity and hypocrisy. Then we have emotional as well as intellectual motives to smash the idols of primitive faith. A mark of maturity in scientists, however, is their awareness that science may be as subject to dogmatism as any other religion.”
Peck, M. Scott [psychiatrist and Medical Director of New Milford Hospital Mental Health Clinic, Connecticut, USA], “The Road Less Travelled: A New Psychology of Love, Traditional Values and Spiritual Growth,” [1978], Arrow: London, 1990, p.238.
————————————————–
“Darwin’s book, On the Origin of Species, was published in 1859. It is perhaps the most influential book that has ever been published, because it was read by scientist and non- scientist alike, and it aroused violent controversy. Religious people disliked it because it appeared to dispense with God; scientists liked it because it seemed to solve the most important problem in the universe-the existence of living matter. In fact, evolution became in a sense a scientific religion; almost all scientists have accepted it and many are prepared to ‘bend’ their observations to fit in with it.
Lipson, H.S. [Professor of Physics, University of Manchester Institute of Science and Technology, UK], “A physicist looks at evolution,” Physics Bulletin, Vol. 31, No. 4, May 1980, p.138.
————————-
“Directed by all-powerful selection, chance becomes a sort of providence, which, under the cover of atheism, is not named but which is secretly worshipped…To insist, even with Olympian assurance, that life appeared quite by chance and evolved in this fashion, is an unfounded supposition which I believe to be wrong and not in accordance with the facts.”
Grasse, Pierre-P., [editor of the 28-volume "Traite de Zoologie", former Chair of Evolution, Sorbonne University and ex-president of the French Academie des Sciences], “Evolution of Living Organisms Evidence for a New Theory of Transformation”, [1973], Academic Press: New York NY, 1977, p.107
————————-
“The more one studies palaeontology, the more certain one becomes that evolution is based on faith alone; exactly the same sort of faith which it is necessary to have when one encounters the great mysteries of religion.”
More, Louis T. [late Professor of Physics, University of Cincinnati, USA], “The Dogma of Evolution,” Princeton University Press: Princeton NJ, 1925, Second Printing, p.160.
————————
By Seth Borenstein
updated 6:05 p.m. MT, Mon., Aug. 20, 2007
WASHINGTON – Around the world, a handful of scientists are trying to create life from scratch and they’re getting closer.
Experts expect an announcement within three to 10 years from someone in the now little-known field of “wet artificial life.”
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/20249628/
this article goes on to say:
“that once the container is made, if scientists add nucleotides in the right proportions, then Darwinian evolution could simply take over.
“We aren’t smart enough to design things, we just let evolution do the hard work and then we figure out what happened,” Szostak said.
————————————–
The idea that evolution precludes creation…or eliminates any creators…may very well be nothing more than the opinion of a closed mind, and an opinion that perhaps is not well thought out.
On earth here…scientists claim to be getting close to CREATING life from scratch…so it certainly appears that creation is [at least]possible.
If creation is possible..then creators may indeed exist.
If creators can create life, as in the article above, they plan on using evolution as PART OF THE CREATION package.
Therefore evolution and creation, rather than being at odds, may in fact, be symbiotic in nature.
The great question?
“Then who created the creators [or God]?” becomes a straw man as a very simple answer exists.
The creator(s)[or God] may very well have simply EVOLVED until their science was sufficient to create life. It’s a possibility.
Having said all that.. Since even atheist scientists are in disagreement over darwinism, and i certainly am not a scientist.. it is hardly my place to laugh at other peoples’ beliefs.
—————————
“One is forced to conclude that many scientists and technologists pay lip-service to Darwinian theory only because it supposedly excludes a creator.”
Dr. Michael Walker, Senior Lecturer — Anthropology, Sydney University. Quadrant, October 1982, page 44.
————————
It appears that evolution science is akin to Man made global warming science – based on some kind of dogmatic consensus.
This distraction of introducing/or bashing religion is of no benefit or relevance as to whether 911 was an inside job, or whether a new world order is being constructed around us.
sorry for the long post.
peace.
July 31st, 2008 at 1:00 am
If it one day turns out there’s a god – or even more of them – and I didn’t believe in him/her/it/them or whatever – well, that’s my very own “little” problem then and not anybody else’s, not?
If on the other hand, it one day turns out that there isn’t a (single) god out there, well, that doesn’t mean it’s the end of the world for people who think/thought otherwise, or is it?
For all I know – fundamentalists – both in science and religion – are potentially dangerous to other people – and I guess religious-fundamentalist scientists (with freemasonry/occult backgrounds) are possibly the most dangerous ones and for obvious reason.
Scientific conditioning + social & genetic engineering + other misuse of science (eugenics, global warming, gmo etc.) and religions (jewish, christian, islamist etc.) are all parts of the NWO-enslavement plan – and behind this very plan is yet another religion – the religion of freemasonry.
In other words – you can’t fight these people who believe in the devil by simply believing the opposite god figure(s). This is not a hollywood-film – and as much as I’d wish…
July 31st, 2008 at 1:19 am
David Nastor: “now they have changed their mind about the BB theory and deny it usually.”
Well, for what I’ve understood is that generally the big-bang theory is only considered as the “most plausable” theory to explain the “beginning” – meaning it’s not an “absolute truth” nor is it considered a perfect theory either.
Nothing’s perfect – not even life itself, which some claim is a creation of god/s.
On the other hand – I personally don’t see why “on earth” do we even need to know whether there is a god or whether there was a big bang or not. And what I mean is that, in my opinion, there are far more important questions out there right NOW that need to be answered first… eh?
January 29th, 2009 at 12:52 am
manbearpig says:
“On the other hand – I personally don’t see why “on earth” do we even need to know whether there is a god or whether there was a big bang or not. And what I mean is that, in my opinion, there are far more important questions out there right NOW that need to be answered first… eh?”
Well, many people take questions such as “why are we here?”, “what is our purpose in life?”, and “where do we originate from?” very seriously and for many, there is a spiritual ingredient present in the possible answers to these kinds of questions. Many ancient mystics even say that our desire to know the answers to these questions contain ingredients of the very answers we seek. That is to say, that our desire our yearning to know our point of origin and purpose for being is the experience of what we call “God” present within our spirits calling us to our final destination: back to union with The Divine. I now some may not agree with that, but we should all be more tolerant of each other’s beliefs. We know there are radical people out there, and I understand that, but I can’t begin to count how many different conversations of this type that devolve into a sea of condescending remarks and arguments about which belief is better or more right. We don’t have all the answers, can’t we be more humble and open-minded. Evolution is junk, Creationism is junk, etc. etc. I have come across a theory that ties Creationism and Evolution(Big Bang) together quite convincingly. Doesn’t mean it’s right, but it’s something to consider. Points of commonality are really more important than points of contention of which there will be no end. I don’t think Religion and Science have to be mutually exclusive. Those who do, may be right, or may be wrong, but I think they just not have come across information that would cause them to consider otherwise.