The disturbance of human remains in burial grounds is to be allowed for the first time since the early Victorian era to deal with a shortage of graves, The Times has learnt.
Under a test scheme to begin in the new year, local authorities across the country will be allowed to exhume remains and rebury them deeper to create space for further burials on top. In some cases, new inscriptions will be added to the existing headstone to ensure that the heritage of the grave is not destroyed. Damaged or insignificant headstones would be removed and replaced with only the new name.
The move comes amid an acute shortage of burial grounds in London and other urban areas, where many cemeteries have already run out of space. It would also ease the difficulty of the disposal of bodies in the event of a pandemic.
Last year a government survey showed that burial grounds in England and Wales will become full in about 30 years. In the capital the shortage is more severe. At least three boroughs have run out of space and some cemeteries have less than a decade left.
(Article continues below)
Tim Morris, chief executive of the Institute of Cemeteries and Crematorium Management and a member of the Government’s burial advisory body, said that only abandoned graves dating back more than 100 years would be considered for reburial under the new scheme.
“In the cities this is a serious problem and our cemeteries are just not sustainable,” he told The Times. “We need these powers across the country or we are going to have serious disposal problems.”
November 14th, 2008 at 6:52 am
Maybe they’re preparing the space for the tens of million of people who will die natural deaths in the next few decades after living normal, healthy lives?
Just a thought. A crazy, brainwashed yet obviously practical thought.
November 14th, 2008 at 11:23 am
Buyers Beware! If history is any indication whatsoever, we can feel pretty confident that should another pandemic ever break out the world authorities would likey burn diseased corps NOT rely on the standard in-ground kind of burials. I am sure owner profit has much more to do with this space enhancing upgrade at the graveyards. I could be wrong but, this story sounds awfully similar to the type of Bush style scare tactics we have all come to know and collectively despise.
November 14th, 2008 at 12:11 pm
Hmmm. Why don’t they just allow us live longer? Like maybe sort out the NHS and make everyone healthy again… Or are they planning something on a massive scale? I won’t be buried anyway… after a bomb or ‘nuking’, there won’t be too much left to bury.
February 15th, 2009 at 11:09 am
During the ‘foot-and-mouth’ livestock outbreak, a field outside my workplace had already been dug up with two huge trenches with the topsoil remaining piled up alongside each trench. That was rather unsettling to travel past each day.
It is a well know fact that nearly all of the council cemeteries are 95% full with all the family crypts sold out. The only solution is a higher packing density.