Recently, Mike Berger from 911Truth.org was interviewed by the “Conscience of Kansas” Conservative Paul Ibbetson. During the interview, Mike mentioned the alleged bribery of the 9/11 Commission by Pakistan to omit any incriminating information about them. I figured a lot of people weren’t familiar with this story, so I was inspired to write this “recap.”
Over the years, there have been many allegations of Pakistani involvement in the 9/11 attacks. Apparently, Lt. General Mahmood Ahmed, the head of the Pakistani ISI, someone who met with U.S. elected and appointed officials in the weeks before 9/11, on the day of 9/11, and in the days after 9/11, ordered possible MI6 Agent Ahmed Omar Saeed Sheikh to wire transfer $100,000 to Mohammad Atta. The 9/11 Families’ submitted a question to the 9/11 Commission about this incident.
Deputy Assistant Director of the FBI’s Counterterrorism Division, John S. Pistole stated that their investigation “has traced the origin of the funding of 9/11 back to financial accounts in Pakistan, where high-ranking and well-known al-Qaeda operatives played a major role in moving the money forward, eventually into the hands of the hijackers located in the US.”
In January 2002, during a visit to India, FBI Director Robert Mueller was told about Saeed Sheikh’s involvement in the 9/11 attacks by Indian Investigators.
(Article continues below)
Apparently, “on the eve of the publication of its report, the 9/11 Commission was given a stunning document from Pakistan, claiming that Pakistani intelligence officers knew in advance of the 9/11 attacks.”
None of this information was mentioned in the 9/11 Report.
On March 3rd, 2006, the Friday Times reported that “Pakistan gave tens of thousands of dollars through its lobbyists in the United States to members of the 9/11 inquiry commission to ‘convince’ them to drop some anti-Pakistan findings in the report.” This according to FO Official Sadiq.
According to the Pakistan paper Daily Times, this story about bribery “triggered” U.S. media interest. I don’t remember seeing any mention of this story at all. If you know of an American media outlet that investigated this story, and reported on the results of that investigation, please let me know.
On April 10th, 2006, Pakistan officially denied the allegations of bribery. “Pakistan has never indulged in the illegal activity of bribing or buying influence anywhere in the world,” said a statement issued by the FO spokesperson here on Sunday.
As it stands right now, we are at a “he said/she said” stand still. So the question remains, were members of the 9/11 Commission bribed to omit any Pakistani involvement from their report? The Executive Director of the 9/11 Commission, Philip Zelikow, someone the families’ called for the resignation of during the time of the 9/11 Commission, someone who tried to insert false information into the 9/11 Report, someone who may have taken direction from Karl Rove, someone who was given a nice cushy job with his old friend Condoleezza Rice, met with the Pakistani ISI in March 2003. Whether or not they talked about “a possible ISI role in the 9/11 plot remains unclear.”
The fact remains, allegations of Pakistani involvement was not mentioned in the 9/11 Report, yet, a lot of information suggests they were involved. What do you think… do you think Phil is the type of person to take a bribe?
August 28th, 2008 at 6:42 am
No planes – Just manufactured video
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/401.html
Turning buildings to dust – What’s a barometric bomb?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SlOn0KuFMSI
August 28th, 2008 at 9:43 am
HELL YEAH!!!!!!!
Complicity begins before the formation and “conspiracy” of the PNAC. Why is the PNAC, (a group which planned not only the takeover of the Mideastern oil and gas, as well as the massive expansion of our military, but also played a key role in the 2000 election coup) completely ommitted from the media and all other investigative outlets and /or reports?
The entire group involved with PNAC should all be tried and if convicted, which would only be possible if our DOJ was righted,publicly hung by the neck until dead!
August 28th, 2008 at 11:10 am
No planes – No brains
http://www.ilovecointelpromen.com
Turning brains into mush – What’s a crack pipe?
http://www.youtube.com/howtosuckdickforcrack
…You’re an idiot Easy. A complete, idiot.
August 28th, 2008 at 12:20 pm
OMG
Are you KIDDING me?
Alex, WHY are you addressing this 8 year old nonsense again?
OK, people….want to know the REAL cause? NOt just of 911, but of all the worldly chaos?
http://www.illuminatimatrix.wordpress.com
There. No excuses. Now you will know.
.
.
.
.
.
August 28th, 2008 at 6:47 pm
Certainly there is fake footage, but fake footage does not imply fake planes.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rA_-w-fsI9Q
Something impacted the building, exactly what is a how done it, and that can be answered in time.
August 29th, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Does it really matter? The whole story is a lie. the only truth in it is that the buildings were destroyed.
August 29th, 2008 at 1:21 pm
Remember Carlin, “These people don’t investigate themselves.”
We need outside help from Switzerland to Russia to track the dirty money down and freeze and disgorge the neocons funds. Then we need to restrict their international travel for fear of being arrested, while the paperwork gets done for international tribunal for war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The government is rogue. “They don’t investigate themselves.”
August 29th, 2008 at 2:35 pm
If a nuclear bomb ever goes off in a U.S. city, without a doubt it will have originated in Pakistan. Now that our good friend Marsharof has been “thrown out the door” by the radicals, who the hell is in charge of the nukes? If nut job Dick Cheney can fly live (locked and loaded) nukes on the wings of a B-52 from South Dakota to Louisiana, and nobody even notice, can you imagine the bedlum fermenting in Pakistan!
August 30th, 2008 at 11:28 am
The ISI in Pakistan is a subdivision of the CIA, which is in bed with MI6. Obviously not everyone in the CIA is in on this, but the CFR has infiltrated every intelligence organization and political body and the media at key positions, in order to control those organizations. Just about every head of the CIA was a CFR member. Mueller in the FBI is CFR. 6 out of 9 9/11 commissioners were CFR. Cheney is CFR. Bush Sr is CFR. Clinton too, etc. etc. The CFR approached Aaron Russo through Nick Rockefeller, who told Russo about 9/11 in the Fall of 2000, before it happened. This is obviously something that was planned for a long time, as they tried it first in 1993, only it didn’t work then. The terrorists in 1993 were supported by the FBI, who gave them the explosives.
August 30th, 2008 at 8:26 pm
There no doubt was some outside influence on the hearing.I can’t tell you if it was monetary ,I.O.U.J (I owe you a job).Or your life won’t be worth a pluck nickel routine.The fact that it was loaded with perjury from top to bottom ,and 600 witnesses were bared from testifying certainly looks like they were trying to hide something.Yet the senate and the congress know that the Kane commission stunk from here to high heaven. I am sure very few of the
senate or the congress had prior knowledge of 911 conspiracy but after 7 years they should have been able to put the pieces together by now.Even they are not that stupid I think.
August 30th, 2008 at 11:10 pm
We must keep the dream alive-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ErFOsoKzpD0
God Bless
GS